date:20111118

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.0-incubating

2011-11-18 Thread Chris Douglas

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:58 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
 The sponsoring entity is normally the Incubator, sometimes another PMC.
 According to podlings.xml the sponsor is the Incubator, so please fix the 
 site.

Woah, I hadn't seen that; fixed. Also fixed a reference to Apache
Flume (incubating), though http://incubator.apache.org/flume doesn't
point to anything, yet. Used
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/flume.html

I couldn't update the site, though (permission issue). I'll ping Jay,
who set it up. -C

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Latest copyright sign-off status [Was: Podlings needing copyright sign-off]

2011-11-18 Thread Tommaso Teofili

2011/11/16 Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com

 On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Tommaso Teofili
 tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
  2011/11/11 Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com
 
  Updating this, half of the items without sign-off in July are now
  signed off. I've updated the list below (though I've not yet added new
  PMCs since June).
 
  Here's the previous email:
 
  On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com
 wrote:
   Here's a list of the projects in the Incubator who need to sign off
   their copyright item; namely:
  
   Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF
   been received.
It is only necessary to transfer rights for the package, the core
   code, and any
new code produced by the project.  
 
  Here's the latest list:
 
  2008-09-29  olio
  2009-02-09  kato
  2009-02-13  stonehenge
  2009-05-08  ace
  2009-05-13  socialsite
  2009-06-25  wink
  2009-11-08  hise
  2010-01-27  manifoldcf
 
 
  in the recorded grants file I can see:
 
  Software grant from Metacarta, Inc.
   ...
 
  and, as far as I know, this is the required paperwork for ManifoldCF
  (previously knwon as Lucene Connectors Framework).
 
  Please let me know if I'm missing something.

 Need to update your status page to indicate that:

  http://incubator.apache.org/projects/manifoldcf.html


done, it should be fixed now.
Tommaso


  Hen

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Actively retiring projects (was: Incubator Board Report November 2011)

2011-11-18 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
 On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:

 We are, however, recognizing that we've had growth issues of our own.  As
 David Crossley pointed out, he made mistakes last month related to the
 Reporting Schedule, and we continue to have issues.  The Incubator is almost
 as big as the rest of the ASF combined.  David posted a plot chart
 reflecting our growth: http://incubator.apache.org/history/

 Excellent plot chart.  As with most plot charts, the end result is a
 Rorschach test.  I'll tell you what I (personally) see in this chart:
 a failure to perform garbage collection.  My personal perspective is
 that incubation shouldn't generally take more than a year.  That
 doesn't mean that there won't be exceptions, and in a few rare cases,
 some that go well beyond that arbitrary time limit, but the point is
 that those should be the exception rather than the rule.

Sometimes when you turn up the heat and reduce the cooking time, the
pies end up being half baked...

I think that it should be possible to reduce mean graduation time for
main sequence podlings by tuning the process but worry about moving
away from graduation by acclamation and consensus towards a contested
system. I think this will happen if we just reduce time and increase
the pressure.

 Now that time is freeing up a tiny bit, I need to document a thread
 from August that would put pressure on projects who haven't done their
 IP handling. I'm less worried about a podling who haven't graduated
 after 12 months and more worried about a podling who haven't managed
 to get their CLAs right within 3 months. We still have far too many
 podlings who haven't signed off on that (first) part of their
 incubation.

+1

Defining a more linear process for main sequence podlings would
probably make sense and focus efforts towards graduation priorities

Robert

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Latest copyright sign-off status [Was: Podlings needing copyright sign-off]

2011-11-18 Thread Jörn Kottmann


On 11/18/11 7:33 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:

You should define 'very small' for Joao and work with legal-discuss
and the Incubator PMC to decide if the item can be signed off or not.

[me=bean counter who points to a field not being signed off :) ]


I reviewed the OpenNLP SourceForge commit log. He did 10 commits, non of 
these modified

or added a file which is part of the code base which came to Apache.

Jörn

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.0-incubating

2011-11-18 Thread sebb

On 18 November 2011 08:10, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
 On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:58 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
 The sponsoring entity is normally the Incubator, sometimes another PMC.
 According to podlings.xml the sponsor is the Incubator, so please fix the 
 site.

 Woah, I hadn't seen that; fixed. Also fixed a reference to Apache
 Flume (incubating), though http://incubator.apache.org/flume doesn't
 point to anything, yet. Used
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/flume.html

 I couldn't update the site, though (permission issue). I'll ping Jay,
 who set it up. -C

AFAICT the problem is no group write:

$ chmod -R g+w kafka

should do the trick.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Accumulo 1.3.5-incubating

2011-11-18 Thread sebb

On 17 November 2011 21:16, Billie J Rinaldi billie.j.rina...@ugov.gov wrote:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Accumulo
(incubating) version 1.3.5. This will be the first incubator release for
Accumulo.

This candidate has received 4 binding +1 votes (1 IPMC, 3 PPMC) and 1
non-binding +1 vote, with no -1 votes. We need 2 additional IPMC votes for
release.

The PPMC vote result can be found here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-accumulo-dev/20.mbox/%3c1465679136.27503.1321560055469.javamail.r...@linzimmb04o.imo.intelink.gov%3e

The Accumulo release process is described here:
http://incubator.apache.org/accumulo/governance/releasing.html

Tarball, checksums, signatures:
http://people.apache.org/~ecn/accumulo-1.3.5rc6/

-1
There's no source release.
Yes, the source is included with the binary, but ASF primary goal is
to release source; binaries are optional and extra.

Also, one or two Java files which don't have AL headers (and don't
appear to be autogenerated).

BTW, most projects release both .zip and .tar.gz, but that is not a requirement.

SVN tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/accumulo/tags/1.3.5rc6/

Minor issue:
NOTICE file says ... its licensed under ... is ungrammatical; should
be ... it's licensed under ...
But better would be ... which is licensed under ...

Lots of problems with missing/incorrect SVN properties; I'll raise a
JIRA for those.

Keys:
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/accumulo/KEYS

The vote will be held open for the next 72 hours.

Thanks,
Billie

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Accumulo 1.3.5-incubating

2011-11-18 Thread Benson Margulies

Sebb,

I think we need a discussion on general@ about source.

I personally serve as release manager for about 3 Apache Maven plugins
per month.

None of them have a 'source release' in the sense you describe.
There's a maven source jar artifact, and that's it.

I'm happy to work with the Accumulo folks to add a full source package
(I think tooling can be borrowed from Apache CXF), but the
inconsistency here disturbs me.

--benson

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:12 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 November 2011 21:16, Billie J Rinaldi billie.j.rina...@ugov.gov wrote:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Accumulo
(incubating) version 1.3.5. This will be the first incubator release for
Accumulo.

This candidate has received 4 binding +1 votes (1 IPMC, 3 PPMC) and 1
non-binding +1 vote, with no -1 votes. We need 2 additional IPMC votes for
release.

The PPMC vote result can be found here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-accumulo-dev/20.mbox/%3c1465679136.27503.1321560055469.javamail.r...@linzimmb04o.imo.intelink.gov%3e

The Accumulo release process is described here:
http://incubator.apache.org/accumulo/governance/releasing.html

Tarball, checksums, signatures:
http://people.apache.org/~ecn/accumulo-1.3.5rc6/

-1
There's no source release.
Yes, the source is included with the binary, but ASF primary goal is
to release source; binaries are optional and extra.

Also, one or two Java files which don't have AL headers (and don't
appear to be autogenerated).

BTW, most projects release both .zip and .tar.gz, but that is not a
requirement.

SVN tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/accumulo/tags/1.3.5rc6/

Minor issue:
NOTICE file says ... its licensed under ... is ungrammatical; should
be ... it's licensed under ...
But better would be ... which is licensed under ...

Lots of problems with missing/incorrect SVN properties; I'll raise a
JIRA for those.

Keys:
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/accumulo/KEYS

The vote will be held open for the next 72 hours.

Thanks,
Billie

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: svn commit: r1203478 - /incubator/public/trunk/build.xml

2011-11-18 Thread sebb

On 18 November 2011 03:44,  cross...@apache.org wrote:
 Author: crossley
 Date: Fri Nov 18 03:44:37 2011
 New Revision: 1203478

 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1203478view=rev
 Log:
 Remove the fixcrlf target (which was added in r463590 and r741205). I reckon 
 that this is now not needed, as the files now have correct svn:eol-style 
 property.
 When people 'svn add' any new files, then be sure about 
 http://apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn-config

Are you sure it's not needed?

It does not fix source files, but generated files, and Anakia/Velocity
sometimes does funny things with EOLs.

I think it might be better to keep the target, but not invoke it automatically.
Then if problems do occur - e.g. cannot commit generated files because
of inconsistent line endings - it's easy to fix them.

 Modified:
    incubator/public/trunk/build.xml

 Modified: incubator/public/trunk/build.xml
 URL: 
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/build.xml?rev=1203478r1=1203477r2=1203478view=diff
 ==
 --- incubator/public/trunk/build.xml (original)
 +++ incubator/public/trunk/build.xml Fri Nov 18 03:44:37 2011
 @@ -91,15 +91,8 @@
             /fileset
         /copy
        copy file=${docs.src}/podlings.xml 
 tofile=${docs.dest}/podlings.xml/
 -        antcall target=fix/antcall
 -
     /target

 -    target name=fix
 -        echo message=Fix line endings due to inconsistent svn:eol-style 
 properties etc./
 -        fixcrlf srcdir=${docs.dest} includes=**/*.html/
 -    /target
 -
        !--
        Site map generation
        --



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: cvs-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: cvs-h...@incubator.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Accumulo 1.3.5-incubating

2011-11-18 Thread Benson Margulies

Sebb,

I was wrong.

--benson

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Accumulo 1.3.5-incubating

2011-11-18 Thread ant elder

I thought even Maven plugins were supposed to now, isn't that what the
changes a little while back to the standard apache profile for the
release plugin to create source zips was for?

...ant

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Sebb,

I think we need a discussion on general@ about source.

I personally serve as release manager for about 3 Apache Maven plugins
per month.

None of them have a 'source release' in the sense you describe.
There's a maven source jar artifact, and that's it.

I'm happy to work with the Accumulo folks to add a full source package
(I think tooling can be borrowed from Apache CXF), but the
inconsistency here disturbs me.

--benson

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:12 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 November 2011 21:16, Billie J Rinaldi billie.j.rina...@ugov.gov
wrote:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Accumulo
(incubating) version 1.3.5. This will be the first incubator release for
Accumulo.