Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3

2018-02-15 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
Yes, we split up the issues into those we would fix for the Beta release
and those for after that before but before leaving the incubator. This is
all documented on the rc3 page on our Wiki, i.e., it is clearly documented
which items we committed to fixing for Beta and which for after that and
the link to that rc3 page is explicitly stated in the vote thread.

Gj

On Friday, February 16, 2018, Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I noticed a number of JIRA issue from the previous RC have not been
> resolved, including some involving IP provenance and licensing. [1][2][3] I
> assume they will be fixed in the next release?
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-312
> 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-309
> 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-308
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3

2018-02-15 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
Thanks a lot, these should be trivial to fix, will make issues for all and
merge for the next release.

Gj

On Friday, February 16, 2018, Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I know the vote is over but you may want to fix this issues I noticed
> before the next release:
> - How are these wav files licensed? [8]
> - Looks like you make have a dependancy on a 4 clause BSD license. [9]
> That’s Category X and not allowed.
>
> BTW I would of voted -1 on this release as it contains compiled source
> code [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1 ./autoupdate.services/test/unit/src/org/netbeans/api/
> autoupdate/data/dummy-signed-twice.jar
> 2 ./autoupdate.services/test/unit/src/org/netbeans/api/
> autoupdate/data/dummy-signed.jar
> 3 ./classfile/test/unit/src/org/netbeans/modules/classfile/
> datafiles/WithLambda.classx
> 4 ./classfile/test/unit/src/regression/datafiles/left-square.class
> 5 ./classfile/test/unit/src/regression/datafiles/SwitchData.class
> 6 ./classfile/test/unit/src/regression/datafiles/test91098.class
> 7 ./nbi/engine/src/org/netbeans/installer/utils/applications/TestJDK.class
> 8 ./javafx2.samples/Xylophone/src/xylophone/Note?.wav
> 9 ./incubating-netbeans-java-9.0-beta-source.zip/
> spellchecker.dictionary_en/external/ispell-enwl-3.1.20-license.txt
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC1

2018-02-15 Thread Sergio Fernández
My +1 (binding). So far I've checked:

* incubating suffix
* incubator DISCLAIMER exists
* signatures and checksums match
* LICENSE& NOTICE file look good enough, although it may require a further
review
* no binary files included in the source release
* release builds

Glad to see the good progress on the different LICENSE files. I think it'd
be good to assist the podling on a more extensive analysis for the upcoming
releases.


On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:37 PM, YiZhi Liu  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> As we have updated the LICENSE file which caused the failure vote for
> Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0.RC0, this is a call for a releasing
> Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0, release candidate 1.
>
> Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
>
> Vote thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/500fb648e8629249b904d9fc56e773
> 7c5312dfe54c17d4d5d06468a8@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>
> Result thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/afaf45dda45da60692476c56a268b9
> 5dd0663bb193f8c77ac372631a@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>
> PR which fixes the license:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/9701
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.1.0.rc1/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is 1.1.0.rc0:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.1.0.rc1
>
> The release hash is 07a83a0325a3d782513a04f47d711710972cb144:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> 07a83a0325a3d782513a04f47d711710972cb144
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> F42C 1A6E 634C 105E 8D98  5105 CA75 1254 E97B 9FE4
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
> Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.1.0+Release+Notes
>
> The vote will end at 11:35 pm on Friday, Feb 16th, PST.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as 1.1.0
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> --
> Yizhi Liu
> DMLC member
> Amazon Web Services
> Vancouver, Canada
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


[RESULT][VOTE] Retire iota

2018-02-15 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

The vote passes with 9 +1 binding votes from:

Pierre Smits
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Mark Thomas
Sergio Fernández
Greg Stein
Leif Hedstrom
Dave Fisher
John D. Ament
Justin Mclean

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC1

2018-02-15 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

+1 binding

I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE ok
- It’s impossible to tell if files have correct headers or not
- no unexpected binary files
- can compile form source

LICENSE is missing this BSD licensed file [1]

This file [2] seem to be CC-BY-2.5 which is category B [2] and should not be 
included in text form in the release. I know it's just a readme but probably 
best to remove it.

I still have an issue with 3000 odd files not having headers or know how they 
are licensed but hopefully this can be sorted out in a later release.

Thanks,
Justin

1. dmlc-core/include/dmlc/concurrentqueue.h
2. 
apache-mxnet-src-1.1.0.rc1-incubating/3rdparty/googletest/googlemock/docs/DevGuide.md
2. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3

2018-02-15 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

I know the vote is over but you may want to fix this issues I noticed before 
the next release:
- How are these wav files licensed? [8]
- Looks like you make have a dependancy on a 4 clause BSD license. [9] That’s 
Category X and not allowed.

BTW I would of voted -1 on this release as it contains compiled source code 
[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]

Thanks,
Justin

1 
./autoupdate.services/test/unit/src/org/netbeans/api/autoupdate/data/dummy-signed-twice.jar
2 
./autoupdate.services/test/unit/src/org/netbeans/api/autoupdate/data/dummy-signed.jar
3 
./classfile/test/unit/src/org/netbeans/modules/classfile/datafiles/WithLambda.classx
4 ./classfile/test/unit/src/regression/datafiles/left-square.class
5 ./classfile/test/unit/src/regression/datafiles/SwitchData.class
6 ./classfile/test/unit/src/regression/datafiles/test91098.class
7 ./nbi/engine/src/org/netbeans/installer/utils/applications/TestJDK.class
8 ./javafx2.samples/Xylophone/src/xylophone/Note?.wav
9 
./incubating-netbeans-java-9.0-beta-source.zip/spellchecker.dictionary_en/external/ispell-enwl-3.1.20-license.txt
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3

2018-02-15 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

I noticed a number of JIRA issue from the previous RC have not been resolved, 
including some involving IP provenance and licensing. [1][2][3] I assume they 
will be fixed in the next release?

Thanks,
Justin

1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-312
2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-309
3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-308


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10

2018-02-15 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

And also missing license in LICENSE for [1]

Thanks,
Justin

1. ponymail/site/fonts/glyphicons-halflings-regular.svg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10

2018-02-15 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

I know the vote is over but I noticed a couple a minor things you may want to 
fix in the next release:
-  NOTICE has incorrect year
- jQuery mentioned in LICENSE doesn’t seem to be bundled

It also might be a good idea to say if you have any IPMC binding votes when 
calling for the vote here.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC1

2018-02-15 Thread Hen
+1. License change looks good to me.

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:28 AM, YiZhi Liu  wrote:

> Just remind that the voting is ongoing. Please help to verify whether
> the release candidate meets the standard and vote accordingly.
>
> 2018-02-13 23:37 GMT-08:00 YiZhi Liu :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As we have updated the LICENSE file which caused the failure vote for
> > Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0.RC0, this is a call for a releasing
> > Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0, release candidate 1.
> >
> > Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
> >
> > Vote thread:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/500fb648e8629249b904d9fc56e773
> 7c5312dfe54c17d4d5d06468a8@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> >
> > Result thread:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/afaf45dda45da60692476c56a268b9
> 5dd0663bb193f8c77ac372631a@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> >
> > PR which fixes the license:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/9701
> >
> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.1.0.rc1/
> >
> > The tag to be voted upon is 1.1.0.rc0:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.1.0.rc1
> >
> > The release hash is 07a83a0325a3d782513a04f47d711710972cb144:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> 07a83a0325a3d782513a04f47d711710972cb144
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > F42C 1A6E 634C 105E 8D98  5105 CA75 1254 E97B 9FE4
> >
> > KEYS file available:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS
> >
> > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
> Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.1.0+Release+Notes
> >
> > The vote will end at 11:35 pm on Friday, Feb 16th, PST.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as 1.1.0
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > --
> > Yizhi Liu
> > DMLC member
> > Amazon Web Services
> > Vancouver, Canada
>
>
>
> --
> Yizhi Liu
> DMLC member
> Amazon Web Services
> Vancouver, Canada
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC1

2018-02-15 Thread YiZhi Liu
Just remind that the voting is ongoing. Please help to verify whether
the release candidate meets the standard and vote accordingly.

2018-02-13 23:37 GMT-08:00 YiZhi Liu :
> Hi all,
>
> As we have updated the LICENSE file which caused the failure vote for
> Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0.RC0, this is a call for a releasing
> Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0, release candidate 1.
>
> Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
>
> Vote thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/500fb648e8629249b904d9fc56e7737c5312dfe54c17d4d5d06468a8@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>
> Result thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/afaf45dda45da60692476c56a268b95dd0663bb193f8c77ac372631a@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>
> PR which fixes the license:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/9701
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.1.0.rc1/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is 1.1.0.rc0:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.1.0.rc1
>
> The release hash is 07a83a0325a3d782513a04f47d711710972cb144:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/07a83a0325a3d782513a04f47d711710972cb144
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> F42C 1A6E 634C 105E 8D98  5105 CA75 1254 E97B 9FE4
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.1.0+Release+Notes
>
> The vote will end at 11:35 pm on Friday, Feb 16th, PST.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as 1.1.0
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> --
> Yizhi Liu
> DMLC member
> Amazon Web Services
> Vancouver, Canada



-- 
Yizhi Liu
DMLC member
Amazon Web Services
Vancouver, Canada

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10

2018-02-15 Thread Daniel Gruno
With the existing IPMC votes in the original vote, and no further votes
cast in the general@ vote, the release has passed. Yay :)

I'll start prepping for this.

With regards,
Daniel.

On 02/12/2018 02:08 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> 
> As seen below ( full thread at https://s.apache.org/F689 ), the Pony
> Mail community has voted to release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10.
> This serves as the official IPMC vote, with 4 binding IPMC votes already
> recorded. The vote will last 72h.
> 
> The release candidate voted on is available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ponymail/
> 
> Specifically, this is a vote on
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ponymail/apache-pony-mail-0.10-incubating.tar.xz
> (md5, sha256 and sig files are provided as well).
> 
> 
> With regards,
> Daniel.
> 
> 
>  Forwarded Message 
> Subject: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.10
> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:01:46 +0100
> From: Daniel Gruno 
> Reply-To: d...@ponymail.incubator.apache.org
> To: d...@ponymail.incubator.apache.org
> 
> With 5 +1s (of which 4 are binding IPMC votes) and 1 -1, the release
> vote has passed. I'll forward to general@incubator and continue the vote
> there for 72h.
> 
> With regards,
> Daniel.
> 
> On 02/09/2018 11:03 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> Hullo folks, time for a release methinks!
>>
>> This is a vote on the artifacts collected from the tree in the 0.10
>> branch with commit hash a8ea8a044996ba0aea08fe59156edb79cd6f9db8.
>>
>> The tree can be inspected at
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-ponymail/tree/a8ea8a044996ba0aea08fe59156edb79cd6f9db8
>>
>> The release candidate is available at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ponymail/
>>
>> Specifically, this is a vote on
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ponymail/apache-pony-mail-0.10-incubating.tar.xz
>> (md5, sha256 and sig files are provided as well).
>>
>> Please inspect and vet the candidate and cast your votes accordingly:
>>
>> [ ] +1: Good to go
>> [ ]  0: Meh, either way is fine
>> [ ] -1: Don't release because
>>
>> Anyone is welcome to vote on this release.
>> PPMC members can cast binding votes for the podling's release decision,
>> and IPMC members may cast binding votes that carry over to the IPMC
>> release vote later. This initial vote will last 72 hours (or less if all
>> possible votes have been cast).
>>
>> With regards,
>> Daniel.
>>
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3

2018-02-15 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
Thanks to all who voted!

The release has PASSED with the following IPMC votes:

+1 Ate Douma (binding)
+1 Bertrand Delacretaz (binding)
+1 Mark Struberg (binding)

Also, 31 members of the Apache NetBeans PPMC and Apache NetBeans
community votes +1 in the PPMC vote for this release.

I will proceed to publish the release and send ANNOUNCE.

On behalf of the Apache NetBeans podling, thank you!

Geertjan



-- Forwarded message --
From: Geertjan Wielenga 
Date: Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 10:36 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3
To: general@incubator.apache.org


Hi all,

The Apache NetBeans community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3.

We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote
on this incubator release candidate.

Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) constitutes all the modules
currently in the Apache NetBeans Git repo, which together provide the
NetBeans Platform (i.e., the underlying application framework), which
was released as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating), as well as all
the modules that provide the Java SE-related features of Apache
NetBeans. In short, Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) is a full
IDE for Java SE development.

Just like the Alpha release, the Beta release is focused specifically
on IP clearance. With Beta, everything in Apache NetBeans Git complies
with Apache IP clearance requirements:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+9.0+Beta

Changes between rc1 and rc2 -- binaries wrongly included in source zip
have been removed:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-276

Changes between rc2 and rc3 -- problems identified by the rc2 IPMC
vote by IPMC members Justin Mclean and John D. Ament have been solved
or issues have been created:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+9.0+Beta+rc3

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8e9520d5e1e365ed2337940fb629c209c63efae24b0a2e44d50412a3@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E

How to try out the Beta release:

1. Download the artifact to be voted on and unzip it.
2. Build it using the README provided by the artifact.
3. Look in nbbuild/netbeans for the NetBeans installation created by
the build process.
4. Run the NetBeans executable and (if you're running on JDK 8) you'll
be prompted to install nb-javac, after agreeing to its licensing
terms, and (if you're running on JDK 9), you'll be able to use javac
directly from JDK 9 and, optionally, you'll be prompted to install
nb-javac, after agreeing to its licensing terms.

Take note of the Apache Rat exclusions, which are now in a separate file:

https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/blob/master/nbbuild/rat-exclusions.txt

If the above succeeds, i.e., Apache NetBeans installs and starts up,
you will have a Java SE development environment that complies with
Apache IP requirements.

Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3 vote thread:

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f1c5a2a3077690f2c7785ed81c36f1ba1920efa01b26f3e7a5f32f2b@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E

Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) vote result thread:

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/079f610360463621276d6d8c99979991bded812559a34eff4458a073@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E

In the above, note there are two IPMC binding votes from Ate Douma and
Bertrand Delacretaz, both Apache NetBeans (incubating) mentors, and 31
non-binding votes, from PPMC members and others in the Apache NetBeans
community.

The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc., as well as a
convenience binary, can be found at:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/incubating-netbeans-java/incubating-9.0-beta-rc3/

The tag to be voted upon is 9.0-beta-rc3:

https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/tree/9.0-beta-rc3

https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/releases/tag/9.0-beta-rc3

Also note, if tag is not identical:

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/66daa753d25a482efecc5b86fdc00dc31250ca1448b533bfba82a51d@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E

The release hash is:

96974a6c59957fb3d8ff18b9dd8a9323ddb00968

...which is found at:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/incubating-netbeans-java/incubating-9.0-beta-rc3/incubating-netbeans-java-9.0-beta-source.zip.sha1

KEYS file is available:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/netbeans/KEYS

Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, run and
test.

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta
(incubating) rc3:

The vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...

Thanks,

Geertjan
on behalf of Apache NetBeans PPMC

-
To 

Re: Incubation disclaimer in German?

2018-02-15 Thread Christofer Dutz
Ok great ... 

I did tweak it a bit, but I thought it might be worth somehow make that 
available to others that might run into the same situation. This is the 
version, that's going to go into print:

Bei Apache PLC4X und Apache Edgent handelt es sich um Projekte, welche sich bei 
der Apache Software Foundation (ASF) im „Inkubations-Zustand“, unter der 
Aufsicht des Apache Incubator PMCs (Project Management Comittee) befinden. Dies 
wird von der ASF von allen neuen Projekten verlangt, bis diese unter Beweis 
gestellt haben, dass sich ihre Infrastruktur, Kommunikationskultur und 
Entscheidungsfindungsprozesse auf eine Art stabilisiert haben, die konsistent 
ist mit denen anderer erfolgreicher ASF Projekte. Der Inkubations-Status ist 
folglich nicht zwangsläufig ein Indikator für Vollständigkeit und Stabilität 
des Codes, sondern besagt vielmehr, dass sich das Projekt als Ganzes noch die 
volle Unterstützung der ASF verdienen muss.

Chris


Am 15.02.18, 12:39 schrieb "Greg Stein" :

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 4:25 AM, Jochen Wiedmann 
wrote:

> 2018-02-14 14:15 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz :
>
> > I am currently finishing some magazine articles about Apache PLC4X and
> Apache Edgent and therefore sent Sally my documents fort he official „ok“ 
…
> I should add the incubation disclaimer to my articles. As these are German
> articles, I didn’t want to add the official English version, so I tried a
> translation. Would you please check if this is ok to use?
>
> Looks good to me (Native German),
>

And the disclaimer isn't "legal" stuff, requiring precision... it is there
to advise users/downloaders. So as long as the proper advice is provided,
then all is good.

Cheers,
-g



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


Re: Incubation disclaimer in German?

2018-02-15 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 4:25 AM, Jochen Wiedmann 
wrote:

> 2018-02-14 14:15 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz :
>
> > I am currently finishing some magazine articles about Apache PLC4X and
> Apache Edgent and therefore sent Sally my documents fort he official „ok“ …
> I should add the incubation disclaimer to my articles. As these are German
> articles, I didn’t want to add the official English version, so I tried a
> translation. Would you please check if this is ok to use?
>
> Looks good to me (Native German),
>

And the disclaimer isn't "legal" stuff, requiring precision... it is there
to advise users/downloaders. So as long as the proper advice is provided,
then all is good.

Cheers,
-g


Re: Incubation disclaimer in German?

2018-02-15 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
2018-02-14 14:15 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz :

> I am currently finishing some magazine articles about Apache PLC4X and Apache 
> Edgent and therefore sent Sally my documents fort he official „ok“ … I should 
> add the incubation disclaimer to my articles. As these are German articles, I 
> didn’t want to add the official English version, so I tried a translation. 
> Would you please check if this is ok to use?

Looks good to me (Native German),

Jochen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution to graduate Apache FreeMarker to TLP

2018-02-15 Thread Daniel Dekany
Since so far there were no objections and request for changes to the
resolution, we are going to start the VOTE thread around next Monday.
If someone intends to vote, please try to do the necessary work
(checking things) now in the DISCUSS phase, rather than then.

Thanks for the feedback we have received so far!


Tuesday, February 6, 2018, 6:38:34 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:

> The FreeMarker community has discussed and voted positively on
> graduating to a TLP. We'd like to initiate this discussion to
> establish a consensus within the Incubator, and if appropriate, will
> initiate a recommendation vote.
>
> Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/freemarker.html
>
> Community Discussion:
> - Project maturity model:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FREEMARKER/Apache+FreeMarker+Project+Maturity+Model
> - Graduation discussion:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b8777f26a57eb7e2f2189a9b299f453ea2c664227ef36d280962b5a4@
> - Resolution discussion:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9a6e53784b930c2a90dbfb2bc725f3dee6a8611f9606f09185e65fe6@
>
> Community Vote:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e85c72b2a7644005ff44d144e08807362e0461a5f854a1f691a960db@
>
> The proposed Resolution of the Apache FreeMarker project:
>
> --
>
> Establish the Apache FreeMarker Project
>
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to 
> the public, related to a template engine.
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache FreeMarker Project",
> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> Foundation; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache FreeMarker Project be and hereby is
> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> related to a template engine, and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache FreeMarker" be
> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> of the Apache FreeMarker Project, and to have primary responsibility
> for management of the projects within the scope of
> responsibility of the Apache FreeMarker Project; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache FreeMarker Project:
>
>   * Dániel Dékány   
>   * David E. Jones  
>   * Jacopo Cappellato   
>   * Jacques Le Roux 
>   * Nan Lei 
>   * Sergio Fernández
>   * Woonsan Ko  
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Dániel Dékány
> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache FreeMarker,
> to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache FreeMarker Project be and hereby
> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> Incubator FreeMarker podling; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> Incubator FreeMarker podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> Project are hereafter discharged.
>
> --
>

-- 
Thanks,
 Daniel Dekany


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Incubation disclaimer in German?

2018-02-15 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi Chris,

2018-02-14 14:15 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz :
> ...I didn’t want to add the official English version, so I tried a 
> translation...

My german is somewhat limited but your translation looks ok to me for
a magazine article.

-Bertrand

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org