Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion (incubating) release 2.0.1-incubating RC3

2016-07-02 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

1+ binding

I checked:
- name include incubating (except installer)
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- no unexpected binary files in source release
- all source files have ASF headers

Is there any reason for the installer to not include apache-trafodion and 
incubating? Please fix for next release.

I’m also a little confused by “trafodion_license” in the installer as it states:
“Project Trafodion includes third party copyrighted software
components, which may be licensed under third party and or
open source license terms as set forth in the LICENSE.TXT
file accompanying the Project Trafodion distribution or as
indicated in the applicable source code file.”

But LICENSE (not LICENSE.TXT) has no 3rd party software. Is the 
trafodion_license file even needed?

With the addition of the new 3 clause BSD licenses the number “2” is the second 
license point has been dropped, you might want to fix that.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

2016-07-02 Thread Leif Hedstrom

> On Jul 1, 2016, at 8:00 AM, Jan van Doorn  wrote:
> 
> Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting 
> Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator.
> 
> [] +1 Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator
> [] +0 Abstain.
> [] -1 Do not accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator because …
> 

+1 (binding).

Cheers,

— leif



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator Logo & Branding

2016-07-02 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré

+1

Regards
JB

On 07/02/2016 04:06 AM, John D. Ament wrote:

All,

As a follow up to the current discussions happening, I wanted to get
opinions from the IPMC on whether or not the Incubator logo should be
included in podling websites.

Take https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BrandingAuditJune2016 as a summary
of podling status.

29 podlings presently show the Incubator Logo.  1 podling uses a custom
version of the logo.  This means we're just above 50% matching.  The
branding guide indicates that this is a should, which essentially means
that unless there's some strong reason to not include, it is to be included
on the website.

I believe the usage of the Incubator logo comes from including parent
project logos on sub-project websites, where podlings are essentially
sub-projects, but I can't find anything confirming this.

If we are to require the logo to be present, we must spell out the URL to
the logo to use.  This may be a variety of logos, include transparency
effects, with and without borders, but we should guide projects on where to
find them.

John



--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org