Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator
+1 Cheers, Adam On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: It's been a nearly a week since the S4 proposal was submitted for discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are now ready for a vote. The latest proposal can be found at the end of this email and at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal The discussion regarding the proposal can be found at: http://s.apache.org/RMU Please cast your votes: [ ] +1 Accept S4 for incubation [ ] +0 Indifferent to S4 incubation [ ] -1 Reject S4 for incubation This vote will close 72 hours from now. Thanks, Patrick -- = S4 Proposal = == Abstract == S4 (Simple Scalable Streaming System) is a general-purpose, distributed, scalable, partially fault-tolerant, pluggable platform that allows programmers to easily develop applications for processing continuous, unbounded streams of data. == Proposal == S4 is a software platform written in Java. Clients that send and receive events can be written in any programming language. S4 also includes a collection of modules called Processing Elements (or PEs for short) that implement basic functionality and can be used by application developers. In S4, keyed data events are routed with affinity to Processing Elements (PEs), which consume the events and do one or both of the following: (1) ''emit'' one or more events which may be consumed by other PEs, (2) ''publish'' results. The architecture resembles the Actors model, providing semantics of encapsulation and location transparency, thus allowing applications to be massively concurrent while exposing a simple programming interface to application developers. To drive adoption and increase the number of contributors to the project, we may need to prioritize the focus based on feedback from the community. We believe that one of the top priorities and driving design principle for the S4 project is to provide a simple API that hides most of the complexity associated with distributed systems and concurrency. The project grew out of the need to provide a flexible platform for application developers and scientists that can be used for quick experimentation and production. S4 differs from existing Apache projects in a number of fundamental ways. Flume is an Incubator project that focuses on log processing, performing lightweight processing in a distributed fashion and accumulating log data in a centralized repository for batch processing. S4 instead performs all stream processing in a distributed fashion and enables applications to form arbitrary graphs to process streams of events. We see Flume as a complementary project. We also expect S4 to complement Hadoop processing and in some cases to supersede it. Kafka is another Incubator project that focuses on processing large amounts of stream data. The design of Kafka, however, follows the pub-sub paradigm, which focuses on delivering messages containing arbitrary data from source processes (publishers) to consumer processes (subscribers). Compared to S4, Kafka is an intermediate step between data generation and processing, while S4 is itself a platform for processing streams of events. S4 overall addresses a need of existing applications to process streams of events beyond moving data to a centralized repository for batch processing. It complements the features of existing Apache projects, such as Hadoop, Flume, and Kafka, by providing a flexible platform for distributed event processing. == Background == S4 was initially developed at Yahoo! Labs starting in 2008 to process user feedback in the context of search advertising. The project was licensed under the Apache License version 2.0 in October 2010. The project documentation is currently available at http://s4.io . == Rationale == Stream computing has been growing steadily over the last 20 years. However, recently there has been an explosion in real-time data sources including the Web, sensor networks, financial securities analysis and trading, traffic monitoring, natural language processing of news and social data, and much more. As Hadoop evolved as a standard open source solution for batch processing of massive data sets, there is no equivalent community supported open source platform for processing data streams in real-time. While various research projects have evolved into proprietary commercial products, S4 has the potential to fill the gap. Many projects that require a scalable stream processing architecture currently use Hadoop by segmenting the input stream into data batches. This solution is not efficient, results in high latency, and introduces unnecessary complexity. The S4 design is primarily driven by large scale applications for data mining and machine learning in a production environment. We think that the S4 design is
Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote: ...it seems useful that one person would step forth and claim to be the champion of bringing a certain project to the ASF and [implicitly] agree to pushing down any artificial process hurdles... I agree with that, and someone signing up as champion also means they believe in the podling having its place at Apache, which is a good thing IMO. In the simplest case, one of the mentors just signs up as the champion, so I don't think keeping that notion is complicated or obsolete. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] DirectMemory to join the Apache Incubator
Excellent stuff. I'd like to join. -- *Ioannis Canellos* * FuseSource http://fusesource.com ** Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com ** Apache Karaf http://karaf.apache.org/ Committer PMC Apache ServiceMix http://servicemix.apache.org/ Committer Apache Gora http://incubator.apache.org/gora/ Committer *
Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: ...Please cast your votes: [ X] +1 Accept S4 for incubation ... * Matthieu Morel (mm at s4 dot io) * Anish Nair (an at s4 dot com)... Shouldn't that be s4 dot io instead? -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator
+1 (binding) 2011/9/20 Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org: It's been a nearly a week since the S4 proposal was submitted for discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are now ready for a vote. The latest proposal can be found at the end of this email and at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal The discussion regarding the proposal can be found at: http://s.apache.org/RMU Please cast your votes: [ ] +1 Accept S4 for incubation [ ] +0 Indifferent to S4 incubation [ ] -1 Reject S4 for incubation This vote will close 72 hours from now. Thanks, Patrick -- = S4 Proposal = == Abstract == S4 (Simple Scalable Streaming System) is a general-purpose, distributed, scalable, partially fault-tolerant, pluggable platform that allows programmers to easily develop applications for processing continuous, unbounded streams of data. == Proposal == S4 is a software platform written in Java. Clients that send and receive events can be written in any programming language. S4 also includes a collection of modules called Processing Elements (or PEs for short) that implement basic functionality and can be used by application developers. In S4, keyed data events are routed with affinity to Processing Elements (PEs), which consume the events and do one or both of the following: (1) ''emit'' one or more events which may be consumed by other PEs, (2) ''publish'' results. The architecture resembles the Actors model, providing semantics of encapsulation and location transparency, thus allowing applications to be massively concurrent while exposing a simple programming interface to application developers. To drive adoption and increase the number of contributors to the project, we may need to prioritize the focus based on feedback from the community. We believe that one of the top priorities and driving design principle for the S4 project is to provide a simple API that hides most of the complexity associated with distributed systems and concurrency. The project grew out of the need to provide a flexible platform for application developers and scientists that can be used for quick experimentation and production. S4 differs from existing Apache projects in a number of fundamental ways. Flume is an Incubator project that focuses on log processing, performing lightweight processing in a distributed fashion and accumulating log data in a centralized repository for batch processing. S4 instead performs all stream processing in a distributed fashion and enables applications to form arbitrary graphs to process streams of events. We see Flume as a complementary project. We also expect S4 to complement Hadoop processing and in some cases to supersede it. Kafka is another Incubator project that focuses on processing large amounts of stream data. The design of Kafka, however, follows the pub-sub paradigm, which focuses on delivering messages containing arbitrary data from source processes (publishers) to consumer processes (subscribers). Compared to S4, Kafka is an intermediate step between data generation and processing, while S4 is itself a platform for processing streams of events. S4 overall addresses a need of existing applications to process streams of events beyond moving data to a centralized repository for batch processing. It complements the features of existing Apache projects, such as Hadoop, Flume, and Kafka, by providing a flexible platform for distributed event processing. == Background == S4 was initially developed at Yahoo! Labs starting in 2008 to process user feedback in the context of search advertising. The project was licensed under the Apache License version 2.0 in October 2010. The project documentation is currently available at http://s4.io . == Rationale == Stream computing has been growing steadily over the last 20 years. However, recently there has been an explosion in real-time data sources including the Web, sensor networks, financial securities analysis and trading, traffic monitoring, natural language processing of news and social data, and much more. As Hadoop evolved as a standard open source solution for batch processing of massive data sets, there is no equivalent community supported open source platform for processing data streams in real-time. While various research projects have evolved into proprietary commercial products, S4 has the potential to fill the gap. Many projects that require a scalable stream processing architecture currently use Hadoop by segmenting the input stream into data batches. This solution is not efficient, results in high latency, and introduces unnecessary complexity. The S4 design is primarily driven by large scale applications for data mining and machine learning in a production environment. We think that the S4 design is surprisingly flexible and lends
Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator
+1 (binding) Regards JB On 09/21/2011 11:04 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: +1 (binding) 2011/9/20 Patrick Huntph...@apache.org: It's been a nearly a week since the S4 proposal was submitted for discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are now ready for a vote. The latest proposal can be found at the end of this email and at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal The discussion regarding the proposal can be found at: http://s.apache.org/RMU Please cast your votes: [ ] +1 Accept S4 for incubation [ ] +0 Indifferent to S4 incubation [ ] -1 Reject S4 for incubation This vote will close 72 hours from now. Thanks, Patrick -- = S4 Proposal = == Abstract == S4 (Simple Scalable Streaming System) is a general-purpose, distributed, scalable, partially fault-tolerant, pluggable platform that allows programmers to easily develop applications for processing continuous, unbounded streams of data. == Proposal == S4 is a software platform written in Java. Clients that send and receive events can be written in any programming language. S4 also includes a collection of modules called Processing Elements (or PEs for short) that implement basic functionality and can be used by application developers. In S4, keyed data events are routed with affinity to Processing Elements (PEs), which consume the events and do one or both of the following: (1) ''emit'' one or more events which may be consumed by other PEs, (2) ''publish'' results. The architecture resembles the Actors model, providing semantics of encapsulation and location transparency, thus allowing applications to be massively concurrent while exposing a simple programming interface to application developers. To drive adoption and increase the number of contributors to the project, we may need to prioritize the focus based on feedback from the community. We believe that one of the top priorities and driving design principle for the S4 project is to provide a simple API that hides most of the complexity associated with distributed systems and concurrency. The project grew out of the need to provide a flexible platform for application developers and scientists that can be used for quick experimentation and production. S4 differs from existing Apache projects in a number of fundamental ways. Flume is an Incubator project that focuses on log processing, performing lightweight processing in a distributed fashion and accumulating log data in a centralized repository for batch processing. S4 instead performs all stream processing in a distributed fashion and enables applications to form arbitrary graphs to process streams of events. We see Flume as a complementary project. We also expect S4 to complement Hadoop processing and in some cases to supersede it. Kafka is another Incubator project that focuses on processing large amounts of stream data. The design of Kafka, however, follows the pub-sub paradigm, which focuses on delivering messages containing arbitrary data from source processes (publishers) to consumer processes (subscribers). Compared to S4, Kafka is an intermediate step between data generation and processing, while S4 is itself a platform for processing streams of events. S4 overall addresses a need of existing applications to process streams of events beyond moving data to a centralized repository for batch processing. It complements the features of existing Apache projects, such as Hadoop, Flume, and Kafka, by providing a flexible platform for distributed event processing. == Background == S4 was initially developed at Yahoo! Labs starting in 2008 to process user feedback in the context of search advertising. The project was licensed under the Apache License version 2.0 in October 2010. The project documentation is currently available at http://s4.io . == Rationale == Stream computing has been growing steadily over the last 20 years. However, recently there has been an explosion in real-time data sources including the Web, sensor networks, financial securities analysis and trading, traffic monitoring, natural language processing of news and social data, and much more. As Hadoop evolved as a standard open source solution for batch processing of massive data sets, there is no equivalent community supported open source platform for processing data streams in real-time. While various research projects have evolved into proprietary commercial products, S4 has the potential to fill the gap. Many projects that require a scalable stream processing architecture currently use Hadoop by segmenting the input stream into data batches. This solution is not efficient, results in high latency, and introduces unnecessary complexity. The S4 design is primarily driven by large scale applications for data mining and machine learning in a production environment. We think that the S4 design is surprisingly flexible and lends itself to run
Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote: ...it seems useful that one person would step forth and claim to be the champion of bringing a certain project to the ASF and [implicitly] agree to pushing down any artificial process hurdles... Why must the name be Champion and not just Mentor? I agree with that, and someone signing up as champion also means they believe in the podling having its place at Apache, which is a good thing IMO. In the simplest case, one of the mentors just signs up as the champion, so I don't think keeping that notion is complicated or obsolete. Champion is just another term for the first potential mentor who steps up. I have read what others think (helping with the process, probably help with the proposal) but I still fail to see why we need another term for it. Less is beautiful. Cheers -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.grobmeier.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
IP Clearance - transferral or licensing of copyright ownership?
I'm trying to get my head around the IP clearance process and specifically about what happens to the copyright ownership during that process. Although IP clearance gets discussed once in a while on this list I couldn't find a clear answer in the archives on this specific point. When a project with a pre-existing code base joins the incubator, does the copyright of that code base get transferred to the ASF or will it be licensed to the ASF? Reading through the IP clearance guide [1], it mentions the Software Grant Agreement (SGA) and going to the text [2] it states that it is a License Agreement to grant a license to the ASF. Also the CCLA [3] and the ICLA [4] are license agreements. I interpret that to mean that the copyright ownership remains with the licensor and only a license is granted. On the other hand, the ASF general FAQ states that the copyright of ASF projects is owned by the ASF, more specifically The members own the code [5]. Also the IP Clearance template [6] has a check that says Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF been received. But it seems that the SGA and *CLAs are just license agreements and don't include a transferral of rights? I must be missing something obvious here but I'm not sure what. Going through a few NOTICE files of projects doesn't really make it clearer, because some only specify the ASF as copyright owner and others specify in general terms that it includes software [originally] developed at X. I know copyright ownership might not be a big deal to many here, but we are dealing with many open source projects where the project lead has a very strong sense of ownership over the code. Besides educating them about the issues I want to make sure I get the facts right. Sander [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-ip-clearance [2] http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt [3] http://www.apache.org/licenses/cla-corporate.txt [4] http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt [5] http://www.apache.org/foundation/faq.html#who-owns-apache-code [6] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator
Thanks for pointing it out, Bertrand. I have just fixed it on the wiki. -Flavio On Sep 21, 2011, at 10:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: ...Please cast your votes: [ X] +1 Accept S4 for incubation ... * Matthieu Morel (mm at s4 dot io) * Anish Nair (an at s4 dot com)... Shouldn't that be s4 dot io instead? -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: Why must the name be Champion and not just Mentor? Because Champion is an aptly name for the role. champion is just another term for the first potential mentor who steps up. It is the correct name for that role: champion |ˈCHampēən| noun 1 a person who has defeated or surpassed all rivals in a competition, esp. in sports: 2 a person who fights or argues for a cause or on behalf of someone else: The correct usage is of course definition #2 I have read what others think (helping with the process, probably help with the proposal) but I still fail to see why we need another term for it. Less is beautiful. Beautiful is in the eye of the beholder. Less is definitely not always beautiful. See for example [1]: less classes. Identifying and correctly naming roles is very important—especially in an environment as the incubator. Martijn [1] https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/blog/2011/one-base-class-to-rule-them-all - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions
champion |ˈCHampēən| noun 1 a person who has defeated or surpassed all rivals in a competition, esp. in sports: 2 a person who fights or argues for a cause or on behalf of someone else: The correct usage is of course definition #2 What is the cause he actually fights/argues for? New folks are speaking to the general list on their own. The arguments I heard for a Champion were understanding the initial process or passing the process hurdles. In addition to somebody from the ASF need to show interest. (mĕn'tôr', -tər) 1) A wise and trusted counselor or teacher. 2) Mentor Greek Mythology. Odysseus's trusted counselor, in whose guise Athena became the guardian and teacher of Telemachus. #1 applies. the projects I have seen needed counseling, not somebody who fight for their case. If you can find a first mentor, you can prove that somebody has an interest. I have read what others think (helping with the process, probably help with the proposal) but I still fail to see why we need another term for it. Less is beautiful. Beautiful is in the eye of the beholder. Less is definitely not always beautiful. See for example [1]: less classes. I agree here. Identifying and correctly naming roles is very important—especially in an environment as the incubator. Thats exact. Thats why I doubt the sense of a Champion. It is already confusing and a hard entry barrier to find a Champion. Where can you find one? Why do I need it? Can I ask on the mailinglist? Then I need to outline my idea, which is going pretty near to have a draft proposal (actually I have heard people say something like that). It would be easier if every potential podling must fill the Proposal form and ask for an initial mentor on the incubator list, once completed. It is only one form and one e-mail. I still can't see why a Champion is necessary. Anyway, cheers Christian Martijn [1] https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/blog/2011/one-base-class-to-rule-them-all - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.grobmeier.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: champion |ˈCHampēən| noun 1 a person who has defeated or surpassed all rivals in a competition, esp. in sports: 2 a person who fights or argues for a cause or on behalf of someone else: The correct usage is of course definition #2 What is the cause he actually fights/argues for? New folks are speaking to the general list on their own. The cause is getting the podling accepted in the incubator, finding mentors and other interested parties. The arguments I heard for a Champion were understanding the initial process or passing the process hurdles. In addition to somebody from the ASF need to show interest. (mĕn'tôr', -tər) 1) A wise and trusted counselor or teacher. 2) Mentor Greek Mythology. Odysseus's trusted counselor, in whose guise Athena became the guardian and teacher of Telemachus. #1 applies. the projects I have seen needed counseling, not somebody who fight for their case. If you can find a first mentor, you can prove that somebody has an interest. A mentor guides the podling through the incubation. A champion guides the podling into the incubator. Big difference and not confusing at all. Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions
What is the cause he actually fights/argues for? New folks are speaking to the general list on their own. The cause is getting the podling accepted in the incubator, finding mentors and other interested parties. The Champion assists the candidate on their initial submission to a Sponsor. http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Champion This is how the Champion role is defined. The default Sponsor is the Apache Incubator - no big deal. The only thing a Champion does is to look at the projects list and try to contact a project if it would sponsor this new podling. Imho this should be discussed on the general@ list, when a Draft proposal is there. #1 applies. the projects I have seen needed counseling, not somebody who fight for their case. If you can find a first mentor, you can prove that somebody has an interest. A mentor guides the podling through the incubation. A champion guides the podling into the incubator. Big difference and not confusing at all. Confusion is in the eye of the beholder too. I am not sure what is wrong with make a draft proposal and ask for help on general@ and why there must be a role for that. But it seems I am the only one who does not see any sense in it, so I shut up now. If folks here want to keep the Champion for whatever reasons, I suggest to update the description a little bit and be more concrete on what is expected from a Champion and how one can find a Champion. Cheers Christian Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.grobmeier.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions
On 21 September 2011 11:57, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: What is the cause he actually fights/argues for? New folks are speaking to the general list on their own. The cause is getting the podling accepted in the incubator, finding mentors and other interested parties. The Champion assists the candidate on their initial submission to a Sponsor. http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Champion This is how the Champion role is defined. The default Sponsor is the Apache Incubator - no big deal. The only thing a Champion does is to look at the projects list and try to contact a project if it would sponsor this new podling. Also, the Champion makes sure the discussion phase is wrapped up and turned into a vote; ensures the vote is tallied etc. These can of course be done by others, but having one person responsible is generally easier, and less likely to result in omission or duplication. By the way, the Champion does not seem to be listed on the podling status pages or summary. I'm not sure if that is an omission, or whether it's because the Champion's role is over once the podling has been created (if that is so). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator
+1 (binding) On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Flavio Junqueira f...@s4.io wrote: Thanks for pointing it out, Bertrand. I have just fixed it on the wiki. -Flavio On Sep 21, 2011, at 10:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: ...Please cast your votes: [ X] +1 Accept S4 for incubation ... * Matthieu Morel (mm at s4 dot io) * Anish Nair (an at s4 dot com)... Shouldn't that be s4 dot io instead? -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: It's been a nearly a week since the S4 proposal was submitted for discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are now ready for a vote. The latest proposal can be found at the end of this email and at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal The discussion regarding the proposal can be found at: http://s.apache.org/RMU Please cast your votes: [ ] +1 Accept S4 for incubation [ ] +0 Indifferent to S4 incubation [ ] -1 Reject S4 for incubation +1 --tim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator
+1 (non binding) great project On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: It's been a nearly a week since the S4 proposal was submitted for discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are now ready for a vote. The latest proposal can be found at the end of this email and at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal The discussion regarding the proposal can be found at: http://s.apache.org/RMU Please cast your votes: [ ] +1 Accept S4 for incubation [ ] +0 Indifferent to S4 incubation [ ] -1 Reject S4 for incubation +1 --tim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:21 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 21 September 2011 11:57, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: What is the cause he actually fights/argues for? New folks are speaking to the general list on their own. The cause is getting the podling accepted in the incubator, finding mentors and other interested parties. The Champion assists the candidate on their initial submission to a Sponsor. http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Champion This is how the Champion role is defined. The default Sponsor is the Apache Incubator - no big deal. The only thing a Champion does is to look at the projects list and try to contact a project if it would sponsor this new podling. Also, the Champion makes sure the discussion phase is wrapped up and turned into a vote; ensures the vote is tallied etc. This might be true, but it is implicit knowledge, which is leading to confusion. If nobody wants to get rid of this term (except me), we should do an update of the Champion description. I would like to add this image in addition: http://code.grobmeier.de/howtobecomeanasfproject.pdf Because an image does say more than thousand words... cheers, Christian These can of course be done by others, but having one person responsible is generally easier, and less likely to result in omission or duplication. By the way, the Champion does not seem to be listed on the podling status pages or summary. I'm not sure if that is an omission, or whether it's because the Champion's role is over once the podling has been created (if that is so). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.grobmeier.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: ...If nobody wants to get rid of this term (except me), we should do an update of the Champion description. I would like to add this image in addition: http://code.grobmeier.de/howtobecomeanasfproject.pdf I like it - I'd just say mentors, plural, in the reddish box on the right. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions
I would like to add this image in addition: http://code.grobmeier.de/howtobecomeanasfproject.pdf I like it - I'd just say mentors, plural, in the reddish box on the right. Agreed, I have changed it local and wait if there are more comments -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.grobmeier.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to add this image in addition: http://code.grobmeier.de/howtobecomeanasfproject.pdf I like it - I'd just say mentors, plural, in the reddish box on the right. Agreed, I have changed it local and wait if there are more comments +1 we should have more of these graphs, like for the release process (also keep the image source file for later modifications!) Cheers, Francis -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.grobmeier.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions
On 21 September 2011 15:12, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:21 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 21 September 2011 11:57, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: What is the cause he actually fights/argues for? New folks are speaking to the general list on their own. The cause is getting the podling accepted in the incubator, finding mentors and other interested parties. The Champion assists the candidate on their initial submission to a Sponsor. http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Champion This is how the Champion role is defined. The default Sponsor is the Apache Incubator - no big deal. The only thing a Champion does is to look at the projects list and try to contact a project if it would sponsor this new podling. Also, the Champion makes sure the discussion phase is wrapped up and turned into a vote; ensures the vote is tallied etc. This might be true, but it is implicit knowledge, which is leading to confusion. If nobody wants to get rid of this term (except me), we should do an update of the Champion description. I would like to add this image in addition: http://code.grobmeier.de/howtobecomeanasfproject.pdf Because an image does say more than thousand words... Surely a podling does not exist until it enters incubation? Beforehand, it is just a proposal to create a podling. Also, the Champion may not need to be recruited; some potential podlings are introduced by the Champion. cheers, Christian These can of course be done by others, but having one person responsible is generally easier, and less likely to result in omission or duplication. By the way, the Champion does not seem to be listed on the podling status pages or summary. I'm not sure if that is an omission, or whether it's because the Champion's role is over once the podling has been created (if that is so). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.grobmeier.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions
I would like to add this image in addition: http://code.grobmeier.de/howtobecomeanasfproject.pdf Because an image does say more than thousand words... Surely a podling does not exist until it enters incubation? Beforehand, it is just a proposal to create a podling. So whats the name for Podling before it becomes one? Simply project? Also, the Champion may not need to be recruited; some potential podlings are introduced by the Champion. In any way, either - the Champion asks the podling to become an ASF project - the podling looks for a Champion to become an ASF project A collective of people who want to create a project from scratch I consider already a project. I will rename the aquire term to team up and make the arrow looking in both sides. Does this then reflect your suggestion? Cheers cheers, Christian These can of course be done by others, but having one person responsible is generally easier, and less likely to result in omission or duplication. By the way, the Champion does not seem to be listed on the podling status pages or summary. I'm not sure if that is an omission, or whether it's because the Champion's role is over once the podling has been created (if that is so). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.grobmeier.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.grobmeier.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] S4 to join the Incubator
+1 (binding) Patrick On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Raffaele P. Guidi raffaele.p.gu...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (non binding) great project On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: It's been a nearly a week since the S4 proposal was submitted for discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are now ready for a vote. The latest proposal can be found at the end of this email and at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal The discussion regarding the proposal can be found at: http://s.apache.org/RMU Please cast your votes: [ ] +1 Accept S4 for incubation [ ] +0 Indifferent to S4 incubation [ ] -1 Reject S4 for incubation +1 --tim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: IP Clearance - transferral or licensing of copyright ownership?
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:27 AM, Sander van der Waal sander.vanderw...@oucs.ox.ac.uk wrote: On the other hand, the ASF general FAQ states that the copyright of ASF projects is owned by the ASF, more specifically The members own the code [5]. Also the IP Clearance template [6] has a check that says Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF been received. But it seems that the SGA and *CLAs are just license agreements and don't include a transferral of rights? I must be missing something obvious here but I'm not sure what. [5] http://www.apache.org/foundation/faq.html#who-owns-apache-code [6] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html ianal Actually, [5] says, All software developed within the Foundation belongs to the ASF, and therefore the members. Software contributed to the ASF would not, I would think, count as developed within. On the other hand, code contributed through the SGA conveys a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license to reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, distribute and sublicense, internally and externally, the Software. [6] I would think that this means the moment ASF makes any change at all to a contribution -- including adding an ASF copyright notice -- that makes it a derivative work, developed within the ASF, and therefore belonging to its members. And the spirit of the SGA seems to sufficiently express this that people contributing under the SGA thereby express consent for it to happen. The only time this would not be the case is if the contributor is contributing something he has no right to so contribute. That isn't a fault of the SGA. /ianal Don - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] DirectMemory to join the Apache Incubator
Hi Ioannis, welcome onboard! I added you in the initial committers list in the proposal! Otis, are you with us too? I hope so! :) Many thanks in advance, have a nice day! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Ioannis Canellos ioca...@gmail.com wrote: Excellent stuff. I'd like to join. -- *Ioannis Canellos* * FuseSource http://fusesource.com ** Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com ** Apache Karaf http://karaf.apache.org/ Committer PMC Apache ServiceMix http://servicemix.apache.org/ Committer Apache Gora http://incubator.apache.org/gora/ Committer * - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] DirectMemory to join the Apache Incubator
I would be glad to have you aboard. R On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Ioannis Canellos ioca...@gmail.comwrote: Excellent stuff. I'd like to join. -- *Ioannis Canellos* * FuseSource http://fusesource.com ** Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com ** Apache Karaf http://karaf.apache.org/ Committer PMC Apache ServiceMix http://servicemix.apache.org/ Committer Apache Gora http://incubator.apache.org/gora/ Committer *
Re: [DISCUSS] DirectMemory to join the Apache Incubator
Sto inserendo spunti e idee come enhancement nell'issue tracking di github (come ho sempre fatto) e pensavo anche che un gruppo google potrebbe tornare comodo, visto che stiamo diventando tanti - ovviamente però se non ci vorrà tanto per avere jira e mailing list apache lascio perdere... che previsioni hai? On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.orgwrote: Hi Ioannis, welcome onboard! I added you in the initial committers list in the proposal! Otis, are you with us too? I hope so! :) Many thanks in advance, have a nice day! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Ioannis Canellos ioca...@gmail.com wrote: Excellent stuff. I'd like to join. -- *Ioannis Canellos* * FuseSource http://fusesource.com ** Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com ** Apache Karaf http://karaf.apache.org/ Committer PMC Apache ServiceMix http://servicemix.apache.org/ Committer Apache Gora http://incubator.apache.org/gora/ Committer * - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] DirectMemory to join the Apache Incubator
Ooops sorry, wrong address and wrong language :P 2011/9/21 Raffaele P. Guidi raffaele.p.gu...@gmail.com Sto inserendo spunti e idee come enhancement nell'issue tracking di github (come ho sempre fatto) e pensavo anche che un gruppo google potrebbe tornare comodo, visto che stiamo diventando tanti - ovviamente però se non ci vorrà tanto per avere jira e mailing list apache lascio perdere... che previsioni hai? On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.orgwrote: Hi Ioannis, welcome onboard! I added you in the initial committers list in the proposal! Otis, are you with us too? I hope so! :) Many thanks in advance, have a nice day! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Ioannis Canellos ioca...@gmail.com wrote: Excellent stuff. I'd like to join. -- *Ioannis Canellos* * FuseSource http://fusesource.com ** Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com ** Apache Karaf http://karaf.apache.org/ Committer PMC Apache ServiceMix http://servicemix.apache.org/ Committer Apache Gora http://incubator.apache.org/gora/ Committer * - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] DirectMemory to join the Apache Incubator
Si senor Mi piace bere vino e birra On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi raffaele.p.gu...@gmail.com wrote: Sto inserendo spunti e idee come enhancement nell'issue tracking di github (come ho sempre fatto) e pensavo anche che un gruppo google potrebbe tornare comodo, visto che stiamo diventando tanti - ovviamente però se non ci vorrà tanto per avere jira e mailing list apache lascio perdere... che previsioni hai? On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.orgwrote: Hi Ioannis, welcome onboard! I added you in the initial committers list in the proposal! Otis, are you with us too? I hope so! :) Many thanks in advance, have a nice day! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Ioannis Canellos ioca...@gmail.com wrote: Excellent stuff. I'd like to join. -- *Ioannis Canellos* * FuseSource http://fusesource.com ** Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com ** Apache Karaf http://karaf.apache.org/ Committer PMC Apache ServiceMix http://servicemix.apache.org/ Committer Apache Gora http://incubator.apache.org/gora/ Committer * - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- http://www.grobmeier.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] DirectMemory to join the Apache Incubator
Really Cool Stuff Sounds great :) On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi raffaele.p.gu...@gmail.com wrote: Sto inserendo spunti e idee come enhancement nell'issue tracking di github (come ho sempre fatto) e pensavo anche che un gruppo google potrebbe tornare comodo, visto che stiamo diventando tanti - ovviamente però se non ci vorrà tanto per avere jira e mailing list apache lascio perdere... che previsioni hai? On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Hi Ioannis, welcome onboard! I added you in the initial committers list in the proposal! Otis, are you with us too? I hope so! :) Many thanks in advance, have a nice day! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Ioannis Canellos ioca...@gmail.com wrote: Excellent stuff. I'd like to join. -- *Ioannis Canellos* * FuseSource http://fusesource.com ** Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com ** Apache Karaf http://karaf.apache.org/ Committer PMC Apache ServiceMix http://servicemix.apache.org/ Committer Apache Gora http://incubator.apache.org/gora/ Committer * - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: IP Clearance - transferral or licensing of copyright ownership?
Apologies...shouldn't have cited [6]. Meant to cite [2]: [2] http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt Good thing IANAL. Don On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:27 AM, Sander van der Waal sander.vanderw...@oucs.ox.ac.uk wrote: On the other hand, the ASF general FAQ states that the copyright of ASF projects is owned by the ASF, more specifically The members own the code [5]. Also the IP Clearance template [6] has a check that says Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF been received. But it seems that the SGA and *CLAs are just license agreements and don't include a transferral of rights? I must be missing something obvious here but I'm not sure what. [5] http://www.apache.org/foundation/faq.html#who-owns-apache-code [6] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html ianal Actually, [5] says, All software developed within the Foundation belongs to the ASF, and therefore the members. Software contributed to the ASF would not, I would think, count as developed within. On the other hand, code contributed through the SGA conveys a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license to reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, distribute and sublicense, internally and externally, the Software. [6] I would think that this means the moment ASF makes any change at all to a contribution -- including adding an ASF copyright notice -- that makes it a derivative work, developed within the ASF, and therefore belonging to its members. And the spirit of the SGA seems to sufficiently express this that people contributing under the SGA thereby express consent for it to happen. The only time this would not be the case is if the contributor is contributing something he has no right to so contribute. That isn't a fault of the SGA. /ianal Don - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] DirectMemory to join the Apache Incubator
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: Si senor Mi piace bere vino e birra ROFL :D don't you like pizza, spaghetti and gelato? ;) http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] DirectMemory to join the Apache Incubator
Lol, just for a moment I thought to have some super power, something like the bionic eyes which allow me to see the translated version of every foreign text. Maurizio Cucchiara On 21 September 2011 18:44, Raffaele P. Guidi raffaele.p.gu...@gmail.com wrote: Sto inserendo spunti e idee come enhancement nell'issue tracking di github (come ho sempre fatto) e pensavo anche che un gruppo google potrebbe tornare comodo, visto che stiamo diventando tanti - ovviamente però se non ci vorrà tanto per avere jira e mailing list apache lascio perdere... che previsioni hai? On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.orgwrote: Hi Ioannis, welcome onboard! I added you in the initial committers list in the proposal! Otis, are you with us too? I hope so! :) Many thanks in advance, have a nice day! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Ioannis Canellos ioca...@gmail.com wrote: Excellent stuff. I'd like to join. -- *Ioannis Canellos* * FuseSource http://fusesource.com ** Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com ** Apache Karaf http://karaf.apache.org/ Committer PMC Apache ServiceMix http://servicemix.apache.org/ Committer Apache Gora http://incubator.apache.org/gora/ Committer * - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] DirectMemory to join the Apache Incubator
I will ask to change my apache ID in italianspammer :P Sorry again. Cheers, Raffaele On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara mcucchi...@apache.orgwrote: Lol, just for a moment I thought to have some super power, something like the bionic eyes which allow me to see the translated version of every foreign text. Maurizio Cucchiara On 21 September 2011 18:44, Raffaele P. Guidi raffaele.p.gu...@gmail.com wrote: Sto inserendo spunti e idee come enhancement nell'issue tracking di github (come ho sempre fatto) e pensavo anche che un gruppo google potrebbe tornare comodo, visto che stiamo diventando tanti - ovviamente però se non ci vorrà tanto per avere jira e mailing list apache lascio perdere... che previsioni hai? On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.orgwrote: Hi Ioannis, welcome onboard! I added you in the initial committers list in the proposal! Otis, are you with us too? I hope so! :) Many thanks in advance, have a nice day! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Ioannis Canellos ioca...@gmail.com wrote: Excellent stuff. I'd like to join. -- *Ioannis Canellos* * FuseSource http://fusesource.com ** Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com ** Apache Karaf http://karaf.apache.org/ Committer PMC Apache ServiceMix http://servicemix.apache.org/ Committer Apache Gora http://incubator.apache.org/gora/ Committer * - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions
Christian Grobmeier wrote: Surely a podling does not exist until it enters incubation? Beforehand, it is just a proposal to create a podling. So whats the name for Podling before it becomes one? Simply project? As suggested above Proposal. Or this http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Process_Description.html calls it Candidate. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Gora 0.1.1-incubating release rc4
Hi Incubator community, Ping: does anyone have time for a quick review of this RC? I'd love to push it out to the mirrors soon: it's been a long time coming. We need 1 more IPMC VOTE. Cheers, Chris On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:54 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: Hi Incubator community, The Gora podling has VOTE'd to release 0.1.1-incubating. We need 1 more IPMC VOTE. Here's a link to the original VOTE thread: http://s.apache.org/UfY Comments, VOTEs, welcome! I'll leave it open for 72 hours. Cheers, Chris Begin forwarded message: From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov Date: September 15, 2011 8:48:03 PM PDT To: gora-...@incubator.apache.org gora-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Gora 0.1.1-incubating release rc4 Reply-To: gora-...@incubator.apache.org gora-...@incubator.apache.org, gora-...@incubator.apache.org gora-...@incubator.apache.org Hi Folks, Okey dok, this VOTE has passed with the following tallies: +1 PPMC Henry Saputra Ioannis Canellos -1 PPMC Alexis de Tréglodé +1 IPMC Chris Mattmann Julien Nioche +1 Community Lewis John McGibbney Per Incubator policy, I will now forward the message to general@incubator.apache.org. We need 1 more IPMC member to cast their +1 to make the VOTE official. Cheers, Chris ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++ ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++ ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
