Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
+1 (binding) LICENSE is OK NOTICE looks good (I'm really careful now on this file, so, I'm 100% sure ;)) DISCLAIMER exists Regards JB On 02/01/2016 11:32 PM, Andreas Kotes wrote: Hello esteemed PPMCs, is there something you need for Apache Wave to get some more traction on this mailinglist? Right now this is kinda blocking here, while we're toiling along inside the project ;) Please consider investing a modest amount of time to get this through the door. The really short documentation for an install can be found on https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Install+WIAB Thank you for your consideration, count On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 02:26:37PM +, Yuri Z wrote: +1 binding from Justin Mclean +1 from Ian Dunlop +1 binding from John D. Ament Unless I missed someone we still need +1 binding. [..] On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM Ali Lownwrote: Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to make its first release since joining the incubator in 2010. [..] The Wave PPMC has voted in favour with 6 binding votes, and 4 non-binding votes from the community. PPMC vote call: https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCABRGrVdhdhhdRMwJ9jsWxzqMX9ijzgG%3Di5BF1YJBAZ2juYFORg%40mail.gmail.com%3E PPMC vote result (second result after a slow start for the first attempt): https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E Staging directory: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/ Please note that - checksums are generated from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha' - .zip versions are generated from the .tar.bz2 version by repacking - binary artifacts are provided for convenience of the end-user, the vote is primarily regarding the source artifacts Git branch: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-rc10 KEYS file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/KEYS Please verify the release and vote. This vote will close after 72 hours on 6th November. [] +1: I approve [] -1: I disapprove because... Please add (binding) if your vote is binding. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Hello esteemed PPMCs, is there something you need for Apache Wave to get some more traction on this mailinglist? Right now this is kinda blocking here, while we're toiling along inside the project ;) Please consider investing a modest amount of time to get this through the door. The really short documentation for an install can be found on https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Install+WIAB Thank you for your consideration, count On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 02:26:37PM +, Yuri Z wrote: > +1 binding from Justin Mclean > +1 from Ian Dunlop > +1 binding from John D. Ament > > Unless I missed someone we still need +1 binding. [..] > >> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM Ali Lownwrote: > >> > Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to make > >> > its first release since joining the incubator in 2010. [..] > >> > The Wave PPMC has voted in favour with 6 binding votes, and 4 > >> > non-binding votes from the community. > >> > > >> > PPMC vote call: > >> > > >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCABRGrVdhdhhdRMwJ9jsWxzqMX9ijzgG%3Di5BF1YJBAZ2juYFORg%40mail.gmail.com%3E > >> > > >> > PPMC vote result (second result after a slow start for the first > >> attempt): > >> > > >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E > >> > > >> > Staging directory: > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/ > >> > > >> > Please note that > >> > - checksums are generated from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha' > >> > - .zip versions are generated from the .tar.bz2 version by repacking > >> > - binary artifacts are provided for convenience of the end-user, the > >> > vote is primarily regarding the source artifacts > >> > > >> > Git branch: > >> > > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-rc10 > >> > > >> > KEYS file: > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/KEYS > >> > > >> > Please verify the release and vote. This vote will close after 72 > >> > hours on 6th November. > >> > > >> > [] +1: I approve > >> > [] -1: I disapprove because... > >> > > >> > Please add (binding) if your vote is binding. -- Andreas 'count' Kotes Taming computers for humans since 1990. "Don't ask what the world needs. Ask what makes you come alive, and go do it. Because what the world needs is people who have come alive." -- Howard Thurman - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
LICENSE file looks good NOTICE file looks good DISCLAIMER file exists Signature file looks good Hash files look good +1 (binding) Small nit, the NOTICE file seemed to have need the year to be updated. - Henry On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Andreas Koteswrote: > Hello esteemed PPMCs, > > is there something you need for Apache Wave to get some more traction on > this mailinglist? > > Right now this is kinda blocking here, while we're toiling along inside > the project ;) > > Please consider investing a modest amount of time to get this through > the door. > > The really short documentation for an install can be found on > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Install+WIAB > > Thank you for your consideration, > >count > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 02:26:37PM +, Yuri Z wrote: > > +1 binding from Justin Mclean > > +1 from Ian Dunlop > > +1 binding from John D. Ament > > > > Unless I missed someone we still need +1 binding. > > [..] > > > >> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM Ali Lown wrote: > > >> > Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to > make > > >> > its first release since joining the incubator in 2010. > > [..] > > > >> > The Wave PPMC has voted in favour with 6 binding votes, and 4 > > >> > non-binding votes from the community. > > >> > > > >> > PPMC vote call: > > >> > > > >> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCABRGrVdhdhhdRMwJ9jsWxzqMX9ijzgG%3Di5BF1YJBAZ2juYFORg%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > >> > > > >> > PPMC vote result (second result after a slow start for the first > > >> attempt): > > >> > > > >> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > >> > > > >> > Staging directory: > > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/ > > >> > > > >> > Please note that > > >> > - checksums are generated from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha' > > >> > - .zip versions are generated from the .tar.bz2 version by repacking > > >> > - binary artifacts are provided for convenience of the end-user, the > > >> > vote is primarily regarding the source artifacts > > >> > > > >> > Git branch: > > >> > > > >> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-rc10 > > >> > > > >> > KEYS file: > > >> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/KEYS > > >> > > > >> > Please verify the release and vote. This vote will close after 72 > > >> > hours on 6th November. > > >> > > > >> > [] +1: I approve > > >> > [] -1: I disapprove because... > > >> > > > >> > Please add (binding) if your vote is binding. > > -- > Andreas 'count' Kotes > Taming computers for humans since 1990. > "Don't ask what the world needs. Ask what makes you come alive, and go do > it. > Because what the world needs is people who have come alive." -- Howard > Thurman > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
So far we got: +1 binding from Justin Mclean +1 from Ian Dunlop +1 binding from John D. Ament Unless I missed someone we still need +1 binding. On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:58 AM Yuri Zwrote: > Thanks! > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:10 AM John D. Ament > wrote: > >> I'm unable to compile/run due to some of the issues noted by ian, just >> that >> I'm not as willing to install older java versions to make it work. >> >> Anyways, it seems like some of these issues are alleviated in your master >> branch, so (to break Marvin's heart a little :-) >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> Release contents look good, with the notes from Justin. >> >> John >> >> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM Ali Lown wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to make >> > its first release since joining the incubator in 2010. >> > >> > The Wave PPMC has voted in favour with 6 binding votes, and 4 >> > non-binding votes from the community. >> > >> > PPMC vote call: >> > >> > >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCABRGrVdhdhhdRMwJ9jsWxzqMX9ijzgG%3Di5BF1YJBAZ2juYFORg%40mail.gmail.com%3E >> > >> > PPMC vote result (second result after a slow start for the first >> attempt): >> > >> > >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E >> > >> > Staging directory: >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/ >> > >> > Please note that >> > - checksums are generated from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha' >> > - .zip versions are generated from the .tar.bz2 version by repacking >> > - binary artifacts are provided for convenience of the end-user, the >> > vote is primarily regarding the source artifacts >> > >> > Git branch: >> > >> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-rc10 >> > >> > KEYS file: >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/KEYS >> > >> > Please verify the release and vote. This vote will close after 72 >> > hours on 6th November. >> > >> > [] +1: I approve >> > [] -1: I disapprove because... >> > >> > Please add (binding) if your vote is binding. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Ali >> > >> > - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > >> > >> >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Thanks! On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:10 AM John D. Amentwrote: > I'm unable to compile/run due to some of the issues noted by ian, just that > I'm not as willing to install older java versions to make it work. > > Anyways, it seems like some of these issues are alleviated in your master > branch, so (to break Marvin's heart a little :-) > > +1 (binding) > > Release contents look good, with the notes from Justin. > > John > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM Ali Lown wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to make > > its first release since joining the incubator in 2010. > > > > The Wave PPMC has voted in favour with 6 binding votes, and 4 > > non-binding votes from the community. > > > > PPMC vote call: > > > > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCABRGrVdhdhhdRMwJ9jsWxzqMX9ijzgG%3Di5BF1YJBAZ2juYFORg%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > PPMC vote result (second result after a slow start for the first > attempt): > > > > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > Staging directory: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/ > > > > Please note that > > - checksums are generated from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha' > > - .zip versions are generated from the .tar.bz2 version by repacking > > - binary artifacts are provided for convenience of the end-user, the > > vote is primarily regarding the source artifacts > > > > Git branch: > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-rc10 > > > > KEYS file: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/KEYS > > > > Please verify the release and vote. This vote will close after 72 > > hours on 6th November. > > > > [] +1: I approve > > [] -1: I disapprove because... > > > > Please add (binding) if your vote is binding. > > > > Thanks, > > Ali > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
I'm unable to compile/run due to some of the issues noted by ian, just that I'm not as willing to install older java versions to make it work. Anyways, it seems like some of these issues are alleviated in your master branch, so (to break Marvin's heart a little :-) +1 (binding) Release contents look good, with the notes from Justin. John On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM Ali Lownwrote: > Hi, > > Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to make > its first release since joining the incubator in 2010. > > The Wave PPMC has voted in favour with 6 binding votes, and 4 > non-binding votes from the community. > > PPMC vote call: > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCABRGrVdhdhhdRMwJ9jsWxzqMX9ijzgG%3Di5BF1YJBAZ2juYFORg%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > PPMC vote result (second result after a slow start for the first attempt): > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > Staging directory: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/ > > Please note that > - checksums are generated from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha' > - .zip versions are generated from the .tar.bz2 version by repacking > - binary artifacts are provided for convenience of the end-user, the > vote is primarily regarding the source artifacts > > Git branch: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-rc10 > > KEYS file: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/KEYS > > Please verify the release and vote. This vote will close after 72 > hours on 6th November. > > [] +1: I approve > [] -1: I disapprove because... > > Please add (binding) if your vote is binding. > > Thanks, > Ali > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, No issues. I have now managed to compile it with no problems on Ubuntu 14.04. (Thanks for the reminder :) ) +1 Cheers, Ian On 29/12/2015 08:02, Yuri Z wrote: > Hi Ian Are there any more issues that hold you from voting on the > Apache Wave release on general@apache? > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 3:25 AM Ali Lownwrote: > >> Hi Ian, >> >> I am not sure about the best way to import this into eclipse, I >> have always used the CLI tools directly. I have CC'd the dev-list >> in case they have a better answer for you. >> >> The inability to find ${build.classpath.path}, >> ${build.macros.path} suggests that you are >> missing/failed-to-import/failed-to-reference the build.properties >> file which contains the values for these macros. >> >> The follow-up problem about missing define-gxpc is to be >> expected because of the above problem resulting in it not >> importing build-macros.xml, which defines "define-gxpc" amongst >> other things. >> >> Ali >> >> On 6 November 2015 at 14:51, Ian Dunlop >> wrote: > Hello, > > I'll give it at 0 the moment since I encountered a build issue. I > downloaded the src zip and imported the code into Eclipse Mars > (4.50) with jdk 1.7.0_79 & ANT 1.9.4 but found the following > issues: > > 1) BUILD FAILED C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:28: > Cannot find > C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\${build.classpath.path} > imported from C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml > > Resolved by commenting out > > > > > > and tried again > > 2) > > BUILD FAILED Target "define-gxpc" does not exist in the project > "waveinabox". It is used from target "gen-gxp". > > Resolved by removing define-gxpc from > > depends="init, define-gxpc, gen-gxp-dep" unless="skip.gen-gxp"> > destdir="${gen.dir}/gxp" target="org.waveprotocol.box.server.gxp" > /> > > 3) > > BUILD FAILED C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:120: > Problem: failed to create task or type buildproto Cause: The name > is undefined. Action: Check the spelling. Action: Check that any > custom tasks/types have been declared. Action: Check that any > / declarations have taken place. > > At that point I figured it best to report the issues here: > > Is there a procedure for building in eclipse, am I missing an ant > setting somewhere? > > So, apart fromn the compile issue everything else looks good: > > signatures are good artifact/hashes good DISCLAIMER OK LICENCE OK > NOTICE OK > > Cheers, > > Ian > > > > On 04/11/2015 07:14, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding. > > Could you please fix the LICENCE Appendix in the next > release. The text should be "Copyright [] [name of > copyright owner]” not "Copyright 2013 The Apache Software > Foundation”. > > I checked: - artefact has incubating in name - signatures > and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE has minor > issue with the copyright in the appendix. Not required but > it could also use the sort form in LICENSE [1] particularly > as you bundle the software LICENSE files. - NOTICE good. - > All source files have Apache headers - No unexpected binary > file in source release (but see below) - can compile from > source - test pass > > I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source > release, I assume you have permission from the person who > took them to use these? IF so you may want to put that in > the LICENSE. > > There's a number of binary file without extensions in > /thumbnail_patterns/ but they all look to be PNGs is this > the case? Where did these images come from? > > I had a quick look at the binary release and the LICENCE > and NOTICE appear comprehensive. I didn;t do a though > check. I did notice that the year is incorrect in the > NOTICE file and LICENSE appendix has the same issue. It’s > actually wrong here as non ASF Apache licensed software is > mentioned. There no need to mean Apache licensed software > in the LICENCE but no harm is done by donning so. [2] > > Thanks, Justin > > 1. > http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps > > 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep > > > > -- - --- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: > general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > >>> >>> - - >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>> general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >> > - -- Ian Dunlop, eScience Lab School of Computer Science The University of
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Hi Ian Are there any more issues that hold you from voting on the Apache Wave release on general@apache? On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 3:25 AM Ali Lownwrote: > Hi Ian, > > I am not sure about the best way to import this into eclipse, I have > always used the CLI tools directly. I have CC'd the dev-list in case > they have a better answer for you. > > The inability to find ${build.classpath.path}, ${build.macros.path} > suggests that you are missing/failed-to-import/failed-to-reference the > build.properties file which contains the values for these macros. > > The follow-up problem about missing define-gxpc is to be expected > because of the above problem resulting in it not importing > build-macros.xml, which defines "define-gxpc" amongst other things. > > Ali > > On 6 November 2015 at 14:51, Ian Dunlop > wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > Hello, > > > > I'll give it at 0 the moment since I encountered a build issue. I > > downloaded the src zip and imported the code into Eclipse Mars (4.50) > > with jdk 1.7.0_79 & ANT 1.9.4 but found the following issues: > > > > 1) > > BUILD FAILED > > C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:28: Cannot find > > C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\${build.classpath.path} imported > > from C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml > > > > Resolved by commenting out > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and tried again > > > > 2) > > > > BUILD FAILED > > Target "define-gxpc" does not exist in the project "waveinabox". It is > > used from target "gen-gxp". > > > > Resolved by removing define-gxpc from > > > >> depends="init, define-gxpc, gen-gxp-dep" unless="skip.gen-gxp"> > > > destdir="${gen.dir}/gxp" > > target="org.waveprotocol.box.server.gxp" /> > > > > > > > > 3) > > > > BUILD FAILED > > C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:120: Problem: failed > > to create task or type buildproto > > Cause: The name is undefined. > > Action: Check the spelling. > > Action: Check that any custom tasks/types have been declared. > > Action: Check that any / declarations have taken > > place. > > > > At that point I figured it best to report the issues here: > > > > Is there a procedure for building in eclipse, am I missing an ant > > setting somewhere? > > > > So, apart fromn the compile issue everything else looks good: > > > > signatures are good > > artifact/hashes good > > DISCLAIMER OK > > LICENCE OK > > NOTICE OK > > > > Cheers, > > > > Ian > > > > > > > > On 04/11/2015 07:14, Justin Mclean wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> +1 binding. > >> > >> Could you please fix the LICENCE Appendix in the next release. The > >> text should be "Copyright [] [name of copyright owner]” not > >> "Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation”. > >> > >> I checked: - artefact has incubating in name - signatures and > >> hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE has minor issue with the > >> copyright in the appendix. Not required but it could also use the > >> sort form in LICENSE [1] particularly as you bundle the software > >> LICENSE files. - NOTICE good. - All source files have Apache > >> headers - No unexpected binary file in source release (but see > >> below) - can compile from source - test pass > >> > >> I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source release, I > >> assume you have permission from the person who took them to use > >> these? IF so you may want to put that in the LICENSE. > >> > >> There's a number of binary file without extensions in > >> /thumbnail_patterns/ but they all look to be PNGs is this the case? > >> Where did these images come from? > >> > >> I had a quick look at the binary release and the LICENCE and NOTICE > >> appear comprehensive. I didn;t do a though check. I did notice that > >> the year is incorrect in the NOTICE file and LICENSE appendix has > >> the same issue. It’s actually wrong here as non ASF Apache > >> licensed software is mentioned. There no need to mean Apache > >> licensed software in the LICENCE but no harm is done by donning so. > >> [2] > >> > >> Thanks, Justin > >> > >> 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps > >> 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep > >> > >> > >> > >> - > >> > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >> > > > > - -- > > Ian Dunlop, eScience Lab > > School of Computer Science > > The University of Manchester > > http://orcid.org/-0001-7066-3350 > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > > Version: GnuPG v2 > > > > iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWPL6FAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5agYH/3yPH2vLCltvOqIZlv70TJ9R > > EmdbRL6rvpJjcah+GH9BPpsYEeENXw5WTARH42RVZT4gFUz62GBIkZhhqFks0/qx > > ubL+bekcivMI2P/eZ3T6S/mKw52d8esRaDvrMKaUZ3Ax3tdkYt/dPaYoXGxAMNS4 > >
[VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Hi We still can use one more vote.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Hi, Can any other IPMC member help out here? Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Bump. I could still do with another vote from an IPMC member. Thanks, Ali On 12 November 2015 at 16:02, Ali Lownwrote: > Hi all, > > I could still do with someone else taking a look at these artifacts. > > Currently there is one +1 vote from Justin Mclean, and one +1 vote > from Christian Grobmeier that can be forwarded from the wave-dev list. > > My understanding is that I require at least 3 binding +1's from IPMC. > > Thanks, > Ali > > On 3 November 2015 at 16:09, Ali Lown wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to make >> its first release since joining the incubator in 2010. >> >> The Wave PPMC has voted in favour with 6 binding votes, and 4 >> non-binding votes from the community. >> >> PPMC vote call: >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCABRGrVdhdhhdRMwJ9jsWxzqMX9ijzgG%3Di5BF1YJBAZ2juYFORg%40mail.gmail.com%3E >> >> PPMC vote result (second result after a slow start for the first attempt): >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E >> >> Staging directory: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/ >> >> Please note that >> - checksums are generated from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha' >> - .zip versions are generated from the .tar.bz2 version by repacking >> - binary artifacts are provided for convenience of the end-user, the >> vote is primarily regarding the source artifacts >> >> Git branch: >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-rc10 >> >> KEYS file: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/KEYS >> >> Please verify the release and vote. This vote will close after 72 >> hours on 6th November. >> >> [] +1: I approve >> [] -1: I disapprove because... >> >> Please add (binding) if your vote is binding. >> >> Thanks, >> Ali - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Hi all, I could still do with someone else taking a look at these artifacts. Currently there is one +1 vote from Justin Mclean, and one +1 vote from Christian Grobmeier that can be forwarded from the wave-dev list. My understanding is that I require at least 3 binding +1's from IPMC. Thanks, Ali On 3 November 2015 at 16:09, Ali Lownwrote: > Hi, > > Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to make > its first release since joining the incubator in 2010. > > The Wave PPMC has voted in favour with 6 binding votes, and 4 > non-binding votes from the community. > > PPMC vote call: > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCABRGrVdhdhhdRMwJ9jsWxzqMX9ijzgG%3Di5BF1YJBAZ2juYFORg%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > PPMC vote result (second result after a slow start for the first attempt): > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > Staging directory: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/ > > Please note that > - checksums are generated from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha' > - .zip versions are generated from the .tar.bz2 version by repacking > - binary artifacts are provided for convenience of the end-user, the > vote is primarily regarding the source artifacts > > Git branch: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-rc10 > > KEYS file: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/KEYS > > Please verify the release and vote. This vote will close after 72 > hours on 6th November. > > [] +1: I approve > [] -1: I disapprove because... > > Please add (binding) if your vote is binding. > > Thanks, > Ali - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Hi Justin, >> Are you referring to the screenshots under war/static/? Those are >> untouched since the migration from Google, so fall under the license >> from them. > > Not the screen shots no but the photos found in here: > ./src/org/waveprotocol/wave/client/editor/harness/public/pics/ > > Do you have the authors permission to use and distribute them? I have no information on the original taker of the photo. They were committed into ASF as part of b3815a04e9114511ce962df0a70ed56841e3a003 [0], which is the import commit by Michael Macfadden from the Google Wave-Protocol source. Looking there, I can only trace these back to a commit by Alex North (a0bb2b999819) [1], which is "merges libraries repository into default repository". As such, these appear to fall under the migratory license from Google again. Ali [0]: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=commit;h=b3815a04e9114511ce962df0a70ed56841e3a003 [1]: https://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/source/detail?spec=svn6a56af40d8236b8a707af8755f48ebfbcff4fa6e=6a56af40d823.=a0bb2b9998191b46f43ed613c924e8a05ac7dd31 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Hi, >> Do you have the authors permission to use and distribute them? > > I have no information on the original taker of the photo. Perhaps these were missed as part of the IP clearance step? [1] As the provenance is a little unclear I’d suggest they be replaced, but up to you. Thanks, Justin 1. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-provenance - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Removing them seems reasonable. They are only used as part of a test-case, which is only accessed if someone is developing using the hosted editor. I shall do this as part of the next release. Ali On 10 November 2015 at 23:44, Justin Mcleanwrote: > Hi, > >>> Do you have the authors permission to use and distribute them? >> >> I have no information on the original taker of the photo. > > Perhaps these were missed as part of the IP clearance step? [1] As the > provenance is a little unclear I’d suggest they be replaced, but up to you. > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-provenance > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Hi, > Are you referring to the screenshots under war/static/? Those are > untouched since the migration from Google, so fall under the license > from them. Not the screen shots no but the photos found in here: ./src/org/waveprotocol/wave/client/editor/harness/public/pics/ Do you have the authors permission to use and distribute them? > These icons are from the Tango Desktop Project, which licenses them > into the public domain, who are mentioned in THANKS. I can mention > this explicitly in THANKS if preferable? In that case should be added to LICENSE. Only minor issue, certainly nothing to hold up this release. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I did try to use the CLI to build it but ran into java issues since windows seems determined to use java 8 and i can only get java 7 to run inside eclipse. Getting windows to use an older version of java seems like a fairly difficult or poorly documented task nowadays. Suggestions welcome (though as noted earlier they may belong a a different list). Cheers, Ian On 08/11/15 19:41, John D. Ament wrote: > Typically speaking, releases should compile. If there are steps > required to make it compile they should be shared. On Nov 8, 2015 > 14:33, "Upayavira"wrote: > >> Ian, >> >> Please bear in mind that this release vote is to validate the >> legal aspects of the release, not its technical merits. Technical >> merits can be resolved in subsequent releases. >> >> Upayavira >> >> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015, at 02:51 PM, Ian Dunlop wrote: > Hello, > > I'll give it at 0 the moment since I encountered a build issue. I > downloaded the src zip and imported the code into Eclipse Mars > (4.50) with jdk 1.7.0_79 & ANT 1.9.4 but found the following > issues: > > 1) BUILD FAILED C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:28: > Cannot find > C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\${build.classpath.path} > imported from C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml > > Resolved by commenting out > > > > > > and tried again > > 2) > > BUILD FAILED Target "define-gxpc" does not exist in the project > "waveinabox". It is used from target "gen-gxp". > > Resolved by removing define-gxpc from > > depends="init, define-gxpc, gen-gxp-dep" unless="skip.gen-gxp"> > destdir="${gen.dir}/gxp" target="org.waveprotocol.box.server.gxp" > /> > > 3) > > BUILD FAILED C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:120: > Problem: failed to create task or type buildproto Cause: The name > is undefined. Action: Check the spelling. Action: Check that any > custom tasks/types have been declared. Action: Check that any > / declarations have taken place. > > At that point I figured it best to report the issues here: > > Is there a procedure for building in eclipse, am I missing an ant > setting somewhere? > > So, apart fromn the compile issue everything else looks good: > > signatures are good artifact/hashes good DISCLAIMER OK LICENCE OK > NOTICE OK > > Cheers, > > Ian > > > > On 04/11/2015 07:14, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding. > > Could you please fix the LICENCE Appendix in the next > release. The text should be "Copyright [] [name of > copyright owner]” not "Copyright 2013 The Apache Software > Foundation”. > > I checked: - artefact has incubating in name - signatures > and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE has minor > issue with the copyright in the appendix. Not required but > it could also use the sort form in LICENSE [1] particularly > as you bundle the software LICENSE files. - NOTICE good. - > All source files have Apache headers - No unexpected binary > file in source release (but see below) - can compile from > source - test pass > > I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source > release, I assume you have permission from the person who > took them to use these? IF so you may want to put that in > the LICENSE. > > There's a number of binary file without extensions in > /thumbnail_patterns/ but they all look to be PNGs is this > the case? Where did these images come from? > > I had a quick look at the binary release and the LICENCE > and NOTICE appear comprehensive. I didn;t do a though > check. I did notice that the year is incorrect in the > NOTICE file and LICENSE appendix has the same issue. It’s > actually wrong here as non ASF Apache licensed software is > mentioned. There no need to mean Apache licensed software > in the LICENCE but no harm is done by donning so. [2] > > Thanks, Justin > > 1. > http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps > > 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep > > > > -- - --- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: > general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > >>> >>> - - >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>> general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >> >> - >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: >> general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Hi Ian, Perhaps you could provide some more information on exactly what steps you took to the wave-dev list, where we can try to help you with getting this to work on your machine, I doubt everyone else on incubator-general is quite as interested... Using a different Java version on Windows normally just requires changing the path system variable to reflect the location of the JDK you are interested in using. Ali On 9 November 2015 at 19:08, Ian Dunlopwrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, > > I did try to use the CLI to build it but ran into java issues since > windows seems determined to use java 8 and i can only get java 7 to > run inside eclipse. Getting windows to use an older version of java > seems like a fairly difficult or poorly documented task nowadays. > Suggestions welcome (though as noted earlier they may belong a a > different list). > > Cheers, > > Ian > > On 08/11/15 19:41, John D. Ament wrote: >> Typically speaking, releases should compile. If there are steps >> required to make it compile they should be shared. On Nov 8, 2015 >> 14:33, "Upayavira" wrote: >> >>> Ian, >>> >>> Please bear in mind that this release vote is to validate the >>> legal aspects of the release, not its technical merits. Technical >>> merits can be resolved in subsequent releases. >>> >>> Upayavira >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015, at 02:51 PM, Ian Dunlop wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'll give it at 0 the moment since I encountered a build issue. I >> downloaded the src zip and imported the code into Eclipse Mars >> (4.50) with jdk 1.7.0_79 & ANT 1.9.4 but found the following >> issues: >> >> 1) BUILD FAILED C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:28: >> Cannot find >> C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\${build.classpath.path} >> imported from C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml >> >> Resolved by commenting out >> >> >> >> >> >> and tried again >> >> 2) >> >> BUILD FAILED Target "define-gxpc" does not exist in the project >> "waveinabox". It is used from target "gen-gxp". >> >> Resolved by removing define-gxpc from >> >> > depends="init, define-gxpc, gen-gxp-dep" unless="skip.gen-gxp"> >> > destdir="${gen.dir}/gxp" target="org.waveprotocol.box.server.gxp" >> /> >> >> 3) >> >> BUILD FAILED C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:120: >> Problem: failed to create task or type buildproto Cause: The name >> is undefined. Action: Check the spelling. Action: Check that any >> custom tasks/types have been declared. Action: Check that any >> / declarations have taken place. >> >> At that point I figured it best to report the issues here: >> >> Is there a procedure for building in eclipse, am I missing an ant >> setting somewhere? >> >> So, apart fromn the compile issue everything else looks good: >> >> signatures are good artifact/hashes good DISCLAIMER OK LICENCE OK >> NOTICE OK >> >> Cheers, >> >> Ian >> >> >> >> On 04/11/2015 07:14, Justin Mclean wrote: >> Hi, >> >> +1 binding. >> >> Could you please fix the LICENCE Appendix in the next >> release. The text should be "Copyright [] [name of >> copyright owner]” not "Copyright 2013 The Apache Software >> Foundation”. >> >> I checked: - artefact has incubating in name - signatures >> and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE has minor >> issue with the copyright in the appendix. Not required but >> it could also use the sort form in LICENSE [1] particularly >> as you bundle the software LICENSE files. - NOTICE good. - >> All source files have Apache headers - No unexpected binary >> file in source release (but see below) - can compile from >> source - test pass >> >> I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source >> release, I assume you have permission from the person who >> took them to use these? IF so you may want to put that in >> the LICENSE. >> >> There's a number of binary file without extensions in >> /thumbnail_patterns/ but they all look to be PNGs is this >> the case? Where did these images come from? >> >> I had a quick look at the binary release and the LICENCE >> and NOTICE appear comprehensive. I didn;t do a though >> check. I did notice that the year is incorrect in the >> NOTICE file and LICENSE appendix has the same issue. It’s >> actually wrong here as non ASF Apache licensed software is >> mentioned. There no need to mean Apache licensed software >> in the LICENCE but no harm is done by donning so. [2] >> >> Thanks, Justin >> >> 1. >> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps >> >> > 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep >> >> >> >> -- > - --- >> >> >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Hi Justin, Thanks for taking a look at the RC, we will fix these minor points for the next release. > I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source release, I assume you > have permission from the person who took them to use these? IF so you may > want to put that in the LICENSE. Are you referring to the screenshots under war/static/? Those are untouched since the migration from Google, so fall under the license from them. > There's a number of binary file without extensions in /thumbnail_patterns/ > but they all look to be PNGs is this the case? Where did these images come > from? These icons are from the Tango Desktop Project, which licenses them into the public domain, who are mentioned in THANKS. I can mention this explicitly in THANKS if preferable? Are there any other IPMC able to take a look at this release, as I don't seem to have enough votes yet? Regards, Ali - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Ian, Please bear in mind that this release vote is to validate the legal aspects of the release, not its technical merits. Technical merits can be resolved in subsequent releases. Upayavira On Fri, Nov 6, 2015, at 02:51 PM, Ian Dunlop wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hello, > > I'll give it at 0 the moment since I encountered a build issue. I > downloaded the src zip and imported the code into Eclipse Mars (4.50) > with jdk 1.7.0_79 & ANT 1.9.4 but found the following issues: > > 1) > BUILD FAILED > C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:28: Cannot find > C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\${build.classpath.path} imported > from C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml > > Resolved by commenting out > > > > > > > and tried again > > 2) > > BUILD FAILED > Target "define-gxpc" does not exist in the project "waveinabox". It is > used from target "gen-gxp". > > Resolved by removing define-gxpc from > > depends="init, define-gxpc, gen-gxp-dep" unless="skip.gen-gxp"> > destdir="${gen.dir}/gxp" > target="org.waveprotocol.box.server.gxp" /> > > > > 3) > > BUILD FAILED > C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:120: Problem: failed > to create task or type buildproto > Cause: The name is undefined. > Action: Check the spelling. > Action: Check that any custom tasks/types have been declared. > Action: Check that any / declarations have taken > place. > > At that point I figured it best to report the issues here: > > Is there a procedure for building in eclipse, am I missing an ant > setting somewhere? > > So, apart fromn the compile issue everything else looks good: > > signatures are good > artifact/hashes good > DISCLAIMER OK > LICENCE OK > NOTICE OK > > Cheers, > > Ian > > > > On 04/11/2015 07:14, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > > > +1 binding. > > > > Could you please fix the LICENCE Appendix in the next release. The > > text should be "Copyright [] [name of copyright owner]” not > > "Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation”. > > > > I checked: - artefact has incubating in name - signatures and > > hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE has minor issue with the > > copyright in the appendix. Not required but it could also use the > > sort form in LICENSE [1] particularly as you bundle the software > > LICENSE files. - NOTICE good. - All source files have Apache > > headers - No unexpected binary file in source release (but see > > below) - can compile from source - test pass > > > > I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source release, I > > assume you have permission from the person who took them to use > > these? IF so you may want to put that in the LICENSE. > > > > There's a number of binary file without extensions in > > /thumbnail_patterns/ but they all look to be PNGs is this the case? > > Where did these images come from? > > > > I had a quick look at the binary release and the LICENCE and NOTICE > > appear comprehensive. I didn;t do a though check. I did notice that > > the year is incorrect in the NOTICE file and LICENSE appendix has > > the same issue. It’s actually wrong here as non ASF Apache > > licensed software is mentioned. There no need to mean Apache > > licensed software in the LICENCE but no harm is done by donning so. > > [2] > > > > Thanks, Justin > > > > 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps > > 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep > > > > > > > > - > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > - -- > Ian Dunlop, eScience Lab > School of Computer Science > The University of Manchester > http://orcid.org/-0001-7066-3350 > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWPL6FAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5agYH/3yPH2vLCltvOqIZlv70TJ9R > EmdbRL6rvpJjcah+GH9BPpsYEeENXw5WTARH42RVZT4gFUz62GBIkZhhqFks0/qx > ubL+bekcivMI2P/eZ3T6S/mKw52d8esRaDvrMKaUZ3Ax3tdkYt/dPaYoXGxAMNS4 > 5IolSgvMaTT2qKlcx0fmCh+gdfmxHFo0ZTvZ55V9ucnmsvQY8orGqZt7SJ+jdySz > vp9AIvnxStMCorZ8tKSLDVo1H+ciQOXxCZWymFlAlm7nQAw5KoLQYMp/OBUrw6Lk > urdolruKU7YGgdwh5uV8WHi+cCfpIyQIRaIz8nFlXYTFx/VL8Dm7vrgFpcH1jyw= > =d5Aa > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Typically speaking, releases should compile. If there are steps required to make it compile they should be shared. On Nov 8, 2015 14:33, "Upayavira"wrote: > Ian, > > Please bear in mind that this release vote is to validate the legal > aspects of the release, not its technical merits. Technical merits can > be resolved in subsequent releases. > > Upayavira > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015, at 02:51 PM, Ian Dunlop wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > Hello, > > > > I'll give it at 0 the moment since I encountered a build issue. I > > downloaded the src zip and imported the code into Eclipse Mars (4.50) > > with jdk 1.7.0_79 & ANT 1.9.4 but found the following issues: > > > > 1) > > BUILD FAILED > > C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:28: Cannot find > > C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\${build.classpath.path} imported > > from C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml > > > > Resolved by commenting out > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and tried again > > > > 2) > > > > BUILD FAILED > > Target "define-gxpc" does not exist in the project "waveinabox". It is > > used from target "gen-gxp". > > > > Resolved by removing define-gxpc from > > > >> depends="init, define-gxpc, gen-gxp-dep" unless="skip.gen-gxp"> > > > destdir="${gen.dir}/gxp" > > target="org.waveprotocol.box.server.gxp" /> > > > > > > > > 3) > > > > BUILD FAILED > > C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:120: Problem: failed > > to create task or type buildproto > > Cause: The name is undefined. > > Action: Check the spelling. > > Action: Check that any custom tasks/types have been declared. > > Action: Check that any / declarations have taken > > place. > > > > At that point I figured it best to report the issues here: > > > > Is there a procedure for building in eclipse, am I missing an ant > > setting somewhere? > > > > So, apart fromn the compile issue everything else looks good: > > > > signatures are good > > artifact/hashes good > > DISCLAIMER OK > > LICENCE OK > > NOTICE OK > > > > Cheers, > > > > Ian > > > > > > > > On 04/11/2015 07:14, Justin Mclean wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > +1 binding. > > > > > > Could you please fix the LICENCE Appendix in the next release. The > > > text should be "Copyright [] [name of copyright owner]” not > > > "Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation”. > > > > > > I checked: - artefact has incubating in name - signatures and > > > hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE has minor issue with the > > > copyright in the appendix. Not required but it could also use the > > > sort form in LICENSE [1] particularly as you bundle the software > > > LICENSE files. - NOTICE good. - All source files have Apache > > > headers - No unexpected binary file in source release (but see > > > below) - can compile from source - test pass > > > > > > I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source release, I > > > assume you have permission from the person who took them to use > > > these? IF so you may want to put that in the LICENSE. > > > > > > There's a number of binary file without extensions in > > > /thumbnail_patterns/ but they all look to be PNGs is this the case? > > > Where did these images come from? > > > > > > I had a quick look at the binary release and the LICENCE and NOTICE > > > appear comprehensive. I didn;t do a though check. I did notice that > > > the year is incorrect in the NOTICE file and LICENSE appendix has > > > the same issue. It’s actually wrong here as non ASF Apache > > > licensed software is mentioned. There no need to mean Apache > > > licensed software in the LICENCE but no harm is done by donning so. > > > [2] > > > > > > Thanks, Justin > > > > > > 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps > > > 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > - -- > > Ian Dunlop, eScience Lab > > School of Computer Science > > The University of Manchester > > http://orcid.org/-0001-7066-3350 > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > > Version: GnuPG v2 > > > > iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWPL6FAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5agYH/3yPH2vLCltvOqIZlv70TJ9R > > EmdbRL6rvpJjcah+GH9BPpsYEeENXw5WTARH42RVZT4gFUz62GBIkZhhqFks0/qx > > ubL+bekcivMI2P/eZ3T6S/mKw52d8esRaDvrMKaUZ3Ax3tdkYt/dPaYoXGxAMNS4 > > 5IolSgvMaTT2qKlcx0fmCh+gdfmxHFo0ZTvZ55V9ucnmsvQY8orGqZt7SJ+jdySz > > vp9AIvnxStMCorZ8tKSLDVo1H+ciQOXxCZWymFlAlm7nQAw5KoLQYMp/OBUrw6Lk > > urdolruKU7YGgdwh5uV8WHi+cCfpIyQIRaIz8nFlXYTFx/VL8Dm7vrgFpcH1jyw= > > =d5Aa > > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail:
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Hi Ian, I am not sure about the best way to import this into eclipse, I have always used the CLI tools directly. I have CC'd the dev-list in case they have a better answer for you. The inability to find ${build.classpath.path}, ${build.macros.path} suggests that you are missing/failed-to-import/failed-to-reference the build.properties file which contains the values for these macros. The follow-up problem about missing define-gxpc is to be expected because of the above problem resulting in it not importing build-macros.xml, which defines "define-gxpc" amongst other things. Ali On 6 November 2015 at 14:51, Ian Dunlopwrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hello, > > I'll give it at 0 the moment since I encountered a build issue. I > downloaded the src zip and imported the code into Eclipse Mars (4.50) > with jdk 1.7.0_79 & ANT 1.9.4 but found the following issues: > > 1) > BUILD FAILED > C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:28: Cannot find > C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\${build.classpath.path} imported > from C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml > > Resolved by commenting out > > > > > > > and tried again > > 2) > > BUILD FAILED > Target "define-gxpc" does not exist in the project "waveinabox". It is > used from target "gen-gxp". > > Resolved by removing define-gxpc from > > depends="init, define-gxpc, gen-gxp-dep" unless="skip.gen-gxp"> > destdir="${gen.dir}/gxp" > target="org.waveprotocol.box.server.gxp" /> > > > > 3) > > BUILD FAILED > C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:120: Problem: failed > to create task or type buildproto > Cause: The name is undefined. > Action: Check the spelling. > Action: Check that any custom tasks/types have been declared. > Action: Check that any / declarations have taken > place. > > At that point I figured it best to report the issues here: > > Is there a procedure for building in eclipse, am I missing an ant > setting somewhere? > > So, apart fromn the compile issue everything else looks good: > > signatures are good > artifact/hashes good > DISCLAIMER OK > LICENCE OK > NOTICE OK > > Cheers, > > Ian > > > > On 04/11/2015 07:14, Justin Mclean wrote: >> Hi, >> >> +1 binding. >> >> Could you please fix the LICENCE Appendix in the next release. The >> text should be "Copyright [] [name of copyright owner]” not >> "Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation”. >> >> I checked: - artefact has incubating in name - signatures and >> hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE has minor issue with the >> copyright in the appendix. Not required but it could also use the >> sort form in LICENSE [1] particularly as you bundle the software >> LICENSE files. - NOTICE good. - All source files have Apache >> headers - No unexpected binary file in source release (but see >> below) - can compile from source - test pass >> >> I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source release, I >> assume you have permission from the person who took them to use >> these? IF so you may want to put that in the LICENSE. >> >> There's a number of binary file without extensions in >> /thumbnail_patterns/ but they all look to be PNGs is this the case? >> Where did these images come from? >> >> I had a quick look at the binary release and the LICENCE and NOTICE >> appear comprehensive. I didn;t do a though check. I did notice that >> the year is incorrect in the NOTICE file and LICENSE appendix has >> the same issue. It’s actually wrong here as non ASF Apache >> licensed software is mentioned. There no need to mean Apache >> licensed software in the LICENCE but no harm is done by donning so. >> [2] >> >> Thanks, Justin >> >> 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps >> 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep >> >> >> >> - >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > - -- > Ian Dunlop, eScience Lab > School of Computer Science > The University of Manchester > http://orcid.org/-0001-7066-3350 > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWPL6FAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5agYH/3yPH2vLCltvOqIZlv70TJ9R > EmdbRL6rvpJjcah+GH9BPpsYEeENXw5WTARH42RVZT4gFUz62GBIkZhhqFks0/qx > ubL+bekcivMI2P/eZ3T6S/mKw52d8esRaDvrMKaUZ3Ax3tdkYt/dPaYoXGxAMNS4 > 5IolSgvMaTT2qKlcx0fmCh+gdfmxHFo0ZTvZ55V9ucnmsvQY8orGqZt7SJ+jdySz > vp9AIvnxStMCorZ8tKSLDVo1H+ciQOXxCZWymFlAlm7nQAw5KoLQYMp/OBUrw6Lk > urdolruKU7YGgdwh5uV8WHi+cCfpIyQIRaIz8nFlXYTFx/VL8Dm7vrgFpcH1jyw= > =d5Aa > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, I'll give it at 0 the moment since I encountered a build issue. I downloaded the src zip and imported the code into Eclipse Mars (4.50) with jdk 1.7.0_79 & ANT 1.9.4 but found the following issues: 1) BUILD FAILED C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:28: Cannot find C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\${build.classpath.path} imported from C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml Resolved by commenting out and tried again 2) BUILD FAILED Target "define-gxpc" does not exist in the project "waveinabox". It is used from target "gen-gxp". Resolved by removing define-gxpc from 3) BUILD FAILED C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:120: Problem: failed to create task or type buildproto Cause: The name is undefined. Action: Check the spelling. Action: Check that any custom tasks/types have been declared. Action: Check that any / declarations have taken place. At that point I figured it best to report the issues here: Is there a procedure for building in eclipse, am I missing an ant setting somewhere? So, apart fromn the compile issue everything else looks good: signatures are good artifact/hashes good DISCLAIMER OK LICENCE OK NOTICE OK Cheers, Ian On 04/11/2015 07:14, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding. > > Could you please fix the LICENCE Appendix in the next release. The > text should be "Copyright [] [name of copyright owner]” not > "Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation”. > > I checked: - artefact has incubating in name - signatures and > hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE has minor issue with the > copyright in the appendix. Not required but it could also use the > sort form in LICENSE [1] particularly as you bundle the software > LICENSE files. - NOTICE good. - All source files have Apache > headers - No unexpected binary file in source release (but see > below) - can compile from source - test pass > > I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source release, I > assume you have permission from the person who took them to use > these? IF so you may want to put that in the LICENSE. > > There's a number of binary file without extensions in > /thumbnail_patterns/ but they all look to be PNGs is this the case? > Where did these images come from? > > I had a quick look at the binary release and the LICENCE and NOTICE > appear comprehensive. I didn;t do a though check. I did notice that > the year is incorrect in the NOTICE file and LICENSE appendix has > the same issue. It’s actually wrong here as non ASF Apache > licensed software is mentioned. There no need to mean Apache > licensed software in the LICENCE but no harm is done by donning so. > [2] > > Thanks, Justin > > 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps > 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - -- Ian Dunlop, eScience Lab School of Computer Science The University of Manchester http://orcid.org/-0001-7066-3350 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWPL6FAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5agYH/3yPH2vLCltvOqIZlv70TJ9R EmdbRL6rvpJjcah+GH9BPpsYEeENXw5WTARH42RVZT4gFUz62GBIkZhhqFks0/qx ubL+bekcivMI2P/eZ3T6S/mKw52d8esRaDvrMKaUZ3Ax3tdkYt/dPaYoXGxAMNS4 5IolSgvMaTT2qKlcx0fmCh+gdfmxHFo0ZTvZ55V9ucnmsvQY8orGqZt7SJ+jdySz vp9AIvnxStMCorZ8tKSLDVo1H+ciQOXxCZWymFlAlm7nQAw5KoLQYMp/OBUrw6Lk urdolruKU7YGgdwh5uV8WHi+cCfpIyQIRaIz8nFlXYTFx/VL8Dm7vrgFpcH1jyw= =d5Aa -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Hi, +1 binding. Could you please fix the LICENCE Appendix in the next release. The text should be "Copyright [] [name of copyright owner]” not "Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation”. I checked: - artefact has incubating in name - signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE has minor issue with the copyright in the appendix. Not required but it could also use the sort form in LICENSE [1] particularly as you bundle the software LICENSE files. - NOTICE good. - All source files have Apache headers - No unexpected binary file in source release (but see below) - can compile from source - test pass I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source release, I assume you have permission from the person who took them to use these? IF so you may want to put that in the LICENSE. There's a number of binary file without extensions in /thumbnail_patterns/ but they all look to be PNGs is this the case? Where did these images come from? I had a quick look at the binary release and the LICENCE and NOTICE appear comprehensive. I didn;t do a though check. I did notice that the year is incorrect in the NOTICE file and LICENSE appendix has the same issue. It’s actually wrong here as non ASF Apache licensed software is mentioned. There no need to mean Apache licensed software in the LICENCE but no harm is done by donning so. [2] Thanks, Justin 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Hi, Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to make its first release since joining the incubator in 2010. The Wave PPMC has voted in favour with 6 binding votes, and 4 non-binding votes from the community. PPMC vote call: https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCABRGrVdhdhhdRMwJ9jsWxzqMX9ijzgG%3Di5BF1YJBAZ2juYFORg%40mail.gmail.com%3E PPMC vote result (second result after a slow start for the first attempt): https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E Staging directory: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/ Please note that - checksums are generated from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha' - .zip versions are generated from the .tar.bz2 version by repacking - binary artifacts are provided for convenience of the end-user, the vote is primarily regarding the source artifacts Git branch: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-rc10 KEYS file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/KEYS Please verify the release and vote. This vote will close after 72 hours on 6th November. [] +1: I approve [] -1: I disapprove because... Please add (binding) if your vote is binding. Thanks, Ali - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org