Re: Omid and Tephra
+1 this seems like the best option. On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 2:29 PM Andrew Purtell wrote: > +1 this would be a good outcome. Both Tephra and OMID are good > technologies, with respective pros and cons, and Phoenix can make good use > of both of them, should they choose to accept ownership of the code. > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:26 AM Alan Gates wrote: > > > Justin and mentors of Omid and Tephra, > > > > As Justin noted in his emails to these podlings this month both are very > > low activity, struggling to even file their reports, and appear to be > > candidates for retirement. > > > > The situation here is somewhat special because Phoenix uses one or both > of > > these technologies (they are both transaction managers on top of HBase), > so > > they may have an interest in their continued survival. Tephra briefly > > discussed this last June[1], though nothing came of it. My conclusion is > > there is not enough momentum left for these podlings to vote themselves > > into Phoenix without an external push. > > > > So before we push them into retirement I believe we should involve the > > Phoenix PMC and see if they want to adopt either or both of these, with > the > > knowledge that they will likely be getting minimal contributions from > > current members of those projects going forward. If others are ok with > > this I can contact the Phoenix PMC and see if they wish to take any > action > > on this. > > > > Alan. > > > > 1. > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/87ace080ef8a967b238781979a8d9a0cb9607ac4a195d5937756ec66@%3Cdev.tephra.apache.org%3E > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Andrew > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > decrepit hands >- A23, Crosstalk >
Re: Omid and Tephra
+1 this would be a good outcome. Both Tephra and OMID are good technologies, with respective pros and cons, and Phoenix can make good use of both of them, should they choose to accept ownership of the code. On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:26 AM Alan Gates wrote: > Justin and mentors of Omid and Tephra, > > As Justin noted in his emails to these podlings this month both are very > low activity, struggling to even file their reports, and appear to be > candidates for retirement. > > The situation here is somewhat special because Phoenix uses one or both of > these technologies (they are both transaction managers on top of HBase), so > they may have an interest in their continued survival. Tephra briefly > discussed this last June[1], though nothing came of it. My conclusion is > there is not enough momentum left for these podlings to vote themselves > into Phoenix without an external push. > > So before we push them into retirement I believe we should involve the > Phoenix PMC and see if they want to adopt either or both of these, with the > knowledge that they will likely be getting minimal contributions from > current members of those projects going forward. If others are ok with > this I can contact the Phoenix PMC and see if they wish to take any action > on this. > > Alan. > > 1. > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/87ace080ef8a967b238781979a8d9a0cb9607ac4a195d5937756ec66@%3Cdev.tephra.apache.org%3E > -- Best regards, Andrew Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's decrepit hands - A23, Crosstalk
Re: [VOTE] release datasketches-postgresql 1.3.0-incubating-rc2
Hi, +1 (Carrying over my vote) Kind Regards, Furkan KAMACI On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 1:40 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > Repeating my +1 here > > Regards, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Oct 22, 2019, at 3:36 PM, Alexander Saydakov < > sayda...@verizonmedia.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > Dear Apache DataSketches IPMC and Community, > > > > This is a call for vote to release Apache DataSketches-postgresql > > version 1.3.0-incubating-rc2 > > > > This is an extension for PostgreSQL database based on the Apache > > DataSketches-cpp core library (version 1.0.0-incubating). > > > > This is the first release of this component as an Apache Incubator > project. > > > > Results from the PPMC vote: > > Four votes were cast. All of the votes were (+1). Two of the votes were > > from mentors. > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/datasketches-dev/201910.mbox/%3CCAA46WsqavOwT%2BdQUGCLFgngPtGeH7AMQc42rh6jZjFA4pLcw-A%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > Source repository: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-datasketches-postgresql > > > > Git tag for this release candidate: > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-datasketches-postgresql/tree/1.3.0-incubating-rc2 > > on branch 1.3.x-incubating > > > > The release candidate repository: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/datasketches/postgresql/1.3.0-incubating-rc2/ > > > > How to build and install: > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-datasketches-postgresql/blob/1.3.0-incubating-rc2/README.md > > > > This is the second stage vote. The vote will remain open for at least 72 > > hours and at least 3 (+1) IPMC votes or a majority of (+1) are acquired. > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > Thank you. > > Alexander Saydakov > > al...@apache.org > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: Omid and Tephra
On 2019/10/23 18:16:31, Alan Gates wrote: > Justin and mentors of Omid and Tephra, > > As Justin noted in his emails to these podlings this month both are very > low activity, struggling to even file their reports, and appear to be > candidates for retirement. > > The situation here is somewhat special because Phoenix uses one or both of > these technologies (they are both transaction managers on top of HBase), so > they may have an interest in their continued survival. Tephra briefly > discussed this last June[1], though nothing came of it. My conclusion is > there is not enough momentum left for these podlings to vote themselves > into Phoenix without an external push. > > So before we push them into retirement I believe we should involve the > Phoenix PMC and see if they want to adopt either or both of these, with the > knowledge that they will likely be getting minimal contributions from > current members of those projects going forward. If others are ok with > this I can contact the Phoenix PMC and see if they wish to take any action > on this. > > Alan. > > 1. > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/87ace080ef8a967b238781979a8d9a0cb9607ac4a195d5937756ec66@%3Cdev.tephra.apache.org%3E > +1 Looks like a good idea to me - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE} Apache Hudi (incubating) 0.5.0 RC6
Thanks everyone. The voting is now closed. Here is the Result email thread that was just sent to general@incubator. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/19bbef3a0a5d660b3bd5791346c6b30855443b7b0069e26a81b57ae4@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E Thanks, Balaji.V (on behalf of Apache Hudi PPMC) On 2019/10/23 20:49:05, Balaji Varadarajan wrote: > Thanks everyone. We have 3 +1 binding votes now. I will wait till tomorrow > morning (PST) before I close the vote. > > Thanks, > Balaji.V > > > On 2019/10/23 08:46:56, Suneel Marthi wrote: > > +1 binding > > > > On 2019/10/19 22:04:19, vbal...@apache.org wrote: > > > Dear IPMC, > > > > > > Apache Hudi (incubating) (pronounced Hoodie) stands for Hadoop Upserts > > > anD Incrementals. Apache Hudi (incubating) manages storage of large > > > analytical datasets on DFS (Cloud stores, HDFS or any Hadoop FileSystem > > > compatible storage) and provide ability to query them. > > > > > > The previous source release candidate 0.5.0-incubating-rc5 had licensing > > > concerns (Please see > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/02d40e3dbababc069c5210928aa4dd335c41ab1837d5a894954f5c9f@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E) > > > . > > > > > > We have addressed them in the new source release candidate (RC#6). The > > > Apache Hudi (incubating) community has voted on this new release > > > candidate and approved. The new source release candidate version is > > > 0.5.0-incubating-rc6 > > > > > > Results: 4 binding +1 votes > > > > > > Here is the voting thread: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/617cad3116308821f845d3be5d71e135fdcbb82b4533c53941a0fda8@%3Cdev.hudi.apache.org%3E > > > Here is the voting result email: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1587f3d766f6b3536d32630f89ba53b86cb09178d744fce05ae93a03@%3Cdev.hudi.apache.org%3E > > > > > > The Apache Hudi community had verified the following aspects of release: > > > - verified checksums and signatures [SUCCESS] > > > - license header check [SUCCESS] > > > - No binaries in source release [SUCCESS] > > > - verified RAT check [SUCCESS] > > > - built from source release (mvn clean install -DskipTests) [SUCCESS] > > > - mvn test from source release [SUCCESS] > > > > > > I'd like to call a vote in general to approve the first release of Apache > > > Hudi (incubating). Please review and vote on the release candidate #5 for > > > the version 0.5.0, as follows: > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release > > > [ ] 0, I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > > > > > > > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: > > > > > > - JIRA release notes [1] > > > - The official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to > > > be deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with > > > fingerprint AF9BAF79D311A3D3288E583F24A499037262AAA4 [3], > > > - all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4] > > > - source code tag "release-0.5.0-incubating-rc6" [5] > > > > > > [1] > > > https://jira.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12322822=12346087 > > > [2] > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hudi/hudi-0.5.0-incubating-rc6/ > > > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/hudi/KEYS > > > [4] > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehudi-1006/ > > > [5] > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-hudi/tree/release-0.5.0-incubating-rc6 > > > > > > A release validation script is available in master for running usual > > > checks. To run this > > > > > > - git clone g...@github.com:apache/incubator-hudi.git > > > - cd incubator-hudi/scripts > > > - ./release/validate_staged_release.sh --release=0.5.0 --rc_num=6 > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. The vote will pass if a > > > majority of at least three +1 IPMC votes are cast > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Balaji.V > > > (on behalf of Apache Hudi PPMC) > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Hudi (incubating) 0.5.0 RC6
The voting for releasing APACHE Hudi (incubating) 0.5.0 RC6 has passed with 3 +1 binding votes and no -1 votes. +1 Vote from: - Dave Fisher(binding) - Thomas Weise (binding) - Suneel Marthi (binding) Voting Thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/14a4c83df04f5bde799dfc904e6fdc67db225ff4e91d945f2e29dae9@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E We will soon follow with the announcement email for the release to general@incubator. Thanks, Balaji.V (on behalf of Apache Hudi PPMC) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] TubeMQ Proposal
Thanks Ming! I have the same hope and let's see how project and community will be growing with Apache's magic and everyone's making effort! Thanks, Junping Ming Wen 于2019年10月23日周三 下午12:02写道： > yes, agreed, good luck for your incubating journey, > and I hope TubeMQ can grow up to a diversity community. > > Thanks, > Ming Wen > Twitter: _WenMing > > > 俊平堵 于2019年10月23日周三 上午9:52写道： > >> As others’ reply, the challenge of building a diversity community do >> exists >> and we should sort it out during incubation process but no need to special >> concern before the incubation (thanks for reminding though). >> About maintaining version, from my experience, it is simple to keep only >> one version here just like TubeMQ now when it is possible. However, I also >> see many other Apache projects that some companies maintain an internal >> version that take/contribute PR from/to open source version as upstream >> which also works well. In my understanding, It is just a version >> management >> choice - I didn’t see how challenges it will bring during the incubation >> stage. Please correct me if I am wrong here. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Junping >> >> Ming Wen 于2019年10月22日 周二上午11:29写道： >> >> > Hi, this is an interesting proposal. >> > >> > I think the competition among different MQ is not an issue for incubator >> > stage. Users and developers will have their own choices. >> > >> > I guess that your challenges during the incubation: >> > expanding diversity (now committers come from one company), >> > and dealing with the relationship between the tencent internal version >> and >> > the open source version (I guess the two are not consistent, if I am >> wrong, >> > please correct me) . >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Ming Wen >> > Twitter: _WenMing >> > >> > >> > Dave Fisher 于2019年10月22日周二 上午10:38写道： >> > >> > > Hi - >> > > >> > > > On Oct 21, 2019, at 7:26 PM, 俊平堵 wrote: >> > > > >> > > > bq. You might be right about that the project currently I believe >> > there's >> > > > only one mentor with recent mentoring experience, and while all >> > proposed >> > > are >> > > > ASF members, not all of them are active on the IPMC general list. It >> > > might >> > > > be better for the project to have at least one other mentor with >> > > executive >> > > > and is more active in the IPMC. What do others think? >> > > > +1. Justin, do you have candidate to join the mentor team here? >> > > >> > > I’m on the Pulsar PMC with Sijie and know that he was also involved >> with >> > > DistributedLog which graduated into Bookkeeper. He will certainly be >> good >> > > help as a mentor. >> > > >> > > If Justin is good with this initial mix. I’m fine. If not then JBO has >> > > offered. >> > > >> > > Best wishes. >> > > >> > > Regards, >> > > Dave >> > > >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > >> > > > Junping >> > > > >> > > > Justin Mclean 于2019年10月21日周一 下午10:31写道： >> > > > >> > > >> Hi, >> > > >> >> > > >>> The first one is if we are able to mentor the project well enough >> > (old >> > > >> discussion). >> > > >> >> > > >> You might be right about that the project currently I believe >> there's >> > > only >> > > >> one mentor with recent mentoring experience, and while all proposed >> > are >> > > ASF >> > > >> members, not all of them are active on the IPMC general list. It >> might >> > > be >> > > >> better for the project to have at least one other mentor with >> > executive >> > > and >> > > >> is more active in the IPMC. What do others think? >> > > >> >> > > >>> As the project comes from Tencent I assume that the community is >> > mostly >> > > >> Chinese and due to the language barrier (and probably a different >> > > culture) >> > > >> we have seen that these projects tend to be "more challenging" >> (this >> > > does >> > > >> not describe it accurate enough but I hope that readers understand >> > what >> > > I >> > > >> mean). >> > > >> >> > > >> While projects in this group do have some challenges, I don’t >> believe >> > > it’s >> > > >> anymore than other projects from different background. In some ways >> > the >> > > ASF >> > > >> model is a good cultural fit - see Sharan’s thesis on that. >> > > >> >> > > >> Thanks, >> > > >> Justin >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> - >> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > - >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > >> > > >> > >> >
Re: Omid and Tephra
Hi, > So before we push them into retirement I believe we should involve the > Phoenix PMC and see if they want to adopt either or both of these, with the > knowledge that they will likely be getting minimal contributions from > current members of those projects going forward. If others are ok with > this I can contact the Phoenix PMC and see if they wish to take any action > on this. Sounds like an excellent plan. +1 Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Omid and Tephra
+1 It seems to be the best option. -Andreas On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 6:47 AM Furkan KAMACI wrote: > Hi, > > +1 > > Kind Regards, > Furkan KAMACI > > 24 Eki 2019 Per, saat 07:11 tarihinde Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > j...@nanthrax.net> > şunu yazdı: > > > +1, good idea. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On 23/10/2019 20:16, Alan Gates wrote: > > > Justin and mentors of Omid and Tephra, > > > > > > As Justin noted in his emails to these podlings this month both are > very > > > low activity, struggling to even file their reports, and appear to be > > > candidates for retirement. > > > > > > The situation here is somewhat special because Phoenix uses one or both > > of > > > these technologies (they are both transaction managers on top of > HBase), > > so > > > they may have an interest in their continued survival. Tephra briefly > > > discussed this last June[1], though nothing came of it. My conclusion > is > > > there is not enough momentum left for these podlings to vote themselves > > > into Phoenix without an external push. > > > > > > So before we push them into retirement I believe we should involve the > > > Phoenix PMC and see if they want to adopt either or both of these, with > > the > > > knowledge that they will likely be getting minimal contributions from > > > current members of those projects going forward. If others are ok with > > > this I can contact the Phoenix PMC and see if they wish to take any > > action > > > on this. > > > > > > Alan. > > > > > > 1. > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/87ace080ef8a967b238781979a8d9a0cb9607ac4a195d5937756ec66@%3Cdev.tephra.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >
[Result][Vote] Release Apache IoTDB 0.8.1 (a bug-fix version of 0.8.0)
Hi, The vote for release Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.1 has passed with 4 +1 binding votes and no -1 vote. +1 Vote from: +1 from Justin McLean, +1 from Kevin A. McGrail, +1 from Willem Jiang, +1 from Gosling Von The vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c6aeb4d8d36f6d188c7b9d0261138263dc8f63ad0421a8a1e16c621e@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E Many thanks to all who voted or provided comments! Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院
