Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating) v0.1.0-rc1

2021-06-07 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
+1 binding.
Thanks.

On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 8:42 PM Zhaofeng Chen  wrote:

>  +1.
>
> I checked
> - Signatures and hashes are good.
> - Sources compiled successfully according to the doc.
> - All test cases are passed.
>
> Best,
> Zhaofeng
>
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 8:16 PM Justin Mclean 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > +1 binding, but only due to WIP disclaimer. The license issue, file
> header
> > and binary files issues will need to be fixed at some point.
> >
> > I also note that this release contains code under the GPL license, which
> > is not compatible with the Apache license and cannot be included in an
> ASF
> > source release. It would be good to note this in your disclaimer so that
> > users of this software are aware of this issue. Hopefully the PPMC is
> aware
> > of this issue and has a plan to remove or replace this software with
> > something that has a compatible license.
> >
> > I checked:
> > - Incubating in name
> > - signatures and hashes are fine
> > - WIP DISCLAIMER exists
> > - LICENSE needs more work
> > - NOTICE is fine
> > - There are unexpected binary files in the source release
> > - There a large number of source files without ASF header so it is not
> > easy to tell if files have the right headers or not
> > - didn’t compile from source
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Justin
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Daffodil to a top-level project

2021-02-07 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
+1 (binding), thanks.

On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 6:40 PM Liang Chen  wrote:

> Hi
>
> +1 for TLP, good luck.
>
> Regards
> Liang
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: Finding a champion and mentors

2020-11-24 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Hi Andrey

It is a valuable project from my perspective, I'm expecting that could be a
new way to interact with computers.
I think it would be more attractive for developers if this library can also
support Rust as well.

Regards
Gordon.

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 6:16 PM Dave Fisher  wrote:

> Hi Andrey,
>
> The project does look very interesting.
>
> If no one else volunteers then I’m willing to help and, if no one else
> volunteers, champion the project into the incubator. Champions don’t always
> mentor, but I’d do so too.
>
> I’m also VP, Petri which was mentioned by Jim. It’s an alternative, but I
> think you don’t have a large enough community.
>
> I notice that the project is currently MIT licensed. It will need to
> change to Apache license 2.0.
>
> Let’s see who else volunteers.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Nov 24, 2020, at 3:35 PM, Andrey Parfenov 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am an author of open source project BrainFlow, and currently I am
> > thinking about moving this project to Apache Incubator.
> > I've read all the documents about the application process and seems like
> > finding mentors/champions is the first step.
> >
> > But it's unclear how to find them and get feedback about the project and
> > it's perspectives at Apache Incubator.
> >
> > More info about project:
> >
> > BrainFlow is a library to read, parse and analyze data from biosensors
> with
> > primary focus on BCI devices, the goal of this library is to provide
> > uniform SDK to different devices and allow programmers to write device
> > agnostic code.
> > As of right now it supports 7 programming languages. First commit was
> > around ~2.5 years ago
> >
> > Docs https://brainflow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
> > Github https://github.com/brainflow-dev/brainflow
> > Website https://brainflow.org/
> > Slack Workspace was created around 6 months ago and currently there are
> 137
> > members
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Andrey
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache NetBeans graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to board

2019-04-09 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
+1 binding

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019, 5:43 PM Daniel Gruno  wrote:

> On 09/04/2019 15.00, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 12:41 PM Geertjan Wielenga
> >  wrote:
> >> ...The Apache NetBeans podling community brings the resolution, after
> >> discussion[1]...
> >
> > Enthusiastic +1, with my NetBeans mentor hat on.
>
> And me t, +1 with my mentor hat on!
>
> >
> > -Bertrand
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: Request for Mentor

2019-03-28 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
It is a great valuable platform for our living environment, hope I have the
opportunity to help this project success.

Gary(Binding)



On Thu, Mar 28, 2019, 11:50 AM lewis john mcgibbney 
wrote:

> Hi general@,
>
> The Apache Science Data Analytics Platform (SDAP) (Incubating) project is
> in need of an active mentor!
>
> What is SDAP?
> http://sdap.apache.org/
> SDAP is a technology software solution currently geared to better enable
> scientists involved in advancing the study of the Earth's physical
> oceanography.
> The platform is an orchestration of several previously funded NASA big
> ocean data solutions using cloud technology, which include:
>
>- data analysis (NEXUS)
>- anomaly detection (OceanXtremes)
>- matchup (DOMS)
>- subsetting
>- discovery (MUDROD)
>- visualization (VQSS)
>
> What state is the podling in?
> SDAP is working towards it's first formal release having encountered some
> issues with the initial release candidate. The Podling requires a mentor
> who can come on board and drive through the generation of Apache-compliant
> release candidates so that the project can continue to grow community
> through usage.
>
> Interested?
> Let us know by responding to this thread ensuring that you CC dev@sdap.a.o.
>
> Thank you
> Lewis
>
> --
> http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/
> http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/lewismc
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator

2019-02-24 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
+1 (binding)

Thanks.
Gary


On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 11:38 AM Clebert Suconic 
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 2:25 PM Felix Cheung 
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 11:39 PM Vinayakumar B 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > -Vinay
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2019, 7:22 am Huxing Zhang,  wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 3:50 AM Antoine Toulme 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > > we've discussed the proposal for the Cava project in [1] and [2].
> The
> > > > > proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3].
> > > > >
> > > > > We discussed how to go about finding a suitable name for the
> project
> > in
> > > > [2].
> > > > > I will kick off a vote to pick a name based on the proposals made
> > > there.
> > > > >
> > > > > According to the Incubator rules[4] I'd like to call a vote to
> accept
> > > the
> > > > > new "Cava" project as a podling in the Apache Incubator.
> > > > >
> > > > > A vote for accepting a new Apache Incubator podling is a majority
> > vote.
> > > > > Everyone is welcome to vote, only Incubator PMC member votes are
> > > binding.
> > > > > It would be helpful (but not required) if you could add a comment
> > > stating
> > > > > whether your vote is binding or non-binding.
> > > > >
> > > > > This vote will run for at least 72 hours (but I expect to keep it
> > open
> > > > for
> > > > > longer). Please VOTE as follows:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator
> > > > > [ ] +0 Abstain
> > > > > [ ] -1 Do not accept Cava into the Apache Incubator because ...
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for everyone who decided to join in in the past
> > discussions!
> > > > > Antoine
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5a7f6a218b11a1cac61fbd53f4c995fd7716f8ad3751cf9f171ebd57@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > > > > [2]:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8d8014f53f140a3ccdd517c3c303de1d45cc04afdaee5961ac43e7fc@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > > > > [3]:
> > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CavaProposal?action=recall=14
> > > > > [4]: https://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#the_vote
> > > > >
> -
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards！
> > > > Huxing
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>

Re: [VOTE] Shut down unused/inactive incubator lists

2019-01-21 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
+1, thanks.

On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, 10:27 AM Henry Saputra  +1
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 4:12 PM sebb  wrote:
>
> > The following lists are all but inactive:
> >
> > announce@ Last post Jan 2008
> > android-interest@ Last post Mar 2011
> > dev@ - only general circulars
> > jaxws-tck@ (private) Last post 2012
> > projects@ Last post Jul 2011
> > user@ - only general circulars
> >
> > I think they should be shut down.
> >
> > Please vote so an Infra Jira can be raised to shut them down.
> > They can have a bounce message added to direct posters to
> > general@/private@ as appropriate
> >
> > [  ] +1
> > [  ] -1 - give a reason please
> >
> > Please vote by end January 2019
> >
> > Sebb.
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc0

2019-01-02 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Happy New Year!

* Signature verified
* SHA verified
* Tried to build the distributed source code (rc0) on my machine using
following command w/ and w/o -j option.
*make -j 6 USE_OPENCV=1 USE_BLAS=openblas USE_CUDA=0*
It reports
*make[1]: Entering directory
'/home/wg/ws/mxnet/apache-mxnet-src-1.4.0.rc0-incubating/3rdparty/dmlc-core'*
*make[1]: 'libdmlc.a' is up to date.*
*make[1]: Leaving directory
'/home/wg/ws/mxnet/apache-mxnet-src-1.4.0.rc0-incubating/3rdparty/dmlc-core'*
*g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)*
*Please submit a full bug report,*
*with preprocessed source if appropriate.*
*See  for instructions.*
*Makefile:461: recipe for target 'build/src/operator/tensor/indexing_op.o'
failed*
*make: *** [build/src/operator/tensor/indexing_op.o] Error 4*

*$ g++ --version*
*g++ (Ubuntu 7.3.0-27ubuntu1~18.04) 7.3.0*
This issue might be related to the compiler that I'm using so doesn't mean
it is a blocker issue.

* please use the Apache repos links instead of Github ones once available

+1 (binding)

Thanks.


On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 1:36 PM Steffen Rochel 
wrote:

> Happy New Year to all of you!
>
> Please review and test Apache MXNet v1.4.0, release candidate 0 and provide
> your vote.
> Current status:
> +1: 1 binding (thanks Jim!)
> 0:0
> -1: 0
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.4.0.rc0/
>
> The tag to be voted upon:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.4.0.rc0
>
> The release hash is c84bb78
> <
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/c84bb7880a51d22ee1e2bfc688d0a2099c0b977b
> >
> :
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/c84bb7880a51d22ee1e2bfc688d0a2099c0b977b
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Notes
>
>
> Regards,
> Steffen
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 5:51 AM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > > On Dec 28, 2018, at 2:07 PM, Steffen Rochel 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear community,
> > >
> > > This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.4.0, release
> > > candidate 0
> > >
> > > Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
> > >
> > > Vote thread:
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/28f4d4bb62ce10d85b1ef856602b27cb6d8971e4ece6f212411b8ca6@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> > >
> > > Result thread:
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/236554041a412415df783d652830272beb21d36660e8e0d5e0237f58@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> > > 
> > >
> > >
> > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> at:
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.4.0.rc0/
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted upon:
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.4.0.rc0
> > >
> > > The release hash is c84bb78
> > > <
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/c84bb7880a51d22ee1e2bfc688d0a2099c0b977b
> > >
> > > :
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/c84bb7880a51d22ee1e2bfc688d0a2099c0b977b
> > >
> > > KEYS file available:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS
> > >
> > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Notes
> > >
> > > The vote will be open until January 3rd noon PST.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 release this package as 1.4.0
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 do not release this package because...
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Steffen
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

2017-11-15 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
I see your point, Lazy is one of motivation why we want to code, so perhaps
a Slack summary bot is desired... :-)


On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com
> wrote:

> I don't think you should sync it...
>
> Someone else please correct me if I'm wrong.. but I was educated
> inside the project I work at.. (activemq) that talking on a private
> list is ok... but you should always direct the discussions to the dev
> list with a summary of the decision.. etc I was once told if it
> didn't happen in the mail list.. it didn't happen.
>
>
> for instance.. a few weeks from now... (Not even saying months or
> years).. the context of the private discussions will be lost.. they
> won't make any sense.. syncing chat here will just spam the list.
>
>
> from my understanding the mail list is the place to go for discussion
> on the apache way. I guess I'm just trying to do the same here..
>
> for instance I didn't go to the slack channel.. hence nothing really
> happened at apache.
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Gary Wong <qich...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It is #storage-class-memory
> >
> > Let me take a look to see if there is a way to sync slack channel with
> mail
> > list bi-directionally...
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> All the communication is happening on slatck?
> >>
> >> shouldn't that all happen on a mail list?
> >>
> >>
> >> It's ok to talk on a list.. but you should consider always feeding the
> >> list.
> >>
> >>
> >> What is the slack channel again? I will join in regardless.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi Lewis,
> >> >
> >> > Invitation sent, Welcome to join us.
> >> >
> >> > Best.
> >> > Gary
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Lewis John McGibbney <
> >> lewi...@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi Gary,
> >> >> I was watching this thread evolve a while back and ended up dropping
> >> it. I
> >> >> have been working on Apache Gora (Generic Object Representation using
> >> Avro)
> >> >> for a number of years. Gora is described as follows
> >> >>
> >> >> The Apache Gora open source framework provides an in-memory data
> model
> >> >> and persistence for big data. Gora supports persisting to
> >> >>  * column stores,
> >> >>  * key value stores,
> >> >>  * document stores,
> >> >>  * distributed in-memory key/value stores,
> >> >>  * in-memory data grids,
> >> >>  * in-memory caches,
> >> >>  * distributed multi-model stores, and
> >> >>  * hybrid in-memory architectures
> >> >> Gora also enables analysis of data with extensive Apache Hadoop
> >> MapReduce
> >> >> and Apache Spark support. Gora uses the Apache Software License v2.0.
> >> >>
> >> >> Please send me an invite to the slack channel  >> org>
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks
> >> >> Lewis
> >> >>
> >> >> On 2017-10-19 11:55, "Gang(Gary) Wang" <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi all,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential
> >> >> > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and
> analytics
> >> >> > because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity
> >> non-volatile
> >> >> > memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will
> fundamentally
> >> >> change
> >> >> > the way to construct high performance applications similar to what
> >> >> happened
> >> >> > when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if
> >> >> possible, I
> >> >> > advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the
> >> >> collaboration
> >> >> > and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory
> >> >> > technology-oriented projects.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Best.
> >> >> > Gary.
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> 
> -
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Clebert Suconic
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

2017-11-15 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Hi Lewis,

Invitation sent, Welcome to join us.

Best.
Gary


On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Lewis John McGibbney <lewi...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Hi Gary,
> I was watching this thread evolve a while back and ended up dropping it. I
> have been working on Apache Gora (Generic Object Representation using Avro)
> for a number of years. Gora is described as follows
>
> The Apache Gora open source framework provides an in-memory data model
> and persistence for big data. Gora supports persisting to
>  * column stores,
>  * key value stores,
>  * document stores,
>  * distributed in-memory key/value stores,
>  * in-memory data grids,
>  * in-memory caches,
>  * distributed multi-model stores, and
>  * hybrid in-memory architectures
> Gora also enables analysis of data with extensive Apache Hadoop MapReduce
> and Apache Spark support. Gora uses the Apache Software License v2.0.
>
> Please send me an invite to the slack channel 
>
> Thanks
> Lewis
>
> On 2017-10-19 11:55, "Gang(Gary) Wang" <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential
> > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics
> > because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity non-volatile
> > memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally
> change
> > the way to construct high performance applications similar to what
> happened
> > when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if
> possible, I
> > advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the
> collaboration
> > and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory
> > technology-oriented projects.
> >
> > Best.
> > Gary.
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

2017-11-14 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
+1 Thanks!

Best,
Gary


On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 9:27 AM, solrac...@apache.org 
wrote:

> +1
>
> 2017-11-14 11:19 GMT-06:00 Johnu George :
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >Can you please vote for this new release?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Johnu
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Johnu George  wrote:
> > > Hello incubator PMCs,
> > >
> > > The Apache Mnemonic community PPMCs and developers have voted and
> > > approved the proposal to release Apache Mnemonic 0.10.0 (incubating).
> > > Apache Mnemonic is an advanced hybrid memory storage oriented library,
> > > it's proposed a non-volatile/durable Java object model and durable
> > > computing model that bring several advantages to significantly improve
> > > the performance of massive real-time data processing/analytics.
> > > Developers can use this library to design their cache-less and SerDe
> > > less high performance applications.
> > >
> > >
> > > [VOTE] thread:
> > >
> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-
> > mnemonic-dev/201711.mbox/%3CCALuGr6auOV9BqQ5FNmQ_V%
> > 2B5qbzrNfiaH6gYyxk-H%2BLBhmo%3DwuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >
> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-
> > mnemonic-dev/201711.mbox/%3CCANLc_9%2BeJ%2BZURAZT%2BTfr-
> > U3AgV5q0h5R7o%3DdA_rd6nf0nd%3DNHA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >
> > > [VOTE RESULT] thread:
> > >
> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-
> > mnemonic-dev/201711.mbox/%3CCABtC0%2Bj2eV1fAMSJU4PEVOsoDUfPBUdQvb
> > nXd5HTN4oSpjauKg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >
> > > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on
> > > this incubator release.
> > >
> > > The Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating release candidate is now
> > > available with the following artifacts for a project vote:
> > >
> > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> at:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > 10.0-incubating-rc1/src/
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.10.0-incubating:
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.10.0-incubating
> > >
> > > The release hash is 0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b:
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b
> > >
> > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> > >
> > > KEYS file available:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> > >
> > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > 10.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> > > Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> > > including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
> The
> > > please vote:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

2017-11-07 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Hi Amit and Atri,

The invitations have been sent to your mailbox, please accept to join our
channel #storage-class-memory. thanks.

Best,
Gary.


On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Atri Sharma <atri.j...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would like to participate as well
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi Avinash, Welcome to join us. please register in the-asf.slack.com and
> > join our channel #storage-class-memory as well, Thanks!
> >
> > Best
> > Gary.
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Avinash Dongre <adon...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I'd like to participate in this as well.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Avinash
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > looks I'm not able to invite you by email in Slack, so please
> register on
> >> > https://the-asf.slack.com and then join our channel
> >> #storage-class-memory,
> >> > Thanks!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Yes, it is another great communication for real-time chat, Debo also
> >> > > mentioned it, so let's create one if desired and we still need to
> post
> >> > > major findings and summary on Apache mail list...
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> >> > > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> What about IRC.  A lot of projects use it at Apache.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:51 PM Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > Yes, I'm working on preparing necessary resources for our
> workgroup.
> >> > the
> >> > >> > progress is
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > 1) Slack channel #Storage-class-memory - created
> >> > >> > 2) Invite project representatives and active contributors to this
> >> > Slack
> >> > >> > channel -  not yet but soon later
> >> > >> > 3) Request a dedicated mail list for our workgroup - request sent
> >> > >> > 4) Request typical platform equipped with storage-class memory
> >> > resource
> >> > >> -
> >> > >> > trying but not guaranteed
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> >> > >> > clebert.suco...@gmail.com
> >> > >> > > wrote:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > > I am also waiting the dev list to be created before we can
> have a
> >> > >> > > discussion...
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Hitesh Shah <
> hit...@apache.org>
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >> > > > Hello Gary,
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > Would it be better to create a mailing list for this
> workgroup
> >> (I
> >> > am
> >> > >> > > > guessing it is too early to be thinking about a new podling
> for
> >> > >> this)
> >> > >> > > where
> >> > >> > > > any interested folks could subscribe to?
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > thanks
> >> > >> > > > -- Hitesh
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> >> > ga...@apache.org
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > > wrote:
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > >> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and
> APIs
> >> > for
> >> > >> > > >> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application,
> >> > >> please go
> >> > >> > > >> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup.
> Thanks!
> &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

2017-11-06 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Hi Avinash, Welcome to join us. please register in the-asf.slack.com and
join our channel #storage-class-memory as well, Thanks!

Best
Gary.

On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Avinash Dongre <adon...@apache.org> wrote:

> I'd like to participate in this as well.
>
> Thanks
> Avinash
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > looks I'm not able to invite you by email in Slack, so please register on
> > https://the-asf.slack.com and then join our channel
> #storage-class-memory,
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, it is another great communication for real-time chat, Debo also
> > > mentioned it, so let's create one if desired and we still need to post
> > > major findings and summary on Apache mail list...
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> > > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> What about IRC.  A lot of projects use it at Apache.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:51 PM Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Yes, I'm working on preparing necessary resources for our workgroup.
> > the
> > >> > progress is
> > >> >
> > >> > 1) Slack channel #Storage-class-memory - created
> > >> > 2) Invite project representatives and active contributors to this
> > Slack
> > >> > channel -  not yet but soon later
> > >> > 3) Request a dedicated mail list for our workgroup - request sent
> > >> > 4) Request typical platform equipped with storage-class memory
> > resource
> > >> -
> > >> > trying but not guaranteed
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> > >> > clebert.suco...@gmail.com
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > I am also waiting the dev list to be created before we can have a
> > >> > > discussion...
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Hitesh Shah <hit...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > > Hello Gary,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Would it be better to create a mailing list for this workgroup
> (I
> > am
> > >> > > > guessing it is too early to be thinking about a new podling for
> > >> this)
> > >> > > where
> > >> > > > any interested folks could subscribe to?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > thanks
> > >> > > > -- Hitesh
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org
> > >> >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs
> > for
> > >> > > >> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application,
> > >> please go
> > >> > > >> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks!
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <
> > ddu...@gmail.com
> > >> >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > Would love to help out in any way including working towards
> > >> common
> > >> > > >> > benchmarks, APIs etc.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > Debo
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > Sent from my iPhone
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org
> > >> >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > >   - Sharing idea and good practice
> > >> > > >> > >   - Identifying common opportunities

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

2017-10-27 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
looks I'm not able to invite you by email in Slack, so please register on
https://the-asf.slack.com and then join our channel #storage-class-memory,
Thanks!



On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:

> Yes, it is another great communication for real-time chat, Debo also
> mentioned it, so let's create one if desired and we still need to post
> major findings and summary on Apache mail list...
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What about IRC.  A lot of projects use it at Apache.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:51 PM Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Yes, I'm working on preparing necessary resources for our workgroup. the
>> > progress is
>> >
>> > 1) Slack channel #Storage-class-memory - created
>> > 2) Invite project representatives and active contributors to this Slack
>> > channel -  not yet but soon later
>> > 3) Request a dedicated mail list for our workgroup - request sent
>> > 4) Request typical platform equipped with storage-class memory resource
>> -
>> > trying but not guaranteed
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Clebert Suconic <
>> > clebert.suco...@gmail.com
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> > > I am also waiting the dev list to be created before we can have a
>> > > discussion...
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Hitesh Shah <hit...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > > > Hello Gary,
>> > > >
>> > > > Would it be better to create a mailing list for this workgroup (I am
>> > > > guessing it is too early to be thinking about a new podling for
>> this)
>> > > where
>> > > > any interested folks could subscribe to?
>> > > >
>> > > > thanks
>> > > > -- Hitesh
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs for
>> > > >> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application,
>> please go
>> > > >> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks!
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <ddu...@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > Would love to help out in any way including working towards
>> common
>> > > >> > benchmarks, APIs etc.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Debo
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Sent from my iPhone
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > >   - Sharing idea and good practice
>> > > >> > >   - Identifying common opportunities
>> > > >> > >   - Promoting storage-class memory application
>> > > >> > >   - Delivering solid solution
>> > > >> > >   - Avoiding reinvent the wheel
>> > > >> > >   - Integrating one another
>> > > >> > >   - Coordinating the progress
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
>> > ga...@apache.org
>> > > >
>> > > >> > wrote:
>> > > >> > >>
>> > > >> > >> Add ORC
>> > > >> > >>
>> > > >> > >>   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
>> > > >> > >>   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
>> > > >> > >>   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
>> > > >> > >>   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
>> > > >> > >>   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
>> > > >> > >>   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*
>> > > >> > >>
>> > > >> > >> With above p

Re: [VOTE] Accept Crail into the Apache Incubator

2017-10-26 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
+1


On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Clebert Suconic 
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Luciano Resende 
> wrote:
> > Off course, my + 1
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Luciano Resende 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Now that the discussion thread on the Crail proposal has ended, please
> >> vote on accepting Crail into into the Apache Incubator.
> >>
> >> The ASF voting rules are described at:
> >>http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> >>
> >> A vote for accepting a new Apache Incubator podling is a majority vote
> >> for which only Incubator PMC member votes are binding.
> >>
> >> Votes from other people are also welcome as an indication of peoples
> >> enthusiasm (or lack thereof).
> >>
> >> Please do not use this VOTE thread for discussions.
> >> If needed, start a new thread instead.
> >>
> >> This vote will run for at least 72 hours. Please VOTE as follows
> >> [] +1 Accept Crail into the Apache Incubator
> >> [] +0 Abstain.
> >> [] -1 Do not accept Crail into the Apache Incubator because ...
> >>
> >> The proposal below is also on the wiki:
> >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CrailProposal
> >>
> >> ===
> >>
> >> Abstract
> >>
> >> Crail is a storage platform for sharing performance critical data in
> >> distributed data processing jobs at very high speed. Crail is built
> >> entirely upon principles of user-level I/O and specifically targets data
> >> center deployments with fast network and storage hardware (e.g., 100Gbps
> >> RDMA, plenty of DRAM, NVMe flash, etc.) as well as new modes of
> operation
> >> such resource disaggregation or serverless computing. Crail is written
> in
> >> Java and integrates seamlessly with the Apache data processing
> ecosystem.
> >> It can be used as a backbone to accelerate high-level data operations
> such
> >> as shuffle or broadcast, or as a cache to store hot data that is queried
> >> repeatedly, or as a storage platform for sharing inter-job data in
> complex
> >> multi-job pipelines, etc.
> >>
> >> Proposal
> >>
> >> Crail enables Apache data processing frameworks to run efficiently in
> next
> >> generation data centers using fast storage and network hardware in
> >> combination with resource (e.g., DRAM, Flash) disaggregation.
> >>
> >> Background
> >>
> >> Crail started as a research project at the IBM Zurich Research
> Laboratory
> >> around 2014 aiming to integrate high-speed I/O hardware effectively into
> >> large scale data processing systems.
> >>
> >> Rational
> >>
> >> During the last decade, I/O hardware has undergone rapid performance
> >> improvements, typically in the order of magnitudes. Modern day
> networking
> >> and storage hardware can deliver 100+ Gbps (10+ GBps) bandwidth with a
> few
> >> microseconds of access latencies. However, despite such progress in raw
> I/O
> >> performance, effectively leveraging modern hardware in data processing
> >> frameworks remains challenging. In most of the cases, upgrading to
> high-end
> >> networking or storage hardware has very little effect on the
> performance of
> >> analytics workloads. The problem comes from heavily layered software
> >> imposing overheads such as deep call stacks, unnecessary data copies,
> >> thread contention, etc. These problems have already been addressed at
> the
> >> operating system level with new I/O APIs such as RDMA verbs, NVMe, etc.,
> >> allowing applications to bypass software layers during I/O operations.
> >> Distributed data processing frameworks on the other hand, are typically
> >> implemented on legacy I/O interfaces such as such as sockets or block
> >> storage. These interfaces have been shown to be insufficient to deliver
> the
> >> full hardware performance. Yet, to the best of our knowledge, there are
> no
> >> active and systematic efforts to integrate these new user level I/O APIs
> >> into Apache software frameworks. This problem affects all end-users and
> >> organizations that use Apache software. We expect them to see
> >> unsatisfactory small performance gains when upgrading their networking
> and
> >> storage hardware.
> >>
> >> Crail solves this problem by providing an efficient storage platform
> built
> >> upon user-level I/O, thus, bypassing layers such as JVM and OS during
> I/O
> >> operations. Moreover, Crail directly leverages the specific hardware
> >> features of RDMA and NVMe to provide a better integration with
> high-level
> >> data operations in Apache compute frameworks. As a consequence, Crail
> >> enables users to run larger, more complex queries against ever
> increasing
> >> amounts of data at a speed largely determined by the deployed hardware.
> >> Crail is generic solution that integrates well with the Apache ecosystem
> >> including frameworks like Spark, Hadoop, Hive, etc.
> >>
> >> Initial Goals
> >>
> >> The initial goals to move Crail to the Apache Incubator is to broaden
> the
> >> community, and foster

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

2017-10-25 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Yes, it is another great communication for real-time chat, Debo also
mentioned it, so let's create one if desired and we still need to post
major findings and summary on Apache mail list...

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com
> wrote:

> What about IRC.  A lot of projects use it at Apache.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:51 PM Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Yes, I'm working on preparing necessary resources for our workgroup. the
> > progress is
> >
> > 1) Slack channel #Storage-class-memory - created
> > 2) Invite project representatives and active contributors to this Slack
> > channel -  not yet but soon later
> > 3) Request a dedicated mail list for our workgroup - request sent
> > 4) Request typical platform equipped with storage-class memory resource -
> > trying but not guaranteed
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> > clebert.suco...@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > I am also waiting the dev list to be created before we can have a
> > > discussion...
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Hitesh Shah <hit...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > Hello Gary,
> > > >
> > > > Would it be better to create a mailing list for this workgroup (I am
> > > > guessing it is too early to be thinking about a new podling for this)
> > > where
> > > > any interested folks could subscribe to?
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > > -- Hitesh
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs for
> > > >> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application, please
> go
> > > >> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks!
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <ddu...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Would love to help out in any way including working towards common
> > > >> > benchmarks, APIs etc.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Debo
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Sent from my iPhone
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >   - Sharing idea and good practice
> > > >> > >   - Identifying common opportunities
> > > >> > >   - Promoting storage-class memory application
> > > >> > >   - Delivering solid solution
> > > >> > >   - Avoiding reinvent the wheel
> > > >> > >   - Integrating one another
> > > >> > >   - Coordinating the progress
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> Add ORC
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
> > > >> > >>   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
> > > >> > >>   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
> > > >> > >>   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
> > > >> > >>   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
> > > >> > >>   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory
> oriented
> > > >> > *Distributed
> > > >> > >> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed
> Data
> > > >> Store,
> > > >> > >> Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing
> > Model*
> > > for
> > > >> > >> new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data
> querying,
> > > >> > >> processing, and analyt

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

2017-10-25 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Good Apache program name for storage-class memory oriented projects, so
let's propose this program to Apache board if appropriate, Thanks!

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) <dedu...@cisco.com>
wrote:

> BTW should we name this group “Apache Durable Computing Initiative”?
>
> debo
>
> On 10/24/17, 11:18 AM, "Debo Dutta (dedutta)" <dedu...@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, the moment we have the workgroup mailer setup, will send out a
> DISCUSS thread.
>
> debo
>
> On 10/24/17, 10:14 AM, "Gang(Gary) Wang" <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs for
> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application,
> please go
> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks!
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <ddu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Would love to help out in any way including working towards
> common
> > benchmarks, APIs etc.
>     >
> > Debo
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup
> > >
> > >   - Sharing idea and good practice
> > >   - Identifying common opportunities
> > >   - Promoting storage-class memory application
> > >   - Delivering solid solution
> > >   - Avoiding reinvent the wheel
> > >   - Integrating one another
> > >   - Coordinating the progress
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> ga...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Add ORC
> > >>
> > >>   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
> > >>   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
> > >>   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
> > >>   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
> > >>   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
> > >>   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*
> > >>
> > >> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory
> oriented
> > *Distributed
> > >> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed
> Data Store,
> > >> Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing
> Model* for
> > >> new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data
> querying,
> > >> processing, and analytics.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley <
> owen.omal...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I can represent ORC within the group.
> > >>>
> > >>> .. Owen
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> ga...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> We can expect more and more projects will take the huge
> potential
> > >>>> advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and
> analytics
> > >>>> because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity
> > non-volatile
> > >>>> memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will
> fundamentally
> > >>> change
> > >>>> the way to construct high performance applications similar
> to what
> > >>> happened
> > >>>> when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s.
> so if
> > >>> possible, I
> > >>>> advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the
> > >>> collaboration
> > >>>> and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class
> memory
> > >>>> technology-oriented projects.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best.
> > >>>> Gary.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> > 
> -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.
> org
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

2017-10-25 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Add *ActiveMQ and Geode*

   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
   - *Hive/LLAP *represented by *Gopal Vijayaraghavan*
   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
   - *RocketMQ  *represented by *Von Gosling*
   - *ActiveMQ *represented by *Clebert Suconic*
   - *Geode *represented by *Swapnil Bawaskar*
   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*

With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory oriented *Distributed
Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed Data Store,
Columnar Storage, **Live Long And Process, Distributed Messaging and
Streaming, High Performance Data Management, **Durable Object Model,
Durable Computing Model* for new generation high-performance applications,
e.g. data querying, processing, and analytics.

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar <
swapnil.bawas...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would be happy to represent Apache Geode.
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) <dedu...@cisco.com>
> wrote:
>
> > BTW should we name this group “Apache Durable Computing Initiative”?
> >
> > debo
> >
> > On 10/24/17, 11:18 AM, "Debo Dutta (dedutta)" <dedu...@cisco.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, the moment we have the workgroup mailer setup, will send out a
> > DISCUSS thread.
> >
> > debo
> >
> > On 10/24/17, 10:14 AM, "Gang(Gary) Wang" <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs
> for
> > storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application,
> > please go
> > ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks!
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <
> ddu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Would love to help out in any way including working towards
> > common
> > > benchmarks, APIs etc.
> > >
> > > Debo
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> ga...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup
> > > >
> > > >   - Sharing idea and good practice
> > > >   - Identifying common opportunities
> > > >   - Promoting storage-class memory application
> > > >   - Delivering solid solution
> > > >   - Avoiding reinvent the wheel
> > > >   - Integrating one another
> > > >   - Coordinating the progress
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Add ORC
> > > >>
> > > >>   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
> > > >>   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
> > > >>   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
> > > >>   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
> > > >>   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
> > > >>   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*
> > > >>
> > > >> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory
> > oriented
> > > *Distributed
> >     > >> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed
> > Data Store,
> > > >> Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing
> > Model* for
> > > >> new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data
> > querying,
> > > >> processing, and analytics.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley <
> > owen.omal...@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> I can represent ORC within the group.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> .. Owen
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Hi all,
> &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

2017-10-24 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Yes, I'm working on preparing necessary resources for our workgroup. the
progress is

1) Slack channel #Storage-class-memory - created
2) Invite project representatives and active contributors to this Slack
channel -  not yet but soon later
3) Request a dedicated mail list for our workgroup - request sent
4) Request typical platform equipped with storage-class memory resource -
trying but not guaranteed


On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com
> wrote:

> I am also waiting the dev list to be created before we can have a
> discussion...
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Hitesh Shah <hit...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hello Gary,
> >
> > Would it be better to create a mailing list for this workgroup (I am
> > guessing it is too early to be thinking about a new podling for this)
> where
> > any interested folks could subscribe to?
> >
> > thanks
> > -- Hitesh
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs for
> >> storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application, please go
> >> ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks!
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <ddu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Would love to help out in any way including working towards common
> >> > benchmarks, APIs etc.
> >> >
> >> > Debo
> >> >
> >> > Sent from my iPhone
> >> >
> >> > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup
> >> > >
> >> > >   - Sharing idea and good practice
> >> > >   - Identifying common opportunities
> >> > >   - Promoting storage-class memory application
> >> > >   - Delivering solid solution
> >> > >   - Avoiding reinvent the wheel
> >> > >   - Integrating one another
> >> > >   - Coordinating the progress
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org
> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Add ORC
> >> > >>
> >> > >>   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
> >> > >>   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
> >> > >>   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
> >> > >>   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
> >> > >>   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
> >> > >>   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*
> >> > >>
> >> > >> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory oriented
> >> > *Distributed
> >> > >> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed Data
> >> Store,
> >> > >> Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing Model*
> for
> >> > >> new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data querying,
> >> > >> processing, and analytics.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley <
> >> owen.omal...@gmail.com>
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> I can represent ORC within the group.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> .. Owen
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> Hi all,
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential
> >> > >>>> advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and
> analytics
> >> > >>>> because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity
> >> > non-volatile
> >> > >>>> memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will
> fundamentally
> >> > >>> change
> >> > >>>> the way to construct high performance applications similar to
> what
> >> > >>> happened
> >> > >>>> when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if
> >> > >>> possible, I
> >> > >>>> advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the
> >> > >>> collaboration
> >> > >>>> and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class
> memory
> >> > >>>> technology-oriented projects.
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> Best.
> >> > >>>> Gary.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >> > -
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

2017-10-24 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
It is a great idea if we could have a common benchmark and APIs for
storage-class memory oriented library/framework/application, please go
ahead to propose one for discussion in our workgroup. Thanks!

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <ddu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Would love to help out in any way including working towards common
> benchmarks, APIs etc.
>
> Debo
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup
> >
> >   - Sharing idea and good practice
> >   - Identifying common opportunities
> >   - Promoting storage-class memory application
> >   - Delivering solid solution
> >   - Avoiding reinvent the wheel
> >   - Integrating one another
> >   - Coordinating the progress
> >
> >
> >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Add ORC
> >>
> >>   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
> >>   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
> >>   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
> >>   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
> >>   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
> >>   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*
> >>
> >> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory oriented
> *Distributed
> >> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed Data Store,
> >> Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing Model* for
> >> new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data querying,
> >> processing, and analytics.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley <owen.omal...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I can represent ORC within the group.
> >>>
> >>> .. Owen
> >>>
> >>>> On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential
> >>>> advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics
> >>>> because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity
> non-volatile
> >>>> memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally
> >>> change
> >>>> the way to construct high performance applications similar to what
> >>> happened
> >>>> when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if
> >>> possible, I
> >>>> advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the
> >>> collaboration
> >>>> and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory
> >>>> technology-oriented projects.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best.
> >>>> Gary.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

2017-10-24 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Add *Hive/LLAP and RocketMQ*

   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
   - *Hive/LLAP *represented by *Gopal Vijayaraghavan*
   - *RocketMQ  *represented by *Von Gosling*
   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*

With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory oriented *Distributed
Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed Data Store,
Columnar Storage, **Live Long And Process, Distributed Messaging and
Streaming, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing Model* for new
generation high-performance applications, e.g. data querying, processing,
and analytics.

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:32 PM, Von Gosling <vongosl...@apache.org> wrote:

> I'm happy to represent Apache RocketMQ on this  storage collaboration
> effort. This is a very key in low latency messaging.
>
> Best Regards,
> Von Gosling
>
>
>
> > 在 2017年10月20日，02:55，Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> 写道：
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential
> > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics
> > because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity non-volatile
> > memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally
> change
> > the way to construct high performance applications similar to what
> happened
> > when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if
> possible, I
> > advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the
> collaboration
> > and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory
> > technology-oriented projects.
> >
> > Best.
> > Gary.
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

2017-10-23 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
There are suggested initial goals for our workgroup

   - Sharing idea and good practice
   - Identifying common opportunities
   - Promoting storage-class memory application
   - Delivering solid solution
   - Avoiding reinvent the wheel
   - Integrating one another
   - Coordinating the progress


On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:

> Add ORC
>
>- *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
>- *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
>- *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
>- *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
>- *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
>- *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*
>
> With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory oriented *Distributed
> Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed Data Store,
> Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing Model* for
> new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data querying,
> processing, and analytics.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley <owen.omal...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I can represent ORC within the group.
>>
>> .. Owen
>>
>> > On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential
>> > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics
>> > because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity non-volatile
>> > memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally
>> change
>> > the way to construct high performance applications similar to what
>> happened
>> > when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if
>> possible, I
>> > advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the
>> collaboration
>> > and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory
>> > technology-oriented projects.
>> >
>> > Best.
>> > Gary.
>>
>>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

2017-10-23 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Add ORC

   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
   - *Crail* represented by *Patrick Stuedi*
   - *ORC *represented by* Owen O'Malley*
   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*

With above projects, we could cover Storage-class memory oriented *Distributed
Database, KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Distributed Data Store,
Columnar Storage, **Durable Object Model, Durable Computing Model* for new
generation high-performance applications, e.g. data querying, processing,
and analytics.


On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen O'Malley <owen.omal...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I can represent ORC within the group.
>
> .. Owen
>
> > On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential
> > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics
> > because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity non-volatile
> > memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally
> change
> > the way to construct high performance applications similar to what
> happened
> > when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if
> possible, I
> > advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the
> collaboration
> > and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory
> > technology-oriented projects.
> >
> > Best.
> > Gary.
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

2017-10-20 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
It is wonderful, as of now, we have the following projects and their
communities.

   - *Ignite* represented by Denis Magda
   - *Arrow *represented by Wes McKinney
   - *Hbase *represented by Anoop John
   - *Mnemonic *represented by* Gary*

With above projects, we can cover Storage-class memory oriented Database,
KV Store, Columnar Structured Dataset, Durable Object Model, Durable
Computing Model for new generation high-performance applications, e.g. data
querying, processing, and analytics.


On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Atri Sharma <atri.j...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Anoop John <anoop.hb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > +1..Am there to represent Apache HBase.
> >
> > -Anoop-
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> I'm happy to represent Apache Arrow on this. This is very much in line
> >> with our focus on zero-copy / memory-mapped data access of structured
> >> data sets and cache-efficient memory layout.
> >>
> >> - Wes
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <ddu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> This is a great idea. Storage class memory will have a big impact on
> many of the Apache projects.
> >>>
> >>> Debo
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>
> >>>> On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential
> >>>> advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics
> >>>> because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity
> non-volatile
> >>>> memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally
> change
> >>>> the way to construct high performance applications similar to what
> happened
> >>>> when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if
> possible, I
> >>>> advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the
> collaboration
> >>>> and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory
> >>>> technology-oriented projects.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best.
> >>>> Gary.
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Atri
> l'apprenant
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [LAZY] Letting anyone invite on Slack

2017-10-19 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Can I get an invitation? Thanks.

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Anu Engineer 
wrote:

> Thank you very much, greatly appreciate it.
>
> We are using slack and this allows even non-committers to participate,
> which was an issue earlier
>
> Thanks
> Anu
>
>
>
>
> On 10/19/17, 11:47 AM, "Hen"  wrote:
>
> Done. Anyone on TheAsf slack workspace can invite someone to the
> workspace.
>
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 03:28 Greg Stein  wrote:
>
> > Fair enough... then open it up. Not even sure why that's a question
> :-)
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Hen  wrote:
> >
> > > While I lean to the 'not seeing the value of Slack', we have many
> > channels
> > > on Slack now (mostly driven by Incubator projects I think; John
> seems to
> > > have taken the lead on the workspace), so this isn't a thread for
> getting
> > > rid of slack :)
> > >
> > > Hen
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Craig Russell <
> apache@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Henri,
> > > >
> > > > We tried to use slack with the Juneau project and never got it
> to work
> > > > "the Apache Way". Inviting people instead of self-service, no
> ability
> > to
> > > > monitor discussions, no archive of discussions.
> > > >
> > > > We gave up and now use the wiki whenever mail doesn't serve.
> Common
> > > > editing of documents, diagrams, etc. are all easily done on
> confluence
> > > > where email doesn't allow sharing documents.
> > > >
> > > > I frankly do not see slack filling a need here.
> > > >
> > > > Craig
> > > >
> > > > > On Oct 13, 2017, at 9:51 PM, Henri Yandell 
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Currently only 'admins' can invite people to the ASF Slack:
> > > > >
> > > > >  https://the-asf.slack.com/
> > > > >
> > > > > If we view it as an IRC equivalent, having to invite people at
> all is
> > > > > weird. We can, via a checkbox, change it so anyone on the ASF
> Slack
> > > > (except
> > > > > 'guests') can invite someone to the Slack workspace:
> > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > >
> > > > > Invitations
> > > > >
> > > > > Choose whether to allow non-admins to invite new people to
> *ASF*.
> > > > >
> > > > > Allow everyone (except guests) to invite new members.
> > > > > 
> > > > >
> > > > > I can't see why we'd have an issue there, so I'm planning to
> turn
> > that
> > > > > checkbox on at the end of next week (Thursday or whenever I
> remember
> > to
> > > > > after that :) ).
> > > > >
> > > > > If this is a bad idea, please object and let me know why :)
> > > > >
> > > > > Hen
> > > >
> > > > Craig L Russell
> > > > c...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 
> -
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.
> org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

[DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

2017-10-19 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Hi all,

We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential
advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics
because silicon companies are able to produce high capacity non-volatile
memory on a large scale, this hardware technology will fundamentally change
the way to construct high performance applications similar to what happened
when replacing tape with disk technology since the 1980s. so if possible, I
advocate establishing an Apache working group to enhance the collaboration
and synergies mentioned by Patrick Stuedi for storage-class memory
technology-oriented projects.

Best.
Gary.

Re: Crail project looking for mentors

2017-10-18 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Sure, Thank you for the invitation.

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017, 4:51 PM patrick stuedi <pstu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Gary,
>
> Didn't know about teh Mnemonic project, but sounds interesting! I need
> to learn more about it, but there might be synergies, in particular to
> provide distributed access to persisted objects on NVMe. If you're
> interested in becoming a mentor for the Crail project we'd be happy to
> have you... let us know..
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> > I'm a PPMC at Mnemonic project,  we got interested in this project
> because
> > our project is working on Ceph memory service for our Durable object
> model
> > (DOM) and Durable computing model (DCM). Crail could be a promising and
> > more efficient solution for us to take fully advantage of the RDMA
> > capabilities for durable object exchange across nodes in a cluster. I'm
> > looking forward to integrating Crail soon...
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 9:18 PM, patrick stuedi <pstu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Efficient asynchronous I/O is one key aspect in Crail, because we're
> >> directly leveraging the asynchronous hardware interfaces of NVMe,
> >> RDMA, etc and export them at the distributed systems level. If you
> >> have experience with libaio and similar interfaces then that's
> >> definitely related.. Crail is a distributed storage system designed
> >> for high-performance storage and networking hardware, tailored to
> >> support data processing in new data center deployments. If you're
> >> interested in becoming a mentor please let us know...
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Clebert Suconic
> >> <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > I have written a libaio wrapper in java.  For artemis and high
> >> performance
> >> > sync IOs.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Would that work be related sim any form ?
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:37 PM Luciano Resende <
> luckbr1...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:58 PM, patrick stuedi <pstu...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Hi all,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The Crail project (www.crail.io) is looking for additional mentors
> >> >> > helping with the Apache incubator process. A draft of the Crail
> >> >> > incubator proposal is available here:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CrailProposal
> >> >> >
> >> >> > If you're interested and you're eligible to be a mentor please let
> us
> >> >> know!
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> We are still looking for one more mentor before starting the formal
> vote
> >> >> for Crail.
> >> >>
> >> >> Any volunteers ?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Luciano Resende
> >> >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> >> >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >> >>
> >> > --
> >> > Clebert Suconic
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: Crail project looking for mentors

2017-10-18 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
I'm a PPMC at Mnemonic project,  we got interested in this project because
our project is working on Ceph memory service for our Durable object model
(DOM) and Durable computing model (DCM). Crail could be a promising and
more efficient solution for us to take fully advantage of the RDMA
capabilities for durable object exchange across nodes in a cluster. I'm
looking forward to integrating Crail soon...



On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 9:18 PM, patrick stuedi  wrote:

> Efficient asynchronous I/O is one key aspect in Crail, because we're
> directly leveraging the asynchronous hardware interfaces of NVMe,
> RDMA, etc and export them at the distributed systems level. If you
> have experience with libaio and similar interfaces then that's
> definitely related.. Crail is a distributed storage system designed
> for high-performance storage and networking hardware, tailored to
> support data processing in new data center deployments. If you're
> interested in becoming a mentor please let us know...
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Clebert Suconic
>  wrote:
> > I have written a libaio wrapper in java.  For artemis and high
> performance
> > sync IOs.
> >
> >
> > Would that work be related sim any form ?
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:37 PM Luciano Resende 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:58 PM, patrick stuedi 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > The Crail project (www.crail.io) is looking for additional mentors
> >> > helping with the Apache incubator process. A draft of the Crail
> >> > incubator proposal is available here:
> >> >
> >> > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CrailProposal
> >> >
> >> > If you're interested and you're eligible to be a mentor please let us
> >> know!
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> We are still looking for one more mentor before starting the formal vote
> >> for Crail.
> >>
> >> Any volunteers ?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Luciano Resende
> >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >>
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Mnemonic project from Incubator

2017-09-20 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
+1

Thanks!
Gary

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:40 PM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
> OFBiz based solutions & services
>
> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:32 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello IPMC and everyone,
> > >
> > > The Mnemonic community has voted on its Dev list to graduate, The vote
> > > passed with
> > > 14 +1s (including  +9s from the PPMC) and 0 -1s.
> > >
> > > Here is the vote result thread in the Dev list:
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bbc187108b73d57fddec0d6a6c2945
> > > 27b626c7c439a7cdab991ea84e@%3Cdev.mnemonic.apache.org%3E
> > >
> > > and the vote thread:
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a49e82d507bb00839413e90b05cb8b
> > > 9448ea242aeb021622f5deb323@%3Cdev.mnemonic.apache.org%3E
> > >
> > > With the discussion having settled down, I would now like to call for
> > > a recommendation VOTE to present the ASF board with the following
> > > resolution
> > > to graduate from incubation and establish Apache Mnemonic
> > > as a top-level project (TLP).
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/94664579041db58bfe2893af6e9d54
> > > 957652653b278d4007e914c672@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > >
> > > Apache Mnemonic entered incubation in March 2016. Since then there have
> > > been nine releases and four committers and two PMC candidate members
> > > have been added to the project. For each release, source artifacts
> > > have been made available. Based on the completed maturity evaluation,
> > > we believe that the project is ready to graduate from the incubator.
> > > More checklist info about graduation, please refer to
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MNEMONIC/
> Maturity+Evaluation
> > >
> > > Please vote on whether to graduate Mnemonic from incubator and
> > > recommend the following graduation resolution to the ASF Board.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Mnemonic from the Incubator
> > > [ ] +0 Don't care
> > > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Mnemonic from the Incubator because...
> > >
> > > This VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > Thanks to all Mentors and Apache Mnemonic Project members
> > > for their support and contributions again.
> > >
> > > The full text of the resolution is below.
> > > If approved by the Apache Incubator PMC members,
> > > the proposed resolution will be submitted to
> > > the Board of Directors for their consideration.
> > > --
> > > Establish the Apache Mnemonic Project
> > >
> > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
> > > the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to
> establish
> > > a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and
> maintenance
> > > of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public,
> > > related to a transparent nonvolatile hybrid memory oriented library for
> > > Big data, High-performance computing, and Analytics.
> > >
> > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee
> > > (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Mnemonic Project", be and hereby is
> > > established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation, and be it further
> > >
> > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Mnemonic Project be and hereby is responsible
> > > for the creation and maintenance of software related to a transparent
> > > nonvolatile hybrid memory oriented library for Big data,
> > > High-performance computing and Analytics; and be it further
> > >
> > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Mnemonic" be and
> > > hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the
> > > direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Mnemonic
> > > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the
> > > projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Mnemonic
> > > Project, and be it further
> > >
> > > RESOLVED, t

[VOTE] Graduate Apache Mnemonic project from Incubator

2017-09-19 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Hello IPMC and everyone,

The Mnemonic community has voted on its Dev list to graduate, The vote
passed with
14 +1s (including  +9s from the PPMC) and 0 -1s.

Here is the vote result thread in the Dev list:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bbc187108b73d57fddec0d6a6c294527b626c7c439a7cdab991ea84e@%3Cdev.mnemonic.apache.org%3E

and the vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a49e82d507bb00839413e90b05cb8b9448ea242aeb021622f5deb323@%3Cdev.mnemonic.apache.org%3E

With the discussion having settled down, I would now like to call for
a recommendation VOTE to present the ASF board with the following
resolution
to graduate from incubation and establish Apache Mnemonic
as a top-level project (TLP).
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/94664579041db58bfe2893af6e9d54957652653b278d4007e914c672@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E

Apache Mnemonic entered incubation in March 2016. Since then there have
been nine releases and four committers and two PMC candidate members
have been added to the project. For each release, source artifacts
have been made available. Based on the completed maturity evaluation,
we believe that the project is ready to graduate from the incubator.
More checklist info about graduation, please refer to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MNEMONIC/Maturity+Evaluation

Please vote on whether to graduate Mnemonic from incubator and
recommend the following graduation resolution to the ASF Board.

[ ] +1 Graduate Apache Mnemonic from the Incubator
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Mnemonic from the Incubator because...

This VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks to all Mentors and Apache Mnemonic Project members
for their support and contributions again.

The full text of the resolution is below.
If approved by the Apache Incubator PMC members,
the proposed resolution will be submitted to
the Board of Directors for their consideration.
--
Establish the Apache Mnemonic Project

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public,
related to a transparent nonvolatile hybrid memory oriented library for
Big data, High-performance computing, and Analytics.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee
(PMC), to be known as the "Apache Mnemonic Project", be and hereby is
established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation, and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache Mnemonic Project be and hereby is responsible
for the creation and maintenance of software related to a transparent
nonvolatile hybrid memory oriented library for Big data,
High-performance computing and Analytics; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Mnemonic" be and
hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the
direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Mnemonic
Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the
projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Mnemonic
Project, and be it further

RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are
appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Mnemonic
Project:

 * Andrew Kyle Purtell  
 * Debojyoti Dutta  
 * Gang Wang
 * Hao Cheng
 * James R. Taylor  
 * Johnu George 
 * Kai Zheng
 * Patrick D. Hunt  
 * Rakesh Radhakrishnan 
 * Uma Maheswara Rao G  
 * Yanping Wang 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Gang Wang be appointed to
the office of Vice President, Apache Mnemonic, to serve in accordance
with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the
Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal
or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed, and be it
further

RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Mnemonic PMC be and hereby is tasked
with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open
development and increased participation in the Apache Mnemonic Project;
and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache Mnemonic Project be and hereby is tasked with
the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Mnemonic
podling; and be it further

RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator
Mnemonic podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter
discharged.
--

Best Regards
Gary on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community

[DISCUSS] The draft graduation resolution

2017-09-12 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Hi everyone

Please give your feedback on this draft graduation resolution below,
that is proposed by our community and hope we can reach a
consensus on this resolution here before we start recommendation
vote.

Thanks!



Establish the Apache Mnemonic Project

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public,
related to a transparent nonvolatile hybrid memory oriented library for
Big data, High-performance computing, and Analytics.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee
(PMC), to be known as the "Apache Mnemonic Project", be and hereby is
established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation, and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache Mnemonic Project be and hereby is responsible
for the creation and maintenance of software related to a transparent
nonvolatile hybrid memory oriented library for Big data,
High-performance computing and Analytics; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Mnemonic" be and
hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the
direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Mnemonic
Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the
projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Mnemonic
Project, and be it further

RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are
appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Mnemonic
Project:

 * Andrew Kyle Purtell  
 * Debo 
 * Gang Wang
 * Hao Cheng
 * James R. Taylor  
 * Johnu George 
 * Kai Zheng
 * Patrick D. Hunt  
 * Rakesh Radhakrishnan 
 * Uma Maheswara Rao G  
 * Yanping Wang 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Gang Wang be appointed to
the office of Vice President, Apache Mnemonic, to serve in accordance
with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the
Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal
or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed, and be it
further

RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Mnemonic PMC be and hereby is tasked
with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open
development and increased participation in the Apache Mnemonic Project;
and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache Mnemonic Project be and hereby is tasked with
the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Mnemonic
podling; and be it further

RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator
Mnemonic podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter
discharged.

Fwd: [VOTE] Graduate Mnemonic to TLP

2017-09-12 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Hi everyone,

Our community graduation vote has been concluded, I'm so sorry for the late
notification.

Here is the vote result thread in the Dev list:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bbc187108b73d57fddec0d6a6c2945
27b626c7c439a7cdab991ea84e@%3Cdev.mnemonic.apache.org%3E

and the vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a49e82d507bb00839413e90b05cb8b
9448ea242aeb021622f5deb323@%3Cdev.mnemonic.apache.org%3E

Thanks!

Gary
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
Date: Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:00 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Mnemonic to TLP
To: d...@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org


Please vote on this community resolution to seek graduation to TLP for
Mnemonic.

This vote will be open for ~72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
three +1 Apache Mnemonic PPMC votes are cast.

[ ] +1 Proceed with graduation process
[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
[ ] -1 Do not proceed yet because…

[REVOKE][VOTE] Graduate Apache Mnemonic project from Incubator

2017-09-12 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Hi everyone,

I revoke this vote and we would restart this vote after the proposal of
Mnemonic graduation resolution has been discussed in general@incubator list.

Thanks!
Gary


-- Forwarded message --
From: Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
Date: Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:20 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Mnemonic project from Incubator
To: general@incubator.apache.org


Hi everyone,

The Mnemonic community voted on its Dev list to graduate, The vote passed
with
14 +1s (including  +9s from the PPMC) and 0 -1s.

Here is the vote result thread in the Dev list:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bbc187108b73d57fddec0d6a6c2945
27b626c7c439a7cdab991ea84e@%3Cdev.mnemonic.apache.org%3E

and the vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a49e82d507bb00839413e90b05cb8b
9448ea242aeb021622f5deb323@%3Cdev.mnemonic.apache.org%3E

This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Mnemonic should graduate from the
Incubator. Please VOTE on the draft resolution pasted below the ballot
which establishes Apache Mnemonic as a new top-level project
at the Apache Software Foundation. I'll leave this VOTE open for
at least 72 hours.

[ ] +1 Graduate Apache Mnemonic from the Incubator
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Mnemonic from the Incubator because...

Thanks !


Establish the Apache Mnemonic Project

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public,
related to a transparent nonvolatile hybrid memory oriented library for
Big data, High-performance computing, and Analytics.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee
(PMC), to be known as the "Apache Mnemonic Project", be and hereby is
established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation, and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache Mnemonic Project be and hereby is responsible
for the creation and maintenance of software related to a transparent
nonvolatile hybrid memory oriented library for Big data,
High-performance computing and Analytics; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Mnemonic" be and
hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the
direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Mnemonic
Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the
projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Mnemonic
Project, and be it further

RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are
appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Mnemonic
Project:

 * Andrew Kyle Purtell  <apurt...@apache.org>
 * Debo <ddu...@apache.org>
 * Gang Wang<ga...@apache.org>
 * Hao Cheng<chha...@apache.org>
 * James R. Taylor  <jamestay...@apache.org>
 * Johnu George <jo...@apache.org>
 * Kai Zheng<dran...@apache.org>
 * Patrick D. Hunt  <ph...@apache.org>
 * Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org>
 * Uma Maheswara Rao G  <umamah...@apache.org>
 * Yanping Wang <yanpi...@apache.org>

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Gang Wang be appointed to
the office of Vice President, Apache Mnemonic, to serve in accordance
with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the
Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal
or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed, and be it
further

RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Mnemonic PMC be and hereby is tasked
with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open
development and increased participation in the Apache Mnemonic Project;
and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache Mnemonic Project be and hereby is tasked with
the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Mnemonic
podling; and be it further

RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator
Mnemonic podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter
discharged.

[VOTE] Graduate Apache Mnemonic project from Incubator

2017-09-11 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Hi everyone,

The Mnemonic community voted on its Dev list to graduate, The vote passed
with
14 +1s (including  +9s from the PPMC) and 0 -1s.

Here is the vote result thread in the Dev list:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bbc187108b73d57fddec0d6a6c294527b626c7c439a7cdab991ea84e@%3Cdev.mnemonic.apache.org%3E

and the vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a49e82d507bb00839413e90b05cb8b9448ea242aeb021622f5deb323@%3Cdev.mnemonic.apache.org%3E

This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Mnemonic should graduate from the
Incubator. Please VOTE on the draft resolution pasted below the ballot
which establishes Apache Mnemonic as a new top-level project
at the Apache Software Foundation. I'll leave this VOTE open for
at least 72 hours.

[ ] +1 Graduate Apache Mnemonic from the Incubator
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Mnemonic from the Incubator because...

Thanks !


Establish the Apache Mnemonic Project

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public,
related to a transparent nonvolatile hybrid memory oriented library for
Big data, High-performance computing, and Analytics.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee
(PMC), to be known as the "Apache Mnemonic Project", be and hereby is
established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation, and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache Mnemonic Project be and hereby is responsible
for the creation and maintenance of software related to a transparent
nonvolatile hybrid memory oriented library for Big data,
High-performance computing and Analytics; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Mnemonic" be and
hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the
direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Mnemonic
Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the
projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Mnemonic
Project, and be it further

RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are
appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Mnemonic
Project:

 * Andrew Kyle Purtell  
 * Debo 
 * Gang Wang
 * Hao Cheng
 * James R. Taylor  
 * Johnu George 
 * Kai Zheng
 * Patrick D. Hunt  
 * Rakesh Radhakrishnan 
 * Uma Maheswara Rao G  
 * Yanping Wang 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Gang Wang be appointed to
the office of Vice President, Apache Mnemonic, to serve in accordance
with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the
Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal
or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed, and be it
further

RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Mnemonic PMC be and hereby is tasked
with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open
development and increased participation in the Apache Mnemonic Project;
and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache Mnemonic Project be and hereby is tasked with
the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Mnemonic
podling; and be it further

RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator
Mnemonic podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter
discharged.

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.7.0-incubating [rc1]

2017-05-04 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Hi all,

After being opened for over more than 72 hours, the vote for releasing
Apache
Mnemonic 0.7.0-incubating passed with 5 binding +1s, 3 non-binding +1s and
no 0 or -1.

* *Binding votes +1s: **
Henry Saputra (hsaputra)
Gangumalla, Uma (umamahesh)
Patrick Hunt (phunt)
John D. Ament (johndament)
Jean-Baptiste Onofré (jbonofre)


** non-binding votes +1s: **Yanping Wang (yanpingw)
Gary (garyw)
Pierre Smits (pierresmits)

*Project Members Role Info*http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/

**Thanks all**
Cheers

Gary on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community



On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hello incubator PMCs,
>
> The Apache Mnemonic community PPMCs and developers have voted and approved 
> the proposal to release Apache Mnemonic 0.7.0 (incubating).
>
> Apache Mnemonic is an advanced hybrid memory storage oriented library, it's 
> proposed a non-volatile/durable Java object model and durable computing model 
> that bring several advantages to significantly improve the performance of 
> massive real-time data processing/analytic. developers are able to use this 
> library to design their cache-less and SerDe-less high performance 
> applications.
>
> [VOTE] thread:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mnemonic-dev/201705.mbox/%3CCALuGr6b2HbvKNtvC914JHZs7VNpT4aUBdLSax1GYMQRZki-ZnQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mnemonic-dev/201705.mbox/%3CD52E2CE6.314AC%25uma.gangumalla%40intel.com%3E
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mnemonic-dev/201705.mbox/%3CCANLc_9KrNn3M3%3DAUua7PT-007RNAEBev97%2BW1ZTcFfnfcz1ZdA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mnemonic-dev/201704.mbox/%3CCAG7vPRKAZ2tsVZJWCRmR0UZxXc5%2Bb7ozHncpPG2x46KU9KzQvA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mnemonic-dev/201704.mbox/%3CCAOgX8szFF2nnj8Si4-BMoP2ofgPMsWBG2Kp%3D0S%2BSzw5Qh2R34A%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> [VOTE RESULT] thread:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mnemonic-dev/201705.mbox/%3CCAOgX8swpm9xaYHR1M9_of57uu_VPzZV04harGYpH4p1ndwKnJg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this 
> incubator release.
>
> The Apache Mnemonic-0.7.0-incubating release candidate is now available with 
> the following artifacts for a project vote:
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.7.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.6.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.7.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 73a2bb7a35ed768b382be2068e0a22a1ced0a67e:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=73a2bb7a35ed768b382be2068e0a22a1ced0a67e
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.7.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.7.0-incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
>
> Thanks,
> Gary on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) team
>
>
>

[VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.7.0-incubating [rc1]

2017-05-02 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Hello incubator PMCs,

The Apache Mnemonic community PPMCs and developers have voted and
approved the proposal to release Apache Mnemonic 0.7.0 (incubating).

Apache Mnemonic is an advanced hybrid memory storage oriented library,
it's proposed a non-volatile/durable Java object model and durable
computing model that bring several advantages to significantly improve
the performance of massive real-time data processing/analytic.
developers are able to use this library to design their cache-less and
SerDe-less high performance applications.

[VOTE] thread:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mnemonic-dev/201705.mbox/%3CCALuGr6b2HbvKNtvC914JHZs7VNpT4aUBdLSax1GYMQRZki-ZnQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mnemonic-dev/201705.mbox/%3CD52E2CE6.314AC%25uma.gangumalla%40intel.com%3E

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mnemonic-dev/201705.mbox/%3CCANLc_9KrNn3M3%3DAUua7PT-007RNAEBev97%2BW1ZTcFfnfcz1ZdA%40mail.gmail.com%3E

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mnemonic-dev/201704.mbox/%3CCAG7vPRKAZ2tsVZJWCRmR0UZxXc5%2Bb7ozHncpPG2x46KU9KzQvA%40mail.gmail.com%3E

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mnemonic-dev/201704.mbox/%3CCAOgX8szFF2nnj8Si4-BMoP2ofgPMsWBG2Kp%3D0S%2BSzw5Qh2R34A%40mail.gmail.com%3E

[VOTE RESULT] thread:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mnemonic-dev/201705.mbox/%3CCAOgX8swpm9xaYHR1M9_of57uu_VPzZV04harGYpH4p1ndwKnJg%40mail.gmail.com%3E

We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on
this incubator release.

The Apache Mnemonic-0.7.0-incubating release candidate is now
available with the following artifacts for a project vote:

The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.7.0-incubating-rc1/src/

The tag to be voted upon is v0.6.0-incubating:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.7.0-incubating

The release hash is 73a2bb7a35ed768b382be2068e0a22a1ced0a67e:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=73a2bb7a35ed768b382be2068e0a22a1ced0a67e

Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS

KEYS file available:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS

For information about the contents of this release, see:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.7.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt

The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
please vote:

[ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.7.0-incubating
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...


Thanks,
Gary on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) team

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating [rc1]

2017-04-13 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Hi all,

After being opened for over more than 72 hours, the vote for releasing
Apache Mnemonic 0.6.0-incubating passed with 3 binding +1s, 2 non-binding
+1s and no 0 or -1.


** Binding votes +1s: **Henry Saputra (hsaputra)
Gangumalla, Uma (umamahesh)
Patrick Hunt (phunt)


** non-binding votes +1s: **Yanping Wang (yanpingw)
Gary (garyw)


** Project Members Role Info **http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/


**Thanks all**Cheers
Gary

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hello incubator PMCs,
>
> The Apache Mnemonic community PPMCs and developers have voted and approved 
> the proposal to release Apache Mnemonic 0.6.0 (incubating).
>
> Apache Mnemonic is an advanced hybrid memory storage oriented library, it's 
> proposed a non-volatile/durable Java object model and durable computing model 
> that bring several advantages to significantly improve the performance of 
> massive real-time data processing/analytic. developers are able to use this 
> library to design their cache-less and SerDe-less high performance 
> applications.
>
> [VOTE] thread:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mnemonic-dev/201704.mbox/%3CCALuGr6Z1UX-pU4wRHea-J4roWW%2BwYOK20tfF%2B4-EdRT6TS6K_A%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mnemonic-dev/201704.mbox/%3CCAG7vPR%2B5Uv9ide1gnaPQT4a%3DWrgsDLfzN9i3xJ3i8Dq-G3oyuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mnemonic-dev/201704.mbox/%3CD50D574B.2FDB5%25uma.gangumalla%40intel.com%3E
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mnemonic-dev/201704.mbox/%3CCAOgX8sz9vy3ms_sEpP0%3DmV6adJX8JFbwynppRAPfkXkNi17%3DrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> [VOTE RESULT] thread:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mnemonic-dev/201704.mbox/%3CCAOgX8sy7mSUR8HvrWCfc2YXtMNR9R5UCj3EaL_RF145SARbKAA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this 
> incubator release.
>
> The Apache Mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating release candidate is now available with 
> the following artifacts for a project vote:
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.6.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.6.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.6.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.6.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
>
> Thanks,
> Gary on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) team
>
>

[VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating [rc1]

2017-04-10 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang 
Hello incubator PMCs,

The Apache Mnemonic community PPMCs and developers have voted and
approved the proposal to release Apache Mnemonic 0.6.0 (incubating).

Apache Mnemonic is an advanced hybrid memory storage oriented library,
it's proposed a non-volatile/durable Java object model and durable
computing model that bring several advantages to significantly improve
the performance of massive real-time data processing/analytic.
developers are able to use this library to design their cache-less and
SerDe-less high performance applications.

[VOTE] thread:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mnemonic-dev/201704.mbox/%3CCALuGr6Z1UX-pU4wRHea-J4roWW%2BwYOK20tfF%2B4-EdRT6TS6K_A%40mail.gmail.com%3E

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mnemonic-dev/201704.mbox/%3CCAG7vPR%2B5Uv9ide1gnaPQT4a%3DWrgsDLfzN9i3xJ3i8Dq-G3oyuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mnemonic-dev/201704.mbox/%3CD50D574B.2FDB5%25uma.gangumalla%40intel.com%3E

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mnemonic-dev/201704.mbox/%3CCAOgX8sz9vy3ms_sEpP0%3DmV6adJX8JFbwynppRAPfkXkNi17%3DrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E

[VOTE RESULT] thread:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mnemonic-dev/201704.mbox/%3CCAOgX8sy7mSUR8HvrWCfc2YXtMNR9R5UCj3EaL_RF145SARbKAA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on
this incubator release.

The Apache Mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating release candidate is now
available with the following artifacts for a project vote:

The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.6.0-incubating-rc1/src/

The tag to be voted upon is v0.6.0-incubating:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.6.0-incubating

The release hash is d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc

Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS

KEYS file available:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS

For information about the contents of this release, see:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.6.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt

The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
please vote:

[ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...


Thanks,
Gary on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) team