[RESULT][VOTE] Release PhotArk M3-incubating (RC2a)
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > The PhotArk community has completed a vote on it's third milestone > release (PhotArk M3-Incubating) and is now looking for IPMC approval > to publish the release. This release candidate has minimal changes compared > to the previous release candidate and address the license/notice issues > raised on this mailing list. > > Please review and vote on approving the M3-incubating release > artifacts of PhotArk. > > The artifacts are available for review at: > http://people.apache.org/~lresende/photark/M3-incubating-RC2a/ > > This includes the signed binary and source distributions, the RAT report, > and the Maven staging repository. > > The release tag is available at : > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/photark/tags/M3-incubating-RC2a/ > > The podling vote thread is : > http://www.mail-archive.com/photark-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg01108.html > > Vote passed with +1 from Luciano Resende, Stefan Seelmann and Ant Elder. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release PhotArk M3-incubating (RC2a)
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:41 PM, ant elder wrote: > +1 to releasing most of this. I do think the duplicate and incorrect > legal files should be cleaned up as Stefan commented, and because of > those the webapp modules in the maven repo look like they have ended > up with the wrong license/notice files. I also think it would be > better to change from having the binary distribution which wrappers > the two webapps to instead just release the two webapps on their own. > Thanks Ant, we already discussed and the next PhotArk release is going to have war distributions instead of the current binary distribution wrapper. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release PhotArk M3-incubating (RC2a)
+1 to releasing most of this. I do think the duplicate and incorrect
legal files should be cleaned up as Stefan commented, and because of
those the webapp modules in the maven repo look like they have ended
up with the wrong license/notice files. I also think it would be
better to change from having the binary distribution which wrappers
the two webapps to instead just release the two webapps on their own.
...ant
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> RAT report looks good.
>> Source distribution exists.
>> Binary distributions and WAR contain licenses and notices of included
>> libraries.
>>
>>
>> Some notes, maybe you can fix that in the next release: the war file
>> contains multiple NOTICE and LICENSE files in
>> - META-INF
>> - WEB-INF/classes
>> - WEB-INF/classes/META-INF
>> I understand that the files in META-INF contain licenses and notices
>> for all included libraries which is fine. But I don't know if the
>> files in WEB-INF are required.
>> Also please note that the WEB-INF/classes/NOTICE still contains the
>> ${pom.name} variable.
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>> Stefan
>>
>>
>
> Thanks Stefan, we will look into this for our next release.
>
> Others, we need one more vote here, any volunteers ?
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release PhotArk M3-incubating (RC2a)
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
> +1
>
> RAT report looks good.
> Source distribution exists.
> Binary distributions and WAR contain licenses and notices of included
> libraries.
>
>
> Some notes, maybe you can fix that in the next release: the war file
> contains multiple NOTICE and LICENSE files in
> - META-INF
> - WEB-INF/classes
> - WEB-INF/classes/META-INF
> I understand that the files in META-INF contain licenses and notices
> for all included libraries which is fine. But I don't know if the
> files in WEB-INF are required.
> Also please note that the WEB-INF/classes/NOTICE still contains the
> ${pom.name} variable.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Stefan
>
>
Thanks Stefan, we will look into this for our next release.
Others, we need one more vote here, any volunteers ?
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
