Re: Discussion: graduating Subversion
On 1/26/10 6:00 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Greg Steingst...@gmail.com wrote: Before calling for a vote to graduate Subversion, I figured it prudent to have a discussion first. I believe Subversion is quite ready (and has been, but the holidays and whatnot kept me from sending this earlier). Any thoughts on why Subversion should NOT graduate now? I want to see a graduation. Motivation; Incubator is about fostering the community, and I don't think that the Incubator can provide anything additional from the Apache folks already present in the Subversion community. Anything else sounds like bureaucracy for the sake of it, to me... Talking about bureaucracy, comparing http://incubator.apache.org/projects/subversion.html and http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2010 looks like the status file is not quite up to date. I'm assuming the question of graduation being asked means that all 'em boxes should in fact have been ticked by now. If so I say tick 'em and vote :) cheers, Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Discussion: graduating Subversion
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 04:56, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote: On 1/26/10 6:00 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Greg Steingst...@gmail.com wrote: Before calling for a vote to graduate Subversion, I figured it prudent to have a discussion first. I believe Subversion is quite ready (and has been, but the holidays and whatnot kept me from sending this earlier). Any thoughts on why Subversion should NOT graduate now? I want to see a graduation. Motivation; Incubator is about fostering the community, and I don't think that the Incubator can provide anything additional from the Apache folks already present in the Subversion community. Anything else sounds like bureaucracy for the sake of it, to me... Talking about bureaucracy, comparing http://incubator.apache.org/projects/subversion.html and http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2010 looks like the status file is not quite up to date. I'm assuming the question of graduation being asked means that all 'em boxes should in fact have been ticked by now. If so I say tick 'em and vote :) Oop. Yeah. I'll get that updated ASAP. Thanks! Cheers, -g - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release UIMA 2.3.0-rc9
The vote passes: This vote has been open for 13 days. There are 3 +1's from IPMC members, and no other votes. +1 Jukka Zitting +1 Ant Elder +1 Jean T. Anderson Thanks to everyone who took the time to review and vote on this. -Marshall Marshall Schor wrote: Hi everyone, The UIMA community has voted on and approved the release of Apache UIMA 2.3.0, consisting of - base UIMA - the UIMA-AS add-on to the base (incorporating ActiveMQ and adding Asynchronous Scaleout capability - UIMACPP - the C++ support - UIMA-Addons - a subset of components from the UIMA Sandbox The vote was +1 from all committers and 1 mentor; no other votes were cast. We now request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this release. Podling vote thread: http://markmail.org/thread/osrpk5skilchagi6 Release artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.3.0-RC9/ (includes RAT reports) SVN root nodes: base UIMA: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.3.0/uimaj-2.3.0-09 UIMA-AS: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uima-as/tags/uima-as-2.3.0/uima-as-2.3.0-09 UIMA-Addons: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/sandbox/tags/sandbox-2.3.0/sandbox-2.3.0-09 UIMACPP: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimacpp/tags/uimacpp-2.3.0-09 UIMA-AS continues to be registered as a 5D002 export artifact (due to including ActiveMQ) - and no other components are currently required to be so designated; see http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ The source distributions are built with scripts, and differ somewhat from the SVN source trees. The various distributions are built using the Maven assembly plugin; the scripts for build the source distribution are found here: base UIMA: uimaj-distr/src/main/assembly/src.xml UIMA-AS: uima-as-distr/src/main/assembly/src.xml UIMA-Addons: SandboxDistr/annotator-package/src/main/assembly/src.xml The UIMACPP source package is built in a different manner for Windows and *nix packaging; some of the make configuration is pre-done for each of these packagings and included in the source distribution. The scripts for building the source are in buildSrcTree.cmd (Windows) and buildSrcTree.sh (*nix) In addition to the source bundles, this release includes (as before) binary downloads for direct use by users; these include html/pdf versions of documentation and javadocs. The builds (except for UIMACPP) have been changed to use the Maven RAT (Release Audit Tool) plugin. The POMs for the 3 distribution projects (uimaj-distr, uima-as-distr, and SandboxDistr/annotationPackage) document the list of exceptions for the RAT tool (mostly things like generated files or test data). KEYS: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS The release is signed by Marshall Schor except for UIMACPP which is signed by Edward Epstein. The signing key of Marshall Schor has been updated to the higher strength following http://www.apache.org/dev/key-transition.html. Please cast your vote! Thanks. -Marshall - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
avro in mapreduce
I would like to call folks attention to MAPREDUCE-1126. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1126 This is a key link in a series of issues involved in integrating Avro in Mapreduce. Aaron proposed a design in early December, building on the design Tom developed last summer and committed in September in HADOOP-6165. Aaron's design was approved, and, after several rounds of reviews, I committed Aaron's patch on 11 January. On 15 January Owen reverted this commit without warning. It seems that Owen objects to the path initiated last July in HADOOP-6165. Aaron has also contributed MAPREDUCE-815, which permits one to use Avro for all phases of Mapreduce. When that issue is committed, the primary chain of Avro integration into Mapreduce will be complete. Can others please take the time to read this issue and express their opinions? Thank you, Doug - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: avro in mapreduce
Oops. Wrong list. Nothing to see here. Doug Doug Cutting wrote: I would like to call folks attention to MAPREDUCE-1126. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1126 This is a key link in a series of issues involved in integrating Avro in Mapreduce. Aaron proposed a design in early December, building on the design Tom developed last summer and committed in September in HADOOP-6165. Aaron's design was approved, and, after several rounds of reviews, I committed Aaron's patch on 11 January. On 15 January Owen reverted this commit without warning. It seems that Owen objects to the path initiated last July in HADOOP-6165. Aaron has also contributed MAPREDUCE-815, which permits one to use Avro for all phases of Mapreduce. When that issue is committed, the primary chain of Avro integration into Mapreduce will be complete. Can others please take the time to read this issue and express their opinions? Thank you, Doug - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Discussion: graduating Subversion
On 1/26/10 1:00 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Greg Steingst...@gmail.com wrote: Before calling for a vote to graduate Subversion, I figured it prudent to have a discussion first. I believe Subversion is quite ready (and has been, but the holidays and whatnot kept me from sending this earlier). Any thoughts on why Subversion should NOT graduate now? I want to see a graduation. Motivation; Incubator is about fostering the community, and I don't think that the Incubator can provide anything additional from the Apache folks already present in the Subversion community. Anything else sounds like bureaucracy for the sake of it, to me... Well said. Nothing to add but my support for graduation. Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
