Re: VXQuery: A Mentor's View
Hi, On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Vinayak Borkar vbo...@yahoo.com wrote: Cezar was the original champion for the VXQuery project. Can he still be a mentor? Yes. The Champion role was originally focused on just the entry to the incubation, so we've had a number of cases where the Champion has also stayed around as a mentor after incubation has started. We recently revised [1] the role of a Champion to be more active throughout incubation, but that change hasn't yet much been implemented in practice. [1] http://markmail.org/message/ljqqhldbdlkferq5 BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
About cc'ing general@ or private@ in votes
Hi, We expect the IPMC to be notified of many ongoing podling votes, and recently an increasingly common pattern for doing so has been to cc the relevant Incubator-wide mailing list, general@ or private@. This is a bit troublesome as it ends up with people sending their votes to multiple lists and at least in some cases to it being unclear where the vote is actually happening. So instead of using cc for notification purposes, I'd recommend people to send the original vote message *only* to the original target list and then *forward* a copy to the relevant Incubator-wide list. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating
Dear Incubator, the Apache Stanbol podling is still in need for one more vote from an IPMC member on this release. Please, have a look and make your vote. This vote is now open for two weeks! Best, - Fabian 2012/7/6 Fabian Christ christ.fab...@gmail.com: Hi, this vote is now open for about 10 days and we are still in need for one more vote from an IPMC member to proceed. It would be really great to finish this release vote soon, so that the Apache Stanbol podling could go on with the next steps towards graduation. Thanks for your time, - Fabian 2012/7/3 Fabian Christ christ.fab...@gmail.com: Dear Incubator, this vote is still open and we are looking for at least one more vote from an IPMC member to pass. Would be great if someone finds the time to verify the release. - Fabian *(Sent from my mobile. Sorry for typos.) Am 29.06.2012 08:46 schrieb Fabian Christ christ.fab...@gmail.com: Hi, we are in need of at least one more IPMC vote to get this release out. It would be great if someone finds the time to check before the weekend. Thanks, - Fabian 2012/6/26 Fabian Christ christ.fab...@googlemail.com: 2012/6/26 sebb seb...@gmail.com: Where is the SVN tag for the release? Here are the SVN tags. - source-assembly-0.10.0-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/source-assembly-0.10.0-incubating - stanbol-parent-1-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/stanbol-parent-1-incubating - org.apache.stanbol.commons.solr.core-0.10.0-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.commons.solr.core-0.10.0-incubating - org.apache.stanbol.commons.web.base-0.10.0-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.commons.web.base-0.10.0-incubating - org.apache.stanbol.data.parent-0.10.0-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.data.parent-0.10.0-incubating - org.apache.stanbol.data.sites.dbpedia-0.10.0-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.data.sites.dbpedia-1.0.4-incubating - apache-stanbol-entityhub-0.10.0-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/apache-stanbol-entityhub-0.10.0-incubating To check that the released artifacts match those tags, you can use the mentioned script $ check_release_matches_tag.sh 257 /tmp -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Celix: A Shepherd's View
Hi, On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote: 1) I would recommend trying to accelerate release plans. Agreed. Is there something in particular that's blocking a release? It takes a lot of work up front, but cutting releases is a critical part of incubation. It's not necessarily even that much work if you're already through IP clearance, which I believe Celix to be since that's not mentioned in the report. Once the IP issues and things like source headers are taken care of, cutting a release can be as simple as: 1) tag the latest trunk 2) export and package the tag 3) checksum and sign the exported package 4) conduct the release vote 5) ship it! If you're worried about stability of the released codebase, simply mark the release as unstable (for example with a 0.x version number) to better manage expectations. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating
Sorry for my late vote, everything (build, test, sigs, checks, etc.) looks fine to me. +1 Tommaso 2012/7/10 Fabian Christ christ.fab...@googlemail.com Dear Incubator, the Apache Stanbol podling is still in need for one more vote from an IPMC member on this release. Please, have a look and make your vote. This vote is now open for two weeks! Best, - Fabian 2012/7/6 Fabian Christ christ.fab...@gmail.com: Hi, this vote is now open for about 10 days and we are still in need for one more vote from an IPMC member to proceed. It would be really great to finish this release vote soon, so that the Apache Stanbol podling could go on with the next steps towards graduation. Thanks for your time, - Fabian 2012/7/3 Fabian Christ christ.fab...@gmail.com: Dear Incubator, this vote is still open and we are looking for at least one more vote from an IPMC member to pass. Would be great if someone finds the time to verify the release. - Fabian *(Sent from my mobile. Sorry for typos.) Am 29.06.2012 08:46 schrieb Fabian Christ christ.fab...@gmail.com: Hi, we are in need of at least one more IPMC vote to get this release out. It would be great if someone finds the time to check before the weekend. Thanks, - Fabian 2012/6/26 Fabian Christ christ.fab...@googlemail.com: 2012/6/26 sebb seb...@gmail.com: Where is the SVN tag for the release? Here are the SVN tags. - source-assembly-0.10.0-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/source-assembly-0.10.0-incubating - stanbol-parent-1-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/stanbol-parent-1-incubating - org.apache.stanbol.commons.solr.core-0.10.0-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.commons.solr.core-0.10.0-incubating - org.apache.stanbol.commons.web.base-0.10.0-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.commons.web.base-0.10.0-incubating - org.apache.stanbol.data.parent-0.10.0-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.data.parent-0.10.0-incubating - org.apache.stanbol.data.sites.dbpedia-0.10.0-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.data.sites.dbpedia-1.0.4-incubating - apache-stanbol-entityhub-0.10.0-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/apache-stanbol-entityhub-0.10.0-incubating To check that the released artifacts match those tags, you can use the mentioned script $ check_release_matches_tag.sh 257 /tmp -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating
Hi, On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Fabian Christ christ.fab...@googlemail.com wrote: the Apache Stanbol podling is still in need for one more vote from an IPMC member on this release. Please, have a look and make your vote. Stanbol mentors, where are you? http://incubator.apache.org/stanbol/team.html says: Bertrand Delacretaz, Ross Gardler, Ted Dunning, Tommaso Teofili BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating
Hi Tommaso, thanks for your time and vote. It is really appreciated :) Best, - Fabian 2012/7/10 Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com: Sorry for my late vote, everything (build, test, sigs, checks, etc.) looks fine to me. +1 Tommaso 2012/7/10 Fabian Christ christ.fab...@googlemail.com Dear Incubator, the Apache Stanbol podling is still in need for one more vote from an IPMC member on this release. Please, have a look and make your vote. This vote is now open for two weeks! Best, - Fabian 2012/7/6 Fabian Christ christ.fab...@gmail.com: Hi, this vote is now open for about 10 days and we are still in need for one more vote from an IPMC member to proceed. It would be really great to finish this release vote soon, so that the Apache Stanbol podling could go on with the next steps towards graduation. Thanks for your time, - Fabian 2012/7/3 Fabian Christ christ.fab...@gmail.com: Dear Incubator, this vote is still open and we are looking for at least one more vote from an IPMC member to pass. Would be great if someone finds the time to verify the release. - Fabian *(Sent from my mobile. Sorry for typos.) Am 29.06.2012 08:46 schrieb Fabian Christ christ.fab...@gmail.com: Hi, we are in need of at least one more IPMC vote to get this release out. It would be great if someone finds the time to check before the weekend. Thanks, - Fabian 2012/6/26 Fabian Christ christ.fab...@googlemail.com: 2012/6/26 sebb seb...@gmail.com: Where is the SVN tag for the release? Here are the SVN tags. - source-assembly-0.10.0-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/source-assembly-0.10.0-incubating - stanbol-parent-1-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/stanbol-parent-1-incubating - org.apache.stanbol.commons.solr.core-0.10.0-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.commons.solr.core-0.10.0-incubating - org.apache.stanbol.commons.web.base-0.10.0-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.commons.web.base-0.10.0-incubating - org.apache.stanbol.data.parent-0.10.0-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.data.parent-0.10.0-incubating - org.apache.stanbol.data.sites.dbpedia-0.10.0-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/org.apache.stanbol.data.sites.dbpedia-1.0.4-incubating - apache-stanbol-entityhub-0.10.0-incubating tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/apache-stanbol-entityhub-0.10.0-incubating To check that the released artifacts match those tags, you can use the mentioned script $ check_release_matches_tag.sh 257 /tmp -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating
Hi, 2012/7/10 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com: http://incubator.apache.org/stanbol/team.html says: Bertrand Delacretaz, Ross Gardler, Ted Dunning, Tommaso Teofili in defense of our mentors: Bertrand and Ross already made their vote and now we have one more from Tommaso. Thanks! -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating
Hi, On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Fabian Christ christ.fab...@googlemail.com wrote: 2012/7/10 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com: http://incubator.apache.org/stanbol/team.html says: Bertrand Delacretaz, Ross Gardler, Ted Dunning, Tommaso Teofili in defense of our mentors: Bertrand and Ross already made their vote and now we have one more from Tommaso. So you already have three votes from the IPMC. :-) BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE] Release Apache Any23 0.7.0-incubating.
Good morning IPMC, I am writing today to submit a VOTE to release Apache Any23 0.7.0-incubating. PPMC vote already passed on any23-dev@ http://s.apache.org/cN2 with already 3 IPMC binding votes. This is the first incubating release ever of the Any23 podling. We solved 48 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312323version=12319884 There are 45 issues left in JIRA: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12312323status=1 SVN source tag (r1358099): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/any23/tags/any23-0.7.0-incubating/ Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheany23-034/ Staging binaries: http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/any23/ Staging site: http://incubator.apache.org/any23/0.7.0-incubating PGP release keys (signed using 19FEA27D): http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/any23/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours and will close approximately on Fri 13th at ~9:00am GMT So please IPMCs cast your votes! [ ] +1, let's get it rmblee!!! [ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before... [ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain why) Many thanks in advance for taking part to the review, all the best! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Any23 0.7.0-incubating.
It's time to release! +1 for me. Mic On 10 July 2012 11:01, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Good morning IPMC, I am writing today to submit a VOTE to release Apache Any23 0.7.0-incubating. PPMC vote already passed on any23-dev@ http://s.apache.org/cN2 with already 3 IPMC binding votes. This is the first incubating release ever of the Any23 podling. We solved 48 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312323version=12319884 There are 45 issues left in JIRA: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12312323status=1 SVN source tag (r1358099): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/any23/tags/any23-0.7.0-incubating/ Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheany23-034/ Staging binaries: http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/any23/ Staging site: http://incubator.apache.org/any23/0.7.0-incubating PGP release keys (signed using 19FEA27D): http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/any23/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours and will close approximately on Fri 13th at ~9:00am GMT So please IPMCs cast your votes! [ ] +1, let's get it rmblee!!! [ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before... [ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain why) Many thanks in advance for taking part to the review, all the best! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Michele Mostarda Senior Software Engineer skype: michele.mostarda twitter: micmos mail: m...@michelemostarda.com site : http://www.michelemostarda.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Any23 0.7.0-incubating.
Ooops, I'm sorry, it was the votation for IPMC :) The best. Mic On 10 July 2012 11:39, Michele Mostarda michele.mosta...@gmail.com wrote: It's time to release! +1 for me. Mic On 10 July 2012 11:01, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Good morning IPMC, I am writing today to submit a VOTE to release Apache Any23 0.7.0-incubating. PPMC vote already passed on any23-dev@ http://s.apache.org/cN2 with already 3 IPMC binding votes. This is the first incubating release ever of the Any23 podling. We solved 48 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312323version=12319884 There are 45 issues left in JIRA: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12312323status=1 SVN source tag (r1358099): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/any23/tags/any23-0.7.0-incubating/ Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheany23-034/ Staging binaries: http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/any23/ Staging site: http://incubator.apache.org/any23/0.7.0-incubating PGP release keys (signed using 19FEA27D): http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/any23/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours and will close approximately on Fri 13th at ~9:00am GMT So please IPMCs cast your votes! [ ] +1, let's get it rmblee!!! [ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before... [ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain why) Many thanks in advance for taking part to the review, all the best! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Michele Mostarda Senior Software Engineer skype: michele.mostarda twitter: micmos mail: m...@michelemostarda.com site : http://www.michelemostarda.com -- Michele Mostarda Senior Software Engineer skype: michele.mostarda twitter: micmos mail: m...@michelemostarda.com site : http://www.michelemostarda.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache Stanbol Entityhub 0.10.0-incubating
2012/7/10 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com: in defense of our mentors: Bertrand and Ross already made their vote and now we have one more from Tommaso. So you already have three votes from the IPMC. :-) Yes, with the vote from Tommaso we have the votes we needed :) This is the overall vote result including the PPMC vote in [1]: +1 : 6 votes (including 3 PPMC votes and 3 IPMC votes from Bertrand, Ross, and Tommaso) 0 : 0 votes -1 : 0 votes [1] http://markmail.org/thread/grjbimzq4x77o37e The vote has passed and is now closed. We will now go on to publish the release. Thank you! -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Celix: A Shepherd's View
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote: 1) I would recommend trying to accelerate release plans. Agreed. Is there something in particular that's blocking a release? We recently updated the build system, to be able to only build parts of Apache Celix and therefore reduce the number of library dependencies, there is still some work to be done here. This is not much and we should be able to do this in the coming days. After that we are IMO ready for a first release. It takes a lot of work up front, but cutting releases is a critical part of incubation. It's not necessarily even that much work if you're already through IP clearance, which I believe Celix to be since that's not mentioned in the report. Once the IP issues and things like source headers are taken care of, cutting a release can be as simple as: 1) tag the latest trunk 2) export and package the tag 3) checksum and sign the exported package 4) conduct the release vote 5) ship it! If you're worried about stability of the released codebase, simply mark the release as unstable (for example with a 0.x version number) to better manage expectations. I think we were focusing to much on a stable and feature complete release. We are now planning to do a 0.0.1 release and take things from there. Greetings, Pepijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?
+1 Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com 09/07/2012 3:44 AM Hey All, This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net project (incubating of course..). We're taking a vote for the Lucene.Net community to see if the community is ready to govern itself as a top level project. Here is a short list of our accomplishments which I believe make us ready for graduation: - Released 2.9.4 - Released 2.9.4g (Generics version) - created a new website, with a new logo (a 99designs contest gracious supported by stackoverflow) - Added two new committers bringing our total to 9. - Preparing for 3.0.3 Release within the next couple of weeks - Started work on 3.5 release. This is the process we will follow: - Community vote (this email). All votes count, there is no non-binding / binding status for this - We will propose a resolution for review (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Graduation+-+Resolution+Template) - We will call a vote on the resolution in general @ incubator - A Board resolution will be submitted. As a community, if you would please vote: [1] Ready for graduation [-1] Not ready because... I know I speak for all the developers on this project, we appreciate (and will continue to appreciate) everyone's contributions via the mailing list and jira. ~Prescott
Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?
+1 On 07/08/2012 1:44 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote: Hey All, This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net project (incubating of course..). We're taking a vote for the Lucene.Net community to see if the community is ready to govern itself as a top level project. Here is a short list of our accomplishments which I believe make us ready for graduation: - Released 2.9.4 - Released 2.9.4g (Generics version) - created a new website, with a new logo (a 99designs contest gracious supported by stackoverflow) - Added two new committers bringing our total to 9. - Preparing for 3.0.3 Release within the next couple of weeks - Started work on 3.5 release. This is the process we will follow: - Community vote (this email). All votes count, there is no non-binding / binding status for this - We will propose a resolution for review (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Graduation+-+Resolution+Template) - We will call a vote on the resolution in general @ incubator - A Board resolution will be submitted. As a community, if you would please vote: [1] Ready for graduation [-1] Not ready because... I know I speak for all the developers on this project, we appreciate (and will continue to appreciate) everyone's contributions via the mailing list and jira. ~Prescott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?
[1] Ready for graduation Regards, Aldo. -Mensaje original- De: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com] Enviado el: domingo, 08 de julio de 2012 14:45 Para: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org CC: general@incubator.apache.org Asunto: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation? Hey All, This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net project (incubating of course..). We're taking a vote for the Lucene.Net community to see if the community is ready to govern itself as a top level project. Here is a short list of our accomplishments which I believe make us ready for graduation: - Released 2.9.4 - Released 2.9.4g (Generics version) - created a new website, with a new logo (a 99designs contest gracious supported by stackoverflow) - Added two new committers bringing our total to 9. - Preparing for 3.0.3 Release within the next couple of weeks - Started work on 3.5 release. This is the process we will follow: - Community vote (this email). All votes count, there is no non-binding / binding status for this - We will propose a resolution for review (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Graduation+-+Reso lution+Template) - We will call a vote on the resolution in general @ incubator - A Board resolution will be submitted. As a community, if you would please vote: [1] Ready for graduation [-1] Not ready because... I know I speak for all the developers on this project, we appreciate (and will continue to appreciate) everyone's contributions via the mailing list and jira. ~Prescott __ La informacion contenida en este mensaje y en cualquier archivo adjunto, es confidencial y esta dirigido unicamente al destinatario del mensaje. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente de su sistema el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos. Esta prohibida cualquier utilizacion, difusion o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las especificas destinatarias del mensaje. UTE no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicacion que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Politica de Seguridad de la Informacion, asi como lo previsto en la Ley 18.331 de Proteccion de Datos Personales y Ley 18381 de Acceso a la Informacion Publica - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: About cc'ing general@ or private@ in votes
Hi Jukka, it sounds like a good approach and apologize for my VOTE thread... just applied the wrong pattern :P Thanks a lot, have a nice day! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, We expect the IPMC to be notified of many ongoing podling votes, and recently an increasingly common pattern for doing so has been to cc the relevant Incubator-wide mailing list, general@ or private@. This is a bit troublesome as it ends up with people sending their votes to multiple lists and at least in some cases to it being unclear where the vote is actually happening. So instead of using cc for notification purposes, I'd recommend people to send the original vote message *only* to the original target list and then *forward* a copy to the relevant Incubator-wide list. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: About cc'ing general@ or private@ in votes
No worries, Simone. Not your issue at all. The private@incubator.a.o list has recently seen a huge influx of voting emails. I'm not surprised to see Jukka provide some guidance. Cheers, -g On Jul 10, 2012 9:16 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Hi Jukka, it sounds like a good approach and apologize for my VOTE thread... just applied the wrong pattern :P Thanks a lot, have a nice day! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, We expect the IPMC to be notified of many ongoing podling votes, and recently an increasingly common pattern for doing so has been to cc the relevant Incubator-wide mailing list, general@ or private@. This is a bit troublesome as it ends up with people sending their votes to multiple lists and at least in some cases to it being unclear where the vote is actually happening. So instead of using cc for notification purposes, I'd recommend people to send the original vote message *only* to the original target list and then *forward* a copy to the relevant Incubator-wide list. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
DirectMemory status (Was: Shepherding: chukwa, mesos, directmemory)
Hi, On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: DirectMemory lacks only a release to be green across the launch control board. Looks like a release is imminent: markmail.org/message/a3yczwysqognrtg4 The release is now out, so given Benson's overview from above I classified DirectMemory as ready to graduate. The DirectMemory report says the following on this topic: + There is only one important issue to address in the move towards graduation + +- Understanding process/decision making guidelines (new committer process + is undergoing testing, release process still yet to be worked out) I suppose the release process is now covered. I notice DirectMemory has already added a committer since incubation started, so there's already some experience on that as well. And with many Apache members as committers I think the project is in any case pretty well covered on the process side. So from my perspective it looks like DirectMemory is close to graduation. The only bit I'm a bit uncertain about is the burstiness of DirectMemory activity (with notable spikes in November, February and June), though that shouldn't be too troublesome as there's a steady level of base activity and it looks like the June burst is continuing well into this month. Does that (and my classification as ready to graduate) sound like an accurate assessment of DirectMemory status? BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: About cc'ing general@ or private@ in votes
Thanks a lot for the feedback Greg, very appreciated!!! all the best, have a nice day, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: No worries, Simone. Not your issue at all. The private@incubator.a.o list has recently seen a huge influx of voting emails. I'm not surprised to see Jukka provide some guidance. Cheers, -g On Jul 10, 2012 9:16 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Hi Jukka, it sounds like a good approach and apologize for my VOTE thread... just applied the wrong pattern :P Thanks a lot, have a nice day! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, We expect the IPMC to be notified of many ongoing podling votes, and recently an increasingly common pattern for doing so has been to cc the relevant Incubator-wide mailing list, general@ or private@. This is a bit troublesome as it ends up with people sending their votes to multiple lists and at least in some cases to it being unclear where the vote is actually happening. So instead of using cc for notification purposes, I'd recommend people to send the original vote message *only* to the original target list and then *forward* a copy to the relevant Incubator-wide list. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
JSPWiki status (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of July2012 by JuanPabloSantos)
Hi, On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org wrote: + Still following the objetive of making the first Apache release: + + 4 JIRA issues were fixed since last period, the project website has been revamped, + and few other niceties fixes have got into trunk (for example lucene library was + upgraded to 3.6.0). + + 2 Release candidates have been made, but they didn't succeed because of + technical issues. Hopefully the third RC will become the first ASF release. If I understand correctly, these issues were about functionality in the JSPWiki software itself, not about the technicalities of the Apache release process. Do you have any active mentors available to help out in preparing the release? If not, please post a recent RC also to general@ for review by the rest of the IPMC. A quick look at one of the RCs brought up a few issues, most notably the presence of binary dependencies in the source release archive - a practice that's considered contrary to Apache principles based on recent discussion on general@. + The main issues blocking graduation keep being the same as in the last report: + resolution acceptance, community and IPMC graduation vote. Again, like in April, I'd note that the most pressing blocker is getting an Apache release out. Beyond that it looks like community activity in JSPWiki is at a bit higher level than it used to be for the most part of the past two years, which is good. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Kitty status (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of April2012 by AlessandroNovarini)
Hi kitty-dev@, [cc general@] The IPMC is still waiting for the July report from Kitty. Looking at the mailing list archive the only recent activity I see discussion about possible retirement and a related vote that was just started. On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org wrote: + The community hasn't grown since the last report. Do you have plans on how to grow the community, or are you happy with the status quo? After 1.5 years in incubation I'd love to see Kitty having a clear plan towards graduation. Could you come up with something like that for your next report? Without such a plan in place, and until there's at least some concrete progress towards one, I can unfortunately only recommend that you move forward with retiring the project. I notice some people opposed the idea of retirement. That seems promising - people still care about the project. But please follow up with some concrete activity to justify the continued existence of the project. A good starting point would be the mentioned report for July (I can still fit it into the main Incubator report if it's in by tomorrow evening) together with some concrete ideas on how the project could be revived. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: JSPWiki status (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of July2012 by JuanPabloSantos)
Hi Jukka, answers inline: On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org wrote: + Still following the objetive of making the first Apache release: + + 4 JIRA issues were fixed since last period, the project website has been revamped, + and few other niceties fixes have got into trunk (for example lucene library was + upgraded to 3.6.0). + + 2 Release candidates have been made, but they didn't succeed because of + technical issues. Hopefully the third RC will become the first ASF release. If I understand correctly, these issues were about functionality in the JSPWiki software itself, not about the technicalities of the Apache release process. exactly. Do you have any active mentors available to help out in preparing the release? If not, please post a recent RC also to general@ for review by the rest of the IPMC. A quick look at one of the RCs brought up a few issues, most notably the presence of binary dependencies in the source release archive - a practice that's considered contrary to Apache principles based on recent discussion on general@. If I recall correctly, I think that we have two active mentors, Craig L Russell and sam Ruby. We had 2 more mentors, but they stepped down due to lack of time. Regarding the binary dependencies. Wasn't the discussion on general@ more focused on (or raised because of) transitive dependencies which were brought into the build and not being AL-compatible? In our case they're all AL compatible [#1], so that should be fine. We try to look very carefully to this issue. For instance, recently we added cobertura+sonar support, which weren't AL compatible so we had some discussion [#2] about the suitability of including them, given the fact that they were not going to be used to build the main war. We decided to not include them b/c they weren't AL compatible. Also, the build is Ant based, so we need them to be there in order to be able to build. [#1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-545 [#2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCAMufup6kANwDJT5aVXo4m4D4Uwnj3Srabm=4nvrms_fwbwf...@mail.gmail.com%3E + The main issues blocking graduation keep being the same as in the last report: + resolution acceptance, community and IPMC graduation vote. Again, like in April, I'd note that the most pressing blocker is getting an Apache release out. Beyond that it looks like community activity in JSPWiki is at a bit higher level than it used to be for the most part of the past two years, which is good. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org regards, juan pablo
Re: What does 'project sponsorship' mean now?
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote: On Fri, Jul 6, 2012, at 09:41 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: ...It seems to me that the concept of 'project sponsorship' of podlings is left over from the days of umbrellas -- a podling sponsored by an umbrella would graduate as a subproject of the umbrella. If this logic is correct, then it would seem that project sponsorship is no longer relevant, and we could remove it from documentation All the podlings that I've been mentoring have been sponsored by the Incubator IIRC, so I tend to agree. Typically where a project graduates to is a graduation time decision, not an incubator entry decision, so it seems reasonable that the incubator sponsors a project until the right destination is agreed, even if the destination may seem obvious when incubation begins. Look at it as giving an *engagement ring* without the commitment (yet) of marriage. I think it has value that theres an intention to work together and start the process towards a single community. It may not work out that way - and thats OK - but if it does go well and the podling joins an existing TLP then I'm sure starting out this way (i.e. being sponsored) can be a positive part of helping it get there. So my 2 cents would be to make it optional - keep it where theres a synergy and interest from a real project. Where it doesn't really mean anything is when the incubator PMC is the sponsor and IMO we may as well drop that. Niall Upayavira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?
+1 On Sunday, July 8, 2012, Prescott Nasser wrote: Hey All, This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net project (incubating of course..). We're taking a vote for the Lucene.Net community to see if the community is ready to govern itself as a top level project. Here is a short list of our accomplishments which I believe make us ready for graduation: - Released 2.9.4 - Released 2.9.4g (Generics version) - created a new website, with a new logo (a 99designs contest gracious supported by stackoverflow) - Added two new committers bringing our total to 9. - Preparing for 3.0.3 Release within the next couple of weeks - Started work on 3.5 release. This is the process we will follow: - Community vote (this email). All votes count, there is no non-binding / binding status for this - We will propose a resolution for review ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Graduation+-+Resolution+Template ) - We will call a vote on the resolution in general @ incubator - A Board resolution will be submitted. As a community, if you would please vote: [1] Ready for graduation [-1] Not ready because... I know I speak for all the developers on this project, we appreciate (and will continue to appreciate) everyone's contributions via the mailing list and jira. ~Prescott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.orgjavascript:; For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.orgjavascript:;
Re: DirectMemory status (Was: Shepherding: chukwa, mesos, directmemory)
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: DirectMemory lacks only a release to be green across the launch control board. Looks like a release is imminent: markmail.org/message/a3yczwysqognrtg4 The release is now out, so given Benson's overview from above I classified DirectMemory as ready to graduate. The DirectMemory report says the following on this topic: + There is only one important issue to address in the move towards graduation + +- Understanding process/decision making guidelines (new committer process + is undergoing testing, release process still yet to be worked out) I suppose the release process is now covered. I notice DirectMemory has already added a committer since incubation started, so there's already some experience on that as well. And with many Apache members as committers I think the project is in any case pretty well covered on the process side. So from my perspective it looks like DirectMemory is close to graduation. The only bit I'm a bit uncertain about is the burstiness of DirectMemory activity (with notable spikes in November, February and June), though that shouldn't be too troublesome as there's a steady level of base activity and it looks like the June burst is continuing well into this month. Does that (and my classification as ready to graduate) sound like an accurate assessment of DirectMemory status? I suppose. Though, it's not clear why we're answering that question on general@ instead of letting the mentors run through the graduation guide with the community? This list is chatty though, so perhaps I missed something? FWIW, this shepherd thing is starting to feel like [duplicative] middle-management. I'd strongly encourage a more passive board-style role (e.g. stepping in only when a problem exists). The burstiness, btw, is likely a result of this being a true volunteer effort - AFAIK, no one's being paid to hack on it. Thanks, --tim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Incubation Status - Project Name Clearance
The following item on project status pages needs to be updated: Make sure that the requested project name does not already exist and check www.nameprotect.com to be sure that the name is not already trademarked for an existing software product. (1) www.nameprotect.com has not been free for quite awhile. I'll bring it up on general@i.a.o. Does trademarks have any guidance? (2) Work was done around a podling name search process. I asked trademarks about this, and am forwarding the following with permission from Shane: On Jul 10, 2012, at 6:15 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote: However the Incubator docs should need to be updated. The fundamental point is that you do some sort of due dilligence in checking the name to be sure that: - The podling's base name is not infringing on any pre-existing potentially related software product. As a public charity, the ASF has no business trying to butt in on anyone else's existing name being used in good faith. - The podling understands if there are any similar (but not directly infringing) trademarks related to the name, or that if the base name is a generic word, that the podling will need to be very careful to always brand themselves as Apache Foo (to ensure that we can protect the full name, even if we couldn't protect just the Foo part if it's a generic term or the like). I'd suggest adding the USPTO TESS search system and/or trademarkia.com as search engines. So, how should the project status check text be changed? Regards, Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
