Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project
You can treat me as Paul Free?mantle in regex form. Paul On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:59 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: I think so. There's a few things that you want to iron out first, before people start voting on this. - 3 is generally the minimum number of mentors. - I can't find a Paul Freemantle on the apache committers list. There's a Paul Fremantle, minor spelling difference. - You may want to review this section to get a better understanding of the goals: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#formulating the Discuss option just helps everyone look at your proposal a little bit better and determine if there's any gotchas. For example, I'm surprised to see a new incubator project using SVN. - Can you list out your issue tracking preference (should probably be JIRA unless you need something else) - Please also explicitly list the mailing lists your want. John On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Hal Lockhart hal.lockh...@oracle.com wrote: So you want me to repost the proposal with the Subject changed to start with [DISCUSS]? Or should I simply reference the wiki page? Hal -Original Message- From: John D. Ament [mailto:john.d.am...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 5:03 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project Hal, Per customs, would you mind if we cancel this and start with a [DISCUSS] thread about OpenAZ? It's unclear if you meant this to be a vote or something. John On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Hal Lockhart hal.lockh...@oracle.com wrote: Abstract OpenAz is a project to create tools and libraries to enable the development of Attribute-based Access Control (ABAC) Systems in a variety of languages. In general the work is at least consistent with or actually conformant to the OASIS XACML Standard. Proposal Generally the work falls into two categories: ready to use tools which implement standardized or well understood components of an ABAC system and design proposals and proof of concept code relating to less well understood or experimental aspects of the problem. Much of the work to date has revolved around defining interfaces enabling a PEP to request an access control decision from a PDP. The XACML standard defines an abstract request format in xml and protocol wire formats in xaml and json, but it does not specify programmatic interfaces in any language. The standard says that the use of XML (or JSON) is not required only the semantics equivalent. The first Interface, AzAPI is modeled closely on the XACML defined interface, expressed in Java. One of the goals was to support calls to both a PDP local to the same process and a PDP in a remote server. AzAPI includes the interface, reference code to handle things like the many supported datatypes in XACML and glue code to mate it to the open source Sun XACML implementation. Because of the dependence on Sun XACML (which is XACML 2.0) the interface was missing some XACML 3.0 features. More recently this was corrected and WSo2 has mated it to their XACML 3.0 PDP. Some work was done by the JPMC team to support calling a remote PDP. WSo2 is also pursuing this capability. A second, higher level interface, PEPAPI was also defined. PEPAPI is more intended for application developers with little knowledge of XACML. It allows Java objects which contain attribute information to be passed in. Conversion methods, called mappers extract information from the objects and present it in the format expected by XACML. Some implementers have chosen to implement PEPAPI directly against their PDP, omitting the use of AzAPI. Naomaru Itoi defined a C++ interface which closely matches the Java one. Examples of more speculative work include: proposals for registration and dispatch of Obligation and Advice handlers, a scheme called AMF to tell PIPs how to retrieve attributes and PIP code to implement it, discussion of PoC code to demonstrate the use of XACML policies to drive OAuth interations and a proposal to use XACML policies to express OAuth scope. ATT has recently contributed their extensive XACML framework to the project. The ATT framework represents the entire XACML 3.0 object set as a collection of Java interfaces and standard implementations of those interfaces. The ATT PDP engine is built on top of this framework and represents a complete implementation of a XACML 3.0 PDP, including all of the multi-decision profiles. In addition, the framework also contains an implementation of the OASIS XACML 3.0 RESTful API v1.0 and XACML JSON Profile v1.0 WD 14. The PEP API includes annotation functionality, allowing
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release
Due to the fact that the release artifacts are not distributed yet i suggest that we simply start a (new) incubator vote for the release to resolve the idleness regarding the release process and separate the general discussion (if necessary) into another thread. Is that feasible ? Thanks Hendrik On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Previously there was a clear rule 1.) do the internal vote and if that succeeds 2.) do another VOTE on the general@incubator list. That's still the rule. The wider Incubator PMC must be given full opportunity to review any release. The 2013 Alternate Release Voting Process is not being used right now, but even if it was, a VOTE on general@incubator would still be required. The send a summary phrase in the documentation for the Alternate process was deliberately copied from the original text to avoid changing any more than necessary. http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases Original: If the majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling SHALL send a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release. Alternate: If the majority of PPMC votes is positive, then the Podling SHALL send a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release. It is not sufficient to send a summary. The podling needs to formal request that the Incubator PMC approve -- i.e. call a VOTE on general@incubator. The criteria for passing differ under the Alternate process, but the general@incubator VOTE has to happen regardless. Now, we tend to forward IPMC votes from the podling dev list, which is arguably confusing because it doesn't follow the letter of the law. But I sure hope nobody wants to start failing release VOTEs because some IPMC member voted only on the PPMC thread. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release
Yes absolutely. Le mar. 18 nov. 2014 10:33, Hendrik Dev hendrikde...@gmail.com a écrit : Due to the fact that the release artifacts are not distributed yet i suggest that we simply start a (new) incubator vote for the release to resolve the idleness regarding the release process and separate the general discussion (if necessary) into another thread. Is that feasible ? Thanks Hendrik On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Previously there was a clear rule 1.) do the internal vote and if that succeeds 2.) do another VOTE on the general@incubator list. That's still the rule. The wider Incubator PMC must be given full opportunity to review any release. The 2013 Alternate Release Voting Process is not being used right now, but even if it was, a VOTE on general@incubator would still be required. The send a summary phrase in the documentation for the Alternate process was deliberately copied from the original text to avoid changing any more than necessary. http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy. html#Releases Original: If the majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling SHALL send a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release. Alternate: If the majority of PPMC votes is positive, then the Podling SHALL send a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release. It is not sufficient to send a summary. The podling needs to formal request that the Incubator PMC approve -- i.e. call a VOTE on general@incubator. The criteria for passing differ under the Alternate process, but the general@incubator VOTE has to happen regardless. Now, we tend to forward IPMC votes from the podling dev list, which is arguably confusing because it doesn't follow the letter of the law. But I sure hope nobody wants to start failing release VOTEs because some IPMC member voted only on the PPMC thread. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release
If you feel that there is something more to discuss regarding the release process, please feel free to start another thread for it. Please do create a vote thread. John On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Hendrik Dev hendrikde...@gmail.com wrote: Due to the fact that the release artifacts are not distributed yet i suggest that we simply start a (new) incubator vote for the release to resolve the idleness regarding the release process and separate the general discussion (if necessary) into another thread. Is that feasible ? Thanks Hendrik On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Previously there was a clear rule 1.) do the internal vote and if that succeeds 2.) do another VOTE on the general@incubator list. That's still the rule. The wider Incubator PMC must be given full opportunity to review any release. The 2013 Alternate Release Voting Process is not being used right now, but even if it was, a VOTE on general@incubator would still be required. The send a summary phrase in the documentation for the Alternate process was deliberately copied from the original text to avoid changing any more than necessary. http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases Original: If the majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling SHALL send a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release. Alternate: If the majority of PPMC votes is positive, then the Podling SHALL send a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release. It is not sufficient to send a summary. The podling needs to formal request that the Incubator PMC approve -- i.e. call a VOTE on general@incubator. The criteria for passing differ under the Alternate process, but the general@incubator VOTE has to happen regardless. Now, we tend to forward IPMC votes from the podling dev list, which is arguably confusing because it doesn't follow the letter of the law. But I sure hope nobody wants to start failing release VOTEs because some IPMC member voted only on the PPMC thread. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE] Release Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating
Hi all, Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating. This will be the second incubator release for Johnzon. The project vote on the dev list is here: http://markmail.org/thread/okwf7wpczerz2cq6 Vote result: 3 binding +1 votes 2 non-binding +1 votes No -1 votes Git commit for the release is [56c9789] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-johnzon.git;a=commit;h=56c9789b3de1fbdcbf0a260ba2f26fce70171ffa Maven staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001 Source releases (zip/tar.gz): http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001/org/apache/johnzon/johnzon/0.2-incubating/johnzon-0.2-incubating-src.zip http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001/org/apache/johnzon/johnzon/0.2-incubating/johnzon-0.2-incubating-src.tar.gz Site is here: http://people.apache.org/~salyh/johnzon-0.2-incubating-site/ PGP release keys (signed using 22D7F6EC): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/johnzon/KEYS The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. [ ] +1 Release this packge [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... Thanks Hendrik -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating
+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-18 15:54 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Dev hendrikde...@gmail.com: Hi all, Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating. This will be the second incubator release for Johnzon. The project vote on the dev list is here: http://markmail.org/thread/okwf7wpczerz2cq6 Vote result: 3 binding +1 votes 2 non-binding +1 votes No -1 votes Git commit for the release is [56c9789] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-johnzon.git;a=commit;h=56c9789b3de1fbdcbf0a260ba2f26fce70171ffa Maven staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001 Source releases (zip/tar.gz): http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001/org/apache/johnzon/johnzon/0.2-incubating/johnzon-0.2-incubating-src.zip http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001/org/apache/johnzon/johnzon/0.2-incubating/johnzon-0.2-incubating-src.tar.gz Site is here: http://people.apache.org/~salyh/johnzon-0.2-incubating-site/ PGP release keys (signed using 22D7F6EC): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/johnzon/KEYS The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. [ ] +1 Release this packge [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... Thanks Hendrik -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating
+1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating
+1 (binding) LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Hendrik Dev hendrikde...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sent: Tuesday, 18 November 2014, 15:54 Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating Hi all, Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating. This will be the second incubator release for Johnzon. The project vote on the dev list is here: http://markmail.org/thread/okwf7wpczerz2cq6 Vote result: 3 binding +1 votes 2 non-binding +1 votes No -1 votes Git commit for the release is [56c9789] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-johnzon.git;a=commit;h=56c9789b3de1fbdcbf0a260ba2f26fce70171ffa Maven staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001 Source releases (zip/tar.gz): http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001/org/apache/johnzon/johnzon/0.2-incubating/johnzon-0.2-incubating-src.zip http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001/org/apache/johnzon/johnzon/0.2-incubating/johnzon-0.2-incubating-src.tar.gz Site is here: http://people.apache.org/~salyh/johnzon-0.2-incubating-site/ PGP release keys (signed using 22D7F6EC): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/johnzon/KEYS The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. [ ] +1 Release this packge [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... Thanks Hendrik -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Retire HDT
Let me know the details, and I'll see if I can join. My calendar is even more of a mess than usual this week, though. On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Evert Lammerts evert.lamme...@gmail.com wrote: No update yet, we had to delay our chat because of conflicting agendas. We should know more by Friday. If anybody wants to join just let me know and I'll pas on the details. Don't think this will affect the retirement vote though... Evert On 06:00, Tue, Nov 18, 2014 Rahul Sharma rsha...@apache.org wrote: +1 Let me know if there is any update on this, I will conclude the vote accordingly. regards Rahul On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Evert Lammerts ev...@apache.org wrote: For whoever is interested: I'm having a Skype call with Mirko this Monday 4pm CET. Let me know if you'd like to join! Evert On Fri Nov 14 2014 at 9:27:40 PM Evert Lammerts evert.lamme...@gmail.com wrote: Like Bob I would have liked to do more than just monitoring the list, but clearly I haven't and that doesn't give me much legitimacy I'm afraid. +0 from me as well. I've just come back to Hadoop after an absence of 18 months, and I see that a development environment for Hadoop-related computing and data warehousing tools (MapReduce, Spark [SQL|Streaming], Pig, HBase, Hive, etc) and their libraries (Mahout, Giraph, MLlib and GraphX) is still missing, and that there *is* a real need for it. Any cloud provider worth their salt offers a Hadoop as a platform service where you can deploy a cluster within minutes, but there's no way to get started developing jobs right away. And I see organisations struggle with this on private deployments as well. Stacks like Hue and IPython Notebook and simple stepping stone nodes fill part of the gap, but I think we can do way better. I've just come back to this space, and this is a problem I'm addressing for my current client (a bank) as well. If somebody would like to discuss tackling this together then lets set up a short call. I do have to say that looking at the current Hadoop toolset, I'm no longer convinced that Eclipse is the way to go here. Best, Evert On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: CC¹ing folks from general@incubator.a.o as they can likely explain (am currently getting ready for a flight back from Italy to Los Angeles and won¹t have time for a bit, Bob). ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++ Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++ -Original Message- From: Bob Kerns r...@acm.org Reply-To: d...@hdt.incubator.apache.org d...@hdt.incubator.apache.org Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 at 6:58 PM To: d...@hdt.incubator.apache.org d...@hdt.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Retire HDT As someone who has unfortunately been inactive, I'm going to abstain +0; otherwise I'd vote -1 and try to be one of those 3 active folks. I still have hopes of doing more stuff with Hadoop and HDT in the future, but job responsibilities keep shifting in unexpected directions, and health and family don't leave me enough time to do it if not actively involved at work. If retired, will this list remain active? Otherwise, it might be hard to gather the 3 active people... I think there's significant needs that are going unmet that we could be addressing, if people (myself included) had the time to devote to it. I've not stopped monitoring the list, and I do hope to contribute in the future. If it is retired, what will be the mechanics for contributing new code? Would it have to be brought out of retirement before that could happen via Apache? (Obviously, a fork on GitHub would be an option, but that might detract from a path back to active Apache involvement). On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Rahul Sharma rsha...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, Based on the discussion happened on the mailing list [1] ,I'd like to call a VOTE to retire[2] Apache HDT from Apache Incubator. It appears i
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating
It looks like johnzon has a dependency on a dual licensed CDDL/GPL library, should that be in the notice file perhaps? On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Hendrik Dev hendrikde...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating. This will be the second incubator release for Johnzon. The project vote on the dev list is here: http://markmail.org/thread/okwf7wpczerz2cq6 Vote result: 3 binding +1 votes 2 non-binding +1 votes No -1 votes Git commit for the release is [56c9789] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-johnzon.git;a=commit;h=56c9789b3de1fbdcbf0a260ba2f26fce70171ffa Maven staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001 Source releases (zip/tar.gz): http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001/org/apache/johnzon/johnzon/0.2-incubating/johnzon-0.2-incubating-src.zip http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001/org/apache/johnzon/johnzon/0.2-incubating/johnzon-0.2-incubating-src.tar.gz Site is here: http://people.apache.org/~salyh/johnzon-0.2-incubating-site/ PGP release keys (signed using 22D7F6EC): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/johnzon/KEYS The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. [ ] +1 Release this packge [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... Thanks Hendrik -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 9:04 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: It looks like johnzon has a dependency on a dual licensed CDDL/GPL library, should that be in the notice file perhaps? That wouldn't apply to the official source release, assuming the CDDL/GPL library is not bundled with the source artifacts. (It shouldn't be!) Optionally we can get into vetting the licensing documentation of the convenience binary, but the VOTE underway applies only to the source. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[RESULT] [VOTE] Graduation of Apache MetaModel from the Incubator
Hi All, The vote has passed with ten binding +1 votes, no +0, and no -1 votes. +1 votes: * Henry Saputra * Chris Mattmann * Ted Dunning * Sergio Fernandez * Jean-Louis Monteiro * Jake Farrell * Noah Slater * Alan Cabrera * Lewis McGibbney * Arvind Prabhakar I will ask the board to add the resolution to the agenda of the next board meeting. Thank you all for participating in the VOTE. Thanks! Henry On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, The Apache MetaModel community has wrapped up the VOTE to propose for graduation from Apache incubator. The VOTE passed with result: 9 binding +1s zero 0s zero -1s (http://bit.ly/1u8n8eo) Apache MetaModel came into ASF incubator on 2013 and since then have grown into small but active community. We have made several good releases with different release managers, and also add new PPMC/committers [1]. The project also has good traffic on the dev mailing list [2]. We would like to propose graduation of Apache MetaModel from ASF incubator to top level project. [ ] +1 Graduate Apache MetaModel from the Incubator. [ ] +0 Don't care. [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache MetaModel from the Incubator because.. . The VOTE will open for 72 hours (11/17/2014) Here is the proposal for the board resolution for graduation: === Board Resolution == Establish the Apache MetaModel Project WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public, related to providing an implementation of a Platform-as-a-Service Framework. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the Apache MetaModel Project, be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache MetaModel Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to providing an implementation of a Platform-as-a-Service Framework; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, MetaModel be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache MetaModel Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache MetaModel Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache MetaModel Project: * Alberto Rodriguez ardlema at apache dot org * Ankit Kumar ankitkumar2711 at apache dot org * Arvind Prabhakar arvind at apache dot org * Henry Saputra hsaputra at apache dot org * Juan Jose van der Linden delostilos at apache dot org * Kasper Sørensen kaspersor at apache dot org * Matt Franklin mfanklin at apache dot org * Noah Slater nslater at apache dot org * Sameer Arora sarora at apache dot org * Tomasz Guzialek tomaszguzialek at apache dot org NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Kasper Sørensen be appointed to the office of Vice President, MetaModel, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the initial Apache MetaModel PMC be and hereby is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open development and increased participation in the Apache MetaModel Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache MetaModel Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator MetaModel podling; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator MetaModel podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator Project are hereafter discharged. Thanks, Henry On behalf of Apache MetaModel incubating PPMCs [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/metamodel.html [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/metamodel-dev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE] Release Apache Slider 0.60.0 incubating
Hi, The Apache Slider project has voted to release 0.60.0-incubating. The team voted to release these artifacts with 6 +1's and nothing else. 2 of the 6 votes were from IPMC members. Vote thread: http://s.apache.org/a6O Result: http://s.apache.org/e3C Staged artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~stevel/slider/slider-release-0.60.0-incubating-rc1 SHA1: c2c06d3532708ac2ed765ebc465edda1b0067025 Source: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-slider.git;a=commit;h=c2c06d3532708ac2ed765ebc465edda1b0067025 Git tag: release-0.60.0-incubating-rc1 PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=ste...@apache.org Basic build/test instructions: http://slider.incubator.apache.org/developing/building.html Please vote on releasing the above as Apache Slider 0.60.0-incubating. This vote will be open for 72 hours. Thanks! - Apache Slider team - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Concerns about NPanday
I tend to agree with John. It seems that the project is pretty much lacking the activity - mostly Brett is pulling it forward when he has cycles, but it doesn't seems like a sustainable situation moving forward. I am new to the IPMC, so I am not sure how this type of situations is handled, so I am looking for a guidance on this. Regards, Cos On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 04:48PM, John D. Ament wrote: As far as I'm concerned, we've given them a lot of opportunity to get back in to shape. If they're still struggling it's because there really is no community interest in the functionality. If you look at the solutions out there, you'll notice that most people in .NET are using NuGet for dependency management. John On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 3:47 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 10 November 2014 18:12, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: Even a few months ago when there was some traffic, there were really only two people answering any questions or doing much at all (Brett and Lars). I think that this is a real candidate for a personal project. Retirement is probably the right way to get to that state. a TLP need min. 3 active PMC, so if there are only 2 active it cannot work. I would ask the project for a plan (max. 3month) or accept going to attic. rgds jan i. On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Hi! once again it feels that despite best efforts of Cos and Brett the project seems to be slipping. The report is missing again, the activity is very, very low and it seems like the only activity is mentors trying to make sense of what's going on. With the activity level this low: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-npanday-dev/ I would like to ask the tough question again: how long should we give this project before we suggest a retirement option to its developer community? Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
