Re: [VOTE] MXNet to enter the Incubator

[Liang Chen]

+1
Good luck!

Regards
Liang

2017-01-21 21:57 GMT+08:00 Charith Elvitigala :

> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards,
>
> On 21 January 2017 at 18:22, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Good luck !
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> >
> > On 01/17/2017 05:20 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Incubator folk,
> >>
> >>I would like to call a vote for accepting "MXNet" for incubation in
> the
> >> Apache Incubator.
> >>
> >> The full proposal is available at this wiki link:
> >>
> >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MXNetProposal?
> action=recall=19
> >>
> >> I will reply to this email with a copy of the proposal.
> >>
> >> MXNet already has a broad community, which I think is clear from the
> >> interest from many contributors in being a part of the project at
> Apache.
> >> There are four mentors signed up, along with 2 or 3 other Apache
> >> committers
> >> looking to be involved in the project.
> >>
> >> Please cast your vote:
> >>
> >>   [ ] +1, bring MXNet into the Incubator
> >>   [ ] -1, MXNet should not enter the Incubator, because...
> >>
> >>  The vote will be open for at least 72 hours, and only votes from the
> >> Incubator PMC are binding.
> >>
> >> As the proposer, I consider my vote already cast in favour (and binding
> as
> >> I'm a PMC member).
> >>
> >> Thanks all,
> >>
> >> Hen
> >>
> >>
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > jbono...@apache.org
> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> Charitha Elvitigala
> Linkdin : https://www.linkedin.com/in/charitha-elvitigala-42a5081a/
>



-- 
Regards
Liang

Binary file inclusion (was [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc4 as 0.1.0)

[John D. Ament]

On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 12:19 PM Marvin Humphrey 
wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 6:41 AM, John D. Ament 
> wrote:
> > However, regarding the
> > binaries.  In a recent discussion (on legal-discuss) it was decided that
> > this was OK.  Ideally the NOTICE would include the information on the
> > binary's source of origin (assuming that the source was eligible to be
> > licensed this way).  In this case, the .tar.gz  is actually the
> > distribution of Apache Spark R that looks like its required to build
> Toree.
>
> I must have missed this on legal-discuss, and it's counter to my
> understanding. Can you please provide a link?
>
> Here is something I wrote to legal-discuss recently, which talks about
> some of the security reasons why bundling a binary dependency is
> problematic: https://s.apache.org/OuNX
>
>
Same thread.  Specifically Mark T's response [1] and Craig's affirmation [2]

[1]:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/995d9ddda07363faff5306154ff3a3aa100a07aad191785d866ae097@%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E
[2]:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5f10a28e5f7bf117599d35e14a00290453c1741d614605950ca897c1@%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E

John


> Marvin Humphrey
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc4 as 0.1.0

[Marvin Humphrey]

On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 6:41 AM, John D. Ament  wrote:
> However, regarding the
> binaries.  In a recent discussion (on legal-discuss) it was decided that
> this was OK.  Ideally the NOTICE would include the information on the
> binary's source of origin (assuming that the source was eligible to be
> licensed this way).  In this case, the .tar.gz  is actually the
> distribution of Apache Spark R that looks like its required to build Toree.

I must have missed this on legal-discuss, and it's counter to my
understanding. Can you please provide a link?

Here is something I wrote to legal-discuss recently, which talks about
some of the security reasons why bundling a binary dependency is
problematic: https://s.apache.org/OuNX

Marvin Humphrey

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree (incubating) 0.1.0-rc4 as 0.1.0

[John D. Ament]

Justin,

Agreed on the -1 due to licensing issues.  However, regarding the
binaries.  In a recent discussion (on legal-discuss) it was decided that
this was OK.  Ideally the NOTICE would include the information on the
binary's source of origin (assuming that the source was eligible to be
licensed this way).  In this case, the .tar.gz  is actually the
distribution of Apache Spark R that looks like its required to build Toree.

John

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 5:25 PM Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Sorry but it’s -1 binding due to unexpected binary in source release and
> can’t compile from source. There are some license and notice issue that
> also need to be sorted.
>
> I checked:
> - signatures and hashes exist
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - LICENSE needs some work  (has a “\n” in plain text in it btw)
> - NOTICE is OK but has incorrect year (also a “\n”)
> - Unexpected binaries in source release (see below)
> - Source files have ASF headers
> - Can’t compile from source
>
> Source release contains several unexpected binary files:
> ./sparkr-interpreter/src/main/resources/sparkr_bundle.tar.gz
>
> ./sparkr-interpreter/src/main/resources/R/pkg/inst/test_support/sparktestjar_2.10-1.0.jar
> ./scala-interpreter/src/test/resources/TestJar2.jar
> ./scala-interpreter/src/test/resources/ScalaTestJar.jar
> ./scala-interpreter/src/test/resources/TestJar.jar
>
> Several of these contain compiled code.
>
> For the license file:
> - Why does it contain a list of copyrights?
> - Why does it include dependancies, only 3rd party code bundled with the
> release should be mentioned in license. [1]
> - In fact I can see no obvious 3rd party code in the release. Is any 3rd
> party code bundled in the release?
> - If there is 3rd party code have the original headers has been replaced
> with an ASF headers?
>
> Following the release instruction I did a make dev and got "make: *** No
> rule to make target `etc/legal/LICENSE_extras', needed by
> `dist/toree-legal/LICENSE'.  Stop.”. Is something missing from the release?
> It may just be that my environment is not set up.
>
> A nice to have the artefacts signed with an apache email rather than a
> gmail address.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#guiding-principle
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] MXNet to enter the Incubator

[Charith Elvitigala]

+1 (binding)

Regards,

On 21 January 2017 at 18:22, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Good luck !
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 01/17/2017 05:20 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> Hi Incubator folk,
>>
>>I would like to call a vote for accepting "MXNet" for incubation in the
>> Apache Incubator.
>>
>> The full proposal is available at this wiki link:
>>
>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MXNetProposal?action=recall=19
>>
>> I will reply to this email with a copy of the proposal.
>>
>> MXNet already has a broad community, which I think is clear from the
>> interest from many contributors in being a part of the project at Apache.
>> There are four mentors signed up, along with 2 or 3 other Apache
>> committers
>> looking to be involved in the project.
>>
>> Please cast your vote:
>>
>>   [ ] +1, bring MXNet into the Incubator
>>   [ ] -1, MXNet should not enter the Incubator, because...
>>
>>  The vote will be open for at least 72 hours, and only votes from the
>> Incubator PMC are binding.
>>
>> As the proposer, I consider my vote already cast in favour (and binding as
>> I'm a PMC member).
>>
>> Thanks all,
>>
>> Hen
>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Charitha Elvitigala
Linkdin : https://www.linkedin.com/in/charitha-elvitigala-42a5081a/

Re: [VOTE] MXNet to enter the Incubator

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

+1 (binding)

Good luck !

Regards
JB

On 01/17/2017 05:20 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:

Hi Incubator folk,

   I would like to call a vote for accepting "MXNet" for incubation in the
Apache Incubator.

The full proposal is available at this wiki link:

https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MXNetProposal?action=recall=19

I will reply to this email with a copy of the proposal.

MXNet already has a broad community, which I think is clear from the
interest from many contributors in being a part of the project at Apache.
There are four mentors signed up, along with 2 or 3 other Apache committers
looking to be involved in the project.

Please cast your vote:

  [ ] +1, bring MXNet into the Incubator
  [ ] -1, MXNet should not enter the Incubator, because...

 The vote will be open for at least 72 hours, and only votes from the
Incubator PMC are binding.

As the proposer, I consider my vote already cast in favour (and binding as
I'm a PMC member).

Thanks all,

Hen



--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org