Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.60-rc1

[Hans Van Akelyen]

Hi Justin,

Thanks for the vote!
If you have some time to spare could you provide us with your maven/java
version and the error you get while building?
The software should build and work on all 3 major platforms, I'm also an
OSX user and can build without errors.

Thanks,
Hans

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 7:18 AM Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>  it contains Category B source code but is using the WIP disclaimer and
> what is contains is clearly stated.
>
> I checked:
> - Incubating in name
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - LICENSE and NOTICE look OK
> - Source files have correct headers
> - No unexpected binary files
> - Unable to compile on OSX (as mentioned before)
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty Incubating Release 0.6.0 rc0

[Elek, Marton]

The vote passed with 4 binding +1 (thanks Arpit, Uma, Justin, Jitendra).

I already upload a patch the add the missing part to the NOTICE file 
(https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis-thirdparty/pull/12) reported 
by Justin (thanks).


Thanks for the votes, will publish the artifacts soon.
Marton

On 1/21/21 7:25 PM, Jitendra Pandey wrote:

+1 (binding)

built from source successfully.


On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 1:17 AM Elek, Marton  wrote:



Vote is passed with 3 binding +1 (together with my +1) and 3 non-binding
+1.


Thanks for all the votes. I will go forward and start the PPMC vote thread.

Marton


On 1/8/21 10:35 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:

Hi Apache Ratis PPMC,

I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis Thirdparty incubating Release 0.6.0
rc0.

The git tag to be voted upon:

https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis-thirdparty/tree/0.6.0-rc0


The git commit hash:

2c0214d6c12804773383ff14755e867788936da2


https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis-thirdparty/commit/2c0214d6c12804773383ff14755e867788936da2




THE SOURCE TARBALL CAN BE FOUND AT:



https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/thirdparty/0.6.0/rc0/




The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
1CEF 33FA 6180 0117 BDB2  E0E0 D51E A8F0 0EE7 9B28

Release artifacts are signed with one of the keys available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS


This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Please vote on releasing this RC.  Thank you in advance.

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Starting with my +1(binding).

Regards,
Marton Elek






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.60-rc1

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

+1 (binding)

 it contains Category B source code but is using the WIP disclaimer and what is 
contains is clearly stated.

I checked:
- Incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER exists 
- LICENSE and NOTICE look OK
- Source files have correct headers
- No unexpected binary files
- Unable to compile on OSX (as mentioned before)

Thanks,
Justin


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty Incubating Release 0.6.0 rc0

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

+1 (binding) but the NOTICE file need updating to include “This product 
includes software developed at…"


I checked:
- incubating in names
- signatures and hashes are file
- LICENSE is fine
- NOTICE is a  bit too minimal please see [1]
- all source files have ASF headers
- no unexpected binary files
- can’t compile but think I may have the wrong version of protobuf installed

Thanks,
Justin


1. https://www.apache.org/licenses/NOTICE-2.0.txt
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Liminal (incubating) 0.0.1-INCUBATING

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> We will fix the issues and create a new release candidate.

I’m still little confused why you have two release artefacts, if you can 
explain that it would be helpful.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.60-rc1

[Hans Van Akelyen]

Hi IPMC,

This is a call for vote to release Apache Hop (Incubating) 0.60-rc1.

The main changes in this release are fixing the issues brought up by the
IPMC:
- Added DISCLAIMER-WIP
- Align Apache headers in source files
- Remove duplicate headers
- Add non compliant source files to LICENSE file
- Minimize RAT exclusions
- Cleanup unused static (including fonts)

As our main codebase was already diverging too far from the 0.50 release we
have abandoned this release and combined all changes in 0.60

Thank you for checking and voting on this release.

Hop community vote and result threads:
Vote:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r55939c05bd25c4e970100a4e973be3ce7cfac35057e3641a157c32e5%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E
Result:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4be6768898a92f19856a3261f4f667cce5da1c9e86538b3b77068f60%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E


The tag to be voted on is 0.60-rc1 (commit 88720ff):
https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/tree/0.60-rc1

The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hop/apache-hop-0.60-incubating-rc1/

The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is:
7288bdc6b5bc4f98bd8b870211a369cee04b1d395baaf0613cbb713b803dd5e26361eaebbe84337d0db9216a493f928198a12c71989d0b905947d87e27cc8d3b

Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0x9a8a628dd4f4aa1e

For more information about the contents of this release, see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HOP/versions/12349498
This release will also include all changes done for release 0.50:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HOP/versions/12349247

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 0.60!

The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until
a majority of at least 3 +1 IPMC votes are cast.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 0.60
[ ] +0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...

Best Regards,
Hans

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty Incubating Release 0.6.0 rc0

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1 (binding)

built from source successfully.


On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 1:17 AM Elek, Marton  wrote:

>
> Vote is passed with 3 binding +1 (together with my +1) and 3 non-binding
> +1.
>
>
> Thanks for all the votes. I will go forward and start the PPMC vote thread.
>
> Marton
>
>
> On 1/8/21 10:35 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
> > Hi Apache Ratis PPMC,
> >
> > I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis Thirdparty incubating Release 0.6.0
> > rc0.
> >
> > The git tag to be voted upon:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis-thirdparty/tree/0.6.0-rc0
> >
> >
> > The git commit hash:
> >
> > 2c0214d6c12804773383ff14755e867788936da2
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis-thirdparty/commit/2c0214d6c12804773383ff14755e867788936da2
> >
> >
> >
> > THE SOURCE TARBALL CAN BE FOUND AT:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/thirdparty/0.6.0/rc0/
> >
> >
> >
> > The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
> > 1CEF 33FA 6180 0117 BDB2  E0E0 D51E A8F0 0EE7 9B28
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with one of the keys available at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS
> > 
> >
> > This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> > Please vote on releasing this RC.  Thank you in advance.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Starting with my +1(binding).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Marton Elek
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Liminal (incubating) 0.0.1-INCUBATING

[Lior Schachter]

Thanks for the feedback Justin.
We will fix the issues and create a new release candidate.

Lior

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:11 AM Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> -1 (binding) until apache-liminal-0.0.1-INCUBATING.tar.gz  vs
> apache-liminal-0.0.1-INCUBATING-source.tar.gz is cleared up.
>
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - signatures and hashes correct
> - DISCLAIMER exists however here no need for the ASF header in the
> DISLAIMER file and where is says "List of known issues goes here” you
> should list them
> - LICENSE seems OK as no 3rd party software is included. Is this correct?
> - NOTICE looks to contain too much information. There no need to mention
> license information here, that should be in LICENSE. You should only have
> "This product uses software developed at” where headers have been removed
> with permission not because you are using 3rd party software.If something
> in not included in the release and just a dependancy there no need to
> mention it in NOTICE or LICENSE.
> - A couple of files are missing headers e.g. [1]
> - No unexpected binaries
>
> I’m not sure what apache-liminal-0.0.1-INCUBATING.tar.gz is vs
> apache-liminal-0.0.1-INCUBATING-source.tar.gz.
> apache-liminal-0.0.1-INCUBATING.tar.gz  is missing LICENSE, NOTICE and
> DISCLAIMER. A release must include these file.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. ./tests/runners/airflow/dag/test_liminal_dags.py
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Liminal (incubating) 0.0.1-INCUBATING

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

-1 (binding) until apache-liminal-0.0.1-INCUBATING.tar.gz  vs 
apache-liminal-0.0.1-INCUBATING-source.tar.gz is cleared up.


I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes correct
- DISCLAIMER exists however here no need for the ASF header in the DISLAIMER 
file and where is says "List of known issues goes here” you should list them
- LICENSE seems OK as no 3rd party software is included. Is this correct?
- NOTICE looks to contain too much information. There no need to mention 
license information here, that should be in LICENSE. You should only have "This 
product uses software developed at” where headers have been removed with 
permission not because you are using 3rd party software.If something in not 
included in the release and just a dependancy there no need to mention it in 
NOTICE or LICENSE.
- A couple of files are missing headers e.g. [1]
- No unexpected binaries

I’m not sure what apache-liminal-0.0.1-INCUBATING.tar.gz is vs 
apache-liminal-0.0.1-INCUBATING-source.tar.gz. 
apache-liminal-0.0.1-INCUBATING.tar.gz  is missing LICENSE, NOTICE and 
DISCLAIMER. A release must include these file.

Thanks,
Justin

1. ./tests/runners/airflow/dag/test_liminal_dags.py
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org