Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.1.rc0

[Sheng Zha]

As of now we still need one more binding vote for this release to pass. We'd 
appreciate it very much if people w/ binding votes on this list could help out. 
Thanks.

-sz

On 2019/05/07 05:51:09, Junru Shao  wrote: 
> Dear community,
> 
> This is a gentle remainder that our vote for releasing Apache MXNet
> (incubating) version 1.4.1.rc0 has been going on for more than 70 hours. We
> need 3 binding +1 votes and more +1 votes than -1 votes for this release.
> Please help us out if you are available :-)
> 
> Thanks,
> Junru
> 
> 
> On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 3:38 PM Justin Mclean  wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Therefore, it is more clear to say “the vote will be open for at least
> > 72 hours, until we got enough votes”.
> >
> > So why not say that? :-) Sometime vote will take longer than 72 hours.
> > Have your mentor or any other IPMC member voted on this release? If not do
> > you  know why?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Omid 1.0.1 (incubating)

[Yoni Gottesman]

This vote passes with 3 +1 votes (3 bindings) and no 0 or -1 votes.

+1 votes
PMC Members:
* James Taylor
* Alan Gates
* Lars Hofhansl

0 votes
* No votes

-1 votes
* No votes

Vote 
thread:https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2eea55fba2c56b78339913c99ca2573dfc21de3ae29821a6aaad13b0@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E

I'll continue in the release process and announce a release in the
next few days.


On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 12:29 AM Alan Gates  wrote:

> +1.  Did a build with a clean mvn repo and profile for HBase-2, looked at
> the LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files, checked for any binary files in
> the distribution, and ran rat.
>
> Alan.
>
> On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 11:56 AM la...@apache.org  wrote:
>
> >  Transferring my +1 from the Omid dev list.
> > On Sunday, May 5, 2019, 1:56:57 AM EDT, Yoni Gottesman <
> > yon...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >  The Apache Omid community has voted on and approved a proposal
> > to release Apache Omid 1.0.1-incubating.
> >
> > PPMC Vote Call:
> >
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/omid-dev/201905.mbox/%3CCAFWCdOqa0yC8yPhF26BG0fX5_guWEV2h3%2B9n2KxRf1CPePVtUA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > PPMC Vote Result:
> >
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/omid-dev/201905.mbox/%3CCAAF1Jdi41sWKTfy6%2B-FY3JA8NHQcqJ17-fNB_sW%3DZOuOKph%2Bmg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > PPMC Vote Summary:
> > 4 binding (IPMC member) +1 votes
> > 0 non-binding PPMC member +1 votes
> > No -1 votes
> >
> > Git tag for the
> > release:
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-omid.git;a=tag;h=aca4d171b12cc18b8cd482e5f2411b86be1b17e5
> >
> > Sources for the
> > release:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/omid/1.0.1-rc0/apache-omid-incubating-1.0.1-src.tar.gz
> >
> > Source release verification:
> >   PGP Signature:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/omid/1.0.1-rc0/apache-omid-incubating-1.0.1-src.tar.gz.asc
> >
> >   SHA512 Hash:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/omid/1.0.1-rc0/apache-omid-incubating-1.0.1-src.tar.gz.sha512
> >
> >
> >   Keys to verify the signature of the release artifact are available
> > at:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/omid/1.0.1-rc0/KEYS
> >
> > We request the permission of IPMC to publish the above release candidate
> as
> > Apache Omid 1.0.1-incubating. Please try out the package and vote.
> >
> > The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of
> > votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Omid 1.0.1-incubating
> > [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Please add (binding) if your vote is binding.
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache Zipkin (incubating) version 2.13.0

[Raja Sundaram Ganesan]

Apologies for missing the voting link

The permalink for the voting can be found here.

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/21014435bd33f7b514b54d5ed33641a2b562ceb47de1241037b34bb4@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E

Thanks,

The Apache Zipkin (Incubating) Team


-

To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org

For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 2:37 PM Raja Sundaram Ganesan 
wrote:

> Thanks to everyone who has participated.
>
> We’ve received 3 +1 binding votes and 4 +1 non-binding vote:
>
>
> +1 binding, Willem Ning Jiang
>
> +1 binding, Andriy Redko
>
> +1 binding, Ignasi Barrera
>
>
> +1 non-binding, Jorge Quilcate
>
> +1 non-binding, Zoltán Nagy
>
> +1 non-binding, Adrian Cole
>
> +1 non-binding, José Carlos Chávez
>
>
> We will work to complete the release process.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> The Apache Zipkin (Incubating) Team
>
>
> -
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 7:51 AM Adrian Cole  wrote:
>
>> FYI there was another binding +1 vote on the other thread from Ignasi
>> Barrera
>>
>>
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/fcc730ad01eb55293f7a174a3b5301f4a277b6222c7bb821d33faf2e@%3Cdev.zipkin.apache.org%3E
>>
>> On 2019/05/07 14:25:42, Raja Sundaram Ganesan 
>> wrote:
>> > Hello IPMC
>> > The Apache Zipkin community has voted on and approved a proposal to
>> release
>> > Apache Zipkin API (incubating) version 0.2.1. The voting thread can be
>> > found here:
>> >
>> >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9d4bbf52bd93a3907737b6cf445b5465607b7dd260a4bdc2a519e6ab@%3Cdev.zipkin.apache.org%3E
>> >
>> > Two binding +1 vote from mentors Willem Ning Jiang and Andriy Redko
>> carry
>> > over from the dev list thread.
>> >
>> > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
>> > incubator release.
>> >
>> > Apache Zipkin (incubating) is the main repository Zipkin Server which
>> > includes Collectors, UI, Storage implementation.
>> >
>> > The release candidates:
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/zipkin/zipkin/2.13.0/
>> >
>> > Git tag for the release:
>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-zipkin/tree/v2.13.0
>> >
>> > Hash for the release tag:
>> >
>> > 7c08091d3f8b0428d1d78839d3bef0f6887746f2
>> >
>> > Release Notes:
>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-zipkin/releases/tag/v2.13.0
>> >
>> > The artifacts have been signed with Key: DA805D02, which can be found
>> > in the keys file:
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/zipkin/KEYS
>> >
>> > Verification Hints:
>> > For your convenience, the below includes a detailed how-to on verifying
>> > a source release. Please note that this document is a work-in-progress
>> >
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZIPKIN/Verifying+a+Source+
>> > Release
>> >
>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
>> number
>> > of votes are reached.
>> >
>> > Please vote accordingly:
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 approve
>> > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > The Apache Zipkin (Incubating) Team
>> >
>> > -
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> >
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>

[VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache Zipkin (incubating) version 2.13.0

[Raja Sundaram Ganesan]

Thanks to everyone who has participated.

We’ve received 3 +1 binding votes and 4 +1 non-binding vote:


+1 binding, Willem Ning Jiang

+1 binding, Andriy Redko

+1 binding, Ignasi Barrera


+1 non-binding, Jorge Quilcate

+1 non-binding, Zoltán Nagy

+1 non-binding, Adrian Cole

+1 non-binding, José Carlos Chávez


We will work to complete the release process.


Thanks,

The Apache Zipkin (Incubating) Team


-

To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org

For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 7:51 AM Adrian Cole  wrote:

> FYI there was another binding +1 vote on the other thread from Ignasi
> Barrera
>
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/fcc730ad01eb55293f7a174a3b5301f4a277b6222c7bb821d33faf2e@%3Cdev.zipkin.apache.org%3E
>
> On 2019/05/07 14:25:42, Raja Sundaram Ganesan  wrote:
> > Hello IPMC
> > The Apache Zipkin community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release
> > Apache Zipkin API (incubating) version 0.2.1. The voting thread can be
> > found here:
> >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9d4bbf52bd93a3907737b6cf445b5465607b7dd260a4bdc2a519e6ab@%3Cdev.zipkin.apache.org%3E
> >
> > Two binding +1 vote from mentors Willem Ning Jiang and Andriy Redko carry
> > over from the dev list thread.
> >
> > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
> > incubator release.
> >
> > Apache Zipkin (incubating) is the main repository Zipkin Server which
> > includes Collectors, UI, Storage implementation.
> >
> > The release candidates:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/zipkin/zipkin/2.13.0/
> >
> > Git tag for the release:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-zipkin/tree/v2.13.0
> >
> > Hash for the release tag:
> >
> > 7c08091d3f8b0428d1d78839d3bef0f6887746f2
> >
> > Release Notes:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-zipkin/releases/tag/v2.13.0
> >
> > The artifacts have been signed with Key: DA805D02, which can be found
> > in the keys file:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/zipkin/KEYS
> >
> > Verification Hints:
> > For your convenience, the below includes a detailed how-to on verifying
> > a source release. Please note that this document is a work-in-progress
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZIPKIN/Verifying+a+Source+
> > Release
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> > of votes are reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Thanks,
> > The Apache Zipkin (Incubating) Team
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: Podling PPMC members and mentors not signed up to private lists

[Pierre Smits]

Hi Justin,

(cross-posting to dev@tuweni ML)

It seems your information about the Tuweni project is incorrect. For its
first report I did a diversity check on each of the project's mailing
lists, and it proves that each of those has a healthy number of mentors
subscribed. The more important MLs, being dev@, user@ and private@ have
resp. 4, 5, and 6 mentors signed up. See [1]


[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/fd3e232392bb21c219ced89d5b09c3c93bb9d516dea7992adec550b6@%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
*Apache Directory , PMC Member*
Apache Incubator , committer
*Apache OFBiz , contributor (without privileges)
since 2008*
Apache Steve , committer


On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 6:33 AM Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> A number of podlings mentors and PPMC members are not signed up to their
> podling private lists.
>
> If you are a mentor of a project listed below can you please remind your
> PPMC members to sign up to the private list and ensure that yourself or
> other mentors are signed up to your podlings private list.
>
> Important emails get sent to the podlings private email lists and as a
> PPMC member you really need to be signed up to it so you don’t miss them. I
> know there may be reasons for this not happening, as some people only use
> lists.apache.org and there may be people who were on an initial PPMC that
> didn’t get involved or your podling may just be starting out.
>
> If your project is approaching graduation I’d especially suggest you try
> and fix this.
>
> The number of missing signups here may indicate that there’s an issue e.g.
> It may be that mentors are not active or not all PPMC members are actively
> involved or it could be just an on-boarding issue of new PPMC members for
> the podling or an initial steppe step that was skipped. Whatever it is it
> wold be good to see more mentors and PPMC members signed up.
> - Amaterasu - One mentor not signed up to private list and no PPMC member
> signed up [1]
> - Annotator  - Two mentors not signed up  and one PPMC member not signed
> up [2]
> - Datasketches - Five PPMC members not signed up [6]
> - Flagon - Two mentors not signed up and three PPMC members not signed up
> [13]
> - Hivemall - Two mentors not signed up [15]
> - Iceberg - One mentor not signed dup and all PPMC not signed up [17]
> - MXNet - Thirteen PPMC members not signed up. [22]
> - Nemo - Seven PPMC members not signed up. [24]
> - Openwisk - Six PPMC members not signed up [26]
> - Piont - One mentor not signed up and ten PPMC members not signed up. [28]
> - Ratis - One mentor and five PPMC members not signed up. [30]
> - Soma - Two mentors not signed up. [33]
> - SDAP - Two mentors not signed up and eight PPMC members not signed up,
> [34]
> - Spot - Thirteen PPMC members not signed up. [37]
> - Taverna - Two mentors and five PPMC members not signed up. [40]
> - Training - Five PPMC members not signed up. [43]
> - Tuweni - Six PPMC members not signed up. [44]
>
> These are less concerning, but it would be nice to see all mentors signed
> up:
> - BatchEE - One mentor not signed up and four PPMC members not signed up
> [3]
> - Crail - Three PPMC not signed up [4]
> - Dories - One mentor not signed up and one PMC member not signed up. [8]
> - Druid - Four PPMC members not signed up [9]
> - Dubbo - Four PPMC members not signed up [10]
> - ECharts - Four PPMC members not signed up [11]
> - Goblin - One mentor not signed up and two PPMC members not signed up.
> [14]
> - Hudi - One mentor not signed up and one PPMC mentor not signed dup. [16]
> - Livy - One mentor not signed up and one PPMC member not signed dup. [19]
> - Omid - One mentor not signed up. [25]
> - Superset - One mentor and one PPMc member not signed up. [38]
> - Tamaya - One mentor and two PPMC members not signed up. [39]
> - Tephra - One mentor and one PPMC member not signed up. [41]
> - Shardingsphere - One mentor not signed up. [35]
> - Singa - One mentor and one PPMC member not signed up. [36]
> - Week - One mentor and one PPMC member not signed up. [45]
> - Zipkin - One mentor and four PPMC members not signed up. [48]
>
> And these podlings are missing a couple of PPMC members:
> - Daffodil - One PPMC member not signed up [5]
> - Dlab - One PPMC member not signed up [7]
> - Edgent - One PPMC member not signed up [12]
> - IoTDB - Four PPMC members not signed up [18]
> - Marvin-AI - Three PPMC members not signed up [20]
> - Milagro - Two PPMC members not signed dup. [21]
> - Myriad - Two PPMC members not signed up [23]
> - PageSpeed - Two PPMC members not signed up. [27]
> - PonyMail - Three PPMC members not signed up. [29]
> - Rya -Three PPMC members not signed up. [31]
> - S2Graph - One PPMC member not signed up [32]
> - Toree - Two PPMC members not signed up.[42]
> - Tvm - One PPMC member not signed up. [45]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.1.rc0

[Hen]

+1 to the release.

I compared to the previous release and shared, on dev@mxnet, a note
regarding licensing of datasets (not included in the release but linked
from a script). I've suggested that a note on the origin and license be
added.

Hen

On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 8:14 AM Junru Shao  wrote:

> Dear community,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.4.1, release
> candidate 0. Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the
> release.
>
> Vote thread:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6c140f4c180c259dd1b7f4ecf36f2d083ed810cd68b37d7f635f5614@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>  .
>
> Result thread:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8b11c43fdafa3b9174fe7fa2344ed3cf468eaf7fffa0afded722cdb2@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>  .
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.4.1.rc0/   .
>
> The tag to be voted upon is 1.4.1.rc0:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.4.1.rc0/   .
>
> The release hash is 1a71996:
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/1a7199691f5cbc6012bb53eecbf884bed5ae6590/
>  .
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS/   .
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.4.1+Release+Notes
>  .
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours, from May 3 2019, 23:59:59 PST to May 07
> 2019, 23:59:59 PST. (Weekends are counted as half day)
>
> [ ] +1 release this package as ...
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 do not release this package because...
>
> Best regards,
> Junru Shao
>

Re: Missing Mentors

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> I am twice on the report of I am one of the 13.  I can't figure out how to
> read this report very well.

You’re fine, the 13 people I extracted from this I’ve not listed anywhere 
public. They probably know who they are and hopefully decide what best for 
their podlings if they are not being active.

I think the biggest take away is last time we look at this I think there was 70 
odd mentors flagged as potentially missing. This is a huge improvement aver 
last time, and possibly shows that mentors are being more engaged and active.

The report has some limitations:
- It’s parsed from the incubator reports so it can only go off what text is in 
that. 
- Som times it’s not 100% correct
- The podlings are listed form oldest to newest left to right.
- Orange mean you missed a sign-off, blue you signed off the report.
- It includes podlings that have graduated
- It includes people who are no longer mentors.

Having dates of sign-offs would probably help and  would separating current 
podlings from graduated one and indicating where some one is no longer a mentor,

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Podling PPMC members and mentors not signed up to private lists

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

A number of podlings mentors and PPMC members are not signed up to their 
podling private lists.

If you are a mentor of a project listed below can you please remind your PPMC 
members to sign up to the private list and ensure that yourself or other 
mentors are signed up to your podlings private list.

Important emails get sent to the podlings private email lists and as a PPMC 
member you really need to be signed up to it so you don’t miss them. I know 
there may be reasons for this not happening, as some people only use 
lists.apache.org and there may be people who were on an initial PPMC that 
didn’t get involved or your podling may just be starting out.

If your project is approaching graduation I’d especially suggest you try and 
fix this.

The number of missing signups here may indicate that there’s an issue e.g. It 
may be that mentors are not active or not all PPMC members are actively 
involved or it could be just an on-boarding issue of new PPMC members for the 
podling or an initial steppe step that was skipped. Whatever it is it wold be 
good to see more mentors and PPMC members signed up.
- Amaterasu - One mentor not signed up to private list and no PPMC member 
signed up [1]
- Annotator  - Two mentors not signed up  and one PPMC member not signed up [2]
- Datasketches - Five PPMC members not signed up [6]
- Flagon - Two mentors not signed up and three PPMC members not signed up [13]
- Hivemall - Two mentors not signed up [15]
- Iceberg - One mentor not signed dup and all PPMC not signed up [17]
- MXNet - Thirteen PPMC members not signed up. [22] 
- Nemo - Seven PPMC members not signed up. [24]
- Openwisk - Six PPMC members not signed up [26]
- Piont - One mentor not signed up and ten PPMC members not signed up. [28]
- Ratis - One mentor and five PPMC members not signed up. [30]
- Soma - Two mentors not signed up. [33]
- SDAP - Two mentors not signed up and eight PPMC members not signed up, [34]
- Spot - Thirteen PPMC members not signed up. [37]
- Taverna - Two mentors and five PPMC members not signed up. [40]
- Training - Five PPMC members not signed up. [43]
- Tuweni - Six PPMC members not signed up. [44]

These are less concerning, but it would be nice to see all mentors signed up:
- BatchEE - One mentor not signed up and four PPMC members not signed up [3]
- Crail - Three PPMC not signed up [4]
- Dories - One mentor not signed up and one PMC member not signed up. [8]
- Druid - Four PPMC members not signed up [9]
- Dubbo - Four PPMC members not signed up [10]
- ECharts - Four PPMC members not signed up [11]
- Goblin - One mentor not signed up and two PPMC members not signed up. [14]
- Hudi - One mentor not signed up and one PPMC mentor not signed dup. [16]
- Livy - One mentor not signed up and one PPMC member not signed dup. [19]
- Omid - One mentor not signed up. [25]
- Superset - One mentor and one PPMc member not signed up. [38]
- Tamaya - One mentor and two PPMC members not signed up. [39]
- Tephra - One mentor and one PPMC member not signed up. [41]
- Shardingsphere - One mentor not signed up. [35]
- Singa - One mentor and one PPMC member not signed up. [36]
- Week - One mentor and one PPMC member not signed up. [45]
- Zipkin - One mentor and four PPMC members not signed up. [48]

And these podlings are missing a couple of PPMC members:
- Daffodil - One PPMC member not signed up [5]
- Dlab - One PPMC member not signed up [7]
- Edgent - One PPMC member not signed up [12]
- IoTDB - Four PPMC members not signed up [18]
- Marvin-AI - Three PPMC members not signed up [20]
- Milagro - Two PPMC members not signed dup. [21]
- Myriad - Two PPMC members not signed up [23]
- PageSpeed - Two PPMC members not signed up. [27]
- PonyMail - Three PPMC members not signed up. [29]
- Rya -Three PPMC members not signed up. [31]
- S2Graph - One PPMC member not signed up [32]
- Toree - Two PPMC members not signed up.[42]
- Tvm - One PPMC member not signed up. [45]
- Warble - Two PPMC members not signed up. [47]

Thanks,
Justin

1. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/amaterasu
2. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/annotator
3. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/batchee
4. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/crail
5. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/daffodil
6. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/datasketches
7.  https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/dlab
8. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/doris
9. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/druid
10. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/dubbo
11. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/echarts
12. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/edgent
13. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/flagon
14. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/gobblin
15. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/hivemall
16. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/hudi
17. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/iceberg
18. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/iotdb
19. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/livy
20. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/marvin
21. https://

Re: Missing Mentors

[Kevin A. McGrail]

I am twice on the report of I am one of the 13.  I can't figure out how to
read this report very well.

On Thu, May 9, 2019, 23:33 Justin Mclean  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> A while back we went though the process of identifying missing mentors and
> t was discussion that there a good correlation between not signing off
> reports and being missing. Whimsey has a page that tracks this [1].
>
> From  [1] I can see a number of mentors that have not been signing off
> reports. Do people think it time to ask those mentor who are not being
> active to either become more involved or step down?
>
> The good news is that with some mentors standing down (who appear on that
> list), and some projects graduating there’s only only 13 mentors I’ve
> identified that we need to check if they still want to continue or have the
> time to help their podling out. That’s huge improvement over last time.
>
> There also seems to be another (slightly weaker correlation) that more
> than 1/2 of these people have not signed up to the podlings private list.
> Now mails can be read on list.apache.org but that’s probably another good
> indicator along with not signing or reports and not checking releases.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
>
> 1. https://whimsy.apache.org/incubator/signoff.cgi
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Missing Mentors

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

A while back we went though the process of identifying missing mentors and t 
was discussion that there a good correlation between not signing off reports 
and being missing. Whimsey has a page that tracks this [1].

From  [1] I can see a number of mentors that have not been signing off reports. 
Do people think it time to ask those mentor who are not being active to either 
become more involved or step down?

The good news is that with some mentors standing down (who appear on that 
list), and some projects graduating there’s only only 13 mentors I’ve 
identified that we need to check if they still want to continue or have the 
time to help their podling out. That’s huge improvement over last time.

There also seems to be another (slightly weaker correlation) that more than 1/2 
of these people have not signed up to the podlings private list. Now mails can 
be read on list.apache.org but that’s probably another good indicator along 
with not signing or reports and not checking releases.

Thanks,
Justin


1. https://whimsy.apache.org/incubator/signoff.cgi
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Omid 1.0.1 (incubating)

[Yoni Gottesman]

This vote passes with 3 +1 votes (3 bindings) and no 0 or -1 votes.

+1 votes
PMC Members:
* James Taylor
* Alan Gates
* Lars Hofhansl

0 votes
* No votes

-1 votes
* No votes

Vote 
thread:https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2eea55fba2c56b78339913c99ca2573dfc21de3ae29821a6aaad13b0@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E

I'll continue in the release process and announce a release in the
next few days.



On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 12:29 AM Alan Gates  wrote:

> +1.  Did a build with a clean mvn repo and profile for HBase-2, looked at
> the LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files, checked for any binary files in
> the distribution, and ran rat.
>
> Alan.
>
> On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 11:56 AM la...@apache.org  wrote:
>
> >  Transferring my +1 from the Omid dev list.
> > On Sunday, May 5, 2019, 1:56:57 AM EDT, Yoni Gottesman <
> > yon...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >  The Apache Omid community has voted on and approved a proposal
> > to release Apache Omid 1.0.1-incubating.
> >
> > PPMC Vote Call:
> >
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/omid-dev/201905.mbox/%3CCAFWCdOqa0yC8yPhF26BG0fX5_guWEV2h3%2B9n2KxRf1CPePVtUA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > PPMC Vote Result:
> >
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/omid-dev/201905.mbox/%3CCAAF1Jdi41sWKTfy6%2B-FY3JA8NHQcqJ17-fNB_sW%3DZOuOKph%2Bmg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > PPMC Vote Summary:
> > 4 binding (IPMC member) +1 votes
> > 0 non-binding PPMC member +1 votes
> > No -1 votes
> >
> > Git tag for the
> > release:
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-omid.git;a=tag;h=aca4d171b12cc18b8cd482e5f2411b86be1b17e5
> >
> > Sources for the
> > release:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/omid/1.0.1-rc0/apache-omid-incubating-1.0.1-src.tar.gz
> >
> > Source release verification:
> >   PGP Signature:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/omid/1.0.1-rc0/apache-omid-incubating-1.0.1-src.tar.gz.asc
> >
> >   SHA512 Hash:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/omid/1.0.1-rc0/apache-omid-incubating-1.0.1-src.tar.gz.sha512
> >
> >
> >   Keys to verify the signature of the release artifact are available
> > at:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/omid/1.0.1-rc0/KEYS
> >
> > We request the permission of IPMC to publish the above release candidate
> as
> > Apache Omid 1.0.1-incubating. Please try out the package and vote.
> >
> > The vote is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of
> > votes (3 binding +1s) is reached.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Omid 1.0.1-incubating
> > [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Please add (binding) if your vote is binding.
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin (incubating) version 2.13.0

[Adrian Cole]

FYI there was another binding +1 vote on the other thread from Ignasi Barrera

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/fcc730ad01eb55293f7a174a3b5301f4a277b6222c7bb821d33faf2e@%3Cdev.zipkin.apache.org%3E

On 2019/05/07 14:25:42, Raja Sundaram Ganesan  wrote: 
> Hello IPMC
> The Apache Zipkin community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
> Apache Zipkin API (incubating) version 0.2.1. The voting thread can be
> found here:
> 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9d4bbf52bd93a3907737b6cf445b5465607b7dd260a4bdc2a519e6ab@%3Cdev.zipkin.apache.org%3E
> 
> Two binding +1 vote from mentors Willem Ning Jiang and Andriy Redko carry
> over from the dev list thread.
> 
> We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
> incubator release.
> 
> Apache Zipkin (incubating) is the main repository Zipkin Server which
> includes Collectors, UI, Storage implementation.
> 
> The release candidates:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/zipkin/zipkin/2.13.0/
> 
> Git tag for the release:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-zipkin/tree/v2.13.0
> 
> Hash for the release tag:
> 
> 7c08091d3f8b0428d1d78839d3bef0f6887746f2
> 
> Release Notes:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-zipkin/releases/tag/v2.13.0
> 
> The artifacts have been signed with Key: DA805D02, which can be found
> in the keys file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/zipkin/KEYS
> 
> Verification Hints:
> For your convenience, the below includes a detailed how-to on verifying
> a source release. Please note that this document is a work-in-progress
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZIPKIN/Verifying+a+Source+
> Release
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> of votes are reached.
> 
> Please vote accordingly:
> 
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> 
> Thanks,
> The Apache Zipkin (Incubating) Team
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Druid (incubating) 0.14.1 release

[Clint Wylie]

Druid 0.14.1-incubating is a small patch release that includes a handful of
bug and documentation fixes.

Source and binary distributions can be downloaded from:
https://druid.apache.org/downloads.html

Important notice:
This release fixes an issue with druid-datasketches extension with quantile
sketches, but introduces another one with theta sketches that was confirmed
after the release was finalized. If you utilize theta sketches, we
recommend not upgrading to this release. This will be fixed in the next
release of Druid.

See the release notes for additional details:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/releases/tag/druid-0.14.1-incubating

Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release!



Disclaimer: Apache Druid is an effort undergoing incubation at The Apache
Software Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the Apache Incubator. Incubation is
required of all newly accepted projects until a further review indicates
that the infrastructure, communications, and decision making process have
stabilized in a manner consistent with other successful ASF projects. While
incubation status is not necessarily a reflection of the completeness or
stability of the code, it does indicate that the project has yet to be
fully endorsed by the ASF.