Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2019-01-14 Thread Kenneth Knowles
Hi,

I'm a bit late as it seems there is great mentorship on this project
already, but I'd be interested in helping as a mentor, too, if it becomes
useful.

Kenn

On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 3:20 PM Thomas Weise  wrote:

> I will start the VOTE in a day or two if there are no further comments.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 2:59 PM Vinoth Chandar 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Added Suneel Marthi as another mentor to the project. Thanks Suneel!
> >
> > Thanks
> > Vinoth
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 8:09 AM Thomas Weise  wrote:
> >
> > > I think that's a fair point.
> > >
> > > If we can make sure we have one more experienced mentor with sufficient
> > > time commitment for at least advisory capacity.
> > >
> > > I'm happy to pick up more of the legwork for initial setup etc.
> > >
> > > Thomas
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 7:48 PM Justin Mclean 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > While I would not oppose it going forward I think the podling could
> > still
> > > > do with another experienced mentor. Any takers?
> > > >
> > > > Reason why I think this is below, please don’t take this personally
> or
> > if
> > > > you think it’s inaccurate speak up, I just want to give this new
> > podling
> > > a
> > > > good chance at success..
> > > >
> > > > > * Luciano Resende (lresende at apache dot org)
> > > >
> > > > Experienced mentor, but may have a few too many podlings to be able
> to
> > > > spend a lot of time mentoring this podling.
> > > >
> > > > > * Thomas Weise (thw at apache dot org
> > > >
> > > > First time mentor and new IPMC member.
> > > >
> > > > > * Kishore Gopalakrishna (kishoreg at apache dot org)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > First time mentor and new IPMC member.who not been that active.
> > (Podling
> > > > missed report and missed last report missed signoff).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Justin
> > > > -
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2019-01-11 Thread Thomas Weise
I will start the VOTE in a day or two if there are no further comments.


On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 2:59 PM Vinoth Chandar 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Added Suneel Marthi as another mentor to the project. Thanks Suneel!
>
> Thanks
> Vinoth
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 8:09 AM Thomas Weise  wrote:
>
> > I think that's a fair point.
> >
> > If we can make sure we have one more experienced mentor with sufficient
> > time commitment for at least advisory capacity.
> >
> > I'm happy to pick up more of the legwork for initial setup etc.
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 7:48 PM Justin Mclean 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > While I would not oppose it going forward I think the podling could
> still
> > > do with another experienced mentor. Any takers?
> > >
> > > Reason why I think this is below, please don’t take this personally or
> if
> > > you think it’s inaccurate speak up, I just want to give this new
> podling
> > a
> > > good chance at success..
> > >
> > > > * Luciano Resende (lresende at apache dot org)
> > >
> > > Experienced mentor, but may have a few too many podlings to be able to
> > > spend a lot of time mentoring this podling.
> > >
> > > > * Thomas Weise (thw at apache dot org
> > >
> > > First time mentor and new IPMC member.
> > >
> > > > * Kishore Gopalakrishna (kishoreg at apache dot org)
> > >
> > >
> > > First time mentor and new IPMC member.who not been that active.
> (Podling
> > > missed report and missed last report missed signoff).
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Justin
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>


Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2019-01-11 Thread Vinoth Chandar
Hi all,

Added Suneel Marthi as another mentor to the project. Thanks Suneel!

Thanks
Vinoth

On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 8:09 AM Thomas Weise  wrote:

> I think that's a fair point.
>
> If we can make sure we have one more experienced mentor with sufficient
> time commitment for at least advisory capacity.
>
> I'm happy to pick up more of the legwork for initial setup etc.
>
> Thomas
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 7:48 PM Justin Mclean  wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > While I would not oppose it going forward I think the podling could still
> > do with another experienced mentor. Any takers?
> >
> > Reason why I think this is below, please don’t take this personally or if
> > you think it’s inaccurate speak up, I just want to give this new podling
> a
> > good chance at success..
> >
> > > * Luciano Resende (lresende at apache dot org)
> >
> > Experienced mentor, but may have a few too many podlings to be able to
> > spend a lot of time mentoring this podling.
> >
> > > * Thomas Weise (thw at apache dot org
> >
> > First time mentor and new IPMC member.
> >
> > > * Kishore Gopalakrishna (kishoreg at apache dot org)
> >
> >
> > First time mentor and new IPMC member.who not been that active. (Podling
> > missed report and missed last report missed signoff).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>


Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2019-01-11 Thread Thomas Weise
I think that's a fair point.

If we can make sure we have one more experienced mentor with sufficient
time commitment for at least advisory capacity.

I'm happy to pick up more of the legwork for initial setup etc.

Thomas

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 7:48 PM Justin Mclean  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> While I would not oppose it going forward I think the podling could still
> do with another experienced mentor. Any takers?
>
> Reason why I think this is below, please don’t take this personally or if
> you think it’s inaccurate speak up, I just want to give this new podling a
> good chance at success..
>
> > * Luciano Resende (lresende at apache dot org)
>
> Experienced mentor, but may have a few too many podlings to be able to
> spend a lot of time mentoring this podling.
>
> > * Thomas Weise (thw at apache dot org
>
> First time mentor and new IPMC member.
>
> > * Kishore Gopalakrishna (kishoreg at apache dot org)
>
>
> First time mentor and new IPMC member.who not been that active. (Podling
> missed report and missed last report missed signoff).
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2019-01-11 Thread Pierre Smits
I have experience to help out as a mentor (I helped Apache Trafodion
through their incubation and successfully graduate).

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*Apache Trafodion , Vice President & PMC
Chair*
*Apache Directory , PMC Member*
Apache Incubator , committer
*Apache OFBiz , contributor (without privileges)
since 2008*
Apache Steve , committer


On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 4:48 AM Justin Mclean  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> While I would not oppose it going forward I think the podling could still
> do with another experienced mentor. Any takers?
>
> Reason why I think this is below, please don’t take this personally or if
> you think it’s inaccurate speak up, I just want to give this new podling a
> good chance at success..
>
> > * Luciano Resende (lresende at apache dot org)
>
> Experienced mentor, but may have a few too many podlings to be able to
> spend a lot of time mentoring this podling.
>
> > * Thomas Weise (thw at apache dot org
>
> First time mentor and new IPMC member.
>
> > * Kishore Gopalakrishna (kishoreg at apache dot org)
>
>
> First time mentor and new IPMC member.who not been that active. (Podling
> missed report and missed last report missed signoff).
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2019-01-10 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

While I would not oppose it going forward I think the podling could still do 
with another experienced mentor. Any takers?

Reason why I think this is below, please don’t take this personally or if you 
think it’s inaccurate speak up, I just want to give this new podling a good 
chance at success..

> * Luciano Resende (lresende at apache dot org)

Experienced mentor, but may have a few too many podlings to be able to spend a 
lot of time mentoring this podling.

> * Thomas Weise (thw at apache dot org

First time mentor and new IPMC member.

> * Kishore Gopalakrishna (kishoreg at apache dot org)


First time mentor and new IPMC member.who not been that active. (Podling missed 
report and missed last report missed signoff).

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2019-01-10 Thread Vinoth Chandar
Hi Justin,

Can you please chime in here on next steps?

Thanks
Vinoth

On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 3:53 PM Vinoth Chandar  wrote:

> Here is the new list.
>
>  * Luciano Resende (lresende at apache dot org)
>  * Thomas Weise (thw at apache dot org
>  * Kishore Gopalakrishna (kishoreg at apache dot org)
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions
>
> Thanks
> Vinoth
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 12:05 AM Justin Mclean 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > Sorry I misspoke, I won’t have time to be a *mentor* but the champion
>> role
>> > is what I’ve done so far and leads to the vote. so in the interest of
>> not
>> > blocking the submission, I would suggest that I stay as champion and be
>> > removed as mentor while we add the volunteers who chimed in on this
>> thread.
>>
>> That’s certainly on option, mind listing who the current proposed mentors
>> are for clarity?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>


Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2019-01-08 Thread Liang Chen
Hi Vinoth

I am Apache CarbonData PMC,  CarbonData is a data store solution for
supporting various data analytics with the unified data lake(main intention
is for reduce data copy/redundant). 

I have much knowledge on upsert datasets for near-real time query , and E2E
incubated ASF project experience. 

Last month, i became mentor volunteer, so i have enough bandwidth. If you
need help, can count me as another mentor candidate.  
BTW :  don't worry, i don't think between CarbonData and Hudi have
conflicts, on the contrary CarbonData and Hudi can integrate together , and
big data ecosystem family in ASF require more members  :)

Regards
Liang


Vinoth Chandar wrote
> Here is the new list.
> 
>  * Luciano Resende (lresende at apache dot org)
>  * Thomas Weise (thw at apache dot org
>  * Kishore Gopalakrishna (kishoreg at apache dot org)
> 
> Please let me know if you have any questions
> 
> Thanks
> Vinoth
> 
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 12:05 AM Justin Mclean <

> justin@

> >
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> > Sorry I misspoke, I won’t have time to be a *mentor* but the champion
>> role
>> > is what I’ve done so far and leads to the vote. so in the interest of
>> not
>> > blocking the submission, I would suggest that I stay as champion and be
>> > removed as mentor while we add the volunteers who chimed in on this
>> thread.
>>
>> That’s certainly on option, mind listing who the current proposed mentors
>> are for clarity?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 

> general-unsubscribe@.apache

>> For additional commands, e-mail: 

> general-help@.apache

>>
>>





--
Sent from: http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2019-01-08 Thread Vinoth Chandar
Here is the new list.

 * Luciano Resende (lresende at apache dot org)
 * Thomas Weise (thw at apache dot org
 * Kishore Gopalakrishna (kishoreg at apache dot org)

Please let me know if you have any questions

Thanks
Vinoth

On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 12:05 AM Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > Sorry I misspoke, I won’t have time to be a *mentor* but the champion
> role
> > is what I’ve done so far and leads to the vote. so in the interest of not
> > blocking the submission, I would suggest that I stay as champion and be
> > removed as mentor while we add the volunteers who chimed in on this
> thread.
>
> That’s certainly on option, mind listing who the current proposed mentors
> are for clarity?
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2019-01-08 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

> Sorry I misspoke, I won’t have time to be a *mentor* but the champion role
> is what I’ve done so far and leads to the vote. so in the interest of not
> blocking the submission, I would suggest that I stay as champion and be
> removed as mentor while we add the volunteers who chimed in on this thread.

That’s certainly on option, mind listing who the current proposed mentors are 
for clarity?

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2019-01-07 Thread Julien Le Dem
Sorry I misspoke, I won’t have time to be a *mentor* but the champion role
is what I’ve done so far and leads to the vote. so in the interest of not
blocking the submission, I would suggest that I stay as champion and be
removed as mentor while we add the volunteers who chimed in on this thread.

https://incubator.apache.org/policy/roles_and_responsibilities.html#champion
Champion

A candidate project shall be sponsored by an Officer
 orMember
 of the Foundation. The
Champion assists the candidate on their initial submission to a Sponsor.
While private conversations are not generally encouraged within the Apache
community, the Champion’s relationship with the Candidate should allow for
this in order to educate the Candidate about the Apache Way and prepare the
project for the questions and issues likely to be raised by the community.

Before incubation begins, the Champion is expected to: * help with any
process/ASF related hurdles before the Candidate enters incubation * help
find the right people in the ASF to speak with * help to find Mentors *
drive the process of entering the Incubator, leading to a vote to accept
the proposed podling

On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 14:56 Justin Mclean  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > I’m currently listed as the champion for this proposal but I just had a
> new
> > baby and I’m currently on paternity leave. I don’t think I’ll have the
> > bandwidth to properly champion the project.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2019-01-05 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

> I’m currently listed as the champion for this proposal but I just had a new
> baby and I’m currently on paternity leave. I don’t think I’ll have the
> bandwidth to properly champion the project.

Thanks for the work up to this point in getting the proposal to the ASF and 
thanks for recognising that you may not have the bandwidth be to able to be an 
effective champion or mentor on another project. As volunteers it’s often easy 
to often over-commit on what we can realistically do with our desire to help. 
This of course doesn't mean you can’t help out the project when you do have the 
time.

Thanks,
Justin


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2019-01-05 Thread Julien Le Dem
Hello all,
I’m currently listed as the champion for this proposal but I just had a new
baby and I’m currently on paternity leave. I don’t think I’ll have the
bandwidth to properly champion the project. Apologies to Vinoth who was
counting on me. Hudi is an awesome project with a bright future ahead. I
would have been honored to champion it but I think it’s best for the
project to have a more available champion. I would strongly encourage
anyone in the position to do so to step up as a champion.
I’ll of course be available to answer questions if you need me.
Best of luck for an interesting project.
Julien

On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 13:52 Vinoth Chandar 
wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> I would like to start a thread to get feedback around incubating Uber's
> Hudi project with ASF.
>
> Hudi is a big-data storage library, that provides atomic upserts and
> incremental data streams, directly on top of data stored in Hadoop
> compatible file systems & object stores. Hudi leverages a lot of Apache
> projects - Spark, Avro, Parquet, Hive - to achieve this. At Uber, Hudi
> manages all the data in our big-data platform
> , and enables incremental
> ETL
> pipelines. Over the past year, we have also seen usages/interest outside of
> Uber and hence the proposal.
>
> Full proposal is here
> https://github.com/uber/hudi/wiki/ASF-Proposal
> Happy to move it under incubator's wiki.
>
> Thank you for your time!
>
> Thanks
> Vinoth
>


Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2019-01-03 Thread Gosling Von
Hi,

I just looked through the proposal for the Hudi and very interested in this 
project, and also willing to be a Hudi mentor.



Best Regards,
Von Gosling

> 在 2019年1月4日,上午6:10,Justin Mclean  写道:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> There's one issue I think needs to be addressed, if the proposed mentors 
> could follow up on my email sent a few weeks back on private@ that would be 
> appreciated.
> 
> Thanks,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2019-01-03 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

There's one issue I think needs to be addressed, if the proposed mentors could 
follow up on my email sent a few weeks back on private@ that would be 
appreciated.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2019-01-03 Thread Pierre Smits
You’re welcome.

Looking forward to see the vote thread started and cast my ballot.

Happy new year to you and the team, and

Best regards,

Pierre

On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 at 15:41 Vinoth Chandar  wrote:

> Thanks Pierre!
> I think we are ready to move forward with the VOTE, given there are no
> additional concerns/comments for the past week or so.
>
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 11:38 PM Pierre Smits 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Vinoth,
> >
> > There is no typical timeline. Each proposal to incubate is unique and
> each
> > timeline depends on the interactions of interested parties.
> >
> > You can use your own judgement to determine whether everything has been
> > said and to take the next step.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Pierre Smits
> >
> > *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President & PMC
> > Chair*
> > *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member*
> > Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
> > *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without
> privileges)
> > since 2008*
> > Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 2:13 AM Vinoth Chandar 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the feedback and comments.
> > >
> > > Its been over a week. Whats the typical timeline/due process for
> starting
> > > the vote?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Vinoth
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 8:04 PM Mohammad Asif Siddiqui <
> > > mohammad.asif.siddiq...@huawei.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Looks like an interesting project.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Asif
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Luciano Resende [mailto:luckbr1...@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: 22 December 2018 PM 05:06
> > > > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal
> > > >
> > > > Very nice, looks like you guys might need one more mentor, feel free
> to
> > > > include myself.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 20:29 Vinoth Chandar  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Justin,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the questions. I will try to answer them below .
> > > > >
> > > > > >>- Use of slack for communication. [1] Has the project thought
> about
> > > > > >>how
> > > > > moving conversations and decision making to a mailing list will
> > affect
> > > > > the community?
> > > > > Good point. We use Slack for interactive debugging, critical
> > decisions
> > > > > (approaches, designs, PR) still happens over github issues (which
> > will
> > > > > remain the same anyway).
> > > > > I can try running a poll if you are really interested. But moving
> to
> > > > > mailing list should be fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > >>- Relatively high bar for committership [1]
> > > > > So far we used a tweaked version of the chromium project's
> > guidelines.
> > > > > Open to advice on this going forward inside ASF
> > > > >
> > > > > >>No mention of non-code contributions at [1],
> > > > > Yes, [1] did not recognize that. But we as a project value it
> > > > > definitely, In fact, the last two committers are the list are
> > included
> > > > > with incubation precisely for non-code contributions. They helped
> get
> > > > > Hudi running on cloud systems.
> > > > >
> > > > > >>- Why the low number (6) of initial committers?
> > > > > No specific reason. We have included folks who have contributed
> > > > > significantly so far to the project, based on the guidelines we set
> > > out.
> > > > > Once we have neutral/standardized governance in place from ASF,
> might
> > > > > be easier to absorb more committers.
> > > > >
> > > > > >>- Of the initial committers mentioned it’s not obvious that all
> > have
> > > > > >>made
> > > > > contributions to the project. You mind listing their GitHub names
> or
> > > > > listing their prev

Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2019-01-03 Thread Vinoth Chandar
Thanks Pierre!
I think we are ready to move forward with the VOTE, given there are no
additional concerns/comments for the past week or so.

On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 11:38 PM Pierre Smits 
wrote:

> Hi Vinoth,
>
> There is no typical timeline. Each proposal to incubate is unique and each
> timeline depends on the interactions of interested parties.
>
> You can use your own judgement to determine whether everything has been
> said and to take the next step.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President & PMC
> Chair*
> *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member*
> Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
> *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without privileges)
> since 2008*
> Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 2:13 AM Vinoth Chandar 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback and comments.
> >
> > Its been over a week. Whats the typical timeline/due process for starting
> > the vote?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Vinoth
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 8:04 PM Mohammad Asif Siddiqui <
> > mohammad.asif.siddiq...@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Looks like an interesting project.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Asif
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Luciano Resende [mailto:luckbr1...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: 22 December 2018 PM 05:06
> > > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal
> > >
> > > Very nice, looks like you guys might need one more mentor, feel free to
> > > include myself.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 20:29 Vinoth Chandar 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Justin,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the questions. I will try to answer them below .
> > > >
> > > > >>- Use of slack for communication. [1] Has the project thought about
> > > > >>how
> > > > moving conversations and decision making to a mailing list will
> affect
> > > > the community?
> > > > Good point. We use Slack for interactive debugging, critical
> decisions
> > > > (approaches, designs, PR) still happens over github issues (which
> will
> > > > remain the same anyway).
> > > > I can try running a poll if you are really interested. But moving to
> > > > mailing list should be fine.
> > > >
> > > > >>- Relatively high bar for committership [1]
> > > > So far we used a tweaked version of the chromium project's
> guidelines.
> > > > Open to advice on this going forward inside ASF
> > > >
> > > > >>No mention of non-code contributions at [1],
> > > > Yes, [1] did not recognize that. But we as a project value it
> > > > definitely, In fact, the last two committers are the list are
> included
> > > > with incubation precisely for non-code contributions. They helped get
> > > > Hudi running on cloud systems.
> > > >
> > > > >>- Why the low number (6) of initial committers?
> > > > No specific reason. We have included folks who have contributed
> > > > significantly so far to the project, based on the guidelines we set
> > out.
> > > > Once we have neutral/standardized governance in place from ASF, might
> > > > be easier to absorb more committers.
> > > >
> > > > >>- Of the initial committers mentioned it’s not obvious that all
> have
> > > > >>made
> > > > contributions to the project. You mind listing their GitHub names or
> > > > listing their previous contribution to the project.
> > > > The first four committers would jump out, if you look at the
> > > > contributions here <https://github.com/uber/hudi/graphs/contributors
> >.
> > > > (vinothchandar, n3nash, bvaradar, prazanna). prazanna actually has a
> > > > lot more code ownership, but github is not showing his commits for
> > > > some reason. You can find it in the raw git log. Already covered the
> > > > last two committers in the previous answer.
> > > >
> > > > >>- Under relationships with other Apache Products “there are no
> > > > >>direct
> > > > competing projects with Hudi” is not a concern. The ASF al

Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2018-12-27 Thread Pierre Smits
Hi Vinoth,

There is no typical timeline. Each proposal to incubate is unique and each
timeline depends on the interactions of interested parties.

You can use your own judgement to determine whether everything has been
said and to take the next step.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President & PMC
Chair*
*Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member*
Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
*Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without privileges)
since 2008*
Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer


On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 2:13 AM Vinoth Chandar 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for the feedback and comments.
>
> Its been over a week. Whats the typical timeline/due process for starting
> the vote?
>
> Thanks
> Vinoth
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 8:04 PM Mohammad Asif Siddiqui <
> mohammad.asif.siddiq...@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> > Looks like an interesting project.
> >
> > Regards
> > Asif
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Luciano Resende [mailto:luckbr1...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: 22 December 2018 PM 05:06
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal
> >
> > Very nice, looks like you guys might need one more mentor, feel free to
> > include myself.
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 20:29 Vinoth Chandar 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Justin,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the questions. I will try to answer them below .
> > >
> > > >>- Use of slack for communication. [1] Has the project thought about
> > > >>how
> > > moving conversations and decision making to a mailing list will affect
> > > the community?
> > > Good point. We use Slack for interactive debugging, critical decisions
> > > (approaches, designs, PR) still happens over github issues (which will
> > > remain the same anyway).
> > > I can try running a poll if you are really interested. But moving to
> > > mailing list should be fine.
> > >
> > > >>- Relatively high bar for committership [1]
> > > So far we used a tweaked version of the chromium project's guidelines.
> > > Open to advice on this going forward inside ASF
> > >
> > > >>No mention of non-code contributions at [1],
> > > Yes, [1] did not recognize that. But we as a project value it
> > > definitely, In fact, the last two committers are the list are included
> > > with incubation precisely for non-code contributions. They helped get
> > > Hudi running on cloud systems.
> > >
> > > >>- Why the low number (6) of initial committers?
> > > No specific reason. We have included folks who have contributed
> > > significantly so far to the project, based on the guidelines we set
> out.
> > > Once we have neutral/standardized governance in place from ASF, might
> > > be easier to absorb more committers.
> > >
> > > >>- Of the initial committers mentioned it’s not obvious that all have
> > > >>made
> > > contributions to the project. You mind listing their GitHub names or
> > > listing their previous contribution to the project.
> > > The first four committers would jump out, if you look at the
> > > contributions here <https://github.com/uber/hudi/graphs/contributors>.
> > > (vinothchandar, n3nash, bvaradar, prazanna). prazanna actually has a
> > > lot more code ownership, but github is not showing his commits for
> > > some reason. You can find it in the raw git log. Already covered the
> > > last two committers in the previous answer.
> > >
> > > >>- Under relationships with other Apache Products “there are no
> > > >>direct
> > > competing projects with Hudi” is not a concern. The ASF allows
> > > directly competing projects.
> > > Sure. we were just describing positioning of the project in the
> > > ecosystem
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Vinoth
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 2:42 PM Justin Mclean
> > > 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Nice proposal and sounds like an interesting project.
> > > >
> > > > A couple of things I noticed that may need some further thought or
> > > > discussion:
> > > > - Use of slack for communication. [1] Has the project thought about
> > > > how moving conversations 

Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2018-12-27 Thread Vinoth Chandar
Hi all,

Thanks for the feedback and comments.

Its been over a week. Whats the typical timeline/due process for starting
the vote?

Thanks
Vinoth



On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 8:04 PM Mohammad Asif Siddiqui <
mohammad.asif.siddiq...@huawei.com> wrote:

> Looks like an interesting project.
>
> Regards
> Asif
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Luciano Resende [mailto:luckbr1...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 22 December 2018 PM 05:06
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal
>
> Very nice, looks like you guys might need one more mentor, feel free to
> include myself.
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 20:29 Vinoth Chandar 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Justin,
> >
> > Thanks for the questions. I will try to answer them below .
> >
> > >>- Use of slack for communication. [1] Has the project thought about
> > >>how
> > moving conversations and decision making to a mailing list will affect
> > the community?
> > Good point. We use Slack for interactive debugging, critical decisions
> > (approaches, designs, PR) still happens over github issues (which will
> > remain the same anyway).
> > I can try running a poll if you are really interested. But moving to
> > mailing list should be fine.
> >
> > >>- Relatively high bar for committership [1]
> > So far we used a tweaked version of the chromium project's guidelines.
> > Open to advice on this going forward inside ASF
> >
> > >>No mention of non-code contributions at [1],
> > Yes, [1] did not recognize that. But we as a project value it
> > definitely, In fact, the last two committers are the list are included
> > with incubation precisely for non-code contributions. They helped get
> > Hudi running on cloud systems.
> >
> > >>- Why the low number (6) of initial committers?
> > No specific reason. We have included folks who have contributed
> > significantly so far to the project, based on the guidelines we set out.
> > Once we have neutral/standardized governance in place from ASF, might
> > be easier to absorb more committers.
> >
> > >>- Of the initial committers mentioned it’s not obvious that all have
> > >>made
> > contributions to the project. You mind listing their GitHub names or
> > listing their previous contribution to the project.
> > The first four committers would jump out, if you look at the
> > contributions here <https://github.com/uber/hudi/graphs/contributors>.
> > (vinothchandar, n3nash, bvaradar, prazanna). prazanna actually has a
> > lot more code ownership, but github is not showing his commits for
> > some reason. You can find it in the raw git log. Already covered the
> > last two committers in the previous answer.
> >
> > >>- Under relationships with other Apache Products “there are no
> > >>direct
> > competing projects with Hudi” is not a concern. The ASF allows
> > directly competing projects.
> > Sure. we were just describing positioning of the project in the
> > ecosystem
> >
> > Thanks
> > Vinoth
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 2:42 PM Justin Mclean
> > 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Nice proposal and sounds like an interesting project.
> > >
> > > A couple of things I noticed that may need some further thought or
> > > discussion:
> > > - Use of slack for communication. [1] Has the project thought about
> > > how moving conversations and decision making to a mailing list will
> > > affect
> > the
> > > community?
> > > - Relatively high bar for committership [1]. While it's up to every
> > (P)PMC
> > > to set the bar, having a high bar hinders project growth and limits
> > people
> > > who are unable to work full time of the project.
> > > - No mention of non-code contributions at [1], as teh ASF we welcome
> > > all forms of contribution.
> > > - Why the low number (6) of initial committers?
> > > - Of the initial committers mentioned it’s not obvious that all have
> > > made contributions to the project. You mind listing their GitHub
> > > names or listing their previous contribution to the project.
> > > - Under relationships with other Apache Products “there are no
> > > direct competing projects with Hudi” is not a concern. The ASF
> > > allows directly competing projects.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Justin
> > >
> > > 1. https://uber.github.io/hudi/community.html#becoming-a-committer
> > > 
> > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> --
> Sent from my Mobile device
>


RE: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2018-12-25 Thread Mohammad Asif Siddiqui
Looks like an interesting project.  
  
Regards  
Asif

-Original Message-
From: Luciano Resende [mailto:luckbr1...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 22 December 2018 PM 05:06
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

Very nice, looks like you guys might need one more mentor, feel free to include 
myself.

On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 20:29 Vinoth Chandar 
wrote:

> Hi Justin,
>
> Thanks for the questions. I will try to answer them below .
>
> >>- Use of slack for communication. [1] Has the project thought about 
> >>how
> moving conversations and decision making to a mailing list will affect 
> the community?
> Good point. We use Slack for interactive debugging, critical decisions 
> (approaches, designs, PR) still happens over github issues (which will 
> remain the same anyway).
> I can try running a poll if you are really interested. But moving to 
> mailing list should be fine.
>
> >>- Relatively high bar for committership [1]
> So far we used a tweaked version of the chromium project's guidelines. 
> Open to advice on this going forward inside ASF
>
> >>No mention of non-code contributions at [1],
> Yes, [1] did not recognize that. But we as a project value it 
> definitely, In fact, the last two committers are the list are included 
> with incubation precisely for non-code contributions. They helped get 
> Hudi running on cloud systems.
>
> >>- Why the low number (6) of initial committers?
> No specific reason. We have included folks who have contributed 
> significantly so far to the project, based on the guidelines we set out.
> Once we have neutral/standardized governance in place from ASF, might 
> be easier to absorb more committers.
>
> >>- Of the initial committers mentioned it’s not obvious that all have 
> >>made
> contributions to the project. You mind listing their GitHub names or 
> listing their previous contribution to the project.
> The first four committers would jump out, if you look at the 
> contributions here <https://github.com/uber/hudi/graphs/contributors>. 
> (vinothchandar, n3nash, bvaradar, prazanna). prazanna actually has a 
> lot more code ownership, but github is not showing his commits for 
> some reason. You can find it in the raw git log. Already covered the 
> last two committers in the previous answer.
>
> >>- Under relationships with other Apache Products “there are no 
> >>direct
> competing projects with Hudi” is not a concern. The ASF allows 
> directly competing projects.
> Sure. we were just describing positioning of the project in the 
> ecosystem
>
> Thanks
> Vinoth
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 2:42 PM Justin Mclean 
> 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Nice proposal and sounds like an interesting project.
> >
> > A couple of things I noticed that may need some further thought or
> > discussion:
> > - Use of slack for communication. [1] Has the project thought about 
> > how moving conversations and decision making to a mailing list will 
> > affect
> the
> > community?
> > - Relatively high bar for committership [1]. While it's up to every
> (P)PMC
> > to set the bar, having a high bar hinders project growth and limits
> people
> > who are unable to work full time of the project.
> > - No mention of non-code contributions at [1], as teh ASF we welcome 
> > all forms of contribution.
> > - Why the low number (6) of initial committers?
> > - Of the initial committers mentioned it’s not obvious that all have 
> > made contributions to the project. You mind listing their GitHub 
> > names or listing their previous contribution to the project.
> > - Under relationships with other Apache Products “there are no 
> > direct competing projects with Hudi” is not a concern. The ASF 
> > allows directly competing projects.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> >
> > 1. https://uber.github.io/hudi/community.html#becoming-a-committer
> > 
> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
--
Sent from my Mobile device


Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2018-12-22 Thread Luciano Resende
Very nice, looks like you guys might need one more mentor, feel free to
include myself.

On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 20:29 Vinoth Chandar 
wrote:

> Hi Justin,
>
> Thanks for the questions. I will try to answer them below .
>
> >>- Use of slack for communication. [1] Has the project thought about how
> moving conversations and decision making to a mailing list will affect the
> community?
> Good point. We use Slack for interactive debugging, critical decisions
> (approaches, designs, PR) still happens over github issues (which will
> remain the same anyway).
> I can try running a poll if you are really interested. But moving to
> mailing list should be fine.
>
> >>- Relatively high bar for committership [1]
> So far we used a tweaked version of the chromium project's guidelines. Open
> to advice on this going forward inside ASF
>
> >>No mention of non-code contributions at [1],
> Yes, [1] did not recognize that. But we as a project value it definitely,
> In fact, the last two committers are the list are included with incubation
> precisely for non-code contributions. They helped get Hudi running on cloud
> systems.
>
> >>- Why the low number (6) of initial committers?
> No specific reason. We have included folks who have contributed
> significantly so far to the project, based on the guidelines we set out.
> Once we have neutral/standardized governance in place from ASF, might be
> easier to absorb more committers.
>
> >>- Of the initial committers mentioned it’s not obvious that all have made
> contributions to the project. You mind listing their GitHub names or
> listing their previous contribution to the project.
> The first four committers would jump out, if you look at the contributions
> here . (vinothchandar,
> n3nash, bvaradar, prazanna). prazanna actually has a lot more code
> ownership, but github is not showing his commits for some reason. You can
> find it in the raw git log. Already covered the last two committers in the
> previous answer.
>
> >>- Under relationships with other Apache Products “there are no direct
> competing projects with Hudi” is not a concern. The ASF allows directly
> competing projects.
> Sure. we were just describing positioning of the project in the ecosystem
>
> Thanks
> Vinoth
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 2:42 PM Justin Mclean 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Nice proposal and sounds like an interesting project.
> >
> > A couple of things I noticed that may need some further thought or
> > discussion:
> > - Use of slack for communication. [1] Has the project thought about how
> > moving conversations and decision making to a mailing list will affect
> the
> > community?
> > - Relatively high bar for committership [1]. While it's up to every
> (P)PMC
> > to set the bar, having a high bar hinders project growth and limits
> people
> > who are unable to work full time of the project.
> > - No mention of non-code contributions at [1], as teh ASF we welcome all
> > forms of contribution.
> > - Why the low number (6) of initial committers?
> > - Of the initial committers mentioned it’s not obvious that all have made
> > contributions to the project. You mind listing their GitHub names or
> > listing their previous contribution to the project.
> > - Under relationships with other Apache Products “there are no direct
> > competing projects with Hudi” is not a concern. The ASF allows directly
> > competing projects.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> >
> > 1. https://uber.github.io/hudi/community.html#becoming-a-committer
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
-- 
Sent from my Mobile device


Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2018-12-21 Thread Vinoth Chandar
Hi Justin,

Thanks for the questions. I will try to answer them below .

>>- Use of slack for communication. [1] Has the project thought about how
moving conversations and decision making to a mailing list will affect the
community?
Good point. We use Slack for interactive debugging, critical decisions
(approaches, designs, PR) still happens over github issues (which will
remain the same anyway).
I can try running a poll if you are really interested. But moving to
mailing list should be fine.

>>- Relatively high bar for committership [1]
So far we used a tweaked version of the chromium project's guidelines. Open
to advice on this going forward inside ASF

>>No mention of non-code contributions at [1],
Yes, [1] did not recognize that. But we as a project value it definitely,
In fact, the last two committers are the list are included with incubation
precisely for non-code contributions. They helped get Hudi running on cloud
systems.

>>- Why the low number (6) of initial committers?
No specific reason. We have included folks who have contributed
significantly so far to the project, based on the guidelines we set out.
Once we have neutral/standardized governance in place from ASF, might be
easier to absorb more committers.

>>- Of the initial committers mentioned it’s not obvious that all have made
contributions to the project. You mind listing their GitHub names or
listing their previous contribution to the project.
The first four committers would jump out, if you look at the contributions
here . (vinothchandar,
n3nash, bvaradar, prazanna). prazanna actually has a lot more code
ownership, but github is not showing his commits for some reason. You can
find it in the raw git log. Already covered the last two committers in the
previous answer.

>>- Under relationships with other Apache Products “there are no direct
competing projects with Hudi” is not a concern. The ASF allows directly
competing projects.
Sure. we were just describing positioning of the project in the ecosystem

Thanks
Vinoth

On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 2:42 PM Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Nice proposal and sounds like an interesting project.
>
> A couple of things I noticed that may need some further thought or
> discussion:
> - Use of slack for communication. [1] Has the project thought about how
> moving conversations and decision making to a mailing list will affect the
> community?
> - Relatively high bar for committership [1]. While it's up to every (P)PMC
> to set the bar, having a high bar hinders project growth and limits people
> who are unable to work full time of the project.
> - No mention of non-code contributions at [1], as teh ASF we welcome all
> forms of contribution.
> - Why the low number (6) of initial committers?
> - Of the initial committers mentioned it’s not obvious that all have made
> contributions to the project. You mind listing their GitHub names or
> listing their previous contribution to the project.
> - Under relationships with other Apache Products “there are no direct
> competing projects with Hudi” is not a concern. The ASF allows directly
> competing projects.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. https://uber.github.io/hudi/community.html#becoming-a-committer
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2018-12-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

Nice proposal and sounds like an interesting project.

A couple of things I noticed that may need some further thought or discussion:
- Use of slack for communication. [1] Has the project thought about how moving 
conversations and decision making to a mailing list will affect the community?
- Relatively high bar for committership [1]. While it's up to every (P)PMC to 
set the bar, having a high bar hinders project growth and limits people who are 
unable to work full time of the project. 
- No mention of non-code contributions at [1], as teh ASF we welcome all forms 
of contribution.
- Why the low number (6) of initial committers?
- Of the initial committers mentioned it’s not obvious that all have made 
contributions to the project. You mind listing their GitHub names or listing 
their previous contribution to the project.
- Under relationships with other Apache Products “there are no direct competing 
projects with Hudi” is not a concern. The ASF allows directly competing 
projects.

Thanks,
Justin

1. https://uber.github.io/hudi/community.html#becoming-a-committer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2018-12-21 Thread Thomas Weise
Very exciting to see this proposal!


On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 2:20 PM Sid Anand  wrote:

> Looks great Vinoth!
> -s (Sid)
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 11:42 AM Vinoth Chandar 
> wrote:
>
> > I have created the proposal in the incubator wiki
> > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HudiProposal
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 6:04 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
> > bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 2:51 PM Vinoth Chandar  >
> > > wrote:
> > > > Created. Username:vinothchandar
> > >
> > > ok, you should have access now.
> > > -Bertrand
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>


Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2018-12-20 Thread Sid Anand
Looks great Vinoth!
-s (Sid)

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 11:42 AM Vinoth Chandar 
wrote:

> I have created the proposal in the incubator wiki
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HudiProposal
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 6:04 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
> bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 2:51 PM Vinoth Chandar 
> > wrote:
> > > Created. Username:vinothchandar
> >
> > ok, you should have access now.
> > -Bertrand
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>


Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2018-12-20 Thread Vinoth Chandar
I have created the proposal in the incubator wiki
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HudiProposal


On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 6:04 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 2:51 PM Vinoth Chandar 
> wrote:
> > Created. Username:vinothchandar
>
> ok, you should have access now.
> -Bertrand
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2018-12-20 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 2:51 PM Vinoth Chandar  wrote:
> Created. Username:vinothchandar

ok, you should have access now.
-Bertrand

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2018-12-20 Thread Vinoth Chandar
Hi,

Created. Username:vinothchandar

Thanks
Vinoth

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 2:45 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:52 PM Vinoth Chandar 
> wrote:
> > ...Full proposal is here
> > https://github.com/uber/hudi/wiki/ASF-Proposal
> > Happy to move it under incubator's wiki
>
> Looks like an exciting project!
>
> To move it to the Incubator wiki, please create an account at
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ and let us know your username.
>
> -Bertrand
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


Re: [DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2018-12-20 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi,

On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:52 PM Vinoth Chandar  wrote:
> ...Full proposal is here
> https://github.com/uber/hudi/wiki/ASF-Proposal
> Happy to move it under incubator's wiki

Looks like an exciting project!

To move it to the Incubator wiki, please create an account at
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ and let us know your username.

-Bertrand

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



[DISCUSS] Hudi Incubation Proposal

2018-12-19 Thread Vinoth Chandar
Hello everyone,

I would like to start a thread to get feedback around incubating Uber's
Hudi project with ASF.

Hudi is a big-data storage library, that provides atomic upserts and
incremental data streams, directly on top of data stored in Hadoop
compatible file systems & object stores. Hudi leverages a lot of Apache
projects - Spark, Avro, Parquet, Hive - to achieve this. At Uber, Hudi
manages all the data in our big-data platform
, and enables incremental ETL
pipelines. Over the past year, we have also seen usages/interest outside of
Uber and hence the proposal.

Full proposal is here
https://github.com/uber/hudi/wiki/ASF-Proposal
Happy to move it under incubator's wiki.

Thank you for your time!

Thanks
Vinoth