RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1

2020-08-10 Thread Chen, Ciyong
Thank you Sheng and all for removing the blocker for the release.

Dear Community,

As the vote is resumed, please take your time to verify and vote on the 
upcoming release for Apache MXNet(incubating).
I copied the content from the original vote mail for your reference.

This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.7.0, release 
candidate 1.

Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.

Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r525a961a10f69bdfb255c64f0be0589bb70efdd880c1be87c81c0c06%40%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E

Result thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbd53614ca01f714d00097a02d906895211336a14ce0e083865cf5144%40%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E

The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.7.0.rc1

The tag to be voted upon is 1.7.0.rc1:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.7.0.rc1

The release hash is 64f737cdd59fe88d2c5b479f25d011c5156b6a8a:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/64f737cdd59fe88d2c5b479f25d011c5156b6a8a

KEYS file available:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS

For information about the contents of this release, see:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.7.0+Release+Notes

The vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 release this package as # [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 do not 
release this package because...

Best regards,
Ciyong Chen

-Original Message-
From: Sheng Zha  
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2020 3:36 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1

Hi,

Since the IP clearance for MShadow has passed [1] and third-party release 
issues are either resolved or tracked in INCUBATOR-253, let's resume this vote.

Here's my +1 carried from vote on dev@ [2].

[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd6ad9de26c0f523db4264e2fe46b0db5e5ad6c5f614b7152352161ab%40%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
[2]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r28fbcad28a0a29c1b40edf4d3898d09946801b663cf103ad59a9bce2%40%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 8:55 PM David Nalley  wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:01 PM Justin Mclean 
> 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > >  1.  Change all MXNet to Apache MXNet (incubating) from 
> > > documentation
> > where it necessary
> > >  2.  Change maven package description ” MXNet Engine Adapter for DJL”
> > to  "Deep Java Library (DJL) Engine Adapter for Apache MXNet" for 
> > clarification
> >
> > Thanks for doing that. ASF generally prefers “powdered by” so I 
> > would double check with trademarks (trademarks@a.o) if this is acceptable 
> > use.
> > [1]
> >
>
> The brand management committee has no issue with "Deep Java Library 
> (DJL) Engine Adapter for Apache MXnet" as it's nominative use[1] and 
> has been documented as such.
>
>
> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#other
>


?????? [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-10 Thread Eason Chen
Hi??
I want to modify the description of the proposal to make it more accurate, 
please help me add permissions??thanks


Here are the details of my account:
Usernamechenguangsheng
emailchenguangsh...@apache.org
Full NameChen Guangsheng






----
??: 
   "general"

https://incubator.apache.org/guides/names.html
 [2] https://www.uspto.gov/trademark

 Thanks
 Henry

 Michael Andr?? Pearce https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/EventMeshProposal


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1

2020-08-10 Thread Sheng Zha
Hi,

Since the IP clearance for MShadow has passed [1] and third-party release
issues are either resolved or tracked in INCUBATOR-253, let's resume this
vote.

Here's my +1 carried from vote on dev@ [2].

[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd6ad9de26c0f523db4264e2fe46b0db5e5ad6c5f614b7152352161ab%40%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
[2]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r28fbcad28a0a29c1b40edf4d3898d09946801b663cf103ad59a9bce2%40%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 8:55 PM David Nalley  wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:01 PM Justin Mclean 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > >  1.  Change all MXNet to Apache MXNet (incubating) from documentation
> > where it necessary
> > >  2.  Change maven package description ” MXNet Engine Adapter for DJL”
> > to  "Deep Java Library (DJL) Engine Adapter for Apache MXNet" for
> > clarification
> >
> > Thanks for doing that. ASF generally prefers “powdered by” so I would
> > double check with trademarks (trademarks@a.o) if this is acceptable use.
> > [1]
> >
>
> The brand management committee has no issue with "Deep Java Library (DJL)
> Engine Adapter for Apache MXnet" as it's nominative use[1] and has been
> documented as such.
>
>
> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#other
>


[RESULT] [IP CLEARANCE] MXNet MShadow project contribution

2020-08-10 Thread Sheng Zha
Hi all,

As the 72-hour vote window has passed without -1 on the lazy vote of MXNet
MShadow IP clearance [1], the IP clearance has passed successfully.

Cheers,
Sheng

[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd0b59e0002843128d68cf8bb11d9bcb3f1ee09ea55d1defd144127dd%40%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.0

2020-08-10 Thread Maxime Beauchemin
We need one more vote please, we're anxious to publish this release!

On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 11:17 AM Felix Cheung  wrote:

> Furkan, can you help?
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 11:54 AM Ville Brofeldt  >
> wrote:
>
> > Justin and Felix,
> >
> >
> >
> > warm thanks for taking the time to vote! The minimum 72h voting time is
> > now complete, and it would be great to get that last missing vote from
> the
> > IPMC to be able to release this highly anticipated release of Apache
> > Superset (Incubating).
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > The Apache Superset (Incubating) Team
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 4. Aug 2020, at 20.19, Ville Brofeldt 
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Hello IPMC,
> >
> > >
> >
> > > The Apache Superset (incubating) community has voted on and approved a
> > proposal to
> >
> > > release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.0.
> >
> > > The voting thread can be found here:
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r76d4a5f850546aed4f5ba94c5c8f7b3cb901d8842ed32832512e715b%40%3Cdev.superset.apache.org%3E
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Here are the binding +1 votes from mentors, carrying over from the
> > podling vote:
> >
> > > - Felix
> >
> > >
> >
> > > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
> >
> > > incubator release.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Apache Superset (incubating) is a modern, enterprise-ready business
> > intelligence web application
> >
> > >
> >
> > > The release candidate:
> >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/superset/0.37.0rc4/
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Git tag for the release:
> >
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/tree/0.37.0rc4
> >
> > >
> >
> > > The Change Log for the release:
> >
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/blob/0.37.0rc4/CHANGELOG.md
> >
> > >
> >
> > > public keys are available at:
> >
> > >
> >
> > > https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/superset/KEYS
> >
> > >
> >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
> number
> >
> > > of votes are reached.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > >
> >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> >
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> >
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Thanks,
> >
> > > The Apache Superset (Incubating) Team
> >
> >
> >
> >
>


Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-10 Thread Duane Pauls
I work for Solace and have consulted internally to confirm that we do not
have any copyright or trademark on the term “Event Mesh”. It’s true it is
something our products are closely aligned with, but it is an industry term
that has been adopted by Gartner and is gaining traction in the industry.
Solace does not oppose the term being used in other applicable products or
projects.

+1 (non-binding) on the idea.

Cheers,
Duane

On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 11:51 AM heng du  wrote:

> Hi @Michael
>
> Thanks for your advice. As far as I know, Solace doesn't have a product
> called Eventmesh, They're just using that name to promote their PubSub
> platform.
>
> But in order not to cause trouble in the future, I also ask guys of Apache
> Brand to help check whether this name is appropriate. For us, we've been
> using the name EventMesh for a long time, and we want to keep it so that
> users can get better product positioning from the name.
>
> And base on this document[1], we searched in the U.S. Patent Office[2] and
> found nothing inappropriate.
>
> [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/names.html
> [2] https://www.uspto.gov/trademark
>
> Thanks
> Henry
>
> Michael André Pearce  于2020年8月6日周四
> 下午3:33写道:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Im PMC member from ActiveMQ project.
>> I like the idea, nice. +1 on it as a project idea.
>>
>> I am though a little -1 on the name of the project, I would recommend
>> that an alternative name for the project is found as there maybe a conflict
>> in rights ability to copyright and trademark to it.
>>
>> I’m aware there is a commercial vendor messaging company called Solace,
>> where they use and market their product with heavy use of the name Event
>> Mesh, you can see this just googling event mesh, brings back many hits to
>> their products, marketing material and other records, so they may hold a
>> heavy claim to this name.
>>
>> Best
>> Michael
>>
>> > On 4 Aug 2020, at 18:33, Kevin Ratnasekera 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Easen,
>> >
>> > +1, Having worked in a similar domain so far, I have to say this is an
>> > interesting project. If you are seeking new mentors, please consider
>> adding
>> > me as a mentor to the project.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Kevin
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 3:34 PM Eason Chen  wrote:
>> >
>> >> Good time of the time to all!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I'd like to bring this new interesting project for the discussion,
>> >> comments and feedback with the aim of starting a formal [VOTE] of its
>> >> acceptance into Incubator.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> People behind this project aren't new to Apache: some of them were
>> behind
>> >> the Apache RocketMQ, which I consider a huge success(especially in
>> China)as
>> >> the community is literally thriving almost 3 years after the
>> graduation.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I have been involved a little bit with this project when it just
>> started
>> >> in WeBank a few years ago. And I'd like to emphasize that the community
>> >> however small it might look so far, has been aligned with Apache ways
>> of
>> >> doing things. Heng Du (from RocketMQ PMC) is very instrumental in
>> >> tirelessly helping this group to learn what it means to be a truly open
>> >> source project.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> The code is already under ALv2 and is publicly available. As you will
>> see
>> >> it has a lot of dependency connections with the rest of Apache
>> ecosystem
>> >> and IMO will fit very well here and continue to grow the community.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> The project's proposal is available at [1].
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thank you very much for the feedback you're willing to provide!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> With best regards,
>> >>
>> >> Eason Chen
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> [1]
>> >>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/EventMeshProposal
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>