Re: [VOTE] Accept Olingo proposal as an incubating project

2013-07-06 Thread Niall Pemberton
+1

Niall


On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Florian Müller f...@apache.org wrote:

 Hi all,

 I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Olingo into the Apache incubator.

 The proposal is pasted at the bottom on this email.
 The corresponding wiki page is: http://wiki.apache.org/**
 incubator/OlingoProposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OlingoProposal

 [ ] +1 Accept Olingo into the Apache incubator
 [ ] +0 Don't care.
 [ ] -1 Don't accept Olingo into the incubator because...

 +1 from me (binding)

 I'll close the VOTE next Sunday.


 Thanks,

 Florian



 = Apache Olingo Proposal =

 === Abstract ===

 Apache Olingo is a generic Java language implementation of the OData 2.0
 specification which will serve as a code base for the upcoming OASIS OData
 specification.

 === Proposal ===

 The Open Data Protocol (OData) [1] is a Web protocol for querying and
 updating data that provides a way to unlock your data and free it from
 silos that exist in applications today. OData does this by applying and
 building upon Web technologies such as HTTP, Atom Publishing Protocol
 (AtomPub) and JSON to provide access to information from a variety of
 applications, services, and stores.

 The Apache Olingo is a library which enables developers to implement OData
 producers and OData consumers. Basic principles of the library are to
 provide an OData 2.0 specification compliant OData Library, enhancements
 shall be possible in a compatible manner, have a clear separation between
 Core and API, to provide an option to build extensions on top. This library
 should be base for implementing future releases of the specification.

 === Background ===

 OData was originally developed by Microsoft and is released in a version
 2.0 under an Open Specification Promise [2]. A lot of companies did show
 interests in this protocol, used it in products and gave feedback back to
 Microsoft. This joined effort resulted in a new release OData 3.0 in 2012,
 this version became the basis for the OASIS technical committee [3] which
 is currently working on a new version of the specification. This OASIS
 standard release is expected this year.

 The initial Java code of this project was developed by a development team
 that had already experience with other OData 2.0 and 3.0 implementations at
 SAP AG. The current code base implements OData 2.0 and because of this
 version is widely used it is a good starting point to build an open source
 community for the OData standard.

 The current code also comes up with an implementation of an OData sample
 service. On the one side this is an example for users which want to use the
 library to expose their own data and on the other side it illustrates how
 implemented features work.

 Additionally, the code base includes an extension which is called JPA
 processor. With this extension it is easy to expose any JPA persistence
 model via OData protocol without a lot of coding.

 === Rationale ===

 More software vendors moving to OData means more choice for customers who
 will be able to use different implementations. For the standard to succeed,
 however, ensuring interoperability is paramount: in order to manage an ever
 growing context and leverage the enormous portability and interoperability
 issues that a globally adopted standard brings, it is necessary to think
 about how to make the related ecosystem healthy and sustainable. Successful
 modern standards are driven by:

 Clear documentation, built iteratively with continuous feedback from
 stakeholders
 A clearly defined compatibility process, enforced by tools that allow to
 gauge how implementations can be compatible and interoperable
 Accurate compliance criteria, documented in writing as well as in actual
 testing code that measure how tools and libraries are able to interoperate
 A sample implementation to clear up potential doubts and ensure that the
 standard can actually be implemented in real life scenarios
 The above mentioned pieces are able to make the development activity,
 towards an OData implementation, easier and more successful. Having an
 healthy ecosystem will ensure a smoother implementation process, more
 compliant products, and ultimately, a wider adoption of the standard.

 The OData ecosystem has been successful in creating and documenting early
 versions of the standard, yet it might potentially lack two very important
 aspects, that is a exhaustive implementation of the complete protocol that
 can be used productively and to ensure interoperability. As much as such
 artifacts can be developed independently by any OData proponent, the value
 of having a neutral party as a steward of actual code is to be considered.
 The Apache Software Foundation has been playing this kind of role for many
 years, and can provide the perfect environment to foster contributions on
 the OData theme with a great amount of expertise.

 === Initial Goals ===

 Implement OData 2.0, make it final and mature
 Start implementation of OASIS 

RE: [VOTE] Accept Olingo proposal as an incubating project

2013-07-06 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
+1 (non-binding)

On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Florian Müller f...@apache.org wrote:

 Hi all,

 I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Olingo into the Apache incubator.

 The proposal is pasted at the bottom on this email.
 The corresponding wiki page is: http://wiki.apache.org/**
 incubator/OlingoProposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OlingoProposal

 [ ] +1 Accept Olingo into the Apache incubator
 [ ] +0 Don't care.
 [ ] -1 Don't accept Olingo into the incubator because...



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] recommend Apache JSPWiki for graduating out of the incubator

2013-07-06 Thread Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
oh, thought it was enough to link the thread vote, thanks for looking into
it

br,
juan pablo

On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:

 On Sat, Jul 6, 2013, at 05:50 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
  Hi Juan Pablo,
 
  I think you meant to link here:

 Argh, hit send too soon:

 http://s.apache.org/uM

 That's the VOTE RESULT.

 Best,

 jzb
 --
 Joe Brockmeier
 j...@zonker.net
 Twitter: @jzb
 http://www.dissociatedpress.net/

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org