Re: [VOTE][RESULT] release Apache OpenWhisk Package Alarm, Package Cloudant, and Package Kafka 2.0.0 (incubating)
Hi - I recently added a detailed clutch analysis page for each podling. It is helpful for these situations as it lists all the releases in a flat sorted manner: https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/openwhisk.html Similar analysis could be added for TLPs … It also shows OpenWhisk 51 git repositories. Regards, Dave > On Apr 2, 2019, at 8:35 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > We have a fun layout in Logging: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/logging/ > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 07:46, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: >> >> Hi Dave, >> >> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 2:39 PM David P Grove wrote: >>> ...For us, using the the version as the primary organizing metric in the >>> dist >>> isn't a great fit. Is there a precedent for doing otherwise (eg, first by >>> component, then the active branches within each component)?... >> >> As an example, Sling also has many components, and we're just throwing >> (most) everything in the top-level folder at >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sling/ >> >> It's not fantastic if you look there, but it makes it easy to check >> that there's only one version of a given component, and the download >> page at https://sling.apache.org/downloads.cgi provides a more >> convenient view. >> >> -Bertrand >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > > -- > Matt Sicker > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] release Apache OpenWhisk Package Alarm, Package Cloudant, and Package Kafka 2.0.0 (incubating)
We have a fun layout in Logging: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/logging/ On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 07:46, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 2:39 PM David P Grove wrote: > > ...For us, using the the version as the primary organizing metric in the > > dist > > isn't a great fit. Is there a precedent for doing otherwise (eg, first by > > component, then the active branches within each component)?... > > As an example, Sling also has many components, and we're just throwing > (most) everything in the top-level folder at > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sling/ > > It's not fantastic if you look there, but it makes it easy to check > that there's only one version of a given component, and the download > page at https://sling.apache.org/downloads.cgi provides a more > convenient view. > > -Bertrand > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > -- Matt Sicker - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] release Apache OpenWhisk Package Alarm, Package Cloudant, and Package Kafka 2.0.0 (incubating)
Hi Dave, On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 2:39 PM David P Grove wrote: > ...For us, using the the version as the primary organizing metric in the dist > isn't a great fit. Is there a precedent for doing otherwise (eg, first by > component, then the active branches within each component)?... As an example, Sling also has many components, and we're just throwing (most) everything in the top-level folder at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sling/ It's not fantastic if you look there, but it makes it easy to check that there's only one version of a given component, and the download page at https://sling.apache.org/downloads.cgi provides a more convenient view. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] release Apache OpenWhisk Package Alarm, Package Cloudant, and Package Kafka 2.0.0 (incubating)
"Henk P. Penning" wrote on 04/02/2019 07:13:11 AM: > >At the moment, OpenWhisk has in /dist/incubator/openwhisk/ : > >apache-openwhisk-0.9.0-incubating/ >apache-openwhisk-0.9.8-incubating/ >apache-openwhisk-0.10.0-incubating/ >apache-openwhisk-1.12.0-incubating/ >apache-openwhisk-2.0.0-incubating/ > >The (legal) policy on software releases [1] says to remove >(from /dist/) releases when development on that version >branch ceases ; for instance > > remove openwhisk-0.9.0 if you're not developping 0.X > remove openwhisk-0.9.8 if you're not developping 0.X > remove openwhisk-1.12.0 if you're not developping 1.12.1 > We understand the policy. OpenWhisk has about 25 sub-components that are released using different version numbering schemes. These dirs all contain most recent releases of some components. For us, using the the version as the primary organizing metric in the dist isn't a great fit. Is there a precedent for doing otherwise (eg, first by component, then the active branches within each component)? That might better communicate how we are organizing our releases. --dave
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] release Apache OpenWhisk Package Alarm, Package Cloudant, and Package Kafka 2.0.0 (incubating)
Hi, On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:13 PM Henk P. Penning wrote: >...If possbile, please remove 'older' releases from > https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/openwhisk/ ... Good point Henk! Note that older releases are archived automatically under http://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/openwhisk/ which should be mentioned on download pages. (I have suggested that for OpenWhisk at https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-website/pull/370 ) -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] release Apache OpenWhisk Package Alarm, Package Cloudant, and Package Kafka 2.0.0 (incubating)
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019, Dave Grove wrote: Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 16:01:05 + From: Dave Grove To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] release Apache OpenWhisk Package Alarm, Package Cloudant, and Package Kafka 2.0.0 (incubating) Hi Dave, We will proceed with the 2.0.0 release of these three components. If possbile, please remove 'older' releases from https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/openwhisk/ At the moment, OpenWhisk has in /dist/incubator/openwhisk/ : apache-openwhisk-0.9.0-incubating/ apache-openwhisk-0.9.8-incubating/ apache-openwhisk-0.10.0-incubating/ apache-openwhisk-1.12.0-incubating/ apache-openwhisk-2.0.0-incubating/ The (legal) policy on software releases [1] says to remove (from /dist/) releases when development on that version branch ceases ; for instance remove openwhisk-0.9.0 if you're not developping 0.X remove openwhisk-0.9.8 if you're not developping 0.X remove openwhisk-1.12.0 if you're not developping 1.12.1 [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#when-to-archive Thanks ; regards, Henk Penning _ Henk P. Penning, ICT-beta R Uithof MG-403_/ \_ Faculty of Science, Utrecht UniversityT +31 30 253 4106 / \_/ \ Leuvenlaan 4, 3584CE Utrecht, NL F +31 30 253 4553 \_/ \_/ http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~penni101/ M penn...@uu.nl \_/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] release Apache OpenWhisk Package Alarm, Package Cloudant, and Package Kafka 2.0.0 (incubating)
Thanks to all who participated in this vote. It has passed with 4 +1 (binding) votes (Matt Sicker, Justin Mclean, Krzysztof Sobkowiak, Bertrand Delacretaz) and no other votes. We will proceed with the 2.0.0 release of these three components. Thanks also to Justin and Bertrand for pointing out a gap in our project's scancode tooling for checking releases. It was inappropriately accepting the short-form Apache license header in non-minimized JavaScript source files. This was not intended; we will correct in the next release. --dave On 2019/03/26 12:48:32, "David P Grove" wrote: > > > The Apache OpenWhisk Community has voted to make the first Apache release > of the OpenWhisk "Package Alarm", "Package Cloudant" and "Package Kafka" > components. > > The OpenWhisk dev list voting thread is here: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e0fb73d8ca0d0c584650f4f5b8b02054f5c99d64895f3e5ace352234@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E > > We request that IPMC Members please review and vote on this incubator > release as described below. > > These three Apache OpenWhisk packages provide basic event-based programming > capabilities to an OpenWhisk deployment. > > This release comprises of source code distribution only. There are three > components (git repos) included in this release of the OpenWhisk Packages > Group. All release artifacts were built by PR#251 in the openwhisk-release > repo from the following Git commit IDs: > * openwhisk-package-alarms: dd6ab4d81c8893436e7242170d57951c089d5185 > * openwhisk-package-cloudant: ce5dac9cb0204fb2f78195d9e3f9364236613a31 > * openwhisk-package-kafka: 49820dd24170f24a37c02fae6ba7ec06e190423f > > openwhisk-package-alarms (C158D76 B5D9A53A AC10AC42 4CD5060C 7A6467D5 > E9624519 117E9C8C AB171590 CCC3505D 5C7E630D C41769B4 44F85F03 BBA40A6A > E04D2264 79FFA78B B3C5BFB8) > src.tar.gz: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/openwhisk/apache-openwhisk-2.0.0-incubating-rc2/openwhisk-package-alarms-2.0.0-incubating-sources.tar.gz > sha512 checksum: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/openwhisk/apache-openwhisk-2.0.0-incubating-rc2/openwhisk-package-alarms-2.0.0-incubating-sources.tar.gz > .sha512 > signature: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/openwhisk/apache-openwhisk-2.0.0-incubating-rc2/openwhisk-package-alarms-2.0.0-incubating-sources.tar.gz > .asc > > openwhisk-package-cloudant (380E1BA8 EC3C72A8 09B10DCF 03BC1D2D 4BFA7E4F > 892995EE 39D26BBE 758AFD5D FA680E81 54A9C726 A0D386C5 B447C947 70D26385 > 2A8D07BF 5848318A 42A3BBDD) > src.tar.gz: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/openwhisk/apache-openwhisk-2.0.0-incubating-rc2/openwhisk-package-cloudant-2.0.0-incubating-sources.tar.gz > sha512 checksum: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/openwhisk/apache-openwhisk-2.0.0-incubating-rc2/openwhisk-package-cloudant-2.0.0-incubating-sources.tar.gz > .sha512 > signature: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/openwhisk/apache-openwhisk-2.0.0-incubating-rc2/openwhisk-package-cloudant-2.0.0-incubating-sources.tar.gz > .asc > > openwhisk-package-kafka (303B8286 AA9B945D 1A740FCB 0DE908D5 A287FAF5 > C20A9DF9 4BBD2F16 C488DF4B 3E82A75B 9D071B1A E1CCDB54 7B623A36 5AC88E5D > 9994539B 00ECEA5D A066D156) > src.tar.gz: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/openwhisk/apache-openwhisk-2.0.0-incubating-rc2/openwhisk-package-kafka-2.0.0-incubating-sources.tar.gz > sha512 checksum: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/openwhisk/apache-openwhisk-2.0.0-incubating-rc2/openwhisk-package-kafka-2.0.0-incubating-sources.tar.gz > .sha512 > signature: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/openwhisk/apache-openwhisk-2.0.0-incubating-rc2/openwhisk-package-kafka-2.0.0-incubating-sources.tar.gz > .asc > > All release artifacts were signed with key 72AF0CC22C4CF320. > KEYS file is available here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/openwhisk/KEYS > > How to verify the artifacts can be found at: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/How+to+verify+the > +release+checklist+and+vote+on+OpenWhisk+modules+under+Apache > > Please vote on releasing version 2.0.0-incubating of Apache OpenWhisk > Package Alarm, Package Cloudant, and Package Kafka as described above. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > [ ] +1 Release Apache OpenWhisk Package Alarm, Package Cloudant, and > Package Kafka 2.0.0-incubating > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 Do not release and the reason > > Checklist for reference: > [ ] Download links are valid. > [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. > [ ] DISCLAIMER is included. > [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. > [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repository. > [ ] All files have license headers if necessary. > [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > regards, > > --dave >
