Re: Questions about a new project entering Apache Incubator
This is not to get the conclusion, and it is not clear, and many other project repositories are with this prefix. https://incubator.apache.org/guides/transferring.html#first_steps_outside_the_incubator (tison found) Graduation doc is there indicating incaubtor- prefix is expected. This is just a 10s operation on GitHub admin page, not a heavy work. Graduation is not happening every day, even not every month. Developer don't have to change remote git, as that redirect forward is supported too. More importantly, I don't agree this is clear without prefix. This us serious change, if you inist this is clear, start a vote. A lot of ppl in this context don't agree too. Sheng Wu 吴晟 Apache SkyWalking Twitter, wusheng1108 Justin Mclean 于2024年4月17日 周三11:59写道： > Hi, > > Both of these projects are new and just getting set up. I'd give them a > little time to do that. Infra in recent years have asked to minimise work > for them on graduation. We recently dropped the requirement for having > incubating in podling domain names so I don't see it's needed in repo names > as long as it clear the project is an incubating project. > Kind Regards, > Justin > > > On Wed, 17 Apr 2024, 1:47 pm Willem Jiang, wrote: > > > With the "incubator" profix, it's easy for us to tell if the project > > belongs to the incubator and it is still in the incubating process. > > Currently I cannot find any disclaimer document[1] in the repo root > > directory from [2][3] to tell if they are still in the incubator or > > not. > > > > [1]https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#disclaimers > > [2]https://github.com/apache/amoro > > [3]https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat > > > > Willem Jiang > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:06 AM Calvin Kirs wrote: > > > > > > Podlings are not yet fully accepted as part of the Apache Software > > > Foundation. > > > > > > I haven't specifically witnessed any formal decision or process for > > > removing the "incubator" prefix from repository names. > > > > > > Unless there are compelling reasons to remove the "incubator" prefix, I > > > believe it's important to maintain a clear distinction between Podlings > > and > > > TLPs, especially in situations where confusion is likely to arise. > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 10:32 AM Sheng Wu > > wrote: > > > > > > > Same mistake for Armoro as Hertzbeat team was misguided from > > > > https://github.com/apache/amoro/issues/2700 > > > > > > > > This is not discussed AFAIK, and the description is not correct. > > > > GitHub supported renaming and repository path forward automatically > > > > years ago. apache/incubator-foo -> apache/foo is transparent and both > > > > addresses work. > > > > > > > > This should not be changed randomly considering many other projects > > > > are using incubator- prefix. This renaming causes confusion. IPMC are > > > > making sure the website has `incubating` and disclaimer as always, > > > > suddenly some projects even could use repository names without > > > > prefixes. This is wrong. > > > > > > > > Mentors of Armoro and Hertzbeat should follow the existing > > > > requirements, and PPMC members of these two projects should ask INFRA > > > > to rename, adding the incubator- prefix back. > > > > > > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > > > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > > > > > > Xuanwo 于2024年4月17日周三 10:19写道： > > > > > > > > > > > For projects in incubation, is it no longer necessary for the > > project > > > > > > name to have the "incubator-" prefix as it used to be? > > > > > > > > > > Based on the discussions in this mailing list, the only change made > > is > > > > the removal of `incubator` from the domain. Now, users access ` > > > > polding.apache.org` instead of `polding.incubator.apache.org` by > > default. > > > > > > > > > > The project and releases are still required to include "incubator", > > and > > > > it's important for the PPMC to clearly communicate that this project > > > > remains under incubation. > > > > > > > > > > In this case, I believe Hertzbeat PPMC made a mistake. I will > suggest > > > > they rename it to incubator-hertzbeat. > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024, at 14:23, rat O wrote: > > > > > > First of all, congratulations to HertzBeat for successfully > > entering > > > > > > the Apache Incubator. > > > > > > > > > > > > I noticed that the project has created an issue for an unknown > > license > > > > > > and is ready to address it. I'm sure the project will also > address > > > > > > other unknown licenses, if they exist. > > > > > > > > > > > > I wonder if the situation of having a significant amount of > > non-English > > > > > > languages in the codes, like these > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/warehouse/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/warehouse/config/WarehouseProperties.java > > > > , > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/common/entity/manager/NoticeRule.java > > >
Re: Questions about a new project entering Apache Incubator
Hi, Both of these projects are new and just getting set up. I'd give them a little time to do that. Infra in recent years have asked to minimise work for them on graduation. We recently dropped the requirement for having incubating in podling domain names so I don't see it's needed in repo names as long as it clear the project is an incubating project. Kind Regards, Justin On Wed, 17 Apr 2024, 1:47 pm Willem Jiang, wrote: > With the "incubator" profix, it's easy for us to tell if the project > belongs to the incubator and it is still in the incubating process. > Currently I cannot find any disclaimer document[1] in the repo root > directory from [2][3] to tell if they are still in the incubator or > not. > > [1]https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#disclaimers > [2]https://github.com/apache/amoro > [3]https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat > > Willem Jiang > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:06 AM Calvin Kirs wrote: > > > > Podlings are not yet fully accepted as part of the Apache Software > > Foundation. > > > > I haven't specifically witnessed any formal decision or process for > > removing the "incubator" prefix from repository names. > > > > Unless there are compelling reasons to remove the "incubator" prefix, I > > believe it's important to maintain a clear distinction between Podlings > and > > TLPs, especially in situations where confusion is likely to arise. > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 10:32 AM Sheng Wu > wrote: > > > > > Same mistake for Armoro as Hertzbeat team was misguided from > > > https://github.com/apache/amoro/issues/2700 > > > > > > This is not discussed AFAIK, and the description is not correct. > > > GitHub supported renaming and repository path forward automatically > > > years ago. apache/incubator-foo -> apache/foo is transparent and both > > > addresses work. > > > > > > This should not be changed randomly considering many other projects > > > are using incubator- prefix. This renaming causes confusion. IPMC are > > > making sure the website has `incubating` and disclaimer as always, > > > suddenly some projects even could use repository names without > > > prefixes. This is wrong. > > > > > > Mentors of Armoro and Hertzbeat should follow the existing > > > requirements, and PPMC members of these two projects should ask INFRA > > > to rename, adding the incubator- prefix back. > > > > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > > > > Xuanwo 于2024年4月17日周三 10:19写道： > > > > > > > > > For projects in incubation, is it no longer necessary for the > project > > > > > name to have the "incubator-" prefix as it used to be? > > > > > > > > Based on the discussions in this mailing list, the only change made > is > > > the removal of `incubator` from the domain. Now, users access ` > > > polding.apache.org` instead of `polding.incubator.apache.org` by > default. > > > > > > > > The project and releases are still required to include "incubator", > and > > > it's important for the PPMC to clearly communicate that this project > > > remains under incubation. > > > > > > > > In this case, I believe Hertzbeat PPMC made a mistake. I will suggest > > > they rename it to incubator-hertzbeat. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024, at 14:23, rat O wrote: > > > > > First of all, congratulations to HertzBeat for successfully > entering > > > > > the Apache Incubator. > > > > > > > > > > I noticed that the project has created an issue for an unknown > license > > > > > and is ready to address it. I'm sure the project will also address > > > > > other unknown licenses, if they exist. > > > > > > > > > > I wonder if the situation of having a significant amount of > non-English > > > > > languages in the codes, like these > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/warehouse/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/warehouse/config/WarehouseProperties.java > > > , > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/common/entity/manager/NoticeRule.java > > > , > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/common/config/AviatorConfiguration.java > > > > > ... > > > > > , will all of them also be addressed in the future? > > > > > > > > > > For projects in incubation, is it no longer necessary for the > project > > > > > name to have the "incubator-" prefix as it used to be? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Xuanwo > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best wishes！ > > CalvinKirs > >
Re: Questions about a new project entering Apache Incubator
With the "incubator" profix, it's easy for us to tell if the project belongs to the incubator and it is still in the incubating process. Currently I cannot find any disclaimer document[1] in the repo root directory from [2][3] to tell if they are still in the incubator or not. [1]https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#disclaimers [2]https://github.com/apache/amoro [3]https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat Willem Jiang On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:06 AM Calvin Kirs wrote: > > Podlings are not yet fully accepted as part of the Apache Software > Foundation. > > I haven't specifically witnessed any formal decision or process for > removing the "incubator" prefix from repository names. > > Unless there are compelling reasons to remove the "incubator" prefix, I > believe it's important to maintain a clear distinction between Podlings and > TLPs, especially in situations where confusion is likely to arise. > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 10:32 AM Sheng Wu wrote: > > > Same mistake for Armoro as Hertzbeat team was misguided from > > https://github.com/apache/amoro/issues/2700 > > > > This is not discussed AFAIK, and the description is not correct. > > GitHub supported renaming and repository path forward automatically > > years ago. apache/incubator-foo -> apache/foo is transparent and both > > addresses work. > > > > This should not be changed randomly considering many other projects > > are using incubator- prefix. This renaming causes confusion. IPMC are > > making sure the website has `incubating` and disclaimer as always, > > suddenly some projects even could use repository names without > > prefixes. This is wrong. > > > > Mentors of Armoro and Hertzbeat should follow the existing > > requirements, and PPMC members of these two projects should ask INFRA > > to rename, adding the incubator- prefix back. > > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > > Xuanwo 于2024年4月17日周三 10:19写道： > > > > > > > For projects in incubation, is it no longer necessary for the project > > > > name to have the "incubator-" prefix as it used to be? > > > > > > Based on the discussions in this mailing list, the only change made is > > the removal of `incubator` from the domain. Now, users access ` > > polding.apache.org` instead of `polding.incubator.apache.org` by default. > > > > > > The project and releases are still required to include "incubator", and > > it's important for the PPMC to clearly communicate that this project > > remains under incubation. > > > > > > In this case, I believe Hertzbeat PPMC made a mistake. I will suggest > > they rename it to incubator-hertzbeat. > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024, at 14:23, rat O wrote: > > > > First of all, congratulations to HertzBeat for successfully entering > > > > the Apache Incubator. > > > > > > > > I noticed that the project has created an issue for an unknown license > > > > and is ready to address it. I'm sure the project will also address > > > > other unknown licenses, if they exist. > > > > > > > > I wonder if the situation of having a significant amount of non-English > > > > languages in the codes, like these > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/warehouse/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/warehouse/config/WarehouseProperties.java > > , > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/common/entity/manager/NoticeRule.java > > , > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/common/config/AviatorConfiguration.java > > > > ... > > > > , will all of them also be addressed in the future? > > > > > > > > For projects in incubation, is it no longer necessary for the project > > > > name to have the "incubator-" prefix as it used to be? > > > > > > -- > > > Xuanwo > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > -- > Best wishes！ > CalvinKirs - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Questions about a new project entering Apache Incubator
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 11:06 PM Calvin Kirs wrote: > Podlings are not yet fully accepted as part of the Apache Software > Foundation. > > I haven't specifically witnessed any formal decision or process for > removing the "incubator" prefix from repository names. > > Unless there are compelling reasons to remove the "incubator" prefix, I > believe it's important to maintain a clear distinction between Podlings and > TLPs, especially in situations where confusion is likely to arise. > FWIW, the incubator- prefix comes from the SVN days where all podlings were under the incubator SVN tree, then had their own but named like a subproject (which in all honesty to simplify ASF policies, podlings are really just subprojects of the Incubator PMC, hence why IPMC votes on them). As tooling has seemingly improved over time, it seems like we can map repositories to the PMC that is responsible for them without relying on naming conventions, which is a big step up. What does concern me though, looking at Hertzbeat, is that there's no mentions of the Incubator anywhere to be found. I'm assuming they're just getting stood up, but perhaps there needs to be a way to cross reference that the repository belongs to incubator that's visible to someone using that repository. I think I'd be for it, but assuming we put up some guardrails for podlings. While its true repositories can redirect, it can be confusing that they do. John > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 10:32 AM Sheng Wu > wrote: > > > Same mistake for Armoro as Hertzbeat team was misguided from > > https://github.com/apache/amoro/issues/2700 > > > > This is not discussed AFAIK, and the description is not correct. > > GitHub supported renaming and repository path forward automatically > > years ago. apache/incubator-foo -> apache/foo is transparent and both > > addresses work. > > > > This should not be changed randomly considering many other projects > > are using incubator- prefix. This renaming causes confusion. IPMC are > > making sure the website has `incubating` and disclaimer as always, > > suddenly some projects even could use repository names without > > prefixes. This is wrong. > > > > Mentors of Armoro and Hertzbeat should follow the existing > > requirements, and PPMC members of these two projects should ask INFRA > > to rename, adding the incubator- prefix back. > > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > > Xuanwo 于2024年4月17日周三 10:19写道： > > > > > > > For projects in incubation, is it no longer necessary for the project > > > > name to have the "incubator-" prefix as it used to be? > > > > > > Based on the discussions in this mailing list, the only change made is > > the removal of `incubator` from the domain. Now, users access ` > > polding.apache.org` instead of `polding.incubator.apache.org` by > default. > > > > > > The project and releases are still required to include "incubator", and > > it's important for the PPMC to clearly communicate that this project > > remains under incubation. > > > > > > In this case, I believe Hertzbeat PPMC made a mistake. I will suggest > > they rename it to incubator-hertzbeat. > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024, at 14:23, rat O wrote: > > > > First of all, congratulations to HertzBeat for successfully entering > > > > the Apache Incubator. > > > > > > > > I noticed that the project has created an issue for an unknown > license > > > > and is ready to address it. I'm sure the project will also address > > > > other unknown licenses, if they exist. > > > > > > > > I wonder if the situation of having a significant amount of > non-English > > > > languages in the codes, like these > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/warehouse/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/warehouse/config/WarehouseProperties.java > > , > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/common/entity/manager/NoticeRule.java > > , > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/common/config/AviatorConfiguration.java > > > > ... > > > > , will all of them also be addressed in the future? > > > > > > > > For projects in incubation, is it no longer necessary for the project > > > > name to have the "incubator-" prefix as it used to be? > > > > > > -- > > > Xuanwo > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > -- > Best wishes！ > CalvinKirs >
Re: Questions about a new project entering Apache Incubator
Podlings are not yet fully accepted as part of the Apache Software Foundation. I haven't specifically witnessed any formal decision or process for removing the "incubator" prefix from repository names. Unless there are compelling reasons to remove the "incubator" prefix, I believe it's important to maintain a clear distinction between Podlings and TLPs, especially in situations where confusion is likely to arise. On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 10:32 AM Sheng Wu wrote: > Same mistake for Armoro as Hertzbeat team was misguided from > https://github.com/apache/amoro/issues/2700 > > This is not discussed AFAIK, and the description is not correct. > GitHub supported renaming and repository path forward automatically > years ago. apache/incubator-foo -> apache/foo is transparent and both > addresses work. > > This should not be changed randomly considering many other projects > are using incubator- prefix. This renaming causes confusion. IPMC are > making sure the website has `incubating` and disclaimer as always, > suddenly some projects even could use repository names without > prefixes. This is wrong. > > Mentors of Armoro and Hertzbeat should follow the existing > requirements, and PPMC members of these two projects should ask INFRA > to rename, adding the incubator- prefix back. > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > Xuanwo 于2024年4月17日周三 10:19写道： > > > > > For projects in incubation, is it no longer necessary for the project > > > name to have the "incubator-" prefix as it used to be? > > > > Based on the discussions in this mailing list, the only change made is > the removal of `incubator` from the domain. Now, users access ` > polding.apache.org` instead of `polding.incubator.apache.org` by default. > > > > The project and releases are still required to include "incubator", and > it's important for the PPMC to clearly communicate that this project > remains under incubation. > > > > In this case, I believe Hertzbeat PPMC made a mistake. I will suggest > they rename it to incubator-hertzbeat. > > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024, at 14:23, rat O wrote: > > > First of all, congratulations to HertzBeat for successfully entering > > > the Apache Incubator. > > > > > > I noticed that the project has created an issue for an unknown license > > > and is ready to address it. I'm sure the project will also address > > > other unknown licenses, if they exist. > > > > > > I wonder if the situation of having a significant amount of non-English > > > languages in the codes, like these > > > > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/warehouse/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/warehouse/config/WarehouseProperties.java > , > > > > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/common/entity/manager/NoticeRule.java > , > > > > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/common/config/AviatorConfiguration.java > > > ... > > > , will all of them also be addressed in the future? > > > > > > For projects in incubation, is it no longer necessary for the project > > > name to have the "incubator-" prefix as it used to be? > > > > -- > > Xuanwo > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Best wishes！ CalvinKirs
Re: Questions about a new project entering Apache Incubator
Same mistake for Armoro as Hertzbeat team was misguided from https://github.com/apache/amoro/issues/2700 This is not discussed AFAIK, and the description is not correct. GitHub supported renaming and repository path forward automatically years ago. apache/incubator-foo -> apache/foo is transparent and both addresses work. This should not be changed randomly considering many other projects are using incubator- prefix. This renaming causes confusion. IPMC are making sure the website has `incubating` and disclaimer as always, suddenly some projects even could use repository names without prefixes. This is wrong. Mentors of Armoro and Hertzbeat should follow the existing requirements, and PPMC members of these two projects should ask INFRA to rename, adding the incubator- prefix back. Sheng Wu 吴晟 Twitter, wusheng1108 Xuanwo 于2024年4月17日周三 10:19写道： > > > For projects in incubation, is it no longer necessary for the project > > name to have the "incubator-" prefix as it used to be? > > Based on the discussions in this mailing list, the only change made is the > removal of `incubator` from the domain. Now, users access > `polding.apache.org` instead of `polding.incubator.apache.org` by default. > > The project and releases are still required to include "incubator", and it's > important for the PPMC to clearly communicate that this project remains under > incubation. > > In this case, I believe Hertzbeat PPMC made a mistake. I will suggest they > rename it to incubator-hertzbeat. > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024, at 14:23, rat O wrote: > > First of all, congratulations to HertzBeat for successfully entering > > the Apache Incubator. > > > > I noticed that the project has created an issue for an unknown license > > and is ready to address it. I'm sure the project will also address > > other unknown licenses, if they exist. > > > > I wonder if the situation of having a significant amount of non-English > > languages in the codes, like these > > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/warehouse/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/warehouse/config/WarehouseProperties.java, > > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/common/entity/manager/NoticeRule.java, > > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/common/config/AviatorConfiguration.java > > ... > > , will all of them also be addressed in the future? > > > > For projects in incubation, is it no longer necessary for the project > > name to have the "incubator-" prefix as it used to be? > > -- > Xuanwo > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Questions about a new project entering Apache Incubator
> For projects in incubation, is it no longer necessary for the project > name to have the "incubator-" prefix as it used to be? Based on the discussions in this mailing list, the only change made is the removal of `incubator` from the domain. Now, users access `polding.apache.org` instead of `polding.incubator.apache.org` by default. The project and releases are still required to include "incubator", and it's important for the PPMC to clearly communicate that this project remains under incubation. In this case, I believe Hertzbeat PPMC made a mistake. I will suggest they rename it to incubator-hertzbeat. On Mon, Apr 15, 2024, at 14:23, rat O wrote: > First of all, congratulations to HertzBeat for successfully entering > the Apache Incubator. > > I noticed that the project has created an issue for an unknown license > and is ready to address it. I'm sure the project will also address > other unknown licenses, if they exist. > > I wonder if the situation of having a significant amount of non-English > languages in the codes, like these > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/warehouse/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/warehouse/config/WarehouseProperties.java, > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/common/entity/manager/NoticeRule.java, > https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/common/config/AviatorConfiguration.java > ... > , will all of them also be addressed in the future? > > For projects in incubation, is it no longer necessary for the project > name to have the "incubator-" prefix as it used to be? -- Xuanwo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Questions about a new project entering Apache Incubator
First of all, congratulations to HertzBeat for successfully entering the Apache Incubator. I noticed that the project has created an issue for an unknown license and is ready to address it. I'm sure the project will also address other unknown licenses, if they exist. I wonder if the situation of having a significant amount of non-English languages in the codes, like these https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/warehouse/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/warehouse/config/WarehouseProperties.java, https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/common/entity/manager/NoticeRule.java, https://github.com/apache/hertzbeat/blob/master/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/common/config/AviatorConfiguration.java ... , will all of them also be addressed in the future? For projects in incubation, is it no longer necessary for the project name to have the "incubator-" prefix as it used to be?
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache HoraeDB(incubating) v2.0.0-RC6 - Incubator Vote Round 2
Cool. I encourage the RM to drop a vote on his/her release and the voter on dev@ to convey their vote on general@ also. Best, tison. 任春韶 于2024年4月16日周二 16:06写道： > The vote passes with 5 +1s and no negative votes. There were 4 binding +1s. > > Vote Thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/dmc4x441jxjqkbzzxqo1j6tzpy72jcrz > > Votes: > ShaoFeng Shi (binding) > Xuanwo (binding) > suyan > Li Gang (binding) > tison (binding) > > Thanks to everyone who participated in the development and review. I will > proceed with the release. >
[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache HoraeDB(incubating) v2.0.0-RC6 - Incubator Vote Round 2
The vote passes with 5 +1s and no negative votes. There were 4 binding +1s. Vote Thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/dmc4x441jxjqkbzzxqo1j6tzpy72jcrz Votes: ShaoFeng Shi (binding) Xuanwo (binding) suyan Li Gang (binding) tison (binding) Thanks to everyone who participated in the development and review. I will proceed with the release.
