Re: [MENTORS] April 2021 Incubator report timeline
Hi, There was a tooling issue. As Dave mentioned these are the projects that need to report: annotator bluemarlin datalab eventmesh flagon hivemall liminal livy milagro mxnet nlpcraft nuttx pagespeed pegasus ponymail spot teaclave toree tubemq weex yunikorn I’ll fix up the boilerplate report. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [MENTORS] April 2021 Incubator report timeline
Hi Nikita, > On Mar 29, 2021, at 4:06 PM, Nikita Ivanov wrote: > > Dave - when you say the report "was not accepted", what does it mean? For > example, NLPCraft community filed the report in March and it is due again > in April? The March report was too sparse and further detail is needed. Since I am now your mentor again I’ll help review the April report on the dev@nlpcraft mailing list All The Best, Dave > > Thank you, > -- > Nikita Ivanov > > > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 2:39 PM Justin Mclean > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I think we may have a slight tooling issue, perhaps related to the 1st > April falling on Wednesday and me being in the southern hemisphere. I’ll > look into it and correct the list. >> >> Thanks, >> Justin >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [MENTORS] April 2021 Incubator report timeline
Dave - when you say the report "was not accepted", what does it mean? For example, NLPCraft community filed the report in March and it is due again in April? Thank you, -- Nikita Ivanov On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 2:39 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > I think we may have a slight tooling issue, perhaps related to the 1st April falling on Wednesday and me being in the southern hemisphere. I’ll look into it and correct the list. > > Thanks, > Justin > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [MENTORS] April 2021 Incubator report timeline
Hi, I think we may have a slight tooling issue, perhaps related to the 1st April falling on Wednesday and me being in the southern hemisphere. I’ll look into it and correct the list. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [MENTORS] April 2021 Incubator report timeline
Hi Dominik, A large number of March reports were not accepted. • Hivemall • Livy • NLPCraft • PageSpeed • Spot • Toree • Weex However, I agree with you that the list should be: "Annotator Developers" "BlueMarlin Developers" "DataLab Developers" "EventMesh Developers" "Flagon Developers" "Hivemall Developers" "Liminal Developers" "Livy Developers" "Milagro Developers" "MXNet Developers" "NLPCraft Developers" "NuttX Developers" "PageSpeed Developers" "Pegasus Developers" "Pony Mail Developers" "Spot Developers" "Teaclave Developers" "Toree Developers" "TubeMQ Developers" "Weex Developers" "YuniKorn Developers" AND NOT: "AGE Developers" "brpc Developers" "Crail Developers" "Hivemall Developers" "Hop Developers" "Livy Developers" "Marvin-AI Developers" "Nemo Developers" "NLPCraft Developers" "PageSpeed Developers" "Spot Developers" "StreamPipes Developers" "Toree Developers" "Wayang Developers" "Weex Developers" Regards, Dave > On Mar 29, 2021, at 1:28 PM, Dominik Riemer wrote: > > Hi Justin, > > I think the list of expected reports below for April refers to reporting > group 3 (usually reporting in March), but should be group 1 for April (plus a > few podlings who didn't report last month) - is this correct? > > Dominik > > On 2021/03/29 03:47:24, Justin Mclean wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Here the report timeline for March report: >>Wed April 07 -- Podling reports due by end of day >>Sun April 11 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day >>Sun April 11 -- Summary due by end of day >>Tue April 13 -- Mentor signoff due by end of day >>Wed April 14 -- Report submitted to Board >>Wed April 21 -- Board meeting >> >> Expected to report are: >> Age >> Brpc >> Crail >> Doris >> EventMesh >> Hivemall >> Hop >> Livy >> Marvin-AI >> Nemo >> NLPCraft >> PageSpeed >> PonyMail >> Spot >> StreamPipes >> Toree >> Wayang >> Weex >> >> As usual you can find the report here [1] >> >> Thanks, >> Justin >> >> 1. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/April2021 >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [MENTORS] April 2021 Incubator report timeline
Hi Justin, I think the list of expected reports below for April refers to reporting group 3 (usually reporting in March), but should be group 1 for April (plus a few podlings who didn't report last month) - is this correct? Dominik On 2021/03/29 03:47:24, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Here the report timeline for March report: > Wed April 07 -- Podling reports due by end of day > Sun April 11 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day > Sun April 11 -- Summary due by end of day > Tue April 13 -- Mentor signoff due by end of day > Wed April 14 -- Report submitted to Board > Wed April 21 -- Board meeting > > Expected to report are: > Age > Brpc > Crail > Doris > EventMesh > Hivemall > Hop > Livy > Marvin-AI > Nemo > NLPCraft > PageSpeed > PonyMail > Spot > StreamPipes > Toree > Wayang > Weex > > As usual you can find the report here [1] > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/April2021 > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc03
Hi ming wen， thanks for reply, I wil start a new vote. Ming Wen 于2021年3月29日周一 下午3:57写道： > yes, looks good to me. > > Thanks, > Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair > Twitter: _WenMing > > > 寒江雪 于2021年3月29日周一 下午3:38写道： > > > Hi ming wen， > > Is it possible to exclude all the unit tests in our project source code > > when packaging the release tarball ? > > > > Ming Wen 于2021年3月29日周一 上午10:59写道： > > > > > hello, mingyu, > > > These files can be in the GitHub repo, but should not be in the > released > > > source package. > > > You can remove the test-related files when packaging, this is also the > > > usual practice. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair > > > Twitter: _WenMing > > > > > > > > > 陈明雨 于2021年3月29日周一 上午10:48写道： > > > > > > > Hi kezhenxu94: > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your apply. > > > > > > > > > > > > We have such a scenario, such as the need to test a file > decompression > > > > code in a unit test. > > > > I think a reasonable way is to directly provide some small zip files > > for > > > > the unit test to test the > > > > decompression logic without writing a set of compression code to > > generate > > > > these zip files at runtime. > > > > > > > > > > > > And in fact, we also refer to the practices of some top-level > projects, > > > > such as [1], [2]. > > > > > > > > > > > > In addition, I only found instructions on the Release that the main > > > > running code cannot contain binary, > > > > but the instructions for unit testing are rather vague, so we are not > > > > completely sure how to deal with these problems reasonably. > > > > If there are related links, could you please provide us for > reference? > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v3.1.1/sql/hive/src/test/resources/regression-test-SPARK-8489 > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/impala/tree/3.4.0/testdata/tzdb > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > 此致！Best Regards > > > > 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen > > > > > > > > Email: > > > > morning...@163.com; > > > > morningman@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 在 2021-03-28 22:55:11，"kezhenxu94" 写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Mar 28, 2021, at 18:40, 陈明雨 wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> Hi kezhenxu94: > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> These files are for unit tests to test the java dynamic library > > > > loading, not some kind of "test tools". > > > > > > > > > >I have some further questions, where are these files come from, if > > their > > > > source codes are in the same repo, why not just build them from the > > > source > > > > codes before using them, if the files’ source codes are not in the > same > > > > repo, there a bunch of ways to depend on them, but including the > binary > > > > files is not the first choice, if worse, the files’ source codes are > > not > > > > accessible, the PMC has no way to review the content and it’s a > > > potential > > > > security problem. > > > > > > > > > >> These files are in the code repo for a long time and also > contained > > in > > > > our previous releases, and no one disagrees with it. > > > > >> So I believe it is ok for a source release. > > > > > > > > > >The previous releases including them does not mean it’s ok IMO, it > > might > > > > be overlooked , that’s one of the reasons why we need several > releases > > > > before graduation to give the IPMC more time to review the release > > > process > > > > as well as their contents. > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> -- > > > > >> > > > > >> 此致！Best Regards > > > > >> 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen > > > > >> > > > > >> Email: > > > > >> chenmin...@apache.org > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>> 在 2021-03-27 22:53:49，"kezhenxu94@apache" > > > > 写道： > > > > >>> Sorry my -1, I saw there are binary files in the source tar, > > although > > > > they’re test tools, but this is not allowed in the source release. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> ./fe/fe-core/src/test/resources/plugin_test/plugin_test.jar > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > ./fe/fe-core/src/test/resources/plugin_test/test_local_plugin/auditdemo.jar > > > > >>> > > > > > On Mar 26, 2021, at 12:36, 寒江雪 wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Please review and vote on Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc03 > > > release. > > > > > > > > Apache Doris is an MPP-based interactive SQL data warehousing > for > > > > reporting > > > > and analysis. > > > > > > > > The Apache Doris community has voted on and approved this > release: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1d3728b02b4f7b56413d3bf334b94fbc9c8406bf2d78aa01fea60a77%40%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > The vote result email thread: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re1eb419d0eb4689d77e82727811facef08f3c2498f64ad2ea812d42a%40%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > The release cand
Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc03
yes, looks good to me. Thanks, Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair Twitter: _WenMing 寒江雪 于2021年3月29日周一 下午3:38写道： > Hi ming wen， > Is it possible to exclude all the unit tests in our project source code > when packaging the release tarball ? > > Ming Wen 于2021年3月29日周一 上午10:59写道： > > > hello, mingyu, > > These files can be in the GitHub repo, but should not be in the released > > source package. > > You can remove the test-related files when packaging, this is also the > > usual practice. > > > > Thanks, > > Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair > > Twitter: _WenMing > > > > > > 陈明雨 于2021年3月29日周一 上午10:48写道： > > > > > Hi kezhenxu94: > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your apply. > > > > > > > > > We have such a scenario, such as the need to test a file decompression > > > code in a unit test. > > > I think a reasonable way is to directly provide some small zip files > for > > > the unit test to test the > > > decompression logic without writing a set of compression code to > generate > > > these zip files at runtime. > > > > > > > > > And in fact, we also refer to the practices of some top-level projects, > > > such as [1], [2]. > > > > > > > > > In addition, I only found instructions on the Release that the main > > > running code cannot contain binary, > > > but the instructions for unit testing are rather vague, so we are not > > > completely sure how to deal with these problems reasonably. > > > If there are related links, could you please provide us for reference? > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v3.1.1/sql/hive/src/test/resources/regression-test-SPARK-8489 > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/impala/tree/3.4.0/testdata/tzdb > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > 此致！Best Regards > > > 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen > > > > > > Email: > > > morning...@163.com; > > > morningman@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 在 2021-03-28 22:55:11，"kezhenxu94" 写道： > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Mar 28, 2021, at 18:40, 陈明雨 wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Hi kezhenxu94: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> These files are for unit tests to test the java dynamic library > > > loading, not some kind of "test tools". > > > > > > > >I have some further questions, where are these files come from, if > their > > > source codes are in the same repo, why not just build them from the > > source > > > codes before using them, if the files’ source codes are not in the same > > > repo, there a bunch of ways to depend on them, but including the binary > > > files is not the first choice, if worse, the files’ source codes are > not > > > accessible, the PMC has no way to review the content and it’s a > > potential > > > security problem. > > > > > > > >> These files are in the code repo for a long time and also contained > in > > > our previous releases, and no one disagrees with it. > > > >> So I believe it is ok for a source release. > > > > > > > >The previous releases including them does not mean it’s ok IMO, it > might > > > be overlooked , that’s one of the reasons why we need several releases > > > before graduation to give the IPMC more time to review the release > > process > > > as well as their contents. > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> > > > >> 此致！Best Regards > > > >> 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen > > > >> > > > >> Email: > > > >> chenmin...@apache.org > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>> 在 2021-03-27 22:53:49，"kezhenxu94@apache" > > 写道： > > > >>> Sorry my -1, I saw there are binary files in the source tar, > although > > > they’re test tools, but this is not allowed in the source release. > > > >>> > > > >>> ./fe/fe-core/src/test/resources/plugin_test/plugin_test.jar > > > >>> > > > > > > ./fe/fe-core/src/test/resources/plugin_test/test_local_plugin/auditdemo.jar > > > >>> > > > > On Mar 26, 2021, at 12:36, 寒江雪 wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Please review and vote on Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc03 > > release. > > > > > > Apache Doris is an MPP-based interactive SQL data warehousing for > > > reporting > > > and analysis. > > > > > > The Apache Doris community has voted on and approved this release: > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1d3728b02b4f7b56413d3bf334b94fbc9c8406bf2d78aa01fea60a77%40%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E > > > > > > The vote result email thread: > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re1eb419d0eb4689d77e82727811facef08f3c2498f64ad2ea812d42a%40%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E > > > > > > The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.14.0-rc03, > > > available > > > here: > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/releases/tag/0.14.0-rc03 > > > > > > Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release, and there > > is a > > > simple release notes can be found here: > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/issues/5374 > > > > > > The artifacts (source, signature and checksum)
Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc03
Hi ming wen， Is it possible to exclude all the unit tests in our project source code when packaging the release tarball ? Ming Wen 于2021年3月29日周一 上午10:59写道： > hello, mingyu, > These files can be in the GitHub repo, but should not be in the released > source package. > You can remove the test-related files when packaging, this is also the > usual practice. > > Thanks, > Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair > Twitter: _WenMing > > > 陈明雨 于2021年3月29日周一 上午10:48写道： > > > Hi kezhenxu94: > > > > > > Thanks for your apply. > > > > > > We have such a scenario, such as the need to test a file decompression > > code in a unit test. > > I think a reasonable way is to directly provide some small zip files for > > the unit test to test the > > decompression logic without writing a set of compression code to generate > > these zip files at runtime. > > > > > > And in fact, we also refer to the practices of some top-level projects, > > such as [1], [2]. > > > > > > In addition, I only found instructions on the Release that the main > > running code cannot contain binary, > > but the instructions for unit testing are rather vague, so we are not > > completely sure how to deal with these problems reasonably. > > If there are related links, could you please provide us for reference? > > > > > > [1] > > > https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v3.1.1/sql/hive/src/test/resources/regression-test-SPARK-8489 > > [2] https://github.com/apache/impala/tree/3.4.0/testdata/tzdb > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > 此致！Best Regards > > 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen > > > > Email: > > morning...@163.com; > > morningman@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > 在 2021-03-28 22:55:11，"kezhenxu94" 写道： > > > > > > > > >> On Mar 28, 2021, at 18:40, 陈明雨 wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi kezhenxu94: > > >> > > >> > > >> These files are for unit tests to test the java dynamic library > > loading, not some kind of "test tools". > > > > > >I have some further questions, where are these files come from, if their > > source codes are in the same repo, why not just build them from the > source > > codes before using them, if the files’ source codes are not in the same > > repo, there a bunch of ways to depend on them, but including the binary > > files is not the first choice, if worse, the files’ source codes are not > > accessible, the PMC has no way to review the content and it’s a > potential > > security problem. > > > > > >> These files are in the code repo for a long time and also contained in > > our previous releases, and no one disagrees with it. > > >> So I believe it is ok for a source release. > > > > > >The previous releases including them does not mean it’s ok IMO, it might > > be overlooked , that’s one of the reasons why we need several releases > > before graduation to give the IPMC more time to review the release > process > > as well as their contents. > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> > > >> 此致！Best Regards > > >> 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen > > >> > > >> Email: > > >> chenmin...@apache.org > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>> 在 2021-03-27 22:53:49，"kezhenxu94@apache" > 写道： > > >>> Sorry my -1, I saw there are binary files in the source tar, although > > they’re test tools, but this is not allowed in the source release. > > >>> > > >>> ./fe/fe-core/src/test/resources/plugin_test/plugin_test.jar > > >>> > > > ./fe/fe-core/src/test/resources/plugin_test/test_local_plugin/auditdemo.jar > > >>> > > > On Mar 26, 2021, at 12:36, 寒江雪 wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Please review and vote on Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc03 > release. > > > > Apache Doris is an MPP-based interactive SQL data warehousing for > > reporting > > and analysis. > > > > The Apache Doris community has voted on and approved this release: > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1d3728b02b4f7b56413d3bf334b94fbc9c8406bf2d78aa01fea60a77%40%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E > > > > The vote result email thread: > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re1eb419d0eb4689d77e82727811facef08f3c2498f64ad2ea812d42a%40%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E > > > > The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.14.0-rc03, > > available > > here: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/releases/tag/0.14.0-rc03 > > > > Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release, and there > is a > > simple release notes can be found here: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/issues/5374 > > > > The artifacts (source, signature and checksum) corresponding to this > > release > > candidate can be found here: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/0.14/0.14.0-rc03/ > > > > This has been signed with PGP key 59F2ACED, corresponding to > > yang...@apache.org. > > KEYS file is available here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/KEYS > > It is also listed here: > > https://people.apache.org/key
