Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.50-rc2

2021-01-01 Thread Julian Hyde
Forwarding my vote from the dev@hop thread: +1 (binding).

IPMC members, please note that 0.50 will be Hop’s first release in incubation. 
As such, there are issues with the release that would not be allowed in an 
official Apache release, namely:
* EPL-licensed source files (category B);
* some binary files whose license has not been fully checked;
* quite a few files are excluded from RAT checking.

Hop plans to fix these issues in a later incubating release. I hope that 
exceptions to release policy can be made for these and similar issues in this 
early-stage incubating release.

Julian (IPMC member & Hop mentor)



> On Jan 1, 2021, at 7:39 AM, Hans Van Akelyen  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi IPMC,
> 
> This is a call for vote to release Apache Hop (Incubating) 0.50-rc2.
> This will be our first Apache incubator release and want to thank everyone
> involved in the process.
> 
> Hop community vote and result threads:
> Vote:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r410e0f080772f33ea711197fa03cbf1f96902535636e69ce472efb43%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E
> 
> Result:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5863968d1942ea5953f81ba107c4bcea993690c3d4d803ddc02d3b84%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E
> 
> The tag to be voted on is 0.50-rc2 (commit 204da03):
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/commit/204da036e545441d36617906263c5a679ce6fbbc
> 
> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hop/apache-hop-0.50-incubating-rc2/
> 
> The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is:
> 128ca209f767aa150bdd4a222f7bda15afc01a34533cef4a204322733a99f7496ed1eb66f86a48a13a2723bae195fdf651b5d7608a70a39a1fc7313a8c48f5df
> apache-hop-0.50-incubating-rc2.tar.gz
> 
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0x9a8a628dd4f4aa1e
> 
> For more information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HOP/versions/12349247
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hop 0.50!
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until
> a majority of at least 3 +1 IPMC votes are cast.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Hop 0.50
> [ ] +0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> 
> Best Regards,
> Hans


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



[VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.50-rc2

2021-01-01 Thread Hans Van Akelyen
Hi IPMC,

This is a call for vote to release Apache Hop (Incubating) 0.50-rc2.
This will be our first Apache incubator release and want to thank everyone
involved in the process.

Hop community vote and result threads:
Vote:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r410e0f080772f33ea711197fa03cbf1f96902535636e69ce472efb43%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E

Result:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5863968d1942ea5953f81ba107c4bcea993690c3d4d803ddc02d3b84%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E

The tag to be voted on is 0.50-rc2 (commit 204da03):
https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/commit/204da036e545441d36617906263c5a679ce6fbbc

The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hop/apache-hop-0.50-incubating-rc2/

The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is:
128ca209f767aa150bdd4a222f7bda15afc01a34533cef4a204322733a99f7496ed1eb66f86a48a13a2723bae195fdf651b5d7608a70a39a1fc7313a8c48f5df
apache-hop-0.50-incubating-rc2.tar.gz

Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0x9a8a628dd4f4aa1e

For more information about the contents of this release, see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HOP/versions/12349247

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hop 0.50!

The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until
a majority of at least 3 +1 IPMC votes are cast.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Hop 0.50
[ ] +0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...

Best Regards,
Hans


Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Gobblin (Incubating) as a TLP

2021-01-01 Thread Abhishek Tiwari
Hi Justin,

Happy new year!

Regarding the feedback you gave us:
1. 3rd party logos being eaten by pacman on the homepage: We have removed
this animation, and created a ticket to follow-up with Trademarks for
future usage of that animation.
2. nofollow attribute missing in links to external entities: We have added
nofollow attributes to such links.
3. Google analytics on homepage: We have removed the usage of Google
Analytics.
4. Docker not following guidelines: We have deleted the pre-apache repo (
https://hub.docker.com/r/gobblin ), and updated the apache/gobblin on
DockerHub to bring it inline with the guidelines.

Please let us know if this addresses the issues that you had identified?

Thanks,
Abhishek

On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 10:37 PM Abhishek Tiwari  wrote:

> Hi Justin,
>
> Thanks for your detailed review. Regarding the identified issues:
>
> *> I suggest you run your home page past trademarks. There's a large
> number of 3rd party logos used without attribution there and I’m not sure
> how some of those trademark owners would feel about a*
> *> pacman eating their logos. *
> 1. Yes, it would be good to review this further with the trademarks, until
> then we will remove this from our home page.
>
> *> You also have links on your home page to various commercial entires
> without the no follow attribute. In general there should be no links to 3rd
> parties on your front page, they can images or links on *
> *> another page but they should be no-follow links.*
>  2. will add no-follow attribute and move them to some other page for
> better hygiene like you suggested
>
> > *Your home page also includes google analytic, while policy has not be
> set, the general advice is to not use Google Analytics and at some future
> point it’s likely that all ASF projects will be asked to stop *
> *> using it.*
> 3. didn't know about this convention, will remove it. Is there an
> alternate recommendation for this?
>
> *> I note that until very recently you have not voted in any PPMC members.
> Is there a reason for that?*
> 4. There was an error in voting early on, where we voted in Tamas and
> Sudarshan as only committers but not PPMCs (although we wanted to invite
> them as PPMCs), so to retroactively fix the issue, by recommendation of our
> mentor we re-ran the vote and invited them to PPMC.
>
> > *Your docker releases [1][2] are not following the guidelines here. [3]*
> 5. will check on docker and get back.
>
> Thanks,
> Abhishek
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 5:14 PM Justin Mclean 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I suggest you run your home page past trademarks. There's a large number
>> of 3rd party logos used without attribution there and I’m not sure how some
>> of those trademark owners would feel about a pacman eating their logos. You
>> also have links on your home page to various commercial entires without the
>> no follow attribute. In general there should be no links to 3rd parties on
>> your front page, they can images or links on another page but they should
>> be no-follow links.
>>
>> Your home page also includes google analytic, while policy has not be
>> set, the general advice is to not use Google Analytics and at some future
>> point it’s likely that all ASF projects will be asked to stop using it.
>>
>> I note that until very recently you have not voted in any PPMC members.
>> Is there a reason for that?
>>
>> Your docker releases [1][2] are not following the guidelines here. [3]
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>>
>> 1. https://hub.docker.com/r/gobblin
>> 2, https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/gobblin
>> 3. https://incubator.apache.org/guides/distribution.html#docker
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>