Re: RAT issues [was: Re: [VOTE] JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating]

[Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez]

Hi,

comments inline

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:

>
> On Oct 8, 2012, at 3:59 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
>
>  Hello,
>>
>> We've added support to generate RAT files (RAT report for RC3 available at
>> [#1]) and began to play with it, via rat-ant-tasks [#2]. As noted in
>> previous e-mails, all the JSP files lack of a proper header. So, a couple
>> of questions:
>>
>> - we pass the addLicenseHeaders argument to the report task. A lot of .new
>> files get generated with the appropiate header, but none of them
>> correspond
>> to JSPs files. On the other hand the RAT report detects the missing header
>> in the JSP files. Is there any way to enforce the process for JSP files?
>>
>
> I'm not clear what you are saying here. If the rat addLicenseHeaders does
> not create .jsp files with the appropriate header, you may need to manually
> edit the .jsp files.


yep, I was wondering if there was some flag to create this files, as other
types of files are created automatically. It was like 1:00am and it seems
my brain refused to continue looking at this. A little bit of sed usage
should do the trick anyways, so this should be easily done.


>
>
>> - we also have some .js files which come with their license header (i.e.:
>> mootools.js). RAT detects them as their header doesn't conform with AL
>> Header. In this case I assume we should ignore this files, is that ok?
>>
>
> If you review all of the files that have their own license header, you can
> then notate them. What rat does is report non-conforming files of all types.
>
> Any files that are licensed under a non-Apache license need to be called
> out in the NOTICE and/or LICENSE files. There are many examples of such
> files in other projects. If you give specific file names, I can help you
> with what needs to be done to include them.
>

These js libraries are noted in [LICENSE | NOTICE] so I'll exclude them
from RAT analysis.


>
> Craig
>
>>
>> We've also made java files conform strictly with AL header, so the headers
>> issue should be solved once we get rid of the two points noted above.
>>
>>
>> thx in advance,
>> juan pablo
>>
>> [#1]: http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/rat_2.9.0_rc3.txt
>> [#2]: http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-tasks/report.html
>>
>>
thx for the tips :-)


br,
juan pablo

Re: RAT issues [was: Re: [VOTE] JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating]

[Craig L Russell]

On Oct 8, 2012, at 3:59 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:


Hello,

We've added support to generate RAT files (RAT report for RC3  
available at

[#1]) and began to play with it, via rat-ant-tasks [#2]. As noted in
previous e-mails, all the JSP files lack of a proper header. So, a  
couple

of questions:

- we pass the addLicenseHeaders argument to the report task. A lot  
of .new
files get generated with the appropiate header, but none of them  
correspond
to JSPs files. On the other hand the RAT report detects the missing  
header
in the JSP files. Is there any way to enforce the process for JSP  
files?


I'm not clear what you are saying here. If the rat addLicenseHeaders  
does not create .jsp files with the appropriate header, you may need  
to manually edit the .jsp files.


- we also have some .js files which come with their license header  
(i.e.:

mootools.js). RAT detects them as their header doesn't conform with AL
Header. In this case I assume we should ignore this files, is that ok?


If you review all of the files that have their own license header, you  
can then notate them. What rat does is report non-conforming files of  
all types.


Any files that are licensed under a non-Apache license need to be  
called out in the NOTICE and/or LICENSE files. There are many examples  
of such files in other projects. If you give specific file names, I  
can help you with what needs to be done to include them.


Craig


We've also made java files conform strictly with AL header, so the  
headers

issue should be solved once we get rid of the two points noted above.


thx in advance,
juan pablo

[#1]: http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/rat_2.9.0_rc3.txt
[#2]: http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-tasks/report.html

On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Craig L Russell
wrote:


Hi Christian,

Thanks for the review of the release.


On Oct 7, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:

Hello,


i'm sorry to -1 your release :-(

Please see:
http://www.apache.org/legal/**src-headers.html#headers




This is a very important document to read and understand. The jspwiki
headers are non-standard and should be rewritten to conform. In  
particular,
there should be no extraneous verbiage before the "Licensed to..."  
text. No

copyright, no other information.



I have found a lot of code like in the the src package
/src/webdocs/Captcha.jsp
which are missing header licenses. I saw it is in the .java files,  
but

they should be basically in every file we release (including jsp)



I agree, .jsp files need the Apache license header just as .java  
files do.




Also export.sh misses headers.

In the headers of the .java files is: JSPWiki - a JSP-based WikiWiki
clone.
Not sure if this is a blocker, but you should use the full name
"Apache JSPWiki" instead of only "JSPWiki". Personally I would get  
rid

of this line actually, but i think it is up to you.



Getting rid of the line is probably the easiest way to conform.



Example:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/**
jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc3/**src/org/apache/catalina/util/**
HexUtils.java


I have not tested signatures yet.

In other projects sometimes the website is being voted on together
with the releases. Is it not the case with JSPWiki?



I don't know that I've ever voted on a web site release. Other  
projects

just update the web site as needed, with no vote.


On another note, I agree with Ross. Your mentors should have told  
you

that and they should have voted already.



This first release has been a long time coming, and I was  
distracted the

last couple of weeks.

I agree that the mentors should review the release and advise of  
remedial

action.

I'd like to see a rat report on the release. I believe that  
analysis of

the rat report will reinforce the comments that Christian and I made.

Regards,

Craig



Not sure if how the overall

situation on your daily project life is. If you feel that you would
need more mentor support, please write a separate e-mail to this  
list.
I have only looked at this e-mail as it was open for a couple of  
days

without much responses.

Best regards,
Christian

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
 wrote:


Hi,

This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as  
Apache

JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating.
This will be our first release. A vote was held on the developer  
mailing

list (http://s.apache.org/dzM) and
passed with 10 +1s (* denoting PPMC):

Janne Jalkannen*
Florian Holeczek*
Harry Metske*
Andrew Jaquith*
Dirk Frederickx*
Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez*
Fabian Haupt
Michael Gerzabek
Christophe Dupriez
Roberto Venturi

We need at least 3 IPMC votes.

This release fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/**jira/secure/ReleaseNote.j

RAT issues [was: Re: [VOTE] JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating]

[Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez]

Hello,

We've added support to generate RAT files (RAT report for RC3 available at
[#1]) and began to play with it, via rat-ant-tasks [#2]. As noted in
previous e-mails, all the JSP files lack of a proper header. So, a couple
of questions:

- we pass the addLicenseHeaders argument to the report task. A lot of .new
files get generated with the appropiate header, but none of them correspond
to JSPs files. On the other hand the RAT report detects the missing header
in the JSP files. Is there any way to enforce the process for JSP files?

- we also have some .js files which come with their license header (i.e.:
mootools.js). RAT detects them as their header doesn't conform with AL
Header. In this case I assume we should ignore this files, is that ok?

We've also made java files conform strictly with AL header, so the headers
issue should be solved once we get rid of the two points noted above.


thx in advance,
juan pablo

[#1]: http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/rat_2.9.0_rc3.txt
[#2]: http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-tasks/report.html

On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Craig L Russell
wrote:

> Hi Christian,
>
> Thanks for the review of the release.
>
>
> On Oct 7, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>  Hello,
>>
>> i'm sorry to -1 your release :-(
>>
>> Please see:
>> http://www.apache.org/legal/**src-headers.html#headers
>>
>
> This is a very important document to read and understand. The jspwiki
> headers are non-standard and should be rewritten to conform. In particular,
> there should be no extraneous verbiage before the "Licensed to..." text. No
> copyright, no other information.
>
>
>> I have found a lot of code like in the the src package
>> /src/webdocs/Captcha.jsp
>> which are missing header licenses. I saw it is in the .java files, but
>> they should be basically in every file we release (including jsp)
>>
>
> I agree, .jsp files need the Apache license header just as .java files do.
>
>
>> Also export.sh misses headers.
>>
>> In the headers of the .java files is: JSPWiki - a JSP-based WikiWiki
>> clone.
>> Not sure if this is a blocker, but you should use the full name
>> "Apache JSPWiki" instead of only "JSPWiki". Personally I would get rid
>> of this line actually, but i think it is up to you.
>>
>
> Getting rid of the line is probably the easiest way to conform.
>
>
>> Example:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/**
>> jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc3/**src/org/apache/catalina/util/**
>> HexUtils.java
>>
>> I have not tested signatures yet.
>>
>> In other projects sometimes the website is being voted on together
>> with the releases. Is it not the case with JSPWiki?
>>
>
> I don't know that I've ever voted on a web site release. Other projects
> just update the web site as needed, with no vote.
>
>
>> On another note, I agree with Ross. Your mentors should have told you
>> that and they should have voted already.
>>
>
> This first release has been a long time coming, and I was distracted the
> last couple of weeks.
>
> I agree that the mentors should review the release and advise of remedial
> action.
>
> I'd like to see a rat report on the release. I believe that analysis of
> the rat report will reinforce the comments that Christian and I made.
>
> Regards,
>
> Craig
>
>
>
>  Not sure if how the overall
>> situation on your daily project life is. If you feel that you would
>> need more mentor support, please write a separate e-mail to this list.
>> I have only looked at this e-mail as it was open for a couple of days
>> without much responses.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Christian
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
>>  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
>>> JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating.
>>> This will be our first release. A vote was held on the developer mailing
>>> list (http://s.apache.org/dzM) and
>>> passed with 10 +1s (* denoting PPMC):
>>>
>>> Janne Jalkannen*
>>> Florian Holeczek*
>>> Harry Metske*
>>> Andrew Jaquith*
>>> Dirk Frederickx*
>>> Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez*
>>> Fabian Haupt
>>> Michael Gerzabek
>>> Christophe Dupriez
>>> Roberto Venturi
>>>
>>> We need at least 3 IPMC votes.
>>>
>>> This release fixes the following issues:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?**
>>> projectId=12310732&version=**12319521
>>>
>>> Source and binary files:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~**jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/
>>>
>>> The tag to be voted upon:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/**
>>> jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc3

Re: [VOTE] JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating

[Florian Holeczek]

Christian and Craig,

thank you very much for having a look at the RC and pointing out these issues. 
We'll fix these asap.

Regards
 Florian

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating

[Christian Grobmeier]

On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Craig L Russell
 wrote:
>> In other projects sometimes the website is being voted on together
>> with the releases. Is it not the case with JSPWiki?
>
> I don't know that I've ever voted on a web site release. Other projects just
> update the web site as needed, with no vote.

Yes, it might be that it is a "speciality" of the projects I work with
(Commons for example always sends a website link with the vote,
Logging does it too.)

>> On another note, I agree with Ross. Your mentors should have told you
>> that and they should have voted already.
>
> This first release has been a long time coming, and I was distracted the
> last couple of weeks.
>
> I agree that the mentors should review the release and advise of remedial
> action.

Rereading my sentence, I hope it didn't sound to harsh. If so, I
apologize for my tune.

> I'd like to see a rat report on the release. I believe that analysis of the
> rat report will reinforce the comments that Christian and I made.

Yes! :-) I wanted to add this in my e-mail, but forgot it. Thanks for
brining it up again.

Cheers
Christian

>
> Regards,
>
> Craig
>
>
>> Not sure if how the overall
>> situation on your daily project life is. If you feel that you would
>> need more mentor support, please write a separate e-mail to this list.
>> I have only looked at this e-mail as it was open for a couple of days
>> without much responses.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Christian
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
>>> JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating.
>>> This will be our first release. A vote was held on the developer mailing
>>> list (http://s.apache.org/dzM) and
>>> passed with 10 +1s (* denoting PPMC):
>>>
>>> Janne Jalkannen*
>>> Florian Holeczek*
>>> Harry Metske*
>>> Andrew Jaquith*
>>> Dirk Frederickx*
>>> Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez*
>>> Fabian Haupt
>>> Michael Gerzabek
>>> Christophe Dupriez
>>> Roberto Venturi
>>>
>>> We need at least 3 IPMC votes.
>>>
>>> This release fixes the following issues:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732&version=12319521
>>>
>>> Source and binary files:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/
>>>
>>> The tag to be voted upon:
>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc3
>>>
>>> JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS
>>>
>>>
>>> Please download, test, and vote by 72 hours from now.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> juan pablo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Oracle
> http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>



-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating

[Craig L Russell]

Hi Christian,

Thanks for the review of the release.

On Oct 7, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:


Hello,

i'm sorry to -1 your release :-(

Please see:
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers


This is a very important document to read and understand. The jspwiki  
headers are non-standard and should be rewritten to conform. In  
particular, there should be no extraneous verbiage before the  
"Licensed to..." text. No copyright, no other information.


I have found a lot of code like in the the src package /src/webdocs/ 
Captcha.jsp

which are missing header licenses. I saw it is in the .java files, but
they should be basically in every file we release (including jsp)


I agree, .jsp files need the Apache license header just as .java files  
do.


Also export.sh misses headers.

In the headers of the .java files is: JSPWiki - a JSP-based WikiWiki  
clone.

Not sure if this is a blocker, but you should use the full name
"Apache JSPWiki" instead of only "JSPWiki". Personally I would get rid
of this line actually, but i think it is up to you.


Getting rid of the line is probably the easiest way to conform.


Example:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc3/src/org/apache/catalina/util/HexUtils.java

I have not tested signatures yet.

In other projects sometimes the website is being voted on together
with the releases. Is it not the case with JSPWiki?


I don't know that I've ever voted on a web site release. Other  
projects just update the web site as needed, with no vote.


On another note, I agree with Ross. Your mentors should have told you
that and they should have voted already.


This first release has been a long time coming, and I was distracted  
the last couple of weeks.


I agree that the mentors should review the release and advise of  
remedial action.


I'd like to see a rat report on the release. I believe that analysis  
of the rat report will reinforce the comments that Christian and I made.


Regards,

Craig



Not sure if how the overall
situation on your daily project life is. If you feel that you would
need more mentor support, please write a separate e-mail to this list.
I have only looked at this e-mail as it was open for a couple of days
without much responses.

Best regards,
Christian

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
 wrote:

Hi,

This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as  
Apache

JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating.
This will be our first release. A vote was held on the developer  
mailing

list (http://s.apache.org/dzM) and
passed with 10 +1s (* denoting PPMC):

Janne Jalkannen*
Florian Holeczek*
Harry Metske*
Andrew Jaquith*
Dirk Frederickx*
Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez*
Fabian Haupt
Michael Gerzabek
Christophe Dupriez
Roberto Venturi

We need at least 3 IPMC votes.

This release fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732&version=12319521

Source and binary files:
http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/

The tag to be voted upon:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc3

JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS


Please download, test, and vote by 72 hours from now.

[ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)


Thanks,
juan pablo




--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating

[Christian Grobmeier]

Hello,

i'm sorry to -1 your release :-(

Please see:
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers

I have found a lot of code like in the the src package /src/webdocs/Captcha.jsp
which are missing header licenses. I saw it is in the .java files, but
they should be basically in every file we release (including jsp)

Also export.sh misses headers.

In the headers of the .java files is: JSPWiki - a JSP-based WikiWiki clone.
Not sure if this is a blocker, but you should use the full name
"Apache JSPWiki" instead of only "JSPWiki". Personally I would get rid
of this line actually, but i think it is up to you.

Example:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc3/src/org/apache/catalina/util/HexUtils.java

I have not tested signatures yet.

In other projects sometimes the website is being voted on together
with the releases. Is it not the case with JSPWiki?

On another note, I agree with Ross. Your mentors should have told you
that and they should have voted already. Not sure if how the overall
situation on your daily project life is. If you feel that you would
need more mentor support, please write a separate e-mail to this list.
I have only looked at this e-mail as it was open for a couple of days
without much responses.

Best regards,
Christian

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating.
> This will be our first release. A vote was held on the developer mailing
> list (http://s.apache.org/dzM) and
> passed with 10 +1s (* denoting PPMC):
>
> Janne Jalkannen*
> Florian Holeczek*
> Harry Metske*
> Andrew Jaquith*
> Dirk Frederickx*
> Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez*
> Fabian Haupt
> Michael Gerzabek
> Christophe Dupriez
> Roberto Venturi
>
> We need at least 3 IPMC votes.
>
> This release fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732&version=12319521
>
> Source and binary files:
> http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/
>
> The tag to be voted upon:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc3
>
> JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS
>
>
> Please download, test, and vote by 72 hours from now.
>
> [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Thanks,
> juan pablo



-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating

[Florian Holeczek]

Hi Ross,

> To do an IP review, which is what's required for release vote, it is time
> consuming. That being said, you mentors should be stepping. Seems like you
> need some more mentors.

thanks for pointing out.
I guess the thread at [1] contains all information needed for the IP review, in 
particular [2], [3] and [4].
Regarding mentors' action on the IP clearance, see [5].

Regards
 Florian

[1] http://incubator.markmail.org/message/vd7vahs6izauvlhx
[2] http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/ApacheRelicensing
[3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-544
[4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-546
[5] http://incubator.markmail.org/message/3vnokdivm63suvok

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating

[Ross Gardler]

To do an IP review, which is what's required for release vote, it is time
consuming. That being said, you mentors should be stepping. Seems like you
need some more mentors.

Sent from my tablet
On Oct 7, 2012 8:10 AM, "Florian Holeczek"  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> the call is open for over a week now, and we still need at least 2 IPMC
> votes.
>
> Come on, it's not that difficult or time-consuming to have a look at
> JSPWiki, even if you've never been using it before. All you need is an
> environment with Subversion, Ant and a JDK (and for giving it a try, a
> servlet container like Tomcat) - quite a small hurdle.
>
> Thanks and Regards
>  Florian
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating

[Florian Holeczek]

Hi all,

the call is open for over a week now, and we still need at least 2 IPMC votes.

Come on, it's not that difficult or time-consuming to have a look at JSPWiki, 
even if you've never been using it before. All you need is an environment with 
Subversion, Ant and a JDK (and for giving it a try, a servlet container like 
Tomcat) - quite a small hurdle.

Thanks and Regards
 Florian

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating

[Benson Margulies]

+1 (IPMC member)

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
 wrote:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating

[Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez]

cool, thanks :-)

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:

> I will do an exam this evening when I get where I'm going.
>
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
>  wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > we have to submit our IPMC Board report this month, and it would be real
> > nice if
> > we could say that we have enough (or at least some, ongoing) IPMC votes.
> >
> > can somebody take a look at this?
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> >
> > br,
> > juan pablo
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Florian Holeczek  >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >> just want to remind you of the ongoing vote...
> >>
> >> Best regards
> >>  Florian Holeczek
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 27.09.2012 20:11, schrieb Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as
> Apache
> >> > JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating.
> >> > This will be our first release. A vote was held on the developer
> mailing
> >> > list (http://s.apache.org/dzM) and
> >> > passed with 10 +1s (* denoting PPMC):
> >> >
> >> > Janne Jalkannen*
> >> > Florian Holeczek*
> >> > Harry Metske*
> >> > Andrew Jaquith*
> >> > Dirk Frederickx*
> >> > Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez*
> >> > Fabian Haupt
> >> > Michael Gerzabek
> >> > Christophe Dupriez
> >> > Roberto Venturi
> >> >
> >> > We need at least 3 IPMC votes.
> >> >
> >> > This release fixes the following issues:
> >> >
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732&version=12319521
> >> >
> >> > Source and binary files:
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/
> >> >
> >> > The tag to be voted upon:
> >> >
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc3
> >> >
> >> > JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> >> > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Please download, test, and vote by 72 hours from now.
> >> >
> >> > [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > juan pablo
> >> >
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating

[Benson Margulies]

I will do an exam this evening when I get where I'm going.

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
 wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> we have to submit our IPMC Board report this month, and it would be real
> nice if
> we could say that we have enough (or at least some, ongoing) IPMC votes.
>
> can somebody take a look at this?
>
> thanks!
>
>
> br,
> juan pablo
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Florian Holeczek wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> just want to remind you of the ongoing vote...
>>
>> Best regards
>>  Florian Holeczek
>>
>>
>> Am 27.09.2012 20:11, schrieb Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
>> > JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating.
>> > This will be our first release. A vote was held on the developer mailing
>> > list (http://s.apache.org/dzM) and
>> > passed with 10 +1s (* denoting PPMC):
>> >
>> > Janne Jalkannen*
>> > Florian Holeczek*
>> > Harry Metske*
>> > Andrew Jaquith*
>> > Dirk Frederickx*
>> > Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez*
>> > Fabian Haupt
>> > Michael Gerzabek
>> > Christophe Dupriez
>> > Roberto Venturi
>> >
>> > We need at least 3 IPMC votes.
>> >
>> > This release fixes the following issues:
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732&version=12319521
>> >
>> > Source and binary files:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/
>> >
>> > The tag to be voted upon:
>> >
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc3
>> >
>> > JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>> > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS
>> >
>> >
>> > Please download, test, and vote by 72 hours from now.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > juan pablo
>> >
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating

[Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez]

Hi again,

we have to submit our IPMC Board report this month, and it would be real
nice if
we could say that we have enough (or at least some, ongoing) IPMC votes.

can somebody take a look at this?

thanks!


br,
juan pablo


On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Florian Holeczek wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> just want to remind you of the ongoing vote...
>
> Best regards
>  Florian Holeczek
>
>
> Am 27.09.2012 20:11, schrieb Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> > JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating.
> > This will be our first release. A vote was held on the developer mailing
> > list (http://s.apache.org/dzM) and
> > passed with 10 +1s (* denoting PPMC):
> >
> > Janne Jalkannen*
> > Florian Holeczek*
> > Harry Metske*
> > Andrew Jaquith*
> > Dirk Frederickx*
> > Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez*
> > Fabian Haupt
> > Michael Gerzabek
> > Christophe Dupriez
> > Roberto Venturi
> >
> > We need at least 3 IPMC votes.
> >
> > This release fixes the following issues:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732&version=12319521
> >
> > Source and binary files:
> > http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/
> >
> > The tag to be voted upon:
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc3
> >
> > JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS
> >
> >
> > Please download, test, and vote by 72 hours from now.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > juan pablo
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating

[Florian Holeczek]

Hi folks,

just want to remind you of the ongoing vote...

Best regards
 Florian Holeczek


Am 27.09.2012 20:11, schrieb Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez:
> Hi,
> 
> This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating.
> This will be our first release. A vote was held on the developer mailing
> list (http://s.apache.org/dzM) and
> passed with 10 +1s (* denoting PPMC):
> 
> Janne Jalkannen*
> Florian Holeczek*
> Harry Metske*
> Andrew Jaquith*
> Dirk Frederickx*
> Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez*
> Fabian Haupt
> Michael Gerzabek
> Christophe Dupriez
> Roberto Venturi
> 
> We need at least 3 IPMC votes.
> 
> This release fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732&version=12319521
> 
> Source and binary files:
> http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/
> 
> The tag to be voted upon:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc3
> 
> JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS
> 
> 
> Please download, test, and vote by 72 hours from now.
> 
> [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> juan pablo
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating

[Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez]

Hi,

This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating.
This will be our first release. A vote was held on the developer mailing
list (http://s.apache.org/dzM) and
passed with 10 +1s (* denoting PPMC):

Janne Jalkannen*
Florian Holeczek*
Harry Metske*
Andrew Jaquith*
Dirk Frederickx*
Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez*
Fabian Haupt
Michael Gerzabek
Christophe Dupriez
Roberto Venturi

We need at least 3 IPMC votes.

This release fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732&version=12319521

Source and binary files:
http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/

The tag to be voted upon:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating_rc3

JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS


Please download, test, and vote by 72 hours from now.

[ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)


Thanks,
juan pablo