Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache HugeGraph(incubating) 1.3.0 available

2024-04-03 Thread sebb
On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 at 15:56, Jacky Yang  wrote:

> Hi,sebb
>
> The download page problem has been basically fixed.
>
>
There are still some errors:
- must use closer.lua for artifacts
- must not link to SNAPSHOT files
- versions before 1.0 don't have hashes and sigs and don't appear to be
official ASF releases
- page must have an Incubation disclaimer


> Download Links: https://hugegraph.apache.org/docs/download/download/
>
> Thanks,
> JackyYang
>
>
> sebb  于2024年4月3日周三 15:32写道:
>
>> On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 at 17:11, Jacky Yang 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Apache HugeGraph (Incubating) Team is glad to announce the new release
>> of
>> > version 1.3.0
>> >
>> > HugeGraph is a fast-speed and highly-scalable distributed graph
>> database,
>> > it provides the basic "Graph Traverser" for OLTP query, and also support
>> > "Graph Computing" for OLAP needs now. Our (final) goal is to provide a
>> > one-click "Graph Service", welcome to use and give us feedback,
>> participate
>> > in research and dev.
>> >
>> > In this version, we have fixed some SEC-related issues. And this is the
>> first
>> > release version of hugegraph-ai, it contains a variety of features,
>> > including an initialized Python client, knowledge graph construction
>> > capabilities through LLM, and the integration of RAG based on HugeGraph.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Download Links: https://hugegraph.apache.org/docs/download/download/
>>
>> The download page has some problems:
>> - it is not clear what the first entry on the page is for, and it does
>> not have sigs or hashes. Do not link directly to dlcdn.
>> - artifact links must use closer.lua
>> - there is no KEYS link
>> - there is no information on how to verify downloads
>>
>> Please fix these ASAP.
>>
>> > Github Release Tag:
>> > - https://github.com/apache/incubator-hugegraph/releases/tag/1.3.0
>> > -
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hugegraph-toolchain/releases/tag/1.3.0
>> > - https://github.com/apache/incubator-hugegraph-ai/releases/tag/1.3.0
>> >
>> > Release Notes:
>> > -
>> https://hugegraph.apache.org/docs/changelog/hugegraph-1.3.0-release-notes/
>> > (EN)
>> > -
>> >
>> https://hugegraph.apache.org/cn/docs/changelog/hugegraph-1.3.0-release-notes/
>> > (CN)
>> >
>> > Website: https://hugegrapgh.apache.org/
>> >
>> > HugeGraph Resources:
>> > - Issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-hugegrapgh/issues
>> > - Mailing list: d...@hugegrapgh.apache.org
>> >
>> > JackyYang
>> > On behalf of Apache HugeGraph(incubating) Team
>> >
>> > -
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> >
>>
>


Re: Trademarks and incubation (was: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project)

2024-04-03 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi -

> On Apr 3, 2024, at 4:33 AM, Shane Curcuru  wrote:
> 
> Question: where did the incubation process fail in this case?  How can we 
> prevent something like this from happening again?

Rather than consider what went wrong in this case and to avoid an how is the 
Incubator broken this time discussion … let’s look at the real problem. 

1. Companies donate IP while not understanding that they are giving up 
trademarks.
2. We defer trademark assignment until Incubation ends.

These branding issues can happen in TLPs as well.

It would help if the following were improved (I’m not licking this cookie, just 
discussion.)

1. If the Champion has one duty to the ASF it is to make sure that any entity 
that will sign an SGA knows the brand implications.
2. The IPMC members need to be willing to actively retire projects that are not 
properly understanding the “Apache Way”. This should not be consider a failure 
of the Incubator.
3. The VP, Brand may need to alter the Podling Name Search to include 
information about the brand’s "pre-existing conditions”.
4. When the Incubator votes to allow graduation it should have explicit 
feedback from one or more active Mentors. The VOTE should not be held unless 
that is demonstrated in the [DISCUSS].
5. The Board should ask for explicit assurances from the Incubator PMC that the 
new PMC has or will handle the situation.

Best,
Dave

> 
> On 2021/12/20 22:50:13 Eya Badal Abdisho wrote:
>> Hello Justin,
>> Thank you for your feedback. Please find more information following:
> 
> ...snip...> - There are some minor trademark issues on the Bitnine site e.g 
> [2] → All
>> will be fixed in a day.
> 
> One issue today is that both the Bitnine site advertises several software 
> products with names that start with "AGE...", including a graph-based tool.  
> The other issue is that AgeDB is a company using similar names and branding 
> as Apache Age.
> 
> These issues clearly weren't fixed, nor do they appear to really have been 
> seriously addressed in the past two years.
> 
>  https://bitnine.net/
>  https://agedb.io/
> 
> ...snip...
>> - I notice one person who replied to this thread had a agedb.io email
>> address - what is it relationship with the project?
>> Agedb is a US startup (incorporated in California May this year) and is
>> affiliated with Bitnine Global, who contributed the original AGE source
>> codes to the Apache Software Foundation. The purpose of Agedb is not yet
>> clearly defined but it is expected to be to provide graph database
>> solutions and related services.
> 
> I definitely appreciate our Incubator mentors, who do an incredible job in 
> their volunteer time.  Helping build communities is hard work, and is to be 
> celebrated.
> 
> How can we improve documentation, education, or training so that the below 
> sentence would leap out at any mentor as a "You can't do that!"
> 
> "purpose of Agedb is ... provide graph database solutions and related 
> services"
> 
> Given we were trying to incubate Apache AGE as a graph database, the above 
> sentence is literally describing trademark infringement!  How can we make it 
> easier to ensure podlings and their donating organizations actually take 
> trademark transfer seriously?
> 
> -- 
> - Shane
>  Member
>  The Apache Software Foundation
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache HugeGraph(incubating) 1.3.0 available

2024-04-03 Thread Jacky Yang
Hi,sebb

The download page problem has been basically fixed.

Download Links: https://hugegraph.apache.org/docs/download/download/

Thanks,
JackyYang


sebb  于2024年4月3日周三 15:32写道:

> On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 at 17:11, Jacky Yang 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Apache HugeGraph (Incubating) Team is glad to announce the new release of
> > version 1.3.0
> >
> > HugeGraph is a fast-speed and highly-scalable distributed graph database,
> > it provides the basic "Graph Traverser" for OLTP query, and also support
> > "Graph Computing" for OLAP needs now. Our (final) goal is to provide a
> > one-click "Graph Service", welcome to use and give us feedback,
> participate
> > in research and dev.
> >
> > In this version, we have fixed some SEC-related issues. And this is the
> first
> > release version of hugegraph-ai, it contains a variety of features,
> > including an initialized Python client, knowledge graph construction
> > capabilities through LLM, and the integration of RAG based on HugeGraph.
> >
> >
> >
> > Download Links: https://hugegraph.apache.org/docs/download/download/
>
> The download page has some problems:
> - it is not clear what the first entry on the page is for, and it does
> not have sigs or hashes. Do not link directly to dlcdn.
> - artifact links must use closer.lua
> - there is no KEYS link
> - there is no information on how to verify downloads
>
> Please fix these ASAP.
>
> > Github Release Tag:
> > - https://github.com/apache/incubator-hugegraph/releases/tag/1.3.0
> > -
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hugegraph-toolchain/releases/tag/1.3.0
> > - https://github.com/apache/incubator-hugegraph-ai/releases/tag/1.3.0
> >
> > Release Notes:
> > -
> https://hugegraph.apache.org/docs/changelog/hugegraph-1.3.0-release-notes/
> > (EN)
> > -
> >
> https://hugegraph.apache.org/cn/docs/changelog/hugegraph-1.3.0-release-notes/
> > (CN)
> >
> > Website: https://hugegrapgh.apache.org/
> >
> > HugeGraph Resources:
> > - Issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-hugegrapgh/issues
> > - Mailing list: d...@hugegrapgh.apache.org
> >
> > JackyYang
> > On behalf of Apache HugeGraph(incubating) Team
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>


Re: [VOTE] Accept HertzBeat Into the ASF Incubator

2024-04-03 Thread Charles Zhang
+1 (binding)

Best wishes,
Charles Zhang
from Apache InLong


Sheng Wu  于2024年4月3日周三 11:03写道:

> +1 binding
>
> Sheng Wu 吴晟
>
> Apache SkyWalking
> Twitter, wusheng1108
>
>
> Duo Zhang 于2024年4月3日 周三11:01写道:
>
> > +1 binding
> >
> > I think Sheng Wu's suggestions are all good follow-ons after joining
> > the incubator, agree these are not blockers for incubation.
> >
> > Good Luck!
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Xinyu Zhou  于2024年4月3日周三 10:50写道:
> > >
> > > +1 binding.
> > >
> > > Good Luck!
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Xinyu Zhou
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 10:19 AM roryqi  wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1, Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Xin Wang  于2024年4月3日周三 09:43写道:
> > > >
> > > > > +1, binding
> > > > >
> > > > > Xun Liu  于2024年4月3日周三 08:58写道:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > Xun Liu
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 7:33 AM zhongyi tan <
> zhongyi@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Good luck
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 在 2024/4/2 20:15,“Zhang Yonglun” >  > > > > > > zhangyong...@apache.org>> 写入:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks to everyone who has already taken the time to vote.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I just wanted to gently remind that our voting process is
> > nearing its
> > > > > > > deadline, and we're still hoping to gather more input. Your
> > thoughts
> > > > > > > and opinions truly matter to us.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your participation in the vote will not only shape our
> decisions
> > but
> > > > > > > also ensure that we consider a diverse range of perspectives.
> We
> > > > value
> > > > > > > every voice and want to make sure everyone has the opportunity
> to
> > > > > > > contribute.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If you haven't already, please take a moment to cast your vote.
> > And
> > > > if
> > > > > > > you have any questions or need assistance, feel free to reach
> > out to
> > > > > > > me anytime.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thank you for your time and consideration.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > > Zhang Yonglun
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Zhang Yonglun  > > > zhangyong...@apache.org
> > > > > >>
> > > > > > > 于2024年3月29日周五 14:24写道:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Incubator,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Following the discussion [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for
> > > > > > HertzBeat[1],
> > > > > > > > I am starting this official vote for the HertzBeat project.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Here is their proposal:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HertzBeatProposal
> > > > > > > <
> > > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HertzBeatProposal
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please cast your vote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [ ] +1, bring into the Incubator
> > > > > > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way
> > > > > > > > [ ] -1, do not bring HertzBeat into the Incubator, because...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The vote will open for one week from today.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/snxcdyvqgvhgjdmfv4l192g9tdf8w7rn
> > > > > <
> > > > > > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/snxcdyvqgvhgjdmfv4l192g9tdf8w7rn
> > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > > > Zhang Yonglun
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > -
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > >  > > > > > > general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org>
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Xin
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>


Re: Trademarks and incubation (was: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project)

2024-04-03 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

> Question: where did the incubation process fail in this case?  How can we 
> prevent something like this from happening again?

The Incubator pointed out the issue during a graduation discussion at the end 
of 2021 (which put off graduation). The people involved said they would not use 
the name AgeDB and would stop using it in a week. They became a TLP in early 
2022. From what I can see, the AgeDB website was created in mid 2023.

Kind Regards,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Update project maturity model to include trademark and branding?

2024-04-03 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

> Besides, the maturity model is applied for all ASF projects and under the
> management of ComDev pmc.
> 
> Shall we cc this thread to dev@community.a.o or start a new thread after we
> have a consensus within the Incubator first?

I had intended to bring it up on dev@community.a.o for refinement and 
discussion, but unfortunately, I did not do so. It is probably overdue to do so.

Kind Regards,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Trademarks and incubation (was: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project)

2024-04-03 Thread tison
Related discussions -
https://lists.apache.org/thread/oc9jft1tyo7cbphcyrtwobf4w5rcbhfw

I'll try to send a more complete reply in days. In short, let's update the
maturity model and provide more case studies.

Best,
tison.


Shane Curcuru  于2024年4月3日周三 19:33写道:

> Question: where did the incubation process fail in this case?  How can
> we prevent something like this from happening again?
>
> On 2021/12/20 22:50:13 Eya Badal Abdisho wrote:
> > Hello Justin,
> >
> > Thank you for your feedback. Please find more information following:
>
> ...snip...> - There are some minor trademark issues on the Bitnine site
> e.g [2] → All
> > will be fixed in a day.
>
> One issue today is that both the Bitnine site advertises several
> software products with names that start with "AGE...", including a
> graph-based tool.  The other issue is that AgeDB is a company using
> similar names and branding as Apache Age.
>
> These issues clearly weren't fixed, nor do they appear to really have
> been seriously addressed in the past two years.
>
>https://bitnine.net/
>https://agedb.io/
>
> ...snip...
> > - I notice one person who replied to this thread had a agedb.io email
> > address - what is it relationship with the project?
> >
> > Agedb is a US startup (incorporated in California May this year) and is
> > affiliated with Bitnine Global, who contributed the original AGE source
> > codes to the Apache Software Foundation. The purpose of Agedb is not yet
> > clearly defined but it is expected to be to provide graph database
> > solutions and related services.
>
> I definitely appreciate our Incubator mentors, who do an incredible job
> in their volunteer time.  Helping build communities is hard work, and is
> to be celebrated.
>
> How can we improve documentation, education, or training so that the
> below sentence would leap out at any mentor as a "You can't do that!"
>
> "purpose of Agedb is ... provide graph database solutions and related
> services"
>
> Given we were trying to incubate Apache AGE as a graph database, the
> above sentence is literally describing trademark infringement!  How can
> we make it easier to ensure podlings and their donating organizations
> actually take trademark transfer seriously?
>
> --
> - Shane
>Member
>The Apache Software Foundation
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


Trademarks and incubation (was: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project)

2024-04-03 Thread Shane Curcuru
Question: where did the incubation process fail in this case?  How can 
we prevent something like this from happening again?


On 2021/12/20 22:50:13 Eya Badal Abdisho wrote:

Hello Justin,

Thank you for your feedback. Please find more information following:


...snip...> - There are some minor trademark issues on the Bitnine site 
e.g [2] → All

will be fixed in a day.


One issue today is that both the Bitnine site advertises several 
software products with names that start with "AGE...", including a 
graph-based tool.  The other issue is that AgeDB is a company using 
similar names and branding as Apache Age.


These issues clearly weren't fixed, nor do they appear to really have 
been seriously addressed in the past two years.


  https://bitnine.net/
  https://agedb.io/

...snip...

- I notice one person who replied to this thread had a agedb.io email
address - what is it relationship with the project?

Agedb is a US startup (incorporated in California May this year) and is
affiliated with Bitnine Global, who contributed the original AGE source
codes to the Apache Software Foundation. The purpose of Agedb is not yet
clearly defined but it is expected to be to provide graph database
solutions and related services.


I definitely appreciate our Incubator mentors, who do an incredible job 
in their volunteer time.  Helping build communities is hard work, and is 
to be celebrated.


How can we improve documentation, education, or training so that the 
below sentence would leap out at any mentor as a "You can't do that!"


"purpose of Agedb is ... provide graph database solutions and related 
services"


Given we were trying to incubate Apache AGE as a graph database, the 
above sentence is literally describing trademark infringement!  How can 
we make it easier to ensure podlings and their donating organizations 
actually take trademark transfer seriously?


--
- Shane
  Member
  The Apache Software Foundation

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Update project maturity model to include trademark and branding?

2024-04-03 Thread tison
cc @Shane

Here is a related thread we ever initialized.

I'm trying to find some time to pick it up, but yet to achieve it.

Best,
tison.


tison  于2023年12月29日周五 15:21写道:

> Besides, the maturity model is applied for all ASF projects and under the
> management of ComDev pmc.
>
> Shall we cc this thread to dev@community.a.o or start a new thread after
> we have a consensus within the Incubator first?
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
>
> tison 于2023年12月29日 周五12:58写道:
>
>> > This varies from project to project:
>> > 1. Some projects have PMC members working at a company who use their
>> trademark, and they make sure that things are correctly done.
>> > 2. Some projects have people who actively look out for these types of
>> issues and report them.
>> > 3. Some projects are more active and set up automated Google searches
>> and the like.
>> > 4. Not all issues occur on web pages. Some of these issues arise at
>> conferences or 3rd party events and are often noticed by PMC members or ASF
>> members.
>>
>> Could you name projects of 3? "Some" is hard to follow, if there is a
>> concrete podling/TLP does the thing correctly, we can reuse the
>> workflow.
>>
>> > Yes, in most cases, the PMC should spend time addressing it.
>>
>> Could you name projects that do well in this direction?
>>
>> > how the project wishes to implement this is up to them.
>>
>> As mentors, we should help the podling to follow certain policies,
>> either we can verify it by actionable check items or references.
>> Otherwise it's totally subjective according to a member's
>> interpretation it and it can increase the burden.
>>
>> Looking at the policy, it writes[1]:
>>
>> > COMPLY WITH APACHE BRAND POLICY
>> > All PMCs must to comply with the Apache Project Branding Requirements.
>> If your project does not comply, or is having issues in determining
>> compliance, including a recognition of this set of PMC responsibilities to
>> handle brand issues, work with trademarks@ to resolve the issue.
>> > Much as complying with Apache legal policy to ensure that our software
>> is safely covered under our license, projects must follow the branding
>> requirements to ensure that we maintain our projects' brands and the Apache
>> brand - and public reputations - for the future benefit of all of Apache
>> projects.
>>
>> So how a PMC complies with the policy is that you should comply with
>> the policy .. circular definition.
>>
>> Of course, there are other scattered docs having sentences on this
>> topic, but since we are currently talking about this, we'd better
>> foster a clear actionable guideline, or at lest feeling how a podling
>> suffers when they are searching these sentences.
>>
>> We don't stop podling by requiring them comply with guidelines, we
>> help them to follow.
>>
>> Best,
>> tison.
>>
>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/responsibility#compliance
>>
>> tison  于2023年12月29日周五 12:39写道:
>> >
>> > > TB50 Any existing previous domain names are in control of the PMC.
>> >
>> > This is hard to follow. If the domain names are under the donating
>> > compay's top domain, said if there is a foo.google.com, shall the PMC
>> > take control of Google?
>> >
>> > > TB60 Any existing trademarks have been or are in the process of being
>> transferred to the ASF.
>> >
>> > Just in case the trademarks are donated to ASF in the proposal. Given
>> > Ignite as an example, GridGain doesn't donate its "GridGain InMemory
>> > Platform" trademark but choose a new trademark "Ignite". So "GridGain"
>> > trademark is still held by GridGain Systems.
>> >
>> > I believe this process should be done with the signed SGAs so if SGAs
>> > are signed properly, this guideline is followed.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > tison.
>> >
>> > tison  于2023年12月29日周五 12:33写道:
>> > >
>> > > >> It seems the updated podling report template has not had the
>> impact it was hoped to have around issues of branding and trademarks.
>> > >
>> > > > For example, a doable mechanism is that, during each quarter's
>> report,
>> > > > the (P)PMC includes a section on what checks they did and if they
>> > > > found any 3rdparty misuse.
>> > >
>> > > And this report to be included for TLPs also. Podlings are to be a
>> > > TLP. Although we don't use TLP as an evidence for what to do
>> > > incorrectly, if a TLP does the right thing, we should refer it as an
>> > > example. Barely policy is hard to follow.
>> > >
>> > > The original podling report template asks "Is the PPMC managing the
>> > > podling's brand / trademarks?" and a podling would answer YES because
>> > > nothing is known to change the answer :D
>> > >
>> > > Best,
>> > > tison.
>> > >
>> > > tison  于2023年12月29日周五 12:25写道:
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks for starting this thread. As we actually evaluate the
>> maturity
>> > > > at how the podling complies with trademarks and branding, we'd
>> better
>> > > > provide certain guidelines for podlings to follow.
>> > > >
>> > > > I can understand TB10 TB20 TB30 after the recent discussions, but
>> > 

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache HugeGraph(incubating) 1.3.0 available

2024-04-03 Thread sebb
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 at 17:11, Jacky Yang  wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Apache HugeGraph (Incubating) Team is glad to announce the new release of
> version 1.3.0
>
> HugeGraph is a fast-speed and highly-scalable distributed graph database,
> it provides the basic "Graph Traverser" for OLTP query, and also support
> "Graph Computing" for OLAP needs now. Our (final) goal is to provide a
> one-click "Graph Service", welcome to use and give us feedback, participate
> in research and dev.
>
> In this version, we have fixed some SEC-related issues. And this is the first
> release version of hugegraph-ai, it contains a variety of features,
> including an initialized Python client, knowledge graph construction
> capabilities through LLM, and the integration of RAG based on HugeGraph.
>
>
>
> Download Links: https://hugegraph.apache.org/docs/download/download/

The download page has some problems:
- it is not clear what the first entry on the page is for, and it does
not have sigs or hashes. Do not link directly to dlcdn.
- artifact links must use closer.lua
- there is no KEYS link
- there is no information on how to verify downloads

Please fix these ASAP.

> Github Release Tag:
> - https://github.com/apache/incubator-hugegraph/releases/tag/1.3.0
> - https://github.com/apache/incubator-hugegraph-toolchain/releases/tag/1.3.0
> - https://github.com/apache/incubator-hugegraph-ai/releases/tag/1.3.0
>
> Release Notes:
> - https://hugegraph.apache.org/docs/changelog/hugegraph-1.3.0-release-notes/
> (EN)
> -
> https://hugegraph.apache.org/cn/docs/changelog/hugegraph-1.3.0-release-notes/
> (CN)
>
> Website: https://hugegrapgh.apache.org/
>
> HugeGraph Resources:
> - Issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-hugegrapgh/issues
> - Mailing list: d...@hugegrapgh.apache.org
>
> JackyYang
> On behalf of Apache HugeGraph(incubating) Team
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org