Re: [VOTE] Retire BlueMarlin

[kezhenxu94@apache]

+1, I saw we have had several discussion threads and they have had several 
chances without positive outcome.

> On Feb 16, 2022, at 07:20, Dave Fisher  wrote:
> 
> Please vote to retire BlueMarlin. This is a group that has made no progress 
> as an Apache podling. There is no interest in developing a community. They’ve 
> had multiple chances.
> 
> [ ] +1 Retire BlueMarlin
> [ ] -1 Keep BlueMarlin and I’m willing to join to make it an Apache Community.
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 

— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [IMPORTANT] Linkis, Doris, Shenyu, MXNet. Website branding issue

[kezhenxu94@apache]

Hi Mingyu, yes, Kafka’s website looks to be a good practice in terms of the 
user wall.

> On Dec 13, 2021, at 10:12, 陈明雨  wrote:
> 
> Hi Zhenxu:
> Thanks for your advice.
> And maybe the Kafka website[1] is one of best practice we can refer to?
> That is to move our "user wall" or "user cases" to a submenu like "Powered 
> by".
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [1] https://kafka.apache.org/powered-by
> 
> --
> 
> 此致！Best Regards
> 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen
> 
> Email:
> chenmin...@apache.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> At 2021-12-12 23:18:45, "kezhenxu94@apache"  wrote:
>> Hi the PPMC of 
>> 
>> - Linkis
>> - Doris
>> - Shenyu
>> - MXNet
>> 
>> (And maybe more...)
>> 
>> I notice that your website violates the best practice of “thanks pages” / 
>> “Trusted By” / “User Wall” [1] and needs some changes to the homepage. The 
>> "TL;DR;” version is not to list your users in the homepage, you can move 
>> them to a submenu like “Users” or similar, but not list them in homepage. 
>> For more rationale please read [1].
>> 
>> Please do not ignore this request and adjust the homepage ideally within 30 
>> days.
>> 
>> [1] https://apache.org/foundation/marks/linking#projectthanks
>> 
>> — 
>> Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
>> GitHub @kezhenxu94
>> Apache Incubator PMC
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[IMPORTANT] Linkis, Doris, Shenyu, MXNet. Website branding issue

[kezhenxu94@apache]

Hi the PPMC of 

- Linkis
- Doris
- Shenyu
- MXNet

(And maybe more...)

I notice that your website violates the best practice of “thanks pages” / 
“Trusted By” / “User Wall” [1] and needs some changes to the homepage. The 
"TL;DR;” version is not to list your users in the homepage, you can move them 
to a submenu like “Users” or similar, but not list them in homepage. For more 
rationale please read [1].

Please do not ignore this request and adjust the homepage ideally within 30 
days.

[1] https://apache.org/foundation/marks/linking#projectthanks

— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94
Apache Incubator PMC


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.9.0.rc8 (corrected vote)

[kezhenxu94@apache]

Carry my +1 (binding) from dev@ list

— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94

> On Dec 6, 2021, at 12:05, Serge Panev  wrote:
> 
> Dear community,
> 
> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.9.0, release
> candidate 8.
> 
> Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
> 
> Vote thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/cb8xjt38s7j78htzd174hyd0yogcwpr8
> 
> Result thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/rwpk1rzdyxmb6vv18d3lb96gqz4nvkdx
> 
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.9.0.rc8/
> 
> The tag to be voted upon is 1.9.0.rc8:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.9.0.rc8
> 
> The release hash is 8173b858dd1bff6be465bca2e2bbfc4eabd189b4:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/8173b858dd1bff6be465bca2e2bbfc4eabd189b4
> 
> KEYS file available:
> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/mxnet/KEYS
> 
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.9.0+Release+Notes
> 
> This vote follows the previous vote 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/63noybmypw0mh0qdp5covbp6yzqo85ly
> but with a corrected KEYS file location.
> 
> The vote will be open for 7 days.
> 
> [ ] +1 release this package as 1.9.0.rc8
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 do not release this package because...
> 
> Best regards,
> Serge Panev
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept SeaTunnel into the Apache Incubator

[kezhenxu94@apache]

+1 binding to bring SeaTunnel into the incubator

> On Dec 3, 2021, at 21:56, Willem Jiang  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Following up the [DISCUSS] thread on SeaTunnel [1] I would like to call a
> VOTE to accept into the Apache Incubator.
> 
> Please cast your vote:
> 
>  [ ] +1, bring  into the Incubator
>  [ ] +0, I don't care either way
>  [ ] -1, do not bring SeaTunnel into the Incubator, because...
> 
> The vote will open at least for 72 hours and only votes from the
> Incubator PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome.
> 
> Please check out the SeaTunnel Proposal from the incubator wiki[2].
> 
> [1]https://lists.apache.org/thread/nvp0sxnl0b69wgylxsvmdshfd70om1gk
> [2]https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/SeaTunnelProposal
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Willem Jiang
> 
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: 姜宁willem
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 

— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.9.0.rc7

[kezhenxu94@apache]

Oh yes, the problem is that `3rdparty/ctc_include` should be listed under 
`BSD-3` section instead of `Apache-2.0` section in the `./LICENSE` file.

> On Sep 13, 2021, at 20:28, Xun Liu  wrote:
> 
> hi, zhenxu
> 
> It is stated in the `./LICENSE`[1] file that 3rdparty/ctc_include is
> `Apache-2.0 license`,
> but the file in ctc_include is `NVIDIA CORPORATION` [2].
> I'm not sure if this will be a problem?
> 
> 
> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/master/LICENSE#L221
> [2]
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/v1.9.x/3rdparty/ctc_include/contrib/moderngpu/include/mgpudevice.cuh#L2
> 
> 
> Xun Liu
> Best regards,
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 7:56 PM kezhenxu94@apache 
> wrote:
> 
>>> I checked the mxnet project again,
>>> and I found that all the files in the third-party submodule
>>> ./3rdparty/ctc_include did not include ASF headers.
>> 
>> Hi Xun, those files are from third-party, and is listed in LICENSE
>> 
>> —
>> Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
>> GitHub @kezhenxu94
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> 
>> 

— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.9.0.rc7

[kezhenxu94@apache]

> I checked the mxnet project again,
> and I found that all the files in the third-party submodule
> ./3rdparty/ctc_include did not include ASF headers.

Hi Xun, those files are from third-party, and is listed in LICENSE

— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kyuubi(Incubating) v1.3.0-incubating RC7

[kezhenxu94@apache]

Hi, +1 (binding), but please take a look at (3), (4).

1. sha sum is OK. 
  But prefer to use relative path instead of absolute path to generate the sha 
sum, for the sake of convenience when verifying.
  For example, prefer `sha -a 512 kyuubi-1.3.0-incubating-bin.tgz` instead of 
`sha -a 512 
/Users/chengpan/Projects/apache-kyuubi/work/release/kyuubi-1.3.0-incubating-bin.tgz`

2. tar balls are signed by  correctly.
3. “incubating” is in file names but “apache-“ is not, prefer to use 
apache-kyuubi-1.3.0-incubating-bin.tgz.
4. “Incubating” is not in NOTICE file.
5. Source files have license header when necessary.
6. Compile from source successfully. `mvn clean install -DskipTests 
-Pkyuubi-extension-spark-3-1,spark-provided`
7. Bundled licenses are listed correctly.

> On Sep 2, 2021, at 17:26, Cheng Pan  wrote:
> 
> Hello Incubator Community,
> 
> The Apache Kyuubi community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
> Apache Kyuubi(Incubating) version v1.3.0-incubating RC7.
> 
> We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
> incubator release.
> 
> Kyuubi community vote thread:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kyuubi.apache.org/msg00754.html
> 
> Vote result thread:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kyuubi.apache.org/msg00802.html
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Kyuubi v1.3.0-incubating
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> 
> To learn more about Apache Kyuubi (Incubating), please see
> https://kyuubi.apache.org/
> 
> The tag to be voted on is v1.3.0-incubating-rc7 (commit f1319e5):
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-kyuubi/tree/v1.3.0-incubating-rc7
> 
> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/kyuubi/v1.3.0-incubating-rc7/
> 
> Signatures used for Kyuubi RCs can be found in this file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/kyuubi/KEYS
> 
> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachekyuubi-1007/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Cheng Pan

— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc (Incubating) 1.0.0-rc02

[kezhenxu94@apache]

+1 binding

- [OK] .sha512 is correct.
- [OK] .asc is signed by lorin...@apache.org.
- [OK] Source files have license header when needed.
- [OK] No unexpected binary files in source tar.
- [OK] LICENSE and NOTICE and DISCLAIMER exist.

> On Aug 31, 2021, at 20:52, Lorin Lee  wrote:
> 
> Hello IPMC,
> 
> 
> 
> The Apache brpc community has voted and approved the release of Apache
> 
> brpc (Incubating) 1.0.0-rc02. We now kindly request the IPMC members
> 
> review and vote for this release.
> 
> 
> 
> brpc is an industrial-grade RPC framework with extremely high performance,
> and it supports multiple protocols, full rpc features, and has many
> convenient tools. The current release provides the first official and
> stable package, resolves all of the license issues, and fixes many bugs.
> 
> 
> 
> brpc community vote thread:
> 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rcdf94f507621ac72226b848e3c2ff7c1e1509e37f4926011398a7a2b%40%3Cdev.brpc.apache.org%3E
> 
> 
> 
> Vote result thread:
> 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r04525259b2044b7118d71418c065cf6173e85c149c0125bb99795c8e%40%3Cdev.brpc.apache.org%3E
> 
> 
> 
> The release candidate:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/1.0.0-rc02/
> 
> 
> 
> This release has been signed with a PGP available here:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/KEYS
> 
> 
> 
> Git tag for the release:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/releases/tag/1.0.0-rc02
> 
> 
> 
> Build guide and get started instructions can be found at:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/blob/master/docs/en/getting_started.md
> 
> 
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
> 
> of votes is reached.
> 
> 
> 
> Please vote accordingly:
> 
> [ ] +1 Approve the release of Apache brpc (Incubating) 1.0.0-rc02
> 
> [ ] +0
> 
> [ ] -1 Do not approve (please specify the reason)
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Lorin Lee
> 
> Apache brpc (Incubating)



— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.9.0.rc7

[kezhenxu94@apache]

Carry my +1 from dev@

> On Aug 30, 2021, at 07:10, Serge Panev  wrote:
> 
> Dear community,
> 
> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.9.0, release
> candidate 7.
> 
> Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
> 
> Vote thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7da1068178bb5f860cd0b20788c5510f31eaf0595f8f44cf42c09393%40%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> 
> Result thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc03c1e94bd91b2fb5bfabc72f3eb79af3204779fe53bd4da72202027%40%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> 
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.9.0.rc7/
> 
> The tag to be voted upon is 1.9.0.rc7:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.9.0.rc7
> 
> The release hash is b5e9ae89bb5a4232875cd354ffe9a091b43bba69:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/b5e9ae89bb5a4232875cd354ffe9a091b43bba69
> 
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS
> 
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.9.0+Release+Notes
> 
> The vote will be open for 7 days.
> 
> [ ] +1 release this package as 1.9.0.rc7
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 do not release this package because...
> 
> Best regards,
> Serge Panev

— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache DataLab (incubating) 2.5.0

[kezhenxu94@apache]

+1 (binding)

- .sha is correct.
- tar is signed by ura.kin...@gmail.com.
- “incubating” in tar name but not in doc.
- source files contain license header if needed.
- LICENSE and NOTICE exist.

The following are not blocker of the release but you might want to fix them in 
the next release.

- it’s better to put “Apache" and "(incubating)" in the README.md at least for 
the first time DataLab occurs, ex. Apache DataLab (Incubating).
- there is a hidden binary file in the source tar "doc/.DS_Store”, consider 
removing it in the next release.

> On Aug 3, 2021, at 15:03, Yurii Kinash  wrote:
> 
> Hello Incubator Community,
> 
> The Apache DataLab community has voted on and approved a proposal to release 
> Apache DataLab (incubating) version 2.5.0.
> 
> We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote in this 
> release.
> 
> DataLab is a platform for creating self-service, exploratory data science 
> environments in the cloud using best-of-breed data science tools.
> DataLab includes a self-service web console, used to create and manage 
> exploratory environments. It allows teams to spin up analytical environments 
> with just a single click of a mouse.
> Once established, the environment can be managed by an analytical team 
> itself, leveraging simple and easy-to-use web-based interface.
> 
> DataLab community vote thread:
> •https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc7f3e1a7e3f46e27ed7f05d6763a8fb162a0b1572cf4bbf0f0afbd5a%40%3Cdev.datalab.apache.org%3E
> 
> Vote result thread:
> •https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9657e8a5f5fdfb29b1df1dc9e291fd291765211e0ff6335bac6f755e%40%3Cdev.datalab.apache.org%3E
> 
> The release candidate:
> • https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/datalab/2.5.0/
> 
> Git tag for the release:
> • https://github.com/apache/incubator-datalab/releases/tag/2.5.0
> 
> Release notes:
> • https://github.com/apache/incubator-datalab/releases/tag/2.5.0
> 
> This has been signed with PGP key CB4730CE3EA35480 corresponding to 
> ura.kin...@gmail.com.
> KEYS file is available here:
> 
>  *   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/datalab/KEYS
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of 
> votes are reached.
> 
> Please vote accordingly:
> 
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> 
> Thanks,
> The Apache DataLab (Incubating) Team
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 

— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ShenYu (incubating) 2.4.0

[kezhenxu94@apache]

Hi, -1 (binding)

1. the commit ID claimed in this thread doesn’t match the release tag v2.4.0 
(https://github.com/apache/incubator-shenyu/commit/dc841a2720ea0b5a6ca71f1b9c1aa7958d241f16).

> Release Commit ID: 
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-shenyu/commit/c75a273a8a9118411ed367e743b574e7fe0a5a87

2. the maven staging repository can not be found (404 NOT FOUND) or you had 
recreated the staging repo.

> Maven 2 staging repository: 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheshenyu-1012/org/apache/shenyu/

3. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/shenyu/2.4.0/ has new 
changes since the voting thread is started.

If you think the release candidate is not good enough or need some fixes, 
please cancel the voting thread as soon as possible
instead of changing it silently when the voting thread is still open, so that 
people don’t waste time in voting a changing candidate.

> On Jul 27, 2021, at 10:57, Zhang Yonglun  wrote:
> 
> Hello Incubator Community,
> 
> This is a call for vote to release Apache ShenYu (incubating) version 2.4.0.
> 
> The Apache ShenYu community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
> Apache ShenYu (incubating) version 2.4.0.
> 
> We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
> incubator release.
> 
> ShenYu community vote thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8164d5840fda82b2d8bce5a7075ea874d247f2c0abf9203821a13cbb%40%3Cdev.shenyu.apache.org%3E
> 
> Vote result thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re7b26cf370707cdb54a5404e317167fde643d3669e9783e335bf3b5e%40%3Cdev.shenyu.apache.org%3E
> 
> Release notes:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-shenyu/blob/master/RELEASE-NOTES.md
> 
> The release candidates:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/shenyu/2.4.0/
> 
> Maven 2 staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheshenyu-1012/org/apache/shenyu/
> 
> Git tag for the release:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-shenyu/tree/v2.4.0/
> 
> Release Commit ID:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-shenyu/commit/c75a273a8a9118411ed367e743b574e7fe0a5a87
> 
> Keys to verify the Release Candidate:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/shenyu/KEYS
> 
> Look at here for how to verify this release candidate:
> https://shenyu.apache.org/community/release/#check-release
> 
> GPG user ID:
> zhangyonglun
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> votes are reached.
> 
> Please vote accordingly:
> 
> [ ] +1 approve
> 
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> 
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> 
> Checklist for reference:
> 
> [ ] Download links are valid.
> 
> [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> 
> [ ] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current
> release.
> 
> [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each ShenYu repo.
> 
> [ ] All files have license headers if necessary.
> 
> [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> 
> --
> 
> Zhang Yonglun
> Apache ShenYu (Incubating)
> Apache ShardingSphere



— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.9.0.rc3

[kezhenxu94@apache]

Hi, my +1 binding only due to DISCLAIMER-WIP

- SIL Open Font License is included in source tar [1].
- Some files are not listed in LICENSE [2].
- Some files are not recognized as ASF license header nor listed in LICENSE, 
hence I’m not sure what they are licensed [3].

[1] docs/python_docs/themes/mx-theme/mxtheme/static/webfonts/ 
[2] 3rdparty/googletest/ci , include/mkldnn
[3] docs/static_site/src/_includes/disqus_comments.html, and all files under 
docs/static_site/***

I also checked

- .asc, .sha512 are correct.
- commit sha and tag are correct.
- license headers are correct if needed.
- LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER-WIP are correct.
- “Incubator” is in src tar name and docs.
- 

> On Jun 11, 2021, at 11:39, Serge Panev  wrote:
> 
> Dear community,
> 
> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.9.0, release
> candidate 3.
> 
> Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
> 
> Vote thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1849016d251dad390312c8a788e9debd36abbf31e1ef15284582b41a%40%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> 
> Result thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r23fe1a469edde8036845d3efb49ac1a69b68277a7275c0270fc9427e%40%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> 
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.9.0.rc3/
> 
> The tag to be voted upon is 1.9.0.rc3:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.9.0.rc3
> 
> The release hash is 579a631c44c97de838379b138858277999754b94:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/579a631c44c97de838379b138858277999754b94
> 
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS
> 
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.9.0+Release+Notes
> 
> 
> The vote will be open for 7 days.
> 
> [ ] +1 release this package as 1.9.0.rc3
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 do not release this package because...
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Serge Panev



— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc06

[kezhenxu94@apache]

+1 (binding)

- .asc, .sha512 are correct.
- no unexpected binary files in src.
- “incubating” in src name and doc.
- files have license header if needed.
- LICENSE and NOTICE exist.
- didn’t compile b/c OS not supported.

> On May 17, 2021, at 11:18, 寒江雪  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Please review and vote on Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc06 release.
> 
> Apache Doris is an MPP-based interactive SQL data warehousing for reporting
> and analysis.
> 
> The Apache Doris community has voted on and approved this release:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1fd266598796a7b18ac00c7a23f8ad23ebcd0e6a64d83277f25c8150%40%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E
> 
> The vote result email thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4d34c37304efe41b6999d4475b962b0923e39356cd200dbef045312f%40%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E
> 
> The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.14.0-rc06, available
> here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/releases/tag/0.14.0-rc06
> 
> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release, and there is a
> simple release notes can be found here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/issues/5374
> 
> The artifacts (source, signature and checksum) corresponding to this release
> candidate can be found here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/0.14/0.14.0-rc06
> 
> This has been signed with PGP key 59F2ACED, corresponding to
> yang...@apache.org.
> KEYS file is available here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/KEYS
> It is also listed here:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/yangzhg.asc
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] +0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> 
> To verify and build, you can refer to the following wiki:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/wiki/How-to-verify-Apache-Release
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Incubator+Release+Checklist
> 
> You can also refer to instruction:
> 
> Firstly, you must install and start docker service, and then you could
> build Doris as the following steps:
> 
> Step1: Pull the docker image with Doris building environment
> $ docker pull apachedoris/doris-dev:build-env-1.2
> You can check it by listing images, its IMAGE ID is d854b488afaf
> 
> Step2: Run the Docker image
> You can run the image directly:
> $ docker run -it apachedoris/doris-dev:build-env1.2
> 
> Step3: Download Doris source
> Now you should in the docker environment, and you can download the Doris
> source package.
> (If you have downloaded the source, and it is not in the image, you can map
> its path to the image in Step2.)
> $ wget
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/0.14/0.14.0-rc06/apache-doris-0.14.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> 
> Step4: Build Doris
> Now you can decompress and enter Doris source path and build Doris.
> $ tar -zxvf apache-doris-0.14.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> $ cd apache-doris-0.14.0-incubating-src
> $ sh build.sh
> 
> Best Regards,
> Yang Zhengguo

— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) 0.7.5

[kezhenxu94@apache]

+1 (binding), some minor issues are expected to fixed in next release.

- Source tar is signed by aradzin...@datalingvo.com, it’s better to sign with 
your @apache.org account.
- Sha shum is correct.
- LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER exist.
- License headers exist in files where applicable, except for generated files 
and 3rd-party files declared in LICENSE.
- No unexpected binary files in source tar.
- “Incubating” exists in distributed file names, but not in the documentations 
(README.md).
- Compile from source codes successfully.

> On May 14, 2021, at 01:42, Aaron Radzinski  wrote:
> 
> Hello all,
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft (incubating)
> version 0.7.5. Apache NLPCraft is a library for adding a natural language
> interface to any application.
> 
> The Apache NLPCraft community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release Apache NLPCraft (Incubating) version 0.7.5. We would like to
> request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release.
> 
> Release information:
> 1. PPMC vote result thread:
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/nlpcraft-dev/202105.mbox/%3cCALV17Qp_roGvs6jvR09zdXX0x99=mtefuax1bhtnw5cbsvk...@mail.gmail.com%3e
> 2. Release location:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nlpcraft/nlpcraft/0.7.5/
> 3. Git tag: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nlpcraft/tree/v0.7.5
> 4. JIRA issues fixed in release:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NLPCRAFT/versions/12349604
> 5. KEYS file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/nlpcraft
> /KEYS
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number
> of votes are reached.
> 
> Please vote accordingly:
> +1 approve
> +0 no opinion
> -1 disapprove with the reason
> 
> Aaron,
> ---
> Thank you,
> On behalf of NLPCraft community

— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Retirement of Weex

[kezhenxu94@apache]

+1 binding

> On May 9, 2021, at 18:06, Willem Jiang  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> According to the retirement guide[1] of incubator, we started the
> public discussion in the weex dev mailing list and got the
> conclusion[2] to go to the retirement process.
> 
> Now we just start a LAZY consensus vote in the IPMC.
> 
> [ ] +1 Support to retire Weex from Apache Incubator
> [ ] -1  Do not Support to retire Weex from Apache Incubator (please
> provide specific comments)
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> [1]https://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
> [2]https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rcaf67836a77ad3bebcafffc9e853bcd043a844e123e06ac8e71c9f4d%40%3Cdev.weex.apache.org%3E
> 
> Willem Jiang
> 
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: 姜宁willem
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 

— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of Shenyu

[kezhenxu94@apache]

In addition to Sheng’s list, I’ll also suggest the community to reconsider
the project name “ShenYu”, because from a quick search, there are several
potential branding / trademark conflicts, such as [1], [2], and [3].

Note that there is no official Chinese names for ASF Projects so you won’t
have “神禹” officially to distinguish yourself from others with the same pinyin 
“ShenYu”.

You may not want to change the name again later b/c that's a lot of work
and can be disruptive to your community, as you’ve already changed once.

[1] SHENYU Official Store 
[2] Shenyu 
[3] 神鱼（SHENYU）京东自营旗舰店 https://shenyu.jd.com

> On Apr 19, 2021, at 21:24, Sheng Wu  wrote:
> 
> Hi Shenyu community
> 
> IPMC has an internal discussion these 2 days. My concerns have been
> resolved.
> Some IPMC members want to give the following suggestions to the Shenyu's
> team
> - The incubating evaluation process only runs some checks on project
> branding, IP clearance, and community-related issues.
> - There is no endorsement of the project's technology from Apache or the
> mentor side even if the project is accepted by Apache Incubator.
> - Company affiliations of potential committers shouldn't matter. Anyone can
> become a committer not matter who they work for.
> - Code and no of commits is not the only activity that result in
> committership.
> - It is best to keep the committer bar low.
> - Dictators / leaders, friendly or other wise are not welcome. The code and
> management of that must be given over to the community.
> - Don't play the number game. The Apache counts on the real community
> activities. A TLP could be a big or small community, but need to be real.
> 
> These are going to be very important with other Apache cultures you need to
> learn and follow.
> If you are willing to learn and follow from your experienced mentors and
> IPMC, I am welcome you to join the incubator journey.
> 
> And this kind of argument is normal, you will experience more and must have
> to face -1 one day, at least when releasing, which would not be pleasant
> always and also normal cases. :)
> Once you get the idea and baseline, it would not be that hard.
> 
> Work closely with your community and mentors, have good luck.
> I am looking forward to your new proposal.
> 
> Sheng Wu 吴晟
> Twitter, wusheng1108
> 
> 
> Sheng Wu 吴晟
> Twitter, wusheng1108
> 
> 
> Sheng Wu  于2021年4月18日周日 下午2:41写道：
> 
>> Thanks, Duo.
>> Look forward to a better version of their proposal.
>> 
>> Sheng Wu 吴晟
>> Twitter, wusheng1108
>> 
>> 张铎(Duo Zhang)  于2021年4月18日周日 下午12:11写道：
>>> 
>>> Thanks Willem for clarifying.
>>> 
>>> As long as the community status is not important when joining incubtor(it
>>> is important when graduating), and there are some concerns, let's remove
>>> the sensitive words such as 'diverse' in the proposal, just mention that
>>> the project is already open sourced and has an initial community, so we
>> do
>>> not need to argue on this any more.
>>> And lack of English skill is a problem. Talking with the project leaders,
>>> they need to use google translate a lot when the topic is not about tech,
>>> so it is easy for them to be misunderstood.
>>> 
>>> So let's focus on the problems which must be solved before joining the
>>> incubator. I think the initial committer candidate is a problem and I saw
>>> the project leaders have already started to solve it.
>>> 
>>> And also, I agree with Willem that, joining incubator does not mean
>>> endorsement from ASF and the mentors about technology. We just want to
>> help
>>> the project to build the community in Apache way in the future.
>>> 
>>> Thanks.
>>> 
>>> Willem Jiang  于2021年4月17日周六 下午11:08写道：
>>> 
 After having some talk with the project leaders, we will start a
 discussion in the dromara community to make a clear initial committer
 choosing standard.
 Then we will update the initial committer list by asking the selected
 committer if they want to join as the initial committer.
 
 BTW, to be more clear,  the incubating evaluation process only runs
 some checks on project branding, IP clearance and community related
 issues.
 There is no endorsement of the project's technology from Apache or the
 mentor side if the project is accepted by Apache Incubator.
 
 Willem Jiang
 
 Twitter: willemjiang
 Weibo: 姜宁willem
 
 On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 7:36 AM Justin Mclean <
>> jus...@classsoftware.com>
 wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>>> We have make the election criterion of initial committer:
>> continuously
>>> contribute for the last one year, code of lines over 3000, commits
 over 15.
> 
> While not as high as some TLP this seems a little too high to me. A
>> year
 is a long time for someone to hang about on the chance they become a
 committer. They will probably make your incubation journey longer. It’s
 also important to 

Re: Release Helm chart as a derived downstream software artifact

[kezhenxu94@apache]

Hi

> I would like the first release of this package to be an official Apache 
> release. I am therefore of the mindset that it should be treated as any other 
> official Apache source code release.

Right, it should follow the Apache release policy and release source tar to be 
an official Apache release.
So there is no exception IMO to release the Helm Chart source tar.

While at the same time, Apache also allows (not requires) binary releases or 
distributions to third-party platforms, such as Pypi,  Docker Hub, npmjs.com, 
etc.

You may be interested in the distribution guide [1] (for incubating projects 
though)

[1] 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Distribution+Guidelines

> Can someone point me to a precedent or policy pertaining to the publication 
> of derived downstream software artifacts such as containers, Helm charts, etc.

There are also some TLPs [2] that did Helm Chart releases just for your 
reference.

[2] https://artifacthub.io/packages/helm/apache-solr/solr-operator 
(https://github.com/apache/solr-operator)
https://artifacthub.io/packages/helm/apache/pulsar 
(https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart)
https://github.com/apache/skywalking-kubernetes

> Thank you
> lewismc
> 
> [0] https://github.com/apache/tika-helm
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 



— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc04

[kezhenxu94@apache]

> On Apr 12, 2021, at 09:47, 寒江雪  wrote:
> 
> Hi
> Doris 0.14.7 is a rolling version maintained internally by baidu. We will
> regularly select committs from the community to the internal version and
> release the version number.  0.14.7 has nothing to do with the community’s
> 0.14 release.

If 0.14.7 has nothing to do with the community, please don’t publish the blog 
[1] under the account named ApacheDoris [2], which I believe is under your 
(PPMC members) control.

[1] https://blog.csdn.net/ucanuup_/article/details/115548997
[2] https://blog.csdn.net/ucanuup_

> 
> Ming Wen  于2021年4月12日周一 上午9:27写道：
> 
>> Hello,
>> When I searched for `Doris 0.14` on Google, I found an article[1]
>> mentioning that Doris 0.14.7 has been released.
>> But I checked the historical release[2] and did not have this version.
>> In my understanding, 0.14.0 has not been released. Why does 0.14.7 exist?
>> 
>> [1] https://www.modb.pro/db/49638
>> [2] https://doris.apache.org/master/en/downloads/downloads.html
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair
>> Twitter: _WenMing
>> 
>> 
>> Xun Liu  于2021年4月11日周日 下午11:05写道：
>> 
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>> 
>>> I checked:
>>> [√] Download links are valid.
>>> [√] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
>>> [√] LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files exist.
>>> [√] All files have license headers if necessary.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Xun Liu
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 10:13 PM Willem Jiang 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 I’m +1, I checked
 
 - LICENSE, DISCLAIM and NOTICE files exist;
 - Release candidate tar is signed, the Shasum.
 - “incubating” exists in tar file name and documentation;
 - License headers exist in files if necessary.
 
 Willem Jiang
 
 Twitter: willemjiang
 Weibo: 姜宁willem
 
 On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 1:37 PM 寒江雪  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Please review and vote on Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc04
>> release.
> 
> Apache Doris is an MPP-based interactive SQL data warehousing for
 reporting
> and analysis.
> 
> The Apache Doris community has voted on and approved this release:
> 
 
>>> 
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc95a58e64b926dc89b61e747fd11f8cb7bb173d95395fa26d02d2c00%40%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E
> 
> The vote result email thread:
> 
 
>>> 
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r14fc4ffeb31046343570a226dd7870ca74b0f15fbad492b09f0bb69f%40%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E
> 
> The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.14.0-rc04,
>>> available
> here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/releases/tag/0.14.0-rc04
> 
> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release, and there is
>> a
> simple release notes can be found here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/issues/5374
> 
> The artifacts (source, signature and checksum) corresponding to this
 release
> candidate can be found here:
> 
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/0.14/0.14.0-rc04/
> 
> This has been signed with PGP key 59F2ACED, corresponding to
> yang...@apache.org.
> KEYS file is available here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/KEYS
> It is also listed here:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/yangzhg.asc
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] +0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> 
> To verify and build, you can refer to the following wiki:
> 
 
>>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/wiki/How-to-verify-Apache-Release
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Incubator+Release+Checklist
> 
> You can also refer to instruction:
> 
> Firstly, you must install and start docker service, and then you
>> could
> build Doris as the following steps:
> 
> Step1: Pull the docker image with Doris building environment
> $ docker pull apachedoris/doris-dev:build-env-1.2
> You can check it by listing images, its IMAGE ID is d854b488afaf
> 
> Step2: Run the Docker image
> You can run the image directly:
> $ docker run -it apachedoris/doris-dev:build-env1.2
> 
> Step3: Download Doris source
> Now you should in the docker environment, and you can download the
>>> Doris
> source package.
> (If you have downloaded the source and it is not in image, you can
>> map
 its
> path to image in Step2.)
> $ wget
> 
 
>>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/0.14/0.14.0-rc04/apache-doris-0.14.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> 
> Step4: Build Doris
> Now you can decompress and enter Doris source path and build Doris.
> $ tar -zxvf apache-doris-0.14.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> $ cd apache-doris-0.14.0-incubating-src
> $ sh build.sh
> 
> Best Regards,
> Yang Zhengguo
 
 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc04

[kezhenxu94@apache]

> On Apr 12, 2021, at 09:33, 寒江雪  wrote:
> 
> Hi Zhenxu Ke:
> Thanks for voting. The following files are not from 3rd-party, they are
> written by ourselves:
> 1. be/src/olap/rowset/alpha_rowset_writer.h
> 2. be/src/olap/rowset/segment_v2/empty_segment_iterator.cpp

If that’s the case, the license header in file 
be/src/olap/rowset/segment_v2/empty_segment_iterator.cpp is not complete, 
please check and compare with other files, add the missing lines into it.

> I will fix the wrong path of
> "fe/fe-common/src/main/java/org/apache/doris/common/jmockit"  in LICENSE.txt
> 
> kezhenxu94@apache  于2021年4月11日周日 下午9:47写道：
> 
>> Hi, I’m +1, here are my check list
>> 
>> - LICENSE, DISCLAIM and NOTICE files exist;
>> - Release candidate tar is signed correctly, by "yang...@apache.org”;
>> - Shasum of the tar is correct;
>> - “incubating” exists in tar file name and documentation;
>> - License headers exist in files if necessary.
>> 
>> However, I found
>> 
>>  - the following files from 3rd-party are not listed in LICENSE.txt:
>>1. be/src/olap/rowset/alpha_rowset_writer.h
>>2. be/src/olap/rowset/segment_v2/empty_segment_iterator.cpp
>> 
>>  - the following files are listed (IMO) but with wrong file path:
>>1. Should be
>> "fe/fe-common/src/main/java/org/apache/doris/common/jmockit”, but was
>> listed as "fe/fe-common/src/test/java/org/apache/doris/common/jmockit” in
>> LICENSE.txt
>> 
>> The missing 3rd-party files in LICENSE.txt is not a blocker IMO because
>> there are files from the same owner ("be/src/olap/lru_cache.h”,
>> “be/src/olap/lru_cache.cpp”, "be/src/olap/skiplist.h”) which are listed.
>> 
>> And the wrong file path is easily fixed in mind so I think you can proceed
>> but remember to fix in the next release.
>> 
>> 
>>> On Apr 7, 2021, at 13:36, 寒江雪  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> Please review and vote on Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc04 release.
>>> 
>>> Apache Doris is an MPP-based interactive SQL data warehousing for
>> reporting
>>> and analysis.
>>> 
>>> The Apache Doris community has voted on and approved this release:
>>> 
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc95a58e64b926dc89b61e747fd11f8cb7bb173d95395fa26d02d2c00%40%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E
>>> 
>>> The vote result email thread:
>>> 
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r14fc4ffeb31046343570a226dd7870ca74b0f15fbad492b09f0bb69f%40%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E
>>> 
>>> The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.14.0-rc04, available
>>> here:
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/releases/tag/0.14.0-rc04
>>> 
>>> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release, and there is a
>>> simple release notes can be found here:
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/issues/5374
>>> 
>>> The artifacts (source, signature and checksum) corresponding to this
>> release
>>> candidate can be found here:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/0.14/0.14.0-rc04/
>>> 
>>> This has been signed with PGP key 59F2ACED, corresponding to
>>> yang...@apache.org.
>>> KEYS file is available here:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/KEYS
>>> It is also listed here:
>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/yangzhg.asc
>>> 
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] +0 No opinion
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>> 
>>> To verify and build, you can refer to the following wiki:
>>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/wiki/How-to-verify-Apache-Release
>>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Incubator+Release+Checklist
>>> 
>>> You can also refer to instruction:
>>> 
>>> Firstly, you must install and start docker service, and then you could
>>> build Doris as the following steps:
>>> 
>>> Step1: Pull the docker image with Doris building environment
>>> $ docker pull apachedoris/doris-dev:build-env-1.2
>>> You can check it by listing images, its IMAGE ID is d854b488afaf
>>> 
>>> Step2: Run the Docker image
>>> You can run the image directly:
>>> $ docker run -it apachedoris/doris-dev:build-env1.2
>>> 
>>> Step3: Download Doris source
>>> Now you should in the docker environment, and you can download the Doris
>>> sourc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc04

[kezhenxu94@apache]

Hi, I’m +1, here are my check list

- LICENSE, DISCLAIM and NOTICE files exist;
- Release candidate tar is signed correctly, by "yang...@apache.org”;
- Shasum of the tar is correct;
- “incubating” exists in tar file name and documentation;
- License headers exist in files if necessary.

However, I found

  - the following files from 3rd-party are not listed in LICENSE.txt:
1. be/src/olap/rowset/alpha_rowset_writer.h
2. be/src/olap/rowset/segment_v2/empty_segment_iterator.cpp

  - the following files are listed (IMO) but with wrong file path:
1. Should be "fe/fe-common/src/main/java/org/apache/doris/common/jmockit”, 
but was listed as "fe/fe-common/src/test/java/org/apache/doris/common/jmockit” 
in LICENSE.txt

The missing 3rd-party files in LICENSE.txt is not a blocker IMO because there 
are files from the same owner ("be/src/olap/lru_cache.h”, 
“be/src/olap/lru_cache.cpp”, "be/src/olap/skiplist.h”) which are listed.

And the wrong file path is easily fixed in mind so I think you can proceed but 
remember to fix in the next release.


> On Apr 7, 2021, at 13:36, 寒江雪  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Please review and vote on Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc04 release.
> 
> Apache Doris is an MPP-based interactive SQL data warehousing for reporting
> and analysis.
> 
> The Apache Doris community has voted on and approved this release:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc95a58e64b926dc89b61e747fd11f8cb7bb173d95395fa26d02d2c00%40%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E
> 
> The vote result email thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r14fc4ffeb31046343570a226dd7870ca74b0f15fbad492b09f0bb69f%40%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E
> 
> The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.14.0-rc04, available
> here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/releases/tag/0.14.0-rc04
> 
> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release, and there is a
> simple release notes can be found here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/issues/5374
> 
> The artifacts (source, signature and checksum) corresponding to this release
> candidate can be found here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/0.14/0.14.0-rc04/
> 
> This has been signed with PGP key 59F2ACED, corresponding to
> yang...@apache.org.
> KEYS file is available here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/KEYS
> It is also listed here:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/yangzhg.asc
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] +0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> 
> To verify and build, you can refer to the following wiki:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/wiki/How-to-verify-Apache-Release
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Incubator+Release+Checklist
> 
> You can also refer to instruction:
> 
> Firstly, you must install and start docker service, and then you could
> build Doris as the following steps:
> 
> Step1: Pull the docker image with Doris building environment
> $ docker pull apachedoris/doris-dev:build-env-1.2
> You can check it by listing images, its IMAGE ID is d854b488afaf
> 
> Step2: Run the Docker image
> You can run the image directly:
> $ docker run -it apachedoris/doris-dev:build-env1.2
> 
> Step3: Download Doris source
> Now you should in the docker environment, and you can download the Doris
> source package.
> (If you have downloaded the source and it is not in image, you can map its
> path to image in Step2.)
> $ wget
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/0.14/0.14.0-rc04/apache-doris-0.14.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> 
> Step4: Build Doris
> Now you can decompress and enter Doris source path and build Doris.
> $ tar -zxvf apache-doris-0.14.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> $ cd apache-doris-0.14.0-incubating-src
> $ sh build.sh
> 
> Best Regards,
> Yang Zhengguo



— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.70-rc1

[kezhenxu94@apache]

Hi, my +1, I’ve checked

- Sha sum is OK
- GPG signature verified.
- RC matches the git tag / branch.
- LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER-WIP files exist.
- Docs, release names include “Incubating”.

However the following issue is not a blocker of the release and can be fixed in 
the following releasees,
but I found the headers in these files are not the one ASF specified.
Note that there is dedicated license header for ASF projects, see this link [1]


- 
plugins/databases/clickhouse/src/main/java/org/apache/hop/databases/clickhouse/ClickhouseDatabaseMeta.java
- 
plugins/databases/clickhouse/src/test/java/org/apache/hop/databases/clickhouse/ClickhouseDatabaseMetaTest.java
- 
plugins/databases/snowflake/src/main/java/org/apache/hop/databases/snowflake/SnowflakeDatabaseMeta.java
- 
plugins/databases/snowflake/src/test/java/org/apache/hop/databases/snowflake/SnowflakeDatabaseMetaTest.java
- 
plugins/misc/git/src/main/java/org/apache/hop/git/DrawDiffOnActionExtensionPoint.java
- 
plugins/misc/git/src/main/java/org/apache/hop/git/DrawDiffOnActionExtensionPoint.java
- 
plugins/misc/git/src/main/java/org/apache/hop/git/DrawDiffOnPipelineHopExtensionPoint.java
- 
plugins/misc/git/src/main/java/org/apache/hop/git/DrawDiffOnTransformExtensionPoint.java
- 
plugins/misc/git/src/main/java/org/apache/hop/git/DrawDiffOnWorkflowHopExtensionPoint.java
- plugins/misc/git/src/main/java/org/apache/hop/git/HopDiff.java
- 
plugins/misc/git/src/main/java/org/apache/hop/git/dialog/DeleteBranchDialog.java
- 
plugins/misc/git/src/main/java/org/apache/hop/git/dialog/MergeBranchDialog.java
- 
plugins/misc/git/src/main/java/org/apache/hop/git/dialog/UsernamePasswordDialog.java
- plugins/misc/git/src/main/java/org/apache/hop/git/model/UIFile.java
- plugins/misc/git/src/main/java/org/apache/hop/git/model/UIGit.java
- 
plugins/misc/git/src/main/java/org/apache/hop/git/model/revision/GitObjectRevision.java
- plugins/misc/git/src/test/java/org/apache/hop/git/HopDiffTest.java
- plugins/misc/git/src/test/java/org/apache/hop/git/model/UIGitTest.java
- core/src/main/java/org/apache/hop/core/util/StorageUnitConverter.java

[1] https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers

> On Mar 30, 2021, at 22:43, Hans Van Akelyen  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Incubator team,
> 
> We are proud to announce that we have a new release candidate ready for
> release and would like your review and vote.
> 
> Build instructions can be found in the README included.
> 
> Hop community vote and result threads:
> Vote:
> 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r24f1435c891c11d87d20d87d832b5de2613a37cda5e92c3587f058d1%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E
> Result:
> 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/red37c2870bd3c366426579ffdd1c33c845eaf13801fd81bc0bd74539%40%3Cdev.hop.apache.org%3E
> 
> The tag to be voted on is 0.70-rc1 (commit
> f16b78f1a16feac5021f4556b30ee0a9609dbc1a)
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/tree/0.70-rc1
> 
> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hop/apache-hop-0.70-incubating-rc1/
> 
> The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is:
> bbf9357801d9bdd0560a6788c7e51d469777d9dbf483be10d67e674552da28848edfba8533bab280afb97949ec55454ec5e147b73ce733010efa57af1997ef3d
> 
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0x9a8a628dd4f4aa1e
> 
> For more information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HOP/versions/12349578
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 0.70!
> 
> The vote is open for 72 hours and passes if
> a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 0.70
> [ ] +0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> 
> Best Regards,
> Hans



— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc03

[kezhenxu94@apache]

Sorry my -1, I saw there are binary files in the source tar, although they’re 
test tools, but this is not allowed in the source release.

./fe/fe-core/src/test/resources/plugin_test/plugin_test.jar
./fe/fe-core/src/test/resources/plugin_test/test_local_plugin/auditdemo.jar

> On Mar 26, 2021, at 12:36, 寒江雪  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Please review and vote on Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc03 release.
> 
> Apache Doris is an MPP-based interactive SQL data warehousing for reporting
> and analysis.
> 
> The Apache Doris community has voted on and approved this release:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1d3728b02b4f7b56413d3bf334b94fbc9c8406bf2d78aa01fea60a77%40%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E
> 
> The vote result email thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re1eb419d0eb4689d77e82727811facef08f3c2498f64ad2ea812d42a%40%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E
> 
> The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.14.0-rc03, available
> here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/releases/tag/0.14.0-rc03
> 
> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release, and there is a
> simple release notes can be found here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/issues/5374
> 
> The artifacts (source, signature and checksum) corresponding to this release
> candidate can be found here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/0.14/0.14.0-rc03/
> 
> This has been signed with PGP key 59F2ACED, corresponding to
> yang...@apache.org.
> KEYS file is available here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/KEYS
> It is also listed here:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/yangzhg.asc
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] +0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> 
> To verify and build, you can refer to following wiki:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/wiki/How-to-verify-Apache-Release
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Incubator+Release+Checklist
> 
> You can also refer to instruction:
> 
> Firstly, you must be install and start docker service, and then you could
> build Doris as following steps:
> 
> Step1: Pull the docker image with Doris building environment
> $ docker pull apachedoris/doris-dev:build-env-1.2
> You can check it by listing images, its IMAGE ID is d854b488afaf
> 
> Step2: Run the Docker image
> You can run image directly:
> $ docker run -it apachedoris/doris-dev:build-env1.2
> 
> Step3: Download Doris source
> Now you should in the docker environment, and you can download the Doris
> source package.
> (If you have downloaded the source and it is not in image, you can map its
> path to image in Step2.)
> $ wget
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/0.14/0.14.0-rc03/apache-doris-0.14.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> 
> Step4: Build Doris
> Now you can decompress and enter Doris source path and build Doris.
> $ tar zxvf apache-doris-0.14.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> $ cd apache-doris-0.14.0-incubating-src
> $ sh build.sh
> 
> Best Regards,
> Yang Zhengguo



— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.0 RC1

[kezhenxu94@apache]

Hey, I found some of the files lack the license headers, 
though some of which are for testing only, but since you have
included them in the source tar, it’d be better to have license headers for 
them.

pinot-clients/pinot-jdbc-client/src/main/resources/java.sql.Driver
pinot-connectors/pinot-spark-connector/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.spark.sql.sources.DataSourceRegister
pinot-core/src/test/resources/conf/pinot-broker.properties
pinot-core/src/test/resources/conf/query-executor.properties
pinot-core/src/test/resources/generate-test-data.py
pinot-integration-tests/src/test/resources/compat-tests/kafka/topic1.cfg
pinot-integration-tests/src/test/resources/index.html
pinot-tools/src/main/resources/conf/sample_filesystem_benchmark.conf


Also, I found that this file `docs/Makefile` originated from 3-rd party [1] and
is modified in the release, but not mentioned in the LICENSE file.

[1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/blob/release-0.7.0-rc/LICENSE


> On Mar 23, 2021, at 00:25, Yupeng Fu  wrote:
> 
> Felix and others,
> 
> The git hash on the git tag is now the same as the one sent out in the
> vote. Please check again
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/commits/release-0.7.0
> 
> Sorry for the inconvenience and thanks for checking.
> 
> Best,
> 
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 3:45 PM Felix Cheung  wrote:
> 
>> For some reason the git hash has changed in release git tag
>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/commits/release-0.7.0
>> 
>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/commit/de0236c25727ffc2408c5bf55836bbfecf40499c
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:00 AM kishore g  wrote:
>> 
>>> Jim/Felix and others
>>> 
>>> Do we have your +1 to go ahead with the release.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> Kishore G
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 9:32 PM kishore g  wrote:
>>> 
>>>> That would be great. We will update the release runbook to make sure
>> this
>>>> doesn't happen again.
>>>> 
>>>> Here is my +1
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 11:03 AM Jim Jagielski 
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I propose that we run the vote anyway, thus ensuring IPMC oversight
>> and
>>>>> (post)approval, and then update the release runbook to make sure this
>>>>> doesn't happen again. Make sense?
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mar 17, 2021, at 11:35 PM, Felix Cheung 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It is unclear the guidance on this but since it is impossible remove
>>>>> from
>>>>>> maven
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/#nexus-search;classname~Pinot
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Once it is published, I’d suggest we update all the links and git
>> hash
>>>>> and
>>>>>> still proceed to vote on this. If there is any issue we should vote
>> on
>>>>>> another release with fix ASAP. Otherwise hopefully IPMC can continue
>>> to
>>>>>> sign off on this release.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 3:09 PM kishore g 
>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Apologies for the mistake. We have done multiple releases until now
>>> and
>>>>>>> this is the first time we missed the step to get the approval from
>>>>> IPMC was
>>>>>>> missed before making the release.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What is the right thing to do at this point? Should we cut another
>>>>> release
>>>>>>> or can we go ahead with this and ensure that this does not happen
>>>>> again.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>> Kishore G
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:59 AM Felix Cheung <
>>> felixche...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Unfortunately this isn’t the right process for a podling release.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> As the mentor, I am sorry to see the release is not up to the
>>> standard
>>>>>>>> upheld by previous releases.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 17, 20

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.0 RC1

[kezhenxu94@apache]

I think this release violates the Apache release policy because it didn’t get 
the approvals from IPMC but was released actually (in both dist.a.o and GitHub).

— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94

> On Mar 17, 2021, at 06:14, Yupeng Fu  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> This is a call for vote to the release Apache Pinot (incubating) version
> 0.7.0.
> 
> Apache Pinot (incubating) is a distributed columnar storage engine that can
> ingest data in realtime and serve analytical queries at low latency.
> 
> Pinot community has voted and approved this release.
> 
> Vote thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r850cee1e6fc23804d161a31d465e30d5d12b7a4e1cc8035264ea91d6%40%3Cdev.pinot.apache.org%3E
> 
> 
> Result thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r80672ac39a6a6eb7f63c7dbbf595de2f7350cf75d2a7a598601da638%40%3Cdev.pinot.apache.org%3E
> 
> The release candidate:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/pinot/apache-pinot-incubating-0.7.0-rc1/
> 
> 
> Git tag for this release:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/tree/release-0.7.0-rc1
> 
> Git hash for this release:
> 695ca390a8080409b3b76f250f2315b81b86b362
> 
> The artifacts have been signed with key: F41AB2B856C6C29D, which can be
> found in the following KEYS file.
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/pinot/KEYS
> 
> Release notes:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/releases/tag/release-0.7.0-rc1
> 
> Staging repository:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepinot-1024
> 
> Documentation on verifying a release candidate:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/PINOT/Validating+a+release+candidate
> 
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number of
> votes are reached.
> 
> Please vote accordingly,
> 
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> 
> Thanks,
> Apache Pinot (incubating) team



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc02

[kezhenxu94@apache]

You have to include a DISCLAIMER file in the release because Doris is still in 
incubator.

If you have license issues, you can have DISCLAIMER-WIP so that IPMC members 
won’t -1 when voting a release (WIP indicates that you’re resolving the 
problem), but if you have resolved the license issues, you MUST have a 
DISCLAIMER file in it, at this time, IPMC members will vote -1 when they find 
license issues.

> On Mar 17, 2021, at 21:22, 陈明雨  wrote:
> 
> Hi Juan, Williem and Zhiyuan:
> 
> 
> Thank for your review.
> 
> 
> 
> But why do we still need to keep DISCLAIMER-WIP in the code base?
> 
> We had some LICENSE issues in version 0.12, so we declared these issues in 
> DISCLAIMER-WIP.
> 
> These license issues have been resolved in version 0.13, so we have removed 
> DISCLAIMER-WIP in version 0.13.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> 此致！Best Regards
> 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen
> 
> 
> 
> Email:
> chenmin...@apache.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 在 2021-03-17 09:18:37，"Zhiyuan Ju"  写道：
>> Please check the necessary files :)
>> 
>> Willem Jiang 于2021年3月16日 周二下午11:19写道：
>> 
>>> We need to keep the DISCLAIMER-WIP into the release kit file.
>>> Please add it back.
>>> 
>>> Willem Jiang
>>> 
>>> Twitter: willemjiang
>>> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 1:36 PM Juan Pan  wrote:
 
 Hi,
 Sorry for my -1 (non-binding)
 Same as Kris Calvin.
 Just my curiosity, DISCLAIMER-WIP existed in incubator-doris-0.12.0 but
>>> disappears from this candidate one?
 
 
 Cheers,
 Trista
 
 
 
   Juan Pan (Trista)
 
 Senior DBA & PMC of Apache ShardingSphere
 E-mail: panj...@apache.org
 
 
 
 
 On 03/15/2021 10:56，寒江雪 wrote：
 Hi all,
 
 Please review and vote on Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc02 release.
 
 Apache Doris is an MPP-based interactive SQL data warehousing for
>>> reporting
 and analysis.
 
 The Apache Doris community has voted on and approved this release:
 
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0dd10dc04af92f262f74a67092c1d927e79c939d62396e2d6284b647%40%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E
 
 The vote result email thread:
 
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r18b7960ac02836cf1285d2139ecb951156d43e94b9d81ba86c67%40%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E
 
 The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.14.0-rc02, available
 here:
 https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/releases/tag/0.14.0-rc02
 
 Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release, and there is a
 simple release notes can be found here:
 https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/issues/5374
 
 The artifacts (source, signature and checksum) corresponding to this
>>> release
 candidate can be found here:
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/0.14/0.14.0-rc02/
 
 This has been signed with PGP key 59F2ACED, corresponding to
 yang...@apache.org.
 KEYS file is available here:
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/KEYS
 It is also listed here:
 https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/yangzhg.asc
 
 The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
 [ ] +1 Approve the release
 [ ] +0 No opinion
 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
 
 To verify and build, you can refer to following wiki:
 
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/wiki/How-to-verify-Apache-Release
 https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Incubator+Release+Checklist
 
 You can also refer to instruction:
 
 Firstly, you must be install and start docker service, and then you could
 build Doris as following steps:
 
 Step1: Pull the docker image with Doris building environment
 $ docker pull apachedoris/doris-dev:build-env-1.2
 You can check it by listing images, its IMAGE ID is 686ed7f45a02
 
 Step2: Run the Docker image
 You can run image directly:
 $ docker run -it apachedoris/doris-dev:build-env1.2
 
 Step3: Download Doris source
 Now you should in docker environment, and you can download Doris source
 package.
 (If you have downloaded source and it is not in image, you can map its
>>> path
 to image in Step2.)
 $ wget
 
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/0.14/0.14.0-rc02/apache-doris-0.14.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
 
 Step4: Build Doris
 Now you can decompress and enter Doris source path and build Doris.
 $ tar zxvf apache-doris-0.14.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
 $ cd apache-doris-0.14.0-incubating-src
 $ sh build.sh
 
 Best Regards,
 Yang Zhengguo
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>> 
>>> --
>> 来自 琚致远



— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.0 RC1

[kezhenxu94@apache]

Hey, most of the links in this email are invalid (404) [1], it seems because 
you have moved the candidate into the release directory [2] already, which 
should be done after incubator votes’ result (this thread).

Also, I found this tag [3] on GitHub but the commit hash doesn’t match the one 
in this thread.

[1]
- 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/pinot/apache-pinot-incubating-0.7.0-rc1/
- https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/tree/release-0.7.0-rc1
- https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepinot-1023
- https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepinot-1024
- https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/releases/tag/release-0.7.0-rc1

[2] 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/pinot/apache-pinot-incubating-0.7.0/
[3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/tree/release-0.7.0

> On Mar 17, 2021, at 06:14, Yupeng Fu  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> This is a call for vote to the release Apache Pinot (incubating) version
> 0.7.0.
> 
> Apache Pinot (incubating) is a distributed columnar storage engine that can
> ingest data in realtime and serve analytical queries at low latency.
> 
> Pinot community has voted and approved this release.
> 
> Vote thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r850cee1e6fc23804d161a31d465e30d5d12b7a4e1cc8035264ea91d6%40%3Cdev.pinot.apache.org%3E
> 
> 
> Result thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r80672ac39a6a6eb7f63c7dbbf595de2f7350cf75d2a7a598601da638%40%3Cdev.pinot.apache.org%3E
> 
> The release candidate:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/pinot/apache-pinot-incubating-0.7.0-rc1/
> 
> 
> Git tag for this release:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/tree/release-0.7.0-rc1
> 
> Git hash for this release:
> 695ca390a8080409b3b76f250f2315b81b86b362
> 
> The artifacts have been signed with key: F41AB2B856C6C29D, which can be
> found in the following KEYS file.
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/pinot/KEYS
> 
> Release notes:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/releases/tag/release-0.7.0-rc1
> 
> Staging repository:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepinot-1024
> 
> Documentation on verifying a release candidate:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/PINOT/Validating+a+release+candidate
> 
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number of
> votes are reached.
> 
> Please vote accordingly,
> 
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> 
> Thanks,
> Apache Pinot (incubating) team



— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc02

[kezhenxu94@apache]

-1 (non-binding) because I cannot see a DISCLAIMER file in the release tar, 
neither in the GitHub repository.

> On Mar 15, 2021, at 10:56, 寒江雪  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Please review and vote on Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc02 release.
> 
> Apache Doris is an MPP-based interactive SQL data warehousing for reporting
> and analysis.
> 
> The Apache Doris community has voted on and approved this release:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0dd10dc04af92f262f74a67092c1d927e79c939d62396e2d6284b647%40%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E
> 
> The vote result email thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r18b7960ac02836cf1285d2139ecb951156d43e94b9d81ba86c67%40%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E
> 
> The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.14.0-rc02, available
> here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/releases/tag/0.14.0-rc02
> 
> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release, and there is a
> simple release notes can be found here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/issues/5374
> 
> The artifacts (source, signature and checksum) corresponding to this release
> candidate can be found here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/0.14/0.14.0-rc02/
> 
> This has been signed with PGP key 59F2ACED, corresponding to
> yang...@apache.org.
> KEYS file is available here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/KEYS
> It is also listed here:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/yangzhg.asc
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] +0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> 
> To verify and build, you can refer to following wiki:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/wiki/How-to-verify-Apache-Release
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Incubator+Release+Checklist
> 
> You can also refer to instruction:
> 
> Firstly, you must be install and start docker service, and then you could
> build Doris as following steps:
> 
> Step1: Pull the docker image with Doris building environment
> $ docker pull apachedoris/doris-dev:build-env-1.2
> You can check it by listing images, its IMAGE ID is 686ed7f45a02
> 
> Step2: Run the Docker image
> You can run image directly:
> $ docker run -it apachedoris/doris-dev:build-env1.2
> 
> Step3: Download Doris source
> Now you should in docker environment, and you can download Doris source
> package.
> (If you have downloaded source and it is not in image, you can map its path
> to image in Step2.)
> $ wget
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/0.14/0.14.0-rc02/apache-doris-0.14.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> 
> Step4: Build Doris
> Now you can decompress and enter Doris source path and build Doris.
> $ tar zxvf apache-doris-0.14.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> $ cd apache-doris-0.14.0-incubating-src
> $ sh build.sh
> 
> Best Regards,
> Yang Zhengguo

— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Liminal (incubating) 0.0.1rc5-INCUBATING

[kezhenxu94@apache]

Hi, there is a dedicated license header for ASF projects [1], while I saw you 
are still using a common license header [2].

Also, I cannot verify the checksum via `shasum -a 512 -c 
apache-liminal-0.0.1rc5-INCUBATING-source.tar.gz.sha512`, error message is 
`shasum: apache-liminal-0.0.1rc5-INCUBATING-source.tar.gz.sha512: no properly 
formatted SHA checksum lines found`, although the checksum is correct, I have 
to generate the checksum and compare myself, so if you could save your checksum 
via `shasum -a 512 apache-liminal-0.0.1rc5-INCUBATING-source.tar.gz > 
apache-liminal-0.0.1rc5-INCUBATING-source.tar.gz.sha512` so that others can 
verify it easily with `shasum -a 512 -c 
apache-liminal-0.0.1rc5-INCUBATING-source.tar.gz.sha512`.

Third, there is no “incubating” in the README.md file [1].

I’ve checked

- LICENSE and NOTICE files are in src tar ball and .whl
- .asc, .sha512 checked
- DISCLAIMER file exists

[1] https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers
[2] http://apache.org/foundation/license-faq.html#Apply-My-Software
[3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-liminal

— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94

> On Feb 3, 2021, at 20:12, Lior Schachter  wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> We would like to have a third round of vote for the first release of
> Apache Liminal (Incubating), after fixing the issues identified at the
> previous round.
> 
> This release enables seamless Liminal installation in Local mode and
> in AWS cloud to execute machine-learning pipelines.
> 
> Liminal community vote and result threads:
> Vote:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r536fafe3328b23b6b37bd7f9dbd1e2e107b4e1435972bd807696781f%40%3Cdev.liminal.apache.org%3E
> 
> Result:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r12ad1e9729e385cf9dcdf2eb9f09aace64c1e100634b40a1c2393a78%40%3Cdev.liminal.apache.org%3E
> 
> Installation and testing instructions can be found in the README included.
> 
> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/liminal/0.0.1rc5-INCUBATING/
> 
> The tag to be voted on:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-liminal/releases/tag/0.0.1rc5-INCUBATING
> 
> The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is:
> 
> apache-liminal-0.0.1rc5-INCUBATING-source.tar.gz:
> BF86B430 D431E433 DB1E6D8E 9917F1B3 AF7BF11A B734ED8C 5AE2C2B4
> 606F7891 F8F65225 C3DAD172 DB0FDE0F 8AE68DA8 E67994AB 306726D4
> 6FED5CF6 A1666CED
> 
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/liminal/KEYS
> 
> For more information about the contents of this release,
> see:https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LIMINAL/versions/12349599
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Liminal
> 0.0.1rc5-INCUBATING. A majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Liminal 0.0.1rc5
> [ ] +0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> 
> Regards,
> Lior Schachter



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Ratis as TLP Project

[kezhenxu94@apache]

+1 non-binding. Good luck!

— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94

> On Jan 30, 2021, at 04:32, Uma gangumalla  wrote:
> 
> Dear Incubator Community,
> 
> We have discussed Apache Ratis Podling graduation in the incubator general
> DISCUSS thread[1] and We did not see any objections to proceed for voting.
> Here is the official vote for graduating Apache Ratis project as TLP.
> 
> Please provide your in the following options:
> [ ] +1 - Recommend graduation of Apache Ratis as a TLP
> [ ]  0 - I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
> [ ] -1 - Do not recommend graduation of Apache Ratis because...
> 
> The VOTE will open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> Just to summarize again:
> Apache Ratis project is a very active project and the community has grown
> well by following the Apache way in the process. It produced several
> releases by having diverse people as release managers. I and the community
> strongly believe that it's ready for graduation.
> 
> The Apache Ratis project has been an Apache incubator project for nearly 3
> year. Since then the community has grown and followed Apache Way. Some
> highlights include:
> * 7 releases given ( including 1.0.0 and 0.0.1 alpha ) by having
> different people as release managers
> * 50 contributors ( from report)
> * 28 committers
> * More than 1161 Jiras created, 905 resolved or closed
> * > 293 pull requests in github
> * One of the biggest positives for this community is that most of the
> members in this community have a lot of experience in other Apache projects
> already.
> 
> Some additional note about the resolution below:
> The current PPMC will be transitioned to the PMC. We have invited some of
> the mentors in the current PPMC who like to stay involved.
> We are also adding Siddharth and Jie Wang into PMC as we believe they are
> committed to the project and a good addition to PMC.
> 
> We have already voted for Ratis TLP in the Ratis Podling community. Please
> find the voting threads for reference. Ratis PPMC DISCUSS thread: [2],
> Ratis PPMC Vote: [3] and Ratis Community: [4]
> 
> To make easy for you to review, here is the *resolution text*[5] copied:
> ==
> Establish the Apache Ratis Project
> 
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
> the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish
> a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
> of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public,
> related to A java implementation for RAFT consensus protocol.
> 
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee
> (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Ratis Project", be and hereby is
> established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the Apache Ratis Project be and hereby is responsible for
> the creation and maintenance of software related to A java
> implementation for RAFT consensus protocol; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Ratis" be and
> hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the
> direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Ratis
> Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the
> projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Ratis Project;
> and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are
> appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Ratis Project:
> 
> * Anu Engineer  [Hadoop, Ozone PMC,
> Incubator Committer]
> * Arpit Agarwal [ ASF Member, Hadoop, Ozone,
> Incubator PMC]
> * Enis Soztutar [ASF Member, Hadoop, HBase,
> Incubator PMC and also PMC in curator, gora, phoenix]
> * Hanisha Koneru[Hadoop, Ozone PMC,
> Incubator Committer]
> * Jie Wang  [Incubator, Ozone Committer]
> * Jing Zhao [Hadoop PMC, Incubator Committer]
> * Jitendra Nath Pandey   [ASF Member, Hadoop, Ozone,
> Incubator PMC and also PMC in ambari, atlas, tez]
> * Josh Elser [ASF Member, HBase, Incubator
> PMC, and also PMC in accumulo, calcite, fluo, phoenix, rya]
> * Lokesh Jain   [Hadoop, Ozone PMC, Incubator
> Committer]
> * Marton Elek[Hadoop, Ozone PMC, Incubator
> Committer]
> * Mingliang Liu  [Hadoop PMC, Incubator
> Committer]
> * Mukul Kumar Singh  [Hadoop, Ozone PMC, Incubator
> Committer]
> * Shashikant Banerjee   [Hadoop, Ozone PMC,
> Incubator Committer]
> * Siddharth Wagle[Ambari, Ozone PMC, Hadoop,
> Incubator Committer]
> * Tsz-wo Sze [ASF Member, Hadoop, Ozone
> PMC, Incubator Committer]
> * Uma Maheswara Rao G   [ASF Member, Hadoop, Ozone,
> Incubator PMC and PMC in bookkeeper, carbondata]
> * Xiaoyu Yao [Hadoop, Ozone PMC, Incubator
> Committer]
> 
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Tsz-wo Sze be appointed to
> the 

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ECharts as TLP (round 2)

[kezhenxu94@apache]

+1 non-binding

ECharts is one of my favorite visualization projects :)

— 
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94

> On Nov 23, 2020, at 4:28 PM, Ovilia  wrote:
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> After discussion with the community [1], and a positive vote result [2] and
> the
> discussion under general mailing list [6], we believe
> ECharts is ready for graduation to a TLP, and we'd like to call on the vote
> to
> graduate Apache ECharts as TPL.
> 
> This is a formal voting thread about Apache ECharts's graduation, please
> Vote:
> [ ] +1 - Recommend graduation of Apache ECharts as a TLP
> [ ]  0 - I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
> [ ] -1 - Do not recommend graduation of Apache ECharts because...
> 
> The VOTE will open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/vote?iso=20201126T1635=237=Graduate+Apache+ECharts+as+TLP=serif=1
> 
> -
> 
> X. Establish the Apache ECharts Project
> 
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to
> the public, related to a charting and data visualization
> library written in JavaScript.
> 
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache ECharts Project",
> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> Foundation; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the Apache ECharts Project be and hereby is
> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> related to a charting and data visualization
> library written in JavaScript; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache ECharts" be
> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
> of the Apache ECharts Project, and to have primary responsibility
> for management of the projects within the scope of
> responsibility of the Apache ECharts Project; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache ECharts Project:
> 
>* Houjin Huang  
>* Deqing Li 
>* Dong Rui  
>* Kener Linfeng 
>* Kevin A. McGrail  
>* Wenli Zhang   
>* Shen Yi   
>* Shuang Su 
>* Siwen Su  
>* Junting Wang  
>* Zhongxiang Wang   
>* Dave Fisher   
>* Sheng Wu  
>* Zak Wu
> 
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Wenli Zhang
> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache ECharts, to
> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache ECharts PMC be and hereby is
> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> encourage open development and increased participation in the
> Apache ECharts Project; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that the Apache ECharts Project be and hereby
> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> Incubator ECharts podling; and be it further
> 
> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> Incubator ECharts podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> Project are hereafter discharged.
> 
> --
> 
> A few points to assist in the discussion:
> 
> - Released 9 official Apache releases by 3 release managers [3]
> - Voted in 9 committers including 3 PPMC members
> - Achieved 43556 stars (and counting) on GitHub
> - Apache suitable name search has been approved [4]
> - Completed the Podling Maturity Assessment, all items are passed [5]
> - Our PPMC is diverse and consists of members from 9 organizations
> - There have been 143 contributors to the codebase, 82 of whom contributed
> during incubation
> - Closed 11033+ issues
> - Merged 603+ pull requests
> 
> We've resolved all branding issues which include Logo, GitHub repo,
> documentation, website, and others.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> *Ovilia*
> 
> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf05e9dfa1aec1ac072c71c9cba882a59c9c57f4f89723da68e96de01%40%3Cdev.echarts.apache.org%3E
> [2]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1179386814f4f99ccb3809527bc9436fe702e0e7573fb5de2c99151f%40%3Cdev.echarts.apache.org%3E
> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/echarts/
> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-153
> [5]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ECHARTS/Apache+Maturity+Model+Assessment+for+ECharts
> [6]
>