Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

2012-02-09 Thread Jim Jagielski

On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

 
 Well, if there's an election, the fair thing is to include all candidates and 
 see who gets the majority. A vote on just one candidate is odd. 
 

Agreed.

I suggest that this VOTE be withdrawn, and a true election,
with all candidates be done.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

2012-02-09 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
 ...I suggest that this VOTE be withdrawn, and a true election,
 with all candidates be done...

Agreed - I think Chris assumed there was only one candidate, but it's
just an assumption AFAICS.

-Bertrand

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

2012-02-09 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
On Feb 9, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

 
 On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
 
 
 Well, if there's an election, the fair thing is to include all candidates 
 and see who gets the majority. A vote on just one candidate is odd. 
 
 
 Agreed.
 
 I suggest that this VOTE be withdrawn, and a true election,
 with all candidates be done.

What's preventing anyone from calling a VOTE on any other candidate? Of which, 
as I understand it, there are none. 

Noel is the existing chair. If this VOTE is *not* successful, then he remains 
the chair.
If it is, successful, then the recommendation is to change him out as the chair.

Did I miss something by actually trying to make progress here?

Cheers,
Chris

++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

2012-02-09 Thread Ate Douma

On 02/09/2012 05:54 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Jim Jagielskij...@jagunet.com  wrote:

...I suggest that this VOTE be withdrawn, and a true election,
with all candidates be done...


Agreed - I think Chris assumed there was only one candidate, but it's
just an assumption AFAICS.


I agree.

I already voted for Jukka, under the impression only he now remained candidate.

Seeing that not being the case (or properly checked), I'm retracting my 
preliminary vote for Jukka (for now).


Ate



-Bertrand

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

2012-02-09 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
On Feb 9, 2012, at 9:03 AM, Ate Douma wrote:

 On 02/09/2012 05:58 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
 On Feb 9, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
 
 
 On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
 
 
 Well, if there's an election, the fair thing is to include all candidates 
 and see who gets the majority. A vote on just one candidate is odd.
 
 
 Agreed.
 
 I suggest that this VOTE be withdrawn, and a true election,
 with all candidates be done.
 
 What's preventing anyone from calling a VOTE on any other candidate? Of 
 which,
 as I understand it, there are none.
 
 Noel is the existing chair. If this VOTE is *not* successful, then he 
 remains the chair.
 If it is, successful, then the recommendation is to change him out as the 
 chair.
 
 Did I miss something by actually trying to make progress here?
 
 For one, how or when would you call this vote successful?

The same way we could if there were 2 people on the ballot. Max(votes), with
the greater number being the winner, no?

There is little difference but implementation mechanism for:

a. holding a single VOTE thread with 2 candidates
b. holding 2 VOTE threads with a candidate each.

And then summing the total votes in either case.

Cheers,
Chris

++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

2012-02-09 Thread sebb
On 9 February 2012 17:11, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
 On Feb 9, 2012, at 9:03 AM, Ate Douma wrote:

 On 02/09/2012 05:58 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
 On Feb 9, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:


 On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:


 Well, if there's an election, the fair thing is to include all candidates 
 and see who gets the majority. A vote on just one candidate is odd.


 Agreed.

 I suggest that this VOTE be withdrawn, and a true election,
 with all candidates be done.

 What's preventing anyone from calling a VOTE on any other candidate? Of 
 which,
 as I understand it, there are none.

 Noel is the existing chair. If this VOTE is *not* successful, then he 
 remains the chair.
 If it is, successful, then the recommendation is to change him out as the 
 chair.

 Did I miss something by actually trying to make progress here?

 For one, how or when would you call this vote successful?

 The same way we could if there were 2 people on the ballot. Max(votes), with
 the greater number being the winner, no?

 There is little difference but implementation mechanism for:

 a. holding a single VOTE thread with 2 candidates
 b. holding 2 VOTE threads with a candidate each.

 And then summing the total votes in either case.

As long as:
- people know that each vote thread is not the only vote thread
- the votes are held at the same time so each person can vote for
either (or both/neither).

Otherwise one or other vote thread may have an unfair advantage.

 Cheers,
 Chris

 ++
 Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
 Senior Computer Scientist
 NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
 Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
 WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
 ++
 Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
 University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
 ++


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

2012-02-09 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 2/9/2012 10:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
 
 On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
 

 Well, if there's an election, the fair thing is to include all candidates 
 and see who gets the majority. A vote on just one candidate is odd. 

 
 Agreed.
 
 I suggest that this VOTE be withdrawn, and a true election,
 with all candidates be done.

Or as we say in the Windows world... ctrl+alt+delete.

+1, a public vote is not the issue, /shrug.  Listing all remaining candidates
(with clear withdrawals from Chris and Benson) is how it must be done.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

2012-02-09 Thread Dave Fisher
I have observations

(1) Why is the IPMC different from other PMCs and holding a personnel VOTEs  on 
a public ML?

(2) Why is there such a hurry to call a [VOTE] without a prior [DISCUSS]?

(3) Why can't Chris start new threads by using New Message rather than a reply 
to a prior thread with a subject change?

Regards,
Dave

On Feb 9, 2012, at 9:11 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:

 On Feb 9, 2012, at 9:03 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
 
 On 02/09/2012 05:58 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
 On Feb 9, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
 
 
 On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
 
 
 Well, if there's an election, the fair thing is to include all candidates 
 and see who gets the majority. A vote on just one candidate is odd.
 
 
 Agreed.
 
 I suggest that this VOTE be withdrawn, and a true election,
 with all candidates be done.
 
 What's preventing anyone from calling a VOTE on any other candidate? Of 
 which,
 as I understand it, there are none.
 
 Noel is the existing chair. If this VOTE is *not* successful, then he 
 remains the chair.
 If it is, successful, then the recommendation is to change him out as the 
 chair.
 
 Did I miss something by actually trying to make progress here?
 
 For one, how or when would you call this vote successful?
 
 The same way we could if there were 2 people on the ballot. Max(votes), with
 the greater number being the winner, no?
 
 There is little difference but implementation mechanism for:
 
 a. holding a single VOTE thread with 2 candidates
 b. holding 2 VOTE threads with a candidate each.
 
 And then summing the total votes in either case.
 
 Cheers,
 Chris
 
 ++
 Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
 Senior Computer Scientist
 NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
 Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
 WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
 ++
 Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
 University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
 ++
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

2012-02-09 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 2/9/2012 11:29 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
 
 (1) Why is the IPMC different from other PMCs and holding a personnel VOTEs  
 on a public ML?

Just to clarify this single issue; by rights, adding committers and
committee members is a personal issue about those individuals.  But
choosing a representative for the board is committee business, not
business about personal matters.  I don't mind which way committees
choose to do it, nor whether they are secret ballots.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org