Re: [VOTE] Accept Bluesky Project into the Incubator
[X] +1 Accept BlueSky for incubation On Jan 6, 2008 1:03 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...the incubator exists to mitigate those concerns, not prevent a project from joining Agree with this. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PROPOSAL] Dimensions Proposal
Hello dear incubators I am Antonio Petrelli and I am a PMC member of Apache Tiles project. I would like to post my proposal about Dimensions, an extension of Tiles, that I would like to be incubated. Currently I cannot find a Champion for this project, so if anyone reading this message would like to get on board, it will be really appreciated. Here follows the proposal. = Dimensions Project Proposal = Author: Antonio Petrelli [[MailTo(apetrelli AT apache DOT org)]] Date: January 2008 Online version: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DimensionsProposal Status: .:: D R A F T ::. == Dimensions, a multi-channel framework Proposal == === Abstract === Dimensions is an Apache Tiles extension that delivers customized content for different users, devices or other criteria. === Proposal === The Dimensions extension for Apache Tiles is capable of delivering different aspects of the same website. By recognizing the calling user and its devices, it organizes the pages using different layout, depending on the developers configuration. This is especially useful for multi-channel websites, to allow a wider range of users to visit a site, by reducing the size of pages for smaller screens, or by showing certain page sections only if a user has sufficient credentials. Dimensions natural place is as an Apache Tiles extension, since it relies on Tiles' concepts, like definition and DefinitionsFactory, and it cannot exist without Tiles. === Background === The initial idea was (here goes initial story by Aaron Roller). But in 2004 the ability of delivering different contents was extended not only on different calling devices, but also on different calling users role. This kind of capability is enabled by using configuration files, that maps all user roles/device crosspoints to a certain site layout. The concept of a dimension arised: the user role was a dimension, while the device was the other. But this kind of concept can be extended infinitely, allowing to create a n-dimensional space in which each crosspoint is a website layout. === Rationale === Currently, when a Java EE website needs to be ported for other devices, it needed the creation of a new project, or at least a new section of the same project. This kind of procedure can lead to code repetition and lack of coherence. Dimensions solves this problem by providing customized aspects for the same website: only the visible part of it will change (depending on the condition imposed by the developer), but the rest of it will remain the same, including the controller and model part of the application. === Initial Goals === The initial goals of the proposed project are: * Include the Apache Software Foundation header in all source code. * Viable community around the Dimensions codebase. * Active relationships and possible cooperation with related projects and communities, especially those that include Apache Tiles support. * Clean-up of the code, by following the Apache Tiles standard. Current Status = Meritocracy = All but one (here I suppose that Aaron will be a committer) initial committers are familiar with the meritocracy principles of Apache, and have already worked on the various source codebases. The missing one contributed to several open source projects and probably will learn very fast. We will follow the normal meritocracy rules also with other potential contributors. = Community = Dimensions community will be, probably, Apache Tiles community. But there are a number of similar targeted projects around the WWW that could help in creating a broader one. = Core Developers = The initial set of developers comes from various backgrounds, as they are in Apache Tiles project, with different but compatible needs for the proposed project. = Alignment = Dimensions will likely be widely used by various open source and commercial projects that have a dependency on Apache Tiles. Known Risks = Orphaned products = There is a risk of making Dimensions an orphaned product, but most probably it will follow Apache Tiles steps. Since Tiles is widely adopted in Java EE applications, it is difficult that Dimensions will be abandoned. = Inexperience with open source = All the initial developers have worked on open source and all but one are PMC members of Apache Tiles. = Homogeneous developers = The initial developers come from a variety of backgrounds and with a variety of needs for the proposed extension. = Reliance on salaried developers = Dimensions does not rely on salaried developers. = Relationships with Other Apache Products = Dimensions is strongly related to Apache Tiles to the point that it should be a subproject of it. Dimensions relies on Tiles' concepts, like definition and DefinitionsFactory. Dimensions cannot exist without Tiles. = An Excessive Fascination with the Apache Brand = All but one of
RE: [PROPOSAL] Dimensions Proposal
FYI, Dimensions is already the name of a software developed by Serena. See [1] I know it's a criterion to leave and not to enter the incubator, but I prefer to share this info before I forget. [1] http://www.serena.com/geo/en/products/dimensions/index.html Gilles -Original Message- From: Antonio Petrelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: lundi 7 janvier 2008 14:26 To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PROPOSAL] Dimensions Proposal Hello dear incubators I am Antonio Petrelli and I am a PMC member of Apache Tiles project. I would like to post my proposal about Dimensions, an extension of Tiles, that I would like to be incubated. Currently I cannot find a Champion for this project, so if anyone reading this message would like to get on board, it will be really appreciated. Here follows the proposal. = Dimensions Project Proposal = Author: Antonio Petrelli [[MailTo(apetrelli AT apache DOT org)]] Date: January 2008 Online version: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DimensionsProposal Status: .:: D R A F T ::. == Dimensions, a multi-channel framework Proposal == === Abstract === Dimensions is an Apache Tiles extension that delivers customized content for different users, devices or other criteria. === Proposal === The Dimensions extension for Apache Tiles is capable of delivering different aspects of the same website. By recognizing the calling user and its devices, it organizes the pages using different layout, depending on the developers configuration. This is especially useful for multi-channel websites, to allow a wider range of users to visit a site, by reducing the size of pages for smaller screens, or by showing certain page sections only if a user has sufficient credentials. Dimensions natural place is as an Apache Tiles extension, since it relies on Tiles' concepts, like definition and DefinitionsFactory, and it cannot exist without Tiles. === Background === The initial idea was (here goes initial story by Aaron Roller). But in 2004 the ability of delivering different contents was extended not only on different calling devices, but also on different calling users role. This kind of capability is enabled by using configuration files, that maps all user roles/device crosspoints to a certain site layout. The concept of a dimension arised: the user role was a dimension, while the device was the other. But this kind of concept can be extended infinitely, allowing to create a n-dimensional space in which each crosspoint is a website layout. === Rationale === Currently, when a Java EE website needs to be ported for other devices, it needed the creation of a new project, or at least a new section of the same project. This kind of procedure can lead to code repetition and lack of coherence. Dimensions solves this problem by providing customized aspects for the same website: only the visible part of it will change (depending on the condition imposed by the developer), but the rest of it will remain the same, including the controller and model part of the application. === Initial Goals === The initial goals of the proposed project are: * Include the Apache Software Foundation header in all source code. * Viable community around the Dimensions codebase. * Active relationships and possible cooperation with related projects and communities, especially those that include Apache Tiles support. * Clean-up of the code, by following the Apache Tiles standard. Current Status = Meritocracy = All but one (here I suppose that Aaron will be a committer) initial committers are familiar with the meritocracy principles of Apache, and have already worked on the various source codebases. The missing one contributed to several open source projects and probably will learn very fast. We will follow the normal meritocracy rules also with other potential contributors. = Community = Dimensions community will be, probably, Apache Tiles community. But there are a number of similar targeted projects around the WWW that could help in creating a broader one. = Core Developers = The initial set of developers comes from various backgrounds, as they are in Apache Tiles project, with different but compatible needs for the proposed project. = Alignment = Dimensions will likely be widely used by various open source and commercial projects that have a dependency on Apache Tiles. Known Risks = Orphaned products = There is a risk of making Dimensions an orphaned product, but most probably it will follow Apache Tiles steps. Since Tiles is widely adopted in Java EE applications, it is difficult that Dimensions will be abandoned. = Inexperience with open source = All the initial developers have worked on open source and all but one are PMC members of
Re: [PROPOSAL] Dimensions Proposal
2008/1/7, Gilles Scokart [EMAIL PROTECTED]: FYI, Dimensions is already the name of a software developed by Serena. See [1] I know it's a criterion to leave and not to enter the incubator, but I prefer to share this info before I forget. Thank you! Then it needs a name change, I will add a note to the wiki page, before the final change when we decide the final name. Thanks again! Antonio
Re: [docs] Release Distribution
On Jan 6, 2008, at 8:34 AM, Gav wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Robert Burrell Donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 6 January 2008 7:01 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [docs] Release Distribution
On Jan 2, 2008 11:24 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
probably best to choose one and then change all instances
[-1] www.apache.org/dist/incubator/podling
[+1] www.apache.org/dist/incubator/empodling/em
[+1] www.apache.org/dist/incubator/{podling}
I don't have a strong preference.
anyone else?
[+1] www.apache.org/dist/incubator/{podling}
I like {podling}, also...
--kevan
I want to join the maillist!
Apche community: I want to join the maillist! Thanks for your help! Best Regards, Sincerely Yang - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept Bluesky Project into the Incubator
+1 Accept BlueSky for incubation --kevan On Jan 5, 2008, at 2:27 PM, Bill Stoddard wrote: Thanks to everyone who made contributions to this proposal and special thanks to Niclas and Aaron for stepping up as mentors. The project is documented here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BlueSky Please vote on accepting Bluesky into the Apache Incubator. The vote will run 1 week, beginning now, and will conclude Saturday, January 12, 2008. [ ] +1 Accept BlueSky for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason : Thanks, Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] publish Tika 0.1-incubating
On Jan 3, 2008, at 11:09 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, On Jan 4, 2008 5:31 AM, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 for this release, and note to developers to have a DISCLAIMER file separately in both source release and the META-INF dir of the binary. Will do. On a related note, when and how did the DISCLAIMER file come to exist? I guess it's a legacy of Wicket, since that was the first time I recall seeing the file. To me it seems debatable whether the disclaimer is more prominent within the README file or in a separate DISCLAIMER file, but I'm OK to go with the latter if people prefer that. I am also curious to know how Andy's and Ryan's contributions came to be. Do we have any paper trail of this? The notice for Andy Clark was added for the NekoHTML [1] dependency (ALv2). The Tika codebase doesn't actually contain any of that code, just uses it as a dependency, so AFAIK the attribution in NOTICE wouldn't actually be needed. It got added [2] a while ago when we were considering a release bundle that contains all the dependencies. The notice was briefly questioned [3] and discussed [4] on tika-dev@ but so far no action was taken on it. The notice for Ryan Ackley is more substantial, as the Tika codebase contains a few classes (part of [5]) from his now-dormant textmining.org [6] codebase. Those classes found their way into Tika via the Nutch and Lius Lite codebases and their status was considered on tika-dev@ with Ryan on Cc [7]. IMO, the attribution for Ryan Ackley in the NOTICE file should include the copyright for those source files (i.e. Copyright 2004 Ryan Ackley). Could also ask for permission to remove the copyright from those source files or move them to the NOTICE file as described in http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#header-existingcopyright Everything else looked good... +1 --kevan
Re: [VOTE] publish Tika 0.1-incubating
On Jan 7, 2008 3:53 PM, Chris Mattmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jukka, I just checked the archives. Thanks very much for the pointer to them. I was expecting everything to be CC'ed to tika-dev, sorry about that. Looks like we have: 5 +1 Jukka,Craig,ant elder,Niclas,Bertrand 0 +0 0 -1 Minor nitpick, but I voted +1 as well. Niall The vote passes. I'll push out the release to the mirrors. Thanks to all who voted on the PMC (and to others for voting also!) Cheers, Chris On 1/6/08 11:49 PM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Jan 7, 2008 3:54 AM, Chris Mattmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the +1. Incubator PMC, anyone else out there? :) Did you check the general@ archives (I recall you aren't subscribed)? We already have enough votes for the release. Will you tally the results, or should I? BR, Jukka Zitting __ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cognizant Development Engineer Early Detection Research Network Project _ Jet Propulsion LaboratoryPasadena, CA Office: 171-266B Mailstop: 171-246 ___ Disclaimer: The opinions presented within are my own and do not reflect those of either NASA, JPL, or the California Institute of Technology. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] publish Tika 0.1-incubating
Hi Jukka, I just checked the archives. Thanks very much for the pointer to them. I was expecting everything to be CC'ed to tika-dev, sorry about that. Looks like we have: 5 +1 Jukka,Craig,ant elder,Niclas,Bertrand 0 +0 0 -1 The vote passes. I'll push out the release to the mirrors. Thanks to all who voted on the PMC (and to others for voting also!) Cheers, Chris On 1/6/08 11:49 PM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Jan 7, 2008 3:54 AM, Chris Mattmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the +1. Incubator PMC, anyone else out there? :) Did you check the general@ archives (I recall you aren't subscribed)? We already have enough votes for the release. Will you tally the results, or should I? BR, Jukka Zitting __ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cognizant Development Engineer Early Detection Research Network Project _ Jet Propulsion LaboratoryPasadena, CA Office: 171-266B Mailstop: 171-246 ___ Disclaimer: The opinions presented within are my own and do not reflect those of either NASA, JPL, or the California Institute of Technology. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] publish Tika 0.1-incubating
Hi Niall, Sorry: I checked: http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html And it didn't have your name listed on the PMC. However, upon clicking that other link on that page, I found your name on the file: https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/committee-info.txt Under the Incubator PMC. Sorry for that omission. However, it may be a good idea to get that first web page updated seeing as though it looks a bit outdated. I'm guessing I'm not the only one that's made that mistake! :) So, to recount, we have 6 +1's from Incubator PMC members. The vote passes (thanks, Niall!) and I've pushed the release out. Thanks! Cheers, Chris On 1/7/08 7:56 AM, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 7, 2008 3:53 PM, Chris Mattmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jukka, I just checked the archives. Thanks very much for the pointer to them. I was expecting everything to be CC'ed to tika-dev, sorry about that. Looks like we have: 5 +1 Jukka,Craig,ant elder,Niclas,Bertrand 0 +0 0 -1 Minor nitpick, but I voted +1 as well. Niall The vote passes. I'll push out the release to the mirrors. Thanks to all who voted on the PMC (and to others for voting also!) Cheers, Chris On 1/6/08 11:49 PM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Jan 7, 2008 3:54 AM, Chris Mattmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the +1. Incubator PMC, anyone else out there? :) Did you check the general@ archives (I recall you aren't subscribed)? We already have enough votes for the release. Will you tally the results, or should I? BR, Jukka Zitting __ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cognizant Development Engineer Early Detection Research Network Project _ Jet Propulsion LaboratoryPasadena, CA Office: 171-266B Mailstop: 171-246 ___ Disclaimer: The opinions presented within are my own and do not reflect those of either NASA, JPL, or the California Institute of Technology. __ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cognizant Development Engineer Early Detection Research Network Project _ Jet Propulsion LaboratoryPasadena, CA Office: 171-266B Mailstop: 171-246 ___ Disclaimer: The opinions presented within are my own and do not reflect those of either NASA, JPL, or the California Institute of Technology. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] publish Tika 0.1-incubating
On Jan 7, 2008 4:04 PM, Chris Mattmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Niall, Sorry: I checked: http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html And it didn't have your name listed on the PMC. However, upon clicking that other link on that page, I found your name on the file: https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/committee-info.txt Under the Incubator PMC. Sorry for that omission. However, it may be a good idea to get that first web page updated seeing as though it looks a bit outdated. I'm guessing I'm not the only one that's made that mistake! :) OK thanks - I've refreshed that page in svn from committee-info.txt just need to work out how refresh the site now. Niall So, to recount, we have 6 +1's from Incubator PMC members. The vote passes (thanks, Niall!) and I've pushed the release out. Thanks! Cheers, Chris On 1/7/08 7:56 AM, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 7, 2008 3:53 PM, Chris Mattmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jukka, I just checked the archives. Thanks very much for the pointer to them. I was expecting everything to be CC'ed to tika-dev, sorry about that. Looks like we have: 5 +1 Jukka,Craig,ant elder,Niclas,Bertrand 0 +0 0 -1 Minor nitpick, but I voted +1 as well. Niall The vote passes. I'll push out the release to the mirrors. Thanks to all who voted on the PMC (and to others for voting also!) Cheers, Chris On 1/6/08 11:49 PM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Jan 7, 2008 3:54 AM, Chris Mattmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the +1. Incubator PMC, anyone else out there? :) Did you check the general@ archives (I recall you aren't subscribed)? We already have enough votes for the release. Will you tally the results, or should I? BR, Jukka Zitting __ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cognizant Development Engineer Early Detection Research Network Project _ Jet Propulsion LaboratoryPasadena, CA Office: 171-266B Mailstop: 171-246 ___ Disclaimer: The opinions presented within are my own and do not reflect those of either NASA, JPL, or the California Institute of Technology. __ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cognizant Development Engineer Early Detection Research Network Project _ Jet Propulsion LaboratoryPasadena, CA Office: 171-266B Mailstop: 171-246 ___ Disclaimer: The opinions presented within are my own and do not reflect those of either NASA, JPL, or the California Institute of Technology. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] publish Tika 0.1-incubating
On Jan 7, 2008 5:46 PM, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html ...I've refreshed that page in svn from committee-info.txt just need to work out how refresh the site now... To update the site, run svn up in /www/incubator.apache.org on people.apache.org. You need to be a member of the incubator unix group to do this, if that's not the case ask root@ to add you to that group. I've just updated whoweare.html there - the automatic copy to the live site runs every few hours IIRC, so there's a lag in going live. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] publish Tika 0.1-incubating
On Jan 7, 2008 5:10 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 7, 2008 5:46 PM, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html ...I've refreshed that page in svn from committee-info.txt just need to work out how refresh the site now... To update the site, run svn up in /www/incubator.apache.org on people.apache.org. You need to be a member of the incubator unix group to do this, if that's not the case ask root@ to add you to that group. Looks like thats the case - I got a permission denied, so I'll ping infra@ I've just updated whoweare.html there - the automatic copy to the live site runs every few hours IIRC, so there's a lag in going live. Thanks :) Niall -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept Bluesky Project into the Incubator
[X ] +1 Accept BlueSky for incubation - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept Bluesky Project into the Incubator
Bill Stoddard wrote: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BlueSky [+1] +1 Accept BlueSky for incubation I think the BlueSky contributors have done a fantastic job of answering the many questions thrown at them by the incubator. In fact I think this was the longest vetting that any proposed podling has ever put up with so far ;-) But that isn't to say that all of the concerns weren't legitimate. It's going to be a challenge, and the biggest vote isn't entering incubation, but graduating into a TLP in the project's own right. The contributors have expressed a desire to transition their practices into an ASF methodology, and they have the right team of mentors to help this happen. Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept Bluesky Project into the Incubator
[x] +1 (non-binding) Accept BlueSky for incubation Simon Bill Stoddard wrote: Thanks to everyone who made contributions to this proposal and special thanks to Niclas and Aaron for stepping up as mentors. The project is documented here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BlueSky Please vote on accepting Bluesky into the Apache Incubator. The vote will run 1 week, beginning now, and will conclude Saturday, January 12, 2008. [ ] +1 Accept BlueSky for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason : Thanks, Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept Bluesky Project into the Incubator
+1 On Jan 5, 2008 2:27 PM, Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks to everyone who made contributions to this proposal and special thanks to Niclas and Aaron for stepping up as mentors. The project is documented here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BlueSky Please vote on accepting Bluesky into the Apache Incubator. The vote will run 1 week, beginning now, and will conclude Saturday, January 12, 2008. [ ] +1 Accept BlueSky for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason : Thanks, Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I want to join the maillist!
Hi, Like other Apache projects, you need to subscribe by sending a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers, Vincent 2008/1/7, east [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Apche community: I want to join the maillist! Thanks for your help! Best Regards, Sincerely Yang - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept Bluesky Project into the Incubator
Bill Stoddard wrote: [x] +1 Accept BlueSky for incubation - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Field of use constraint on OSOA license?
There is an updated license here: http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0/license.txt and I've attached a copy of the text below. To my layman's understanding that seems OK but it would be good to have official blessing. Thanks Janet for getting this through. -- Jeremy On Jan 7, 2008, at 3:56 PM, Janet Campbell wrote: Yes, my understanding is that the new version of the license has now been posted. Janet Campbell Phone: +1.613.224.9461, x.229 (GMT -5) Fax: +1.613.224.5172 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Oisin Hurley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 5:36 AM To: Janet Campbell Cc: general@incubator.apache.org; 'Legal Discuss' Subject: Re: Field of use constraint on OSOA license? On 20 Dec 2007, at 20:50, Janet Campbell wrote: We have been in touch with the OSOA folks and the license restriction referred to below has now been removed. Thanks for pushing that through, Janet. Have you secured the new license text, and has it been posted on the OSOA site do you know? best regards Oisin License for the Service Component Architecture JavaDoc, Interface Definition files and XSD files. The Service Component Architecture JavaDoc, Interface Definition files, and XSD files are being provided by the copyright holders under the following license. By using and/or copying this work, you agree that you have read, understood and will comply with the following terms and conditions: Permission to copy, display, make derivative works of, and distribute the Service Component Architecture JavaDoc, Interface Definition Files and XSD files (the Artifacts) in any medium without fee or royalty is hereby granted, provided that you include the following on ALL copies of the Artifacts, or portions thereof, that you make: 1. A link or URL to the Artifacts at this location: http://www.osoa.org/display/Main/Service+Component+Architecture +Specifications 2. The full text of this copyright notice as shown in the Artifacts. THE ARTIFACTS ARE PROVIDED AS IS, AND THE AUTHORS MAKE NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THE ARTIFACTS AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THEIR CONTENTS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NON-INFRINGEMENT OR TITLE. THE AUTHORS WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO ANY USE OR DISTRIBUTION OF THE ARTIFACTS. The name and trademarks of the Authors may NOT be used in any manner, including advertising or publicity pertaining to the Service Component Architecture Specification or its contents without specific, written prior permission. Title to copyright in the Service Component Architecture Specification and the JavaDoc, Interface Definition Files and XSD Files will at all times remain with the Authors. No other rights are granted by implication, estoppel or otherwise. Revision level 1.1, last updated on 2007/11/19 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Field of use constraint on OSOA license?
On Jan 7, 2008 9:58 PM, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is an updated license here: http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0/license.txt and I've attached a copy of the text below. To my layman's understanding that seems OK but it would be good to have official blessing. Thanks Janet for getting this through. no performance rights so i guess that we'll have to strike out the sing-a-long-a-spec from the next apachecon ;-) looks good to me: thanks to everyone who sorted this out might be a good idea raising this on legal discuss so that it can be included in the third party licensing policy draft - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [docs] Release Distribution
Hi Matthieu,
You've convinced me.
+1 for www.apache.org/dist/incubator/{podling}
Craig
On Jan 6, 2008, at 10:20 AM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
On Jan 6, 2008 2:01 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jan 2, 2008 11:24 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
clan.net wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
probably best to choose one and then change all instances
[-1] www.apache.org/dist/incubator/podling
[+1] www.apache.org/dist/incubator/empodling/em
[+1] www.apache.org/dist/incubator/{podling}http://
www.apache.org/dist/incubator/%7Bpodling%7D
I don't have a strong preference.
anyone else?
I'd go for {podling}. That's what I've seen most often and it's
even being
specified [1].
Matthieu
[1]
http://bitworking.org/projects/URI-Templates/draft-gregorio-
uritemplate-02.html
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [VOTE] Accept Bluesky Project into the Incubator
+1 Vincent 2008/1/5, Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thanks to everyone who made contributions to this proposal and special thanks to Niclas and Aaron for stepping up as mentors. The project is documented here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BlueSky Please vote on accepting Bluesky into the Apache Incubator. The vote will run 1 week, beginning now, and will conclude Saturday, January 12, 2008. [ ] +1 Accept BlueSky for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason : Thanks, Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept Bluesky Project into the Incubator
+1 to accept BlueSky into incubation Good luck, Craig On Jan 5, 2008, at 11:27 AM, Bill Stoddard wrote: Thanks to everyone who made contributions to this proposal and special thanks to Niclas and Aaron for stepping up as mentors. The project is documented here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BlueSky Please vote on accepting Bluesky into the Apache Incubator. The vote will run 1 week, beginning now, and will conclude Saturday, January 12, 2008. [ ] +1 Accept BlueSky for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason : Thanks, Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
