Re: [PROPOSAL] Deft for incubation
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: It would be nice, very nice indeed, if this happened. It is not a MUST. :) Regards, Alan +1 :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.1-incubating
72 hours has elapsed and the lazy consensus vote is now closed. There were no additional votes from IPMC members regarding this release. Please see the rave-dev vote thread for a list of the 3 IPMC members who cast +1 for the release. -Original Message- From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfrank...@mitre.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 8:38 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: rave-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.1-incubating This is the first incubator release for Apache Rave, with the artifacts being versioned as 0.1-incubating. We are requesting a lazy consensus vote, as we have already received 3 binding IPMC +1 votes during the release voting on rave-dev - Vote thread: http://apache.markmail.org/message/vmgwtdoueobdmc2g?q=list:org%2Eapache%2Ei ncubator%2Erave-dev+%5BVOTE%5D+Apache+order:date-backwardpage=3s Result: http://apache.markmail.org/message/lq6n7jgkhhlntqig?q=list:org%2Eapache%2Ei ncubator%2Erave-dev+%5BVOTE%5D+Apache+order:date-backwardpage=1 Release notes: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rave/tags/0.1-incubating/CHANGEL OG SVN source tag (master) (r1141150): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rave/rave-master-pom/tags/0.1-in cubating/ SVN source tag (project)(r1141160) https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rave/tags/0.1-incubating/ Maven staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-004/ Staged Source releases: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-004/org/ap ache/rave/rave-master/0.1-incubating/rave-master-0.1-incubating-source-rele ase.zip https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-004/org/ap ache/rave/rave-project/0.1-incubating/rave-project-0.1-incubating-source-re lease.zip Staged Binary releases http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/rave/0.1-incubating/rave-0.1-incu bating-bin.zip http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/rave/0.1-incubating/rave-0.1-incu bating-bin.tar.gz PGP release keys: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rave/KEYS Lazy consensus, vote open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Deft to join the incubator
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com wrote: [X] +1 Accept Deft for incubation /niklas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[RESULT][VOTE] Deft to join the Incubator
Hi After 72 hours of voting, the results for Deft to join the Incubator are complete: * 9 +1's from IPMC members * 1 +1 from non-binding * No -1 * No 0 Binding +1: Alan D. Cabrera Bertrand Delacretaz Emmanuel Lecharny Julien Vermillard Mark Struberg Mohammad Nour El-Din Niklas Gustavsson Robert Burrell Donkin Tim Williams Non-binding +1: Ashish Paliwal Thanks for helping out on the proposal and voting! /niklas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?
On Jul 7, 2011, at 9:40 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:32:37 AM Karl Wright wrote: OK - so now I'm getting conflicting advice. Somebody went through a fair bit of effort to implement the geronimo versions of all these packages, including saaj-impl. Are you saying that Sun/Oracle recently changed the licensing terms sufficiently that substituting the geronimo jars is no longer necessary? I wouldn't say recently, but yes. They did change licenses a while ago *for new releases* from BCL to CDDL which moved them from Category X to Category B. So yes, substituting the geronimo jars in MOST cases is no longer necessary. Agreed. However, not all of the Sun jars have had a new release with the new License. That said, may folks would prefer the Apache licensed versions. That said, you specifically asked about saaj-impl, not saaj-api. Geronimo doesn't have a saaj-impl. The closest at Apache would likely be in Axis. I believe they have an saaj-impl based on Axiom someplace. Geronimo does have an saaj-api I believe. If so, what caveats do I need to include in NOTICE.txt and LICENSE.txt, or should I just copy whatever Chemistry does? Well, you'd need to mention the CDDL license for the saaj-impl in the LICENSE.TXT. Adding a bit more background: saaj-impl (and many of the other implementations/specs) are dual licensed GPL v2 and CDDL. Any ASF project should choose CDDL. I had thought that the procedure for this was to include both of the licenses, then explicitly choose the preferred license. Looks like I'm wrong/out-of-date. Only the CDDL license should be included. See http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#mutually-exclusive for details. --kevan Karl On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:08:52 AM Karl Wright wrote: Hi all, The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache Chemistry. The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include activation-1.1.jar and saaj-impl-1.3.jar, both of which seem to be from Sun, and are (I believe) covered by the Sun/Oracle license. I was told a while back that activation.jar could not be included in MCF for this reason, but that there was a geronimo-activation.jar available instead, which is what ManifoldCF uses. But I don't know about saaj-impl. The recent versions of most of that stuff is CDDL which is OK (category b license) for shipping the binaries. Definitely use 1.3.2 though: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/saaj-impl/1.3.2 / Dan (a) Does anyone know if there's an Apache-licensed replacement for saaj-impl? (b) Should somebody tell Chemistry that they may have a license problem? Thanks! Karl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://dankulp.com/blog Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://dankulp.com/blog Talend - http://www.talend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Project shutdown guide?
Daniel Kulp wrote: Christian Grobmeier wrote: What is with user accounts of people who are not active in other apache projects and started at the ASF with the retired project? Are the accounts closed too? Any more ideas? I am +1 for creating a page on the incubator site with a shutdown guide, btw. +1 I did find this page on the wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RetiringPodlings but I definitely think an official guide on the web page would be more appropriate. The question came up again recently. I scoured the archives and found some relevant links to past discussion and effort on this topic. Re: process for going Dormant/Retired http://s.apache.org/oN It certainly does need collecting into an i.a.o web page. -David * Check copyright checkbox is signed off on. ** If not, then dig in to see if it can be signed off on. *** If so, sign off with current date. *** If not, remove source. Hen On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: Is there a list someplace of the steps to take to shutdown a project? On the website, I see entry guides, podling guides, graduation guides, etc but not a shutdown/termination guide. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
