[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Nemo (Incubating) 0.1

2018-12-30 Thread Joo Yeon Kim
Hello incubator community,

The vote to release Apache Nemo (Incubating) 0.1 is now closed.
The result is as follows:

7 (+1) binding votes from:
+ Justin Mclean
+ Dave Meikle
+ Davor Bonaci
+ Byung-Gon Chun
+ Mohammad Asif Siddiqui
+ Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+ Liang Chen

and no -1 votes.

Thank you all for the time and effort to review and guide our release.

Apache Nemo (incubating) will now proceed with the release and publish the
approved artifacts.

Happy holidays!

On behalf of the Apache Nemo PPMC,
Joo Yeon Kim


Re: Feedback requested: New committer invitation template

2018-12-30 Thread David Jencks
I like this couchdb text a lot except please actually invite the recipient 
instead of indicating a desire to perhaps do so at some indefinite time. E.g.
> The Apache CouchDB Project Management Committee (PMC) hereby invites you to 
> become a committer.
David Jencks 


Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 30, 2018, at 11:22 AM, Joan Touzet  wrote:
> 
> Nice work, Daniel - that should definitely be incorporated. It's a big
> improvement over a template that a human has to review before 
> 
> In addition to this, we over at CouchDB found the intro text a bit too
> forceful for our tastes - too much guilt tripping and expectation
> setting. It's also in our opinion premature to start talking about ICLAs
> until the candidate actually accepts.
> 
> Here's how we adapted this email to be friendlier (including links to our
> project bylaws and CoC):
> 
> 8<8<8<8<8<8<8<8<8<8<
> 
> Dear %NAME%,
> 
> The Apache CouchDB Project Management Committee (PMC) would like to invite 
> you to become a committer. Committers are given a binding vote in certain 
> project decisions, as well as write access to public project infrastructure.
> 
> We value your contributions to date, and believe that you are committed to 
> the project. We mean this in the sense of being loyal to the project and its 
> interests. It is a position of trust, not an expectation of activity level.
> 
> You can read more about the role in our bylaws:
> 
>http://couchdb.apache.org/bylaws.html#committers
> 
> Please also familiarise yourself with our code of conduct:
> 
>http://couchdb.apache.org/conduct.html
> 
> While these documents apply to all community members, by accepting this 
> invitation you are indicating that you have read and agree to them.
> 
> Accepting this invitation does not obligate you to contribute. The ASF is a 
> volunteer organisation and it is normal for people's contribution levels to 
> vary. We welcome more contributions from you, but there is no expectation, 
> and this position of trust will not expire through inactivity.
> 
> Of course, you can decline and continue to contribute as you do now. If you 
> do decline, it will be kept private, unless you say otherwise.
> 
> Either way, please let us know in reply to the priv...@couchdb.apache.org 
> list only. If you accept, we will announce your new position on the 
> d...@couchdb.apache.org list after your account is created.
> 
> On behalf of the CouchDB PMC,
> %YOURNAME%
> 8<8<8<8<8<8<8<8<8<8<
> 
> Once this is accepted by the candidate, we then send through instructions to 
> sign an ICLA, which I'm now updating to use Humbedooh's lovely online 
> generator.
> 
> You can see all of our PMC form letters here:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/couchdb-admin/tree/master/email
> 
> -Joan
> 
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Daniel Gruno" 
>> To: d...@community.apache.org, general@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2018 1:24:20 PM
>> Subject: Re: Feedback requested: New committer invitation template
>> 
>>> On 12/30/18 6:41 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>>> I like this template suggestion. It may also be helpful to note
>>> that the
>>> Apache ids must be letters and numbers only as some people request
>>> special
>>> characters in their ids.
>> 
>> Not to toot my own horn too much, but we also have
>> https://asf.icla.online/ which simplifies the
>> print-type-sign-scan-email
>> routine for Apache ICLAs (and does verify that user ID is both
>> available
>> and matches our syntax). Could be an idea to point to that for easy
>> ICLA
>> work :)
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 09:24, Craig Russell 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 Hi Hugo,
 
 The intent is for the PMC member sending the invitation to do the
 check
 before sending the mail and edit the mail so the candidate only
 sees the
 appropriate option.
 
 I'll try to make this more clear in the instructions on the page
 that
 contains the sample email. [I originally had three different
 sample emails
 but they were all the same except for the paragraph B.]
 
 Thanks for the feedback.
 
 Craig
 
> On Dec 29, 2018, at 9:32 PM, Hugo Louro 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Craig,
> 
> +1 for the overall proposal. There is only one thing that I would
> like
 to clarify. Do you plan to have a custom email for each of the
 three cases
 (already have an Apache id, already filed an ICLA, and have not
 filed an
 ICLA), and research ahead of time to which case the person
 applies, or have
 an email that covers all the cases. If the later, my suggestion is
 that the
 email should clearly direct the recipient to choose specifically
 the case
 that applies to her/himself. I mean, have written something along
 the
 lines: If you already have an Apache is, follow these
 instructions, if
 already filed 

Re: Feedback requested: New committer invitation template

2018-12-30 Thread Joan Touzet
Nice work, Daniel - that should definitely be incorporated. It's a big
improvement over a template that a human has to review before 

In addition to this, we over at CouchDB found the intro text a bit too
forceful for our tastes - too much guilt tripping and expectation
setting. It's also in our opinion premature to start talking about ICLAs
until the candidate actually accepts.

Here's how we adapted this email to be friendlier (including links to our
project bylaws and CoC):

8<8<8<8<8<8<8<8<8<8<

Dear %NAME%,

The Apache CouchDB Project Management Committee (PMC) would like to invite you 
to become a committer. Committers are given a binding vote in certain project 
decisions, as well as write access to public project infrastructure.

We value your contributions to date, and believe that you are committed to the 
project. We mean this in the sense of being loyal to the project and its 
interests. It is a position of trust, not an expectation of activity level.

You can read more about the role in our bylaws:

http://couchdb.apache.org/bylaws.html#committers

Please also familiarise yourself with our code of conduct:

http://couchdb.apache.org/conduct.html

While these documents apply to all community members, by accepting this 
invitation you are indicating that you have read and agree to them.

Accepting this invitation does not obligate you to contribute. The ASF is a 
volunteer organisation and it is normal for people's contribution levels to 
vary. We welcome more contributions from you, but there is no expectation, and 
this position of trust will not expire through inactivity.

Of course, you can decline and continue to contribute as you do now. If you do 
decline, it will be kept private, unless you say otherwise.

Either way, please let us know in reply to the priv...@couchdb.apache.org list 
only. If you accept, we will announce your new position on the 
d...@couchdb.apache.org list after your account is created.

On behalf of the CouchDB PMC,
%YOURNAME%
8<8<8<8<8<8<8<8<8<8<

Once this is accepted by the candidate, we then send through instructions to 
sign an ICLA, which I'm now updating to use Humbedooh's lovely online generator.

You can see all of our PMC form letters here:

https://github.com/apache/couchdb-admin/tree/master/email

-Joan

- Original Message -
> From: "Daniel Gruno" 
> To: d...@community.apache.org, general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2018 1:24:20 PM
> Subject: Re: Feedback requested: New committer invitation template
> 
> On 12/30/18 6:41 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> > I like this template suggestion. It may also be helpful to note
> > that the
> > Apache ids must be letters and numbers only as some people request
> > special
> > characters in their ids.
> 
> Not to toot my own horn too much, but we also have
> https://asf.icla.online/ which simplifies the
> print-type-sign-scan-email
> routine for Apache ICLAs (and does verify that user ID is both
> available
> and matches our syntax). Could be an idea to point to that for easy
> ICLA
> work :)
> 
> 
> > 
> > On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 09:24, Craig Russell 
> > wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi Hugo,
> >>
> >> The intent is for the PMC member sending the invitation to do the
> >> check
> >> before sending the mail and edit the mail so the candidate only
> >> sees the
> >> appropriate option.
> >>
> >> I'll try to make this more clear in the instructions on the page
> >> that
> >> contains the sample email. [I originally had three different
> >> sample emails
> >> but they were all the same except for the paragraph B.]
> >>
> >> Thanks for the feedback.
> >>
> >> Craig
> >>
> >>> On Dec 29, 2018, at 9:32 PM, Hugo Louro 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Craig,
> >>>
> >>> +1 for the overall proposal. There is only one thing that I would
> >>> like
> >> to clarify. Do you plan to have a custom email for each of the
> >> three cases
> >> (already have an Apache id, already filed an ICLA, and have not
> >> filed an
> >> ICLA), and research ahead of time to which case the person
> >> applies, or have
> >> an email that covers all the cases. If the later, my suggestion is
> >> that the
> >> email should clearly direct the recipient to choose specifically
> >> the case
> >> that applies to her/himself. I mean, have written something along
> >> the
> >> lines: If you already have an Apache is, follow these
> >> instructions, if
> >> already filed an ICLA follow these other instructions, otherwise
> >> follow
> >> this instead.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Hugo
> >>>
>  On Dec 29, 2018, at 3:29 PM, Craig Russell
>  
> >> wrote:
> 
>  Hi,
> 
>  In order to simplify the process of granting new committers
>  write
> >> access to a project's repository, I'd like to propose a change in
> >> the
> >> invitation letter sent to candidates after the PMC has voted to
> >> accept them
> >> as committers.
> 
>  

Re: Feedback requested: New committer invitation template

2018-12-30 Thread Daniel Gruno

On 12/30/18 6:41 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:

I like this template suggestion. It may also be helpful to note that the
Apache ids must be letters and numbers only as some people request special
characters in their ids.


Not to toot my own horn too much, but we also have 
https://asf.icla.online/ which simplifies the print-type-sign-scan-email 
routine for Apache ICLAs (and does verify that user ID is both available 
and matches our syntax). Could be an idea to point to that for easy ICLA 
work :)





On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 09:24, Craig Russell  wrote:


Hi Hugo,

The intent is for the PMC member sending the invitation to do the check
before sending the mail and edit the mail so the candidate only sees the
appropriate option.

I'll try to make this more clear in the instructions on the page that
contains the sample email. [I originally had three different sample emails
but they were all the same except for the paragraph B.]

Thanks for the feedback.

Craig


On Dec 29, 2018, at 9:32 PM, Hugo Louro  wrote:

Hi Craig,

+1 for the overall proposal. There is only one thing that I would like

to clarify. Do you plan to have a custom email for each of the three cases
(already have an Apache id, already filed an ICLA, and have not filed an
ICLA), and research ahead of time to which case the person applies, or have
an email that covers all the cases. If the later, my suggestion is that the
email should clearly direct the recipient to choose specifically the case
that applies to her/himself. I mean, have written something along the
lines: If you already have an Apache is, follow these instructions, if
already filed an ICLA follow these other instructions, otherwise follow
this instead.


Thanks,
Hugo


On Dec 29, 2018, at 3:29 PM, Craig Russell 

wrote:


Hi,

In order to simplify the process of granting new committers write

access to a project's repository, I'd like to propose a change in the
invitation letter sent to candidates after the PMC has voted to accept them
as committers.


The original is at

https://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html#committer-invite-template


It does not distinguish among these three cases: already have an Apache

id, already filed an ICLA, and have not filed an ICLA. There are many cases
where unnecessary work is done because of improper guidance.



To: joeblo...@foo.net
Cc: private@[PROJECT].apache.org
Subject: Invitation to become [PROJECT] committer: Joe Bloggs

Hello [invitee name],

The [Project] Project Management Committee] (PMC)
hereby offers you committer privileges to the project
[as well as membership in the PMC]. These privileges are
offered on the understanding that you'll use them
reasonably and with common sense. We like to work on trust
rather than unnecessary constraints.

Being a committer enables you to more easily make
changes without needing to go through the patch
submission process. [Being a PMC member enables you
to guide the direction of the project.]

Being a committer does not require you to
participate any more than you already do. It does
tend to make one even more committed.  You will
probably find that you spend more time here.

Of course, you can decline and instead remain as a
contributor, participating as you do now.

A. This personal invitation is a chance for you to
accept or decline in private.  Either way, please
let us know in reply to the [priv...@project.apache.org]
address only.

[check http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html]
[B. If you accept, since you already have an Apache id,
the PMC will grant you write access to the repository.
]

[check http://people.apache.org/unlistedclas.html]
[B. If you accept, since you already have an iCLA on file,
the PMC will request an Apache id for you. In your response,
please choose an id that is not already in use. See
http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
]

[B. If you accept, the next step is to register an iCLA:
   1. Details of the iCLA and the forms are found
   through this link: http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas

   2. Instructions for its completion and return to
   the Secretary of the ASF are found at
   http://www.apache.org/licenses/#submitting
   Do not submit ICLAs to anyone but secretary, but
   please do cc: [priv...@project.apache.org]

   3. When you transmit the completed iCLA, request
   to notify the Apache [Project] and choose a
   unique Apache id. Look to see if your preferred
   id is already taken at
   http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
   This will allow the Secretary to notify the PMC
   when your iCLA has been recorded.
]

When your reply to this invitation is received, you will
receive a follow-up message with the next steps for
establishing you as a committer.

Craig L Russell
Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 

Re: Feedback requested: New committer invitation template

2018-12-30 Thread Matt Sicker
I like this template suggestion. It may also be helpful to note that the
Apache ids must be letters and numbers only as some people request special
characters in their ids.

On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 09:24, Craig Russell  wrote:

> Hi Hugo,
>
> The intent is for the PMC member sending the invitation to do the check
> before sending the mail and edit the mail so the candidate only sees the
> appropriate option.
>
> I'll try to make this more clear in the instructions on the page that
> contains the sample email. [I originally had three different sample emails
> but they were all the same except for the paragraph B.]
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> Craig
>
> > On Dec 29, 2018, at 9:32 PM, Hugo Louro  wrote:
> >
> > Hi Craig,
> >
> > +1 for the overall proposal. There is only one thing that I would like
> to clarify. Do you plan to have a custom email for each of the three cases
> (already have an Apache id, already filed an ICLA, and have not filed an
> ICLA), and research ahead of time to which case the person applies, or have
> an email that covers all the cases. If the later, my suggestion is that the
> email should clearly direct the recipient to choose specifically the case
> that applies to her/himself. I mean, have written something along the
> lines: If you already have an Apache is, follow these instructions, if
> already filed an ICLA follow these other instructions, otherwise follow
> this instead.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hugo
> >
> >> On Dec 29, 2018, at 3:29 PM, Craig Russell 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> In order to simplify the process of granting new committers write
> access to a project's repository, I'd like to propose a change in the
> invitation letter sent to candidates after the PMC has voted to accept them
> as committers.
> >>
> >> The original is at
> https://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html#committer-invite-template
> >>
> >> It does not distinguish among these three cases: already have an Apache
> id, already filed an ICLA, and have not filed an ICLA. There are many cases
> where unnecessary work is done because of improper guidance.
> >>
> >> 
> >> To: joeblo...@foo.net
> >> Cc: private@[PROJECT].apache.org
> >> Subject: Invitation to become [PROJECT] committer: Joe Bloggs
> >>
> >> Hello [invitee name],
> >>
> >> The [Project] Project Management Committee] (PMC)
> >> hereby offers you committer privileges to the project
> >> [as well as membership in the PMC]. These privileges are
> >> offered on the understanding that you'll use them
> >> reasonably and with common sense. We like to work on trust
> >> rather than unnecessary constraints.
> >>
> >> Being a committer enables you to more easily make
> >> changes without needing to go through the patch
> >> submission process. [Being a PMC member enables you
> >> to guide the direction of the project.]
> >>
> >> Being a committer does not require you to
> >> participate any more than you already do. It does
> >> tend to make one even more committed.  You will
> >> probably find that you spend more time here.
> >>
> >> Of course, you can decline and instead remain as a
> >> contributor, participating as you do now.
> >>
> >> A. This personal invitation is a chance for you to
> >> accept or decline in private.  Either way, please
> >> let us know in reply to the [priv...@project.apache.org]
> >> address only.
> >>
> >> [check http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html]
> >> [B. If you accept, since you already have an Apache id,
> >> the PMC will grant you write access to the repository.
> >> ]
> >>
> >> [check http://people.apache.org/unlistedclas.html]
> >> [B. If you accept, since you already have an iCLA on file,
> >> the PMC will request an Apache id for you. In your response,
> >> please choose an id that is not already in use. See
> >> http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
> >> ]
> >>
> >> [B. If you accept, the next step is to register an iCLA:
> >>   1. Details of the iCLA and the forms are found
> >>   through this link: http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
> >>
> >>   2. Instructions for its completion and return to
> >>   the Secretary of the ASF are found at
> >>   http://www.apache.org/licenses/#submitting
> >>   Do not submit ICLAs to anyone but secretary, but
> >>   please do cc: [priv...@project.apache.org]
> >>
> >>   3. When you transmit the completed iCLA, request
> >>   to notify the Apache [Project] and choose a
> >>   unique Apache id. Look to see if your preferred
> >>   id is already taken at
> >>   http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
> >>   This will allow the Secretary to notify the PMC
> >>   when your iCLA has been recorded.
> >> ]
> >>
> >> When your reply to this invitation is received, you will
> >> receive a follow-up message with the next steps for
> >> establishing you as a committer.
> >>
> >> Craig L Russell
> >> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
> >> c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
> >>
> >>
> >> 

Re: Feedback requested: New committer invitation template

2018-12-30 Thread Craig Russell
Hi Hugo,

The intent is for the PMC member sending the invitation to do the check before 
sending the mail and edit the mail so the candidate only sees the appropriate 
option. 

I'll try to make this more clear in the instructions on the page that contains 
the sample email. [I originally had three different sample emails but they were 
all the same except for the paragraph B.]

Thanks for the feedback.

Craig

> On Dec 29, 2018, at 9:32 PM, Hugo Louro  wrote:
> 
> Hi Craig, 
> 
> +1 for the overall proposal. There is only one thing that I would like to 
> clarify. Do you plan to have a custom email for each of the three cases 
> (already have an Apache id, already filed an ICLA, and have not filed an 
> ICLA), and research ahead of time to which case the person applies, or have 
> an email that covers all the cases. If the later, my suggestion is that the 
> email should clearly direct the recipient to choose specifically the case 
> that applies to her/himself. I mean, have written something along the lines: 
> If you already have an Apache is, follow these instructions, if already filed 
> an ICLA follow these other instructions, otherwise follow this instead. 
> 
> Thanks,
> Hugo
> 
>> On Dec 29, 2018, at 3:29 PM, Craig Russell  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> In order to simplify the process of granting new committers write access to 
>> a project's repository, I'd like to propose a change in the invitation 
>> letter sent to candidates after the PMC has voted to accept them as 
>> committers.
>> 
>> The original is at 
>> https://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html#committer-invite-template
>> 
>> It does not distinguish among these three cases: already have an Apache id, 
>> already filed an ICLA, and have not filed an ICLA. There are many cases 
>> where unnecessary work is done because of improper guidance.
>> 
>> 
>> To: joeblo...@foo.net
>> Cc: private@[PROJECT].apache.org
>> Subject: Invitation to become [PROJECT] committer: Joe Bloggs
>> 
>> Hello [invitee name],
>> 
>> The [Project] Project Management Committee] (PMC) 
>> hereby offers you committer privileges to the project 
>> [as well as membership in the PMC]. These privileges are
>> offered on the understanding that you'll use them
>> reasonably and with common sense. We like to work on trust
>> rather than unnecessary constraints.
>> 
>> Being a committer enables you to more easily make 
>> changes without needing to go through the patch 
>> submission process. [Being a PMC member enables you 
>> to guide the direction of the project.]
>> 
>> Being a committer does not require you to 
>> participate any more than you already do. It does 
>> tend to make one even more committed.  You will 
>> probably find that you spend more time here.
>> 
>> Of course, you can decline and instead remain as a 
>> contributor, participating as you do now.
>> 
>> A. This personal invitation is a chance for you to 
>> accept or decline in private.  Either way, please 
>> let us know in reply to the [priv...@project.apache.org] 
>> address only.
>> 
>> [check http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html]
>> [B. If you accept, since you already have an Apache id,
>> the PMC will grant you write access to the repository.
>> ]
>> 
>> [check http://people.apache.org/unlistedclas.html]
>> [B. If you accept, since you already have an iCLA on file,
>> the PMC will request an Apache id for you. In your response,
>> please choose an id that is not already in use. See
>> http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
>> ]
>> 
>> [B. If you accept, the next step is to register an iCLA:
>>   1. Details of the iCLA and the forms are found 
>>   through this link: http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
>> 
>>   2. Instructions for its completion and return to 
>>   the Secretary of the ASF are found at
>>   http://www.apache.org/licenses/#submitting
>>   Do not submit ICLAs to anyone but secretary, but
>>   please do cc: [priv...@project.apache.org] 
>> 
>>   3. When you transmit the completed iCLA, request 
>>   to notify the Apache [Project] and choose a 
>>   unique Apache id. Look to see if your preferred 
>>   id is already taken at 
>>   http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html 
>>   This will allow the Secretary to notify the PMC 
>>   when your iCLA has been recorded.
>> ]
>> 
>> When your reply to this invitation is received, you will 
>> receive a follow-up message with the next steps for 
>> establishing you as a committer.
>> 
>> Craig L Russell
>> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
>> c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For