Re: Release vote thresholds
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: ...Ant, you proposed a minimum of one IPMC vote for each release: ... How about simply changing the rules for Incubator releases so that they don't require at least three binding votes, but instead make it at least three votes only one of which must be binding... I would agree with that provided that we require other voters to document what they have actually reviewed in the release, something like: -PPMC members review their release and create a text file in the incubator's svn repository, based on a template that indicates what needs to be reviewed in a release -At least one Incubator PMC member reviews the release, updates the file accordingly, and their +1 vote along with the usual PPMC vote validates the release -For the first release we require at least three IPMC members to participate, instead of just one. This would provide good oversight, while helping educate the PPMC members and keep a good record of the release requirements that other podlings can use as examples. And make sure people's +1s are based on something tangible and documented. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Majority vs Lazy Majority
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 3:29 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: ...This is a bit of a mess Yeah - I wish projects would just refer to http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html and http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html and avoid duplicating that information. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire the Provisionr podling
I think we are done now. Thanks Tony! I will update the incubator report in a few days. -- Andrei Savu On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Andrei Savu as...@apache.org wrote: I've update the incubator project status page. All the remaining tasks are listed here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7041 -- Andrei Savu On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Andrei Savu as...@apache.org wrote: The VOTE passed with 3 +1 binding votes from the following IPMC members: Roman Shaposhnik Tom White Bertrand Delacretaz I will take care of the retirement steps and reply to this email when done: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html#steps-to-retirement Thanks, Andrei Savu
Re: [VOTE] Apache Helix as TLP Resolution
ping. How many votes does it need? On 21 November 2013 12:07, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Here the vote for Apache Helix as TLP graduation. The vote result for dev@helix.i.a.o is available here: http://markmail.org/message/22orwjy2v3d4af67 Vote open for 72H [+1] [0] [-1] X. Resolution to establish the Apache Helix Project WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to cluster management system for managing partitioned and replicated resources in distributed data systems. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the The Apache Helix Project, be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that The Apache Helix Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software project related to cluster management system for managing partitioned and replicated resources in distributed data systems; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Helix be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of The Apache Helix Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of The Apache Helix Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of The Apache Helix Project: * Olivier Lamy olamy * Patrick Hunt phunt * Mahadev Konar mahadev * Owen O'Malley omalley * Kishore Gopalakrishna kishoreg * Zhen Zhang zzhang * Shi Lu slu * Kapil Surlaker ksurlaker * Bob Schulman rms * Swaroop Jagadish swaroop-aj * Rahul Aggarwal rahula * Terence Yim chtyim * Santiago Perez santip * Vinayak Borkar vinayakb * Shirshanka Das sdas * Kanak Biscuitwala kanak NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Kishore Gopalakrishna be and hereby is appointed to the office of Vice President, Helix, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Helix Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Helix podling; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibility pertaining to the Apache Incubator Helix podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter discharged. -- Olivier Lamy Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy -- Olivier Lamy Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire the Provisionr podling
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Andrei Savu as...@apache.org wrote: I think we are done now. Thank you for cleaning up the camp site. Best wishes to Provisionr's contributors as you move on to other adventures. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Release vote thresholds
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: This would provide good oversight, while helping educate the PPMC members and keep a good record of the release requirements that other podlings can use as examples. And make sure people's +1s are based on something tangible and documented. +1 to your formulation, Bertrand -- I think it significantly improves the proposal. I especially like that PPMC votes are *always* binding subject to the requirement that that they be earned through a little extra work. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Helix as TLP Resolution
+ 1 (binding). Good to see Helix hatch out of incubation. Suresh On Nov 20, 2013, at 8:07 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Here the vote for Apache Helix as TLP graduation. The vote result for dev@helix.i.a.o is available here: http://markmail.org/message/22orwjy2v3d4af67 Vote open for 72H [+1] [0] [-1] X. Resolution to establish the Apache Helix Project WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to cluster management system for managing partitioned and replicated resources in distributed data systems. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the The Apache Helix Project, be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that The Apache Helix Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software project related to cluster management system for managing partitioned and replicated resources in distributed data systems; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Helix be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of The Apache Helix Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of The Apache Helix Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of The Apache Helix Project: * Olivier Lamy olamy * Patrick Hunt phunt * Mahadev Konar mahadev * Owen O'Malley omalley * Kishore Gopalakrishna kishoreg * Zhen Zhang zzhang * Shi Lu slu * Kapil Surlaker ksurlaker * Bob Schulman rms * Swaroop Jagadish swaroop-aj * Rahul Aggarwal rahula * Terence Yim chtyim * Santiago Perez santip * Vinayak Borkar vinayakb * Shirshanka Das sdas * Kanak Biscuitwala kanak NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Kishore Gopalakrishna be and hereby is appointed to the office of Vice President, Helix, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Helix Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Helix podling; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibility pertaining to the Apache Incubator Helix podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter discharged. -- Olivier Lamy Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.2.0-incubating RC0
Hello folks, I have created a tez-0.2.0-incubating release candidate (rc0). This is the first release for Tez. Therefore, please do not be gentle. GIT source tag: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-tez/repo?p=incubator-tez.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release-0.2.0-rc0 Staging site: http://people.apache.org/~hitesh/tez-release-rc/tez-0.2.0-incubating-rc0/ Nexus Staging URL: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetez-002/ PGP release keys: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xA9510905F0B000F0 KEYS file also available at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/tez/KEYS One can look into the issues fixed in this release at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ/fixforversion/12324349 Vote will be open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) thanks -- Hitesh - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] helix-0.6.2-incubating
David Nalley wrote: (and incidentally you don't seem to be moving older versions (0.6.0, 0.6.1, etc) to the archive when promoting a new release. - see http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#when-to-archive for more) Anything that is in the dist area is automatically archived, as explained in that document. What they do need to do, is to *delete* all of the old releases from their dist area. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox-0.3.1-incubating RC3
Hello All - Just to follow up on this thread, we will have these NOTICES file issues corrected in the next release and assume that this VOTE will continue in the absence of a -1 vote. Thank you again, for the insight here. --larry On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:40 AM, larry mccay larry.mc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Sebb - Thank you for your review and insight! We will make these changes immediately and insure that they are correct going forward. Do these issues require a new release candidate - or would that only be indicated by a -1? thanks, --larry On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:23 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 20 November 2013 16:09, larry mccay larry.mc...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All, This is a call for a vote on Apache Knox Gateway 0.3.1 incubating. A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 3 +1's, and 0 -1's or +0's and now requires a vote on general@incubator.apache.org. The [VOTE] thread can be found at: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-knox-dev/201311.mbox/%3CCACRbFyjgLrCSahhtWWHK-%3DaeQFM4Oegbe3fQjs-RV2-TAnhdxA%40mail.gmail.com%3E The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-knox.git Branch v0.3.1 (git checkout -b v0.3.1) Tag: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-knox.git;a=tag;h=5a907022dbc2b0a8534de47fe7b8c871c4f075f9 The NOTICE file is wrong; the first 6 lines should be removed (i.e. lines with == and following blank line) Also, the text should be: This product includes software developed at not This product includes software developed by Source archive zip file and signature are available from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/knox/knox-incubating-0.3.1/knox-incubating-0.3.1-src.zip https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/knox/knox-incubating-0.3.1/knox-incubating-0.3.1-src.zip.asc Checksums of the source archive: SHA1: 04bb11360f57c0431c30cfb181e3199868fe6053 The KEYS file can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/knox/knox-incubating-0.3.1/KEYS The KEYS file should really be at the top level of the release area, i.e. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/knox/KEYS The release changes file can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/knox/knox-incubating-0.3.1/CHANGES The release has been signed with key (587C089B): http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x82F9C371587C089B Vote will be open for 72 hours. thanks, --larry Larry McCay - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Transition Incubator dist area
On Nov 20, 2013 Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Nov 18, 2013 Marvin Humphrey wrote: If I've done everything right, it should be possible for Infra to flip the switch and use new-style dist.apache.org synchronization at the incubator/ level. Infra flipped the switch today. We now use dist.apache.org exclusively. It would be nice if we continue on with the cleanup. These tasks remain to be done. Marvin Humphrey The following run of Clutch reported somthing strange. Back in September 2013 the Ctakes project did clean up their distribution area: http://svn.apache.org/r1523922 However Clutch now reported that they need to clean up again. So their artefacts must have returned. http://svn.apache.org/r1544987 see the changes to content/clutcho2.ent file. So perhaps that is a sign of something. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
