Re: [IP CLEARANCE] PostScript DSC parser for XML Graphics Commons
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 05:01, Jeremias Maerki wrote: I've added a new IP clearance document: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/ip-cleara nce/xmlgraphics-commons-postscript-dsc-parser.html?view=co (SVN URL for the lack of karma to update the incubator website.) Incubator PMC, please review and get back to me if something's wrong. It looks Ok to me. Perhaps a line of who is the Copyright owner (not only distribution rights) would be better... +1 from me otherwise (binding). Cheers Niclas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [IP CLEARANCE] IBM contribution of Network Server system tests to Apache Derby
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 12:20, Jean T. Anderson wrote: IBM has contributed system tests to Apache Derby: - The ASF secretary recorded the software grant in cclas.txt. - The code was uploaded to Jira issue DERBY-2248. [1] - The ip clearance form was added to the Incubator site. [2] - The Derby vote to accept the contribution passed. [3] +1 Niclas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] approve the release of Trinidad's Maven plugins (1.0.0-incubating)
+1 Carsten Matthias Wessendorf wrote: The Trinidad community voted to release the the maven plugins as a 1.0.0-incubating release. These plugins are required for the maven build of the core code of the Trinidad Podling. To fulfill the incubator guides, we like to ask you guys, the Incubator PMC, for a permission to release those maven plugins. There were seven +1 votes and the vote has been tracked at [1]. (5 binding) The plugins are documented at [2] and our release notes inculde the bugs that have been addressed ([3]). The plugins are available as source and bin inside the following m2 staging repo (see [4]). -- Carsten Ziegeler http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RESULT] (was Re: [VOTE] approve the release of Trinidad's Maven plugins (1.0.0-incubating))
The votes of Trinidad's Maven plugins (1.0.0-incubating) release have been tallied: +1 Martin van den Bemt (Mentor and Incubator PMC, binding) +1 Craig McClanahan (Mentor and Incubator PMC, binding) +1 Carsten Ziegeler (Incubator PMC, binding) == +1 Daniel Kulp (non-binding) There were 3 binding Incubator PMC +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. I will follow up this email with an official release announcement. Thanks, Matthias On 2/27/07, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Carsten Matthias Wessendorf wrote: The Trinidad community voted to release the the maven plugins as a 1.0.0-incubating release. These plugins are required for the maven build of the core code of the Trinidad Podling. To fulfill the incubator guides, we like to ask you guys, the Incubator PMC, for a permission to release those maven plugins. There were seven +1 votes and the vote has been tracked at [1]. (5 binding) The plugins are documented at [2] and our release notes inculde the bugs that have been addressed ([3]). The plugins are available as source and bin inside the following m2 staging repo (see [4]). -- Carsten Ziegeler http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Just to be clear, we plan to fix the issues Dan raised in the next release, which is not yet scheduled, but will be sometime in the future. We ask that the Incubator PMC members review this, the current release candidate, and look forward to your feedback and votes. -Marshall Schor Thilo Goetz wrote: Daniel Kulp wrote: On Friday 23 February 2007 16:39, Adam Lally wrote: The Apache UIMA community has voted to release version 2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to approve this release. Release artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/ A quick look through this looks OK to me for the src and bin distributions. Great! HOWEVER, I notice you are using Maven for builds. Is UIMA planning on releasing the 2.1.0-incubating artifacts to the maven repository so other maven based projects can use it?If so, then we have problems. You would need to get those artifacts into the staging area as well so we can look at and vote on them. A quick look reveals: We currently have no plans to release anything to the maven repository. Hopefully in the future sometime, but not for this release. 1) The jars don't have the incubator disclaimer in them. (this is the critical one) I see. I didn't think this was required, but I understand it makes sense when individual jars are downloadable from the maven repo. We'll make sure to have the disclaimer in there before we release anything to the maven repository. 2) The name for jVinci doesn't have Apache UIMA in it. 3) The poms don't have a licenses section 4) The organization tag doesn't have a url to apache.org All of these make sense, even if we're not distributing anything via maven repos (yet). Will fix. Thanks for taking the time to look at our release candidate. --Thilo So, I'm +1 (non-binding) on these exact distributions, but -1 if there are maven artifacts that are supposed to be deployed along with it. Dan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ratify Tuscany vote to release build dependencies
+1 from me. -- dims On 2/26/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Resending as a [VOTE] thread as this one seems to be rambling ... -- Forwarded message -- From: Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Feb 25, 2007 6:34 AM Subject: Ratify Tuscany vote to release build dependencies To: general@incubator.apache.org The vote below was held in the Tuscany podling to release two artifacts that are used by other modules during the build process; they are a podling-wide parent pom and configuration data for code checking. There are four +1's from the PPMC but no binding votes and we would like to ask the IPMC to approve the release. -- Jeremy Begin forwarded message: From: Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: February 25, 2007 6:14:15 AM PST To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: [RESULT] Release updated parent pom and buildtools Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Passed with +1's from jboynes, jmarino, isilval, rineholt and no -1's I'll ask the IPMC to ratify this. -- Jeremy On Feb 21, 2007, at 6:34 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: The parent pom and buildtools were recently updated and as these are used by all other modules I think we should formally release them. These are distributed through the maven repo rather than as a end-user distribution. Please vote to approve the release content: parent-pom [tag]https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/ java/pom/parent/2 [binary] http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/ org/apache/tuscany/parent/2-incubating/ [rat]http://people.apache.org/~jboynes/rat/parent-2.rat buildtools [tag]https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/ java/buildtools/2 [binary] http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/ org/apache/tuscany/buildtools/2-incubating/ [rat]http://people.apache.org/~jboynes/rat/buildtools-2.rat Here's my +1 Given the recent discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED] about crypto issues around Bouncy Castle, I would point out that these artifacts are not impacted by the export issue. -- Jeremy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
