Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.15.0-rc4
Thanks for your guidance, we have done a lot of repairs, and we are ready to release v0.15.0-rc5. Felix Cheung 于2023年1月31日周二 04:44写道： > As I understand you can release under the WIP disclaimer > > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 12:31 AM Zikuan An wrote: > > > Thanks for your valuable suggestion. > > > > I will revisit the whole process and re-open the vote after fixing the > > issues you mentioned. > > > > > > Best, > > > > Zikuan An > > > > Justin Mclean 于2023年1月19日周四 16:25写道： > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Because it contains a restriction of use clause e.g. "This license does > > > not include the right to compile assets, vectors or images from > > ManyPixels > > > to replicate a similar or competing service, in any form or distribute > > the > > > assets in packs or otherwise. This extends to automated and > non-automated > > > ways to link, embed.” It would be best to ask on legal discuss about > > this. > > > > > > For instance this license has been considered Category X. [1] > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > > Justin > > > > > > 1. https://www.pexels.com/license/ > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > >
[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) 2.0.0-RC3
Hello Incubator Community, I'm cancelling this vote: https://lists.apache.org/thread/f266jk6o4lym5k0pwl951jt6pqy35bqo due to licenses issues. I'll fix them and start a new vote process. Thanks a lot for all your help. Best, Huajie Wang
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) 2.0.0-RC3
Hi Justin: Thanks for your answer, this vote is closed, we will fix them and start a new vote process Best, Huajie Wang Justin Mclean 于2023年2月1日周三 07:33写道： > HI, > > > Do you mean that: all frontend dependencies' licenses need to included > in > > binary license file ( /LICENSE), right? > > Just a note it’s not all dependancies that need to be listed but only what > is included in the release see [1] > > Kind Regards, > Justin > > 1. https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html#guiding > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) 2.0.0-RC3
HI, > Do you mean that: all frontend dependencies' licenses need to included in > binary license file ( /LICENSE), right? Just a note it’s not all dependancies that need to be listed but only what is included in the release see [1] Kind Regards, Justin 1. https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html#guiding - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HugeGraph(Incubating) 1.0.0
HI, > Thank you for your answer. There is another question I would like to ask, is > it necessary to copy the source code of the 3rd party library of the apache > license, in addition to keeping the header, do we need to make additional > declarations in our notices file? It depends if the 3rd party library has a NOTICE file or not. [1] Kind Regards, Justin 1. https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) 2.0.0-RC3
Ah yeah, sorry I missed that part, I searched npmjs and found no result so I thought the front end licenses are missing, didn’t notice you used the GitHub address of the dependency. Then only 2 issues need resolved. > On Jan 31, 2023, at 23:43, Huajie Wang wrote: > > hi kezhenxu: > > >> All frontend dependencies' licenses are not included in the binary > license file > > I checked again, All frontend dependencies' licenses are already included > in the binary license file[1] (all of them after line 732) > > > [1] > https://github.com/apache/incubator-streampark/blob/dev/dist-material/release-docs/LICENSE#L732 > > > > Best, > Huajie Wang > > > > kezhenxu94 于2023年1月31日周二 21:28写道： > >> Hi, it's better you should send a [CANCEL][VOTE] email for the previous >> unsuccessful vote, >> and start a new round of vote with subject [VOTE][ROUND ], so people >> won't get confused >> which thread to check. >> >> I'm -1, it looks like not all issues in last round are resolved: >> >> - The maven wrapper license should be included in the source LICENSE >> file[1], >> and should not be included in the binary LICENSE file[2], >> I suggest you don't add unnecessary LICENSE information in binary LICENSE >> if you don't distribute that work >> (maven wrapper is source dependency in this case). >> >> - All frontend dependencies' licenses are not included in the binary >> license file[2], >> although there are some license files copied from the dependencies to the >> licenses folder[3], >> but there are some many other dependencies' license missed in the [2]. >> >> - Some files are copied and modified from other repositories but are not >> listed in the LICENSE file, such as (not curated list) >> - >> streampark-common/src/main/scala/org/apache/streampark/common/util/ExceptionUtils.scala >> is copied and modified from >> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/util/ExceptionUtils.java >> - >> streampark-common/src/main/scala/org/apache/streampark/common/util/AssertUtils.scala >> is copied and modified from >> https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/blob/main/spring-core/src/main/java/org/springframework/util/Assert.java >> >> Others I checked are OK: >> >> - all tarballs are signed with 5AE01B8E . >> - all tarballs have correct shasums. >> >> [1] /LICENSE >> [2] dist-material/release-docs/LICENSE >> [3] dist-material/release-docs/licenses/front-end >> On Jan 31, 2023, at 19:44, Huajie Wang wrote: >>> >>> Hello Incubator Community: >>> >>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) >>> version 2.0.0-RC3 >>> >>> The Apache StreamPark community has voted on and approved a proposal to >>> release >>> Apache StreamPark(Incubating) version 2.0.0-RC3 >>> >>> We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this >>> incubator release. >>> >>> Apache StreamPark, Make stream processing easier! easy-to-use streaming >>> application development framework and operation platform. >>> >>> StreamPark community vote thread: >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/b3lzmy10tnm1wf0gopskyc93xd3m87zn >>> >>> Vote result thread: >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/cflr622wv5b262w1tz8myvjr0dcyj8md >>> >>> The release candidate: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/streampark/2.0.0-RC3/ >>> >>> Git tag for the release: >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-streampark/releases/tag/v2.0.0-rc3 >>> >>> Maven artifacts are available in a staging repository at: >>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestreampark-1008/ >>> >>> The artifacts signed with PGP key [5AE01B8E], corresponding to [ >>> benj...@apache.org], that can be found in keys file: >>> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/streampark/KEYS >>> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number >>> of votes are reached. >>> >>> Please vote accordingly: >>> [ ] +1 approve >>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason >>> >>> More detailed checklist please refer: >>> • >>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist >>> >>> Steps to validate the release， Please refer to: >>> • https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html >>> • https://streampark.apache.org/community/release/how-to-verify >>> >>> >>> How to Build: >>> >>> 1) clone source code: git clone -b v2.0.0-rc3 g...@github.com:apache/incubator-streampark.git >>> >>> 2) build project: cd incubator-streampark && sh ./build.sh >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> On behalf of Apache StreamPark(Incubating) community >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> Huajie Wang >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) 2.0.0-RC3
hi kezhenxu: > All frontend dependencies' licenses are not included in the binary license file I checked again, All frontend dependencies' licenses are already included in the binary license file[1] (all of them after line 732) [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-streampark/blob/dev/dist-material/release-docs/LICENSE#L732 Best, Huajie Wang kezhenxu94 于2023年1月31日周二 21:28写道： > Hi, it's better you should send a [CANCEL][VOTE] email for the previous > unsuccessful vote, > and start a new round of vote with subject [VOTE][ROUND ], so people > won't get confused > which thread to check. > > I'm -1, it looks like not all issues in last round are resolved: > > - The maven wrapper license should be included in the source LICENSE > file[1], > and should not be included in the binary LICENSE file[2], > I suggest you don't add unnecessary LICENSE information in binary LICENSE > if you don't distribute that work > (maven wrapper is source dependency in this case). > > - All frontend dependencies' licenses are not included in the binary > license file[2], > although there are some license files copied from the dependencies to the > licenses folder[3], > but there are some many other dependencies' license missed in the [2]. > > - Some files are copied and modified from other repositories but are not > listed in the LICENSE file, such as (not curated list) > - > streampark-common/src/main/scala/org/apache/streampark/common/util/ExceptionUtils.scala > is copied and modified from > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/util/ExceptionUtils.java > - > streampark-common/src/main/scala/org/apache/streampark/common/util/AssertUtils.scala > is copied and modified from > https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/blob/main/spring-core/src/main/java/org/springframework/util/Assert.java > > Others I checked are OK: > > - all tarballs are signed with 5AE01B8E . > - all tarballs have correct shasums. > > [1] /LICENSE > [2] dist-material/release-docs/LICENSE > [3] dist-material/release-docs/licenses/front-end > > > On Jan 31, 2023, at 19:44, Huajie Wang wrote: > > > > Hello Incubator Community: > > > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) > > version 2.0.0-RC3 > > > > The Apache StreamPark community has voted on and approved a proposal to > > release > > Apache StreamPark(Incubating) version 2.0.0-RC3 > > > > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this > > incubator release. > > > > Apache StreamPark, Make stream processing easier! easy-to-use streaming > > application development framework and operation platform. > > > > StreamPark community vote thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/b3lzmy10tnm1wf0gopskyc93xd3m87zn > > > > Vote result thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/cflr622wv5b262w1tz8myvjr0dcyj8md > > > > The release candidate: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/streampark/2.0.0-RC3/ > > > > Git tag for the release: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-streampark/releases/tag/v2.0.0-rc3 > > > > Maven artifacts are available in a staging repository at: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestreampark-1008/ > > > > The artifacts signed with PGP key [5AE01B8E], corresponding to [ > > benj...@apache.org], that can be found in keys file: > > https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/streampark/KEYS > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number > > of votes are reached. > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > More detailed checklist please refer: > > • > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist > > > > Steps to validate the release， Please refer to: > > • https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html > > • https://streampark.apache.org/community/release/how-to-verify > > > > > > How to Build: > > > > 1) clone source code: > >> git clone -b v2.0.0-rc3 g...@github.com:apache/incubator-streampark.git > > > > 2) build project: > >> cd incubator-streampark && sh ./build.sh > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > On behalf of Apache StreamPark(Incubating) community > > > > > > Best, > > Huajie Wang > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) 2.0.0-RC3
hi kezhenxu: Thanks for your review and feedback. about frontend dependencies' licenses , I have some questions > All frontend dependencies' licenses are not included in the binary license file Do you mean that: all frontend dependencies' licenses need to included in binary license file ( /LICENSE), right? This part I refered to dolphinscheduler[1], > although there are some license files copied from the dependencies to the licenses folder (dist-material/release-docs/licenses/front-end), but there are some many other dependencies' license missed in the LICENSE (dist-material/release-docs/LICENSE) Do you mean that: some frontend dependencies' licenses missed, no matter where ([2] or [3]) list it, right? [1] https://github.com/apache/dolphinscheduler/tree/dev/dolphinscheduler-dist/release-docs/licenses/ui-licenses [2] dist-material/release-docs/LICENSE [3] dist-material/release-docs/licenses/front-end Best, Huajie Wang kezhenxu94 于2023年1月31日周二 21:28写道： > Hi, it's better you should send a [CANCEL][VOTE] email for the previous > unsuccessful vote, > and start a new round of vote with subject [VOTE][ROUND ], so people > won't get confused > which thread to check. > > I'm -1, it looks like not all issues in last round are resolved: > > - The maven wrapper license should be included in the source LICENSE > file[1], > and should not be included in the binary LICENSE file[2], > I suggest you don't add unnecessary LICENSE information in binary LICENSE > if you don't distribute that work > (maven wrapper is source dependency in this case). > > - All frontend dependencies' licenses are not included in the binary > license file[2], > although there are some license files copied from the dependencies to the > licenses folder[3], > but there are some many other dependencies' license missed in the [2]. > > - Some files are copied and modified from other repositories but are not > listed in the LICENSE file, such as (not curated list) > - > streampark-common/src/main/scala/org/apache/streampark/common/util/ExceptionUtils.scala > is copied and modified from > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/util/ExceptionUtils.java > - > streampark-common/src/main/scala/org/apache/streampark/common/util/AssertUtils.scala > is copied and modified from > https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/blob/main/spring-core/src/main/java/org/springframework/util/Assert.java > > Others I checked are OK: > > - all tarballs are signed with 5AE01B8E . > - all tarballs have correct shasums. > > [1] /LICENSE > [2] dist-material/release-docs/LICENSE > [3] dist-material/release-docs/licenses/front-end > > > On Jan 31, 2023, at 19:44, Huajie Wang wrote: > > > > Hello Incubator Community: > > > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) > > version 2.0.0-RC3 > > > > The Apache StreamPark community has voted on and approved a proposal to > > release > > Apache StreamPark(Incubating) version 2.0.0-RC3 > > > > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this > > incubator release. > > > > Apache StreamPark, Make stream processing easier! easy-to-use streaming > > application development framework and operation platform. > > > > StreamPark community vote thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/b3lzmy10tnm1wf0gopskyc93xd3m87zn > > > > Vote result thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/cflr622wv5b262w1tz8myvjr0dcyj8md > > > > The release candidate: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/streampark/2.0.0-RC3/ > > > > Git tag for the release: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-streampark/releases/tag/v2.0.0-rc3 > > > > Maven artifacts are available in a staging repository at: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestreampark-1008/ > > > > The artifacts signed with PGP key [5AE01B8E], corresponding to [ > > benj...@apache.org], that can be found in keys file: > > https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/streampark/KEYS > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number > > of votes are reached. > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > More detailed checklist please refer: > > • > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist > > > > Steps to validate the release， Please refer to: > > • https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html > > • https://streampark.apache.org/community/release/how-to-verify > > > > > > How to Build: > > > > 1) clone source code: > >> git clone -b v2.0.0-rc3 g...@github.com:apache/incubator-streampark.git > > > > 2) build project: > >> cd incubator-streampark && sh ./build.sh > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > On behalf of Apache StreamPark(Incubating) community > > > > > > Best, > > Huajie Wang > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) 2.0.0-RC3
Hi, it's better you should send a [CANCEL][VOTE] email for the previous unsuccessful vote, and start a new round of vote with subject [VOTE][ROUND ], so people won't get confused which thread to check. I'm -1, it looks like not all issues in last round are resolved: - The maven wrapper license should be included in the source LICENSE file[1], and should not be included in the binary LICENSE file[2], I suggest you don't add unnecessary LICENSE information in binary LICENSE if you don't distribute that work (maven wrapper is source dependency in this case). - All frontend dependencies' licenses are not included in the binary license file[2], although there are some license files copied from the dependencies to the licenses folder[3], but there are some many other dependencies' license missed in the [2]. - Some files are copied and modified from other repositories but are not listed in the LICENSE file, such as (not curated list) - streampark-common/src/main/scala/org/apache/streampark/common/util/ExceptionUtils.scala is copied and modified from https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/util/ExceptionUtils.java - streampark-common/src/main/scala/org/apache/streampark/common/util/AssertUtils.scala is copied and modified from https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/blob/main/spring-core/src/main/java/org/springframework/util/Assert.java Others I checked are OK: - all tarballs are signed with 5AE01B8E . - all tarballs have correct shasums. [1] /LICENSE [2] dist-material/release-docs/LICENSE [3] dist-material/release-docs/licenses/front-end > On Jan 31, 2023, at 19:44, Huajie Wang wrote: > > Hello Incubator Community: > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) > version 2.0.0-RC3 > > The Apache StreamPark community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release > Apache StreamPark(Incubating) version 2.0.0-RC3 > > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this > incubator release. > > Apache StreamPark, Make stream processing easier! easy-to-use streaming > application development framework and operation platform. > > StreamPark community vote thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/b3lzmy10tnm1wf0gopskyc93xd3m87zn > > Vote result thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/cflr622wv5b262w1tz8myvjr0dcyj8md > > The release candidate: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/streampark/2.0.0-RC3/ > > Git tag for the release: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-streampark/releases/tag/v2.0.0-rc3 > > Maven artifacts are available in a staging repository at: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestreampark-1008/ > > The artifacts signed with PGP key [5AE01B8E], corresponding to [ > benj...@apache.org], that can be found in keys file: > https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/streampark/KEYS > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number > of votes are reached. > > Please vote accordingly: > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > More detailed checklist please refer: > • > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist > > Steps to validate the release， Please refer to: > • https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html > • https://streampark.apache.org/community/release/how-to-verify > > > How to Build: > > 1) clone source code: >> git clone -b v2.0.0-rc3 g...@github.com:apache/incubator-streampark.git > > 2) build project: >> cd incubator-streampark && sh ./build.sh > > > Thanks, > > On behalf of Apache StreamPark(Incubating) community > > > Best, > Huajie Wang - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE] Release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) 2.0.0-RC3
Hello Incubator Community: This is a call for a vote to release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) version 2.0.0-RC3 The Apache StreamPark community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) version 2.0.0-RC3 We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. Apache StreamPark, Make stream processing easier! easy-to-use streaming application development framework and operation platform. StreamPark community vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/b3lzmy10tnm1wf0gopskyc93xd3m87zn Vote result thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/cflr622wv5b262w1tz8myvjr0dcyj8md The release candidate: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/streampark/2.0.0-RC3/ Git tag for the release: https://github.com/apache/incubator-streampark/releases/tag/v2.0.0-rc3 Maven artifacts are available in a staging repository at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestreampark-1008/ The artifacts signed with PGP key [5AE01B8E], corresponding to [ benj...@apache.org], that can be found in keys file: https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/streampark/KEYS The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number of votes are reached. Please vote accordingly: [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason More detailed checklist please refer: • https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist Steps to validate the release， Please refer to: • https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html • https://streampark.apache.org/community/release/how-to-verify How to Build: 1) clone source code: > git clone -b v2.0.0-rc3 g...@github.com:apache/incubator-streampark.git 2) build project: > cd incubator-streampark && sh ./build.sh Thanks, On behalf of Apache StreamPark(Incubating) community Best, Huajie Wang
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HugeGraph(Incubating) 1.0.0
Hi Thank you for your answer. There is another question I would like to ask, is it necessary to copy the source code of the 3rd party library of the apache license, in addition to keeping the header, do we need to make additional declarations in our notices file? Vaughn On 2023/01/30 21:59:54 Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm a little confused about the license process; > > 1. If the license header of the third-party code contains Copyright, can it > > be kept in our code, or should it be removed and only declared in the > > NOTICE file > > The 3rd party header has to be keep in your code and not removed. Copyright > notices are only relocated if they are donated to the ASF as part of a > software grant. > > > 2. If a large class/file refers to a small piece of code (or subclass), how > > to choose to cancel the license header, can both be kept, or should only > > one be selected > > > 3. A subclass is a third-party code reference, can its license header be > > placed on the subclass name, or must it be placed in the entire file to > > open (if so, how to indicate which part is referenced) > > I’m not sure what you are asking, but if you copy any 3rd party code you > should also keep the header, and not change it even if you make modifications > to the code. > > Kind Regards, > Justin > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
