Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
Hello Incubator PMC - Thank you for your reviews of this; please do not confuse this with another release vote just posted for the UIMA Add-on package, which is another piece of the project, moving forward under a separate packaging and vote. For this vote, so far we have 1 +1 vote (only). Could some others please review and cast their votes? Thanks again. -Marshall Schor Michael Baessler wrote: The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to publish a new bug fix release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug fixes of for release version 2.2.1 that was published in December 2007. For details about the fixes, please have a look at the release notes. We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s (all the committers) and no 0s or -1s. The vote thread is here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200804.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please review the release candidate here: http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/ There are subdirectories like: /bin - contains the binary distribution files /src - contains the source distribution files /rat - contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some comments The SVN tag for this release candidate is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05 The KEYS file can be found in the SVN at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS Please vote: [ ] +1 Accept to release Apache UIMA 2.2.2 [ ] -1 No, because Thanks! -- Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cut the crap
ROTFLMHO.. So tell us how you really feel Roy. :) For what it's worth, I agree with you, especially for projects entering incubator. Scott Roy T. Fielding wrote: I've wasted too much time today on the stupid IP Clearance template that insists on asking a bunch of irrelevant questions about decisions that the Incubator is not responsible for making. The required IP clearance questions should be: Date: Identify the Contribution: Identify the Contributor(s): What are the filenames for the applicable software grant(s): Corporate CLA(s): Individual CLA(s): Location of initial import: Destination PMC: That's it. Licensing the artifacts, removal of dependencies, changing headers, and checking for product trade names are all activities of the PMC before a release is made, NOT before an import. Committer access is a responsibility of the destination PMC. Prior distribution rights are irrelevant. Where on earth did this crap come from? The template reads like a friggin nanny's club treatise on the correct angle to wipe one's ass. The only reason we have this form is to record the connection between grant and initial commit. Don't waste our time with anything else. Roy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cut the crap
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've wasted too much time today on the stupid IP Clearance template that insists on asking a bunch of irrelevant questions about decisions that the Incubator is not responsible for making. The required IP clearance questions should be: Date: Identify the Contribution: Identify the Contributor(s): What are the filenames for the applicable software grant(s): Corporate CLA(s): Individual CLA(s): Location of initial import: Destination PMC: That's it. pretty much agree the VOTE link is useful but maybe the incubator doesn't need to check that a PMC is conducting it's affairs correctly. not clear how much oversight the board expects the incubator to perform for IP clearances. Licensing the artifacts, removal of dependencies, changing headers, and checking for product trade names are all activities of the PMC before a release is made, NOT before an import. Committer access is a responsibility of the destination PMC. Prior distribution rights are irrelevant. Where on earth did this crap come from? dunno. stuff only gets fixed once someone notices it's wrong. it's CTR so feel free to remove the cruft. The template reads like a friggin nanny's club treatise on the correct angle to wipe one's ass. The only reason we have this form is to record the connection between grant and initial commit. Don't waste our time with anything else. :-) IMHO writing documentation is tough and it's hard to target the audience correctly. probably an annotated template would work better (if anyone has some spare cycles to implement). - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cut the crap
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ROTFLMHO.. So tell us how you really feel Roy. :) For what it's worth, I agree with you, especially for projects entering incubator. submit a patch ;-) - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
