Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating (2nd RC)
Hi all, the current tally, right now, is: +1 binding from Ant Elder (IPMC) +1 binding from Siegfried Goeschl (Mentor) +5 non binding from PPMC (all votes casted on jspwiki-dev@i.a.o) We still need one more +1 binding vote to be able to release, so we'd be most grateful if someone could take a look at it. thx in advance! br, juan pablo On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ant, thanks for the vote :-) Regarding the NOTICE file, specifically which comments? Right now has 4 entries, being the reasons behind each one: - fckconfig.js entry: published under MPL 2.0, so it requires to be in NOTICE - Portions of this code donated by BaseN Corporation. entry: legal's advice [#1] was to keep this entry in NOTICE - SilkIconSet entry: published under Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License, which in section 4.b states If you distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform the Work or any Derivative Works or Collective Works, You must keep intact all copyright notices [...] - Slimbox: published under MIT license so shouldn't be there, as pointed in [#2]. However, as it's been modified, I thought of it as a derivative work and, it fell under section 4.d of the AL You may add Your own attribution notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed as modifying the License. Please note that I'm not saying they *should* be there, only why they are there. If there's anything wrong on that file we'll correct it ASAP (btw, a handy way to check if other projects are including specifics entries in NOTICE files for 3rd party libraries is to search for an specific dependency at [#4] and then checking the svn's NOTICE file of the projects using it) Regarding the missing DISCLAIMER, our distribution target didn't catch it. It's already fixed on trunk, although our plan is release 2.9.1 in order to start graduation discuss soon thereafter. @general: aside from Ant's vote, we've got another couple of votes at jspwiki-dev, so the tally right now is 5PPMC +1 votes, 1 +1 IPMC vote br, juan pablo [#1]: http://s.apache.org/7Hs [#2]: http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps [#3]: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html#redistribution [#4]: https://analysis.apache.org/dependencies/index On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:15 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: Hi JSPWiki, I'm from the Incubator PMC and looking at your release. I give it a +1. There are a couple of nits. One is that it looks like the Incubation DISCLAIMER text is missing from the binary zip. It is there in the source artifact and tag though and we've let releases go with these missing before so i don't think this is a blocker, fix it next time, or better, graduate from the Incubator now so its not needed next time. The NOTICE file still has some comments that probably aren't needed there and they could be moved somewhere else like the README. Again many Incubator releases have similar issues so i don't think that should be a blocker and i can help you get that updated for the next release. ...ant On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, We've held a vote on jspwiki-dev for a 2nd RC of Apache JSPWiki 2.9.1-incubating [#1]. The vote on release candidate has been open for more than 72 hours on the developer mailing list. After the voting timeframe, we have 3 non-binding votes (from jspwiki developers). I'd therefore like to ask now the general incubator to check our release candidate. The release notes (fixed issues) are available at the Jira Issue Tracker [#2]. Please find attached below the concrete details on the release and on the vote. thanks in advance, juan pablo [#1] http://s.apache.org/UDD [#2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732version=12321249 === Note that we are voting upon the source (subversion tag and signed artifacts). Binaries are provided for convenience only. The tag to be voted upon: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_1_incubating_rc2 Source and binary files, with RAT report: http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/releases/2.9.1-incubating-4-rc2/ Checksums: JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-4-bin.zip MD5:58b7e2fd9290612762825683e81ca22d SHA1: 5eb4cfa7c7b00e2a002573c72f1e83c15f708e2b SHA512: 0e1487d09044e0ce900194b42ff3e465ee96ebde1a75c0603715ec42bbf425b950c901bff87bbadf43173d3c91ced170ab0eebe4525706344642e68db069ba18 JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-4-src.zip MD5:707b52ce9ca32fe012bcc3b1a79d8f96 SHA1: 41619359a04d49a2f5b58b8ba1a5d0c186fbbb1c SHA512:
Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating (2nd RC)
Looks good. +1 Craig On May 13, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: Hi all, the current tally, right now, is: +1 binding from Ant Elder (IPMC) +1 binding from Siegfried Goeschl (Mentor) +5 non binding from PPMC (all votes casted on jspwiki-dev@i.a.o) We still need one more +1 binding vote to be able to release, so we'd be most grateful if someone could take a look at it. thx in advance! br, juan pablo On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ant, thanks for the vote :-) Regarding the NOTICE file, specifically which comments? Right now has 4 entries, being the reasons behind each one: - fckconfig.js entry: published under MPL 2.0, so it requires to be in NOTICE - Portions of this code donated by BaseN Corporation. entry: legal's advice [#1] was to keep this entry in NOTICE - SilkIconSet entry: published under Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License, which in section 4.b states If you distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform the Work or any Derivative Works or Collective Works, You must keep intact all copyright notices [...] - Slimbox: published under MIT license so shouldn't be there, as pointed in [#2]. However, as it's been modified, I thought of it as a derivative work and, it fell under section 4.d of the AL You may add Your own attribution notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed as modifying the License. Please note that I'm not saying they *should* be there, only why they are there. If there's anything wrong on that file we'll correct it ASAP (btw, a handy way to check if other projects are including specifics entries in NOTICE files for 3rd party libraries is to search for an specific dependency at [#4] and then checking the svn's NOTICE file of the projects using it) Regarding the missing DISCLAIMER, our distribution target didn't catch it. It's already fixed on trunk, although our plan is release 2.9.1 in order to start graduation discuss soon thereafter. @general: aside from Ant's vote, we've got another couple of votes at jspwiki-dev, so the tally right now is 5PPMC +1 votes, 1 +1 IPMC vote br, juan pablo [#1]: http://s.apache.org/7Hs [#2]: http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps [#3]: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html#redistribution [#4]: https://analysis.apache.org/dependencies/index On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:15 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: Hi JSPWiki, I'm from the Incubator PMC and looking at your release. I give it a +1. There are a couple of nits. One is that it looks like the Incubation DISCLAIMER text is missing from the binary zip. It is there in the source artifact and tag though and we've let releases go with these missing before so i don't think this is a blocker, fix it next time, or better, graduate from the Incubator now so its not needed next time. The NOTICE file still has some comments that probably aren't needed there and they could be moved somewhere else like the README. Again many Incubator releases have similar issues so i don't think that should be a blocker and i can help you get that updated for the next release. ...ant On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, We've held a vote on jspwiki-dev for a 2nd RC of Apache JSPWiki 2.9.1-incubating [#1]. The vote on release candidate has been open for more than 72 hours on the developer mailing list. After the voting timeframe, we have 3 non-binding votes (from jspwiki developers). I'd therefore like to ask now the general incubator to check our release candidate. The release notes (fixed issues) are available at the Jira Issue Tracker [#2]. Please find attached below the concrete details on the release and on the vote. thanks in advance, juan pablo [#1] http://s.apache.org/UDD [#2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732version=12321249 === Note that we are voting upon the source (subversion tag and signed artifacts). Binaries are provided for convenience only. The tag to be voted upon: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_1_incubating_rc2 Source and binary files, with RAT report: http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/releases/2.9.1-incubating-4-rc2/ Checksums: JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-4-bin.zip MD5:58b7e2fd9290612762825683e81ca22d SHA1: 5eb4cfa7c7b00e2a002573c72f1e83c15f708e2b SHA512: 0e1487d09044e0ce900194b42ff3e465ee96ebde1a75c0603715ec42bbf425b950c901bff87bbadf43173d3c91ced170ab0eebe4525706344642e68db069ba18 JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-4-src.zip MD5:
Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating (2nd RC)
Don't let me stop the vote but I'm getting java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space when I run the tests, mvn clean install. My MAVEN_OPTS is: -Xms2G -Xmx2G -XX:PermSize=1G -XX:MaxPermSize=1G Am I doing something wrong? Regards, Alan On May 7, 2013, at 2:16 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, We've held a vote on jspwiki-dev for a 2nd RC of Apache JSPWiki 2.9.1-incubating [#1]. The vote on release candidate has been open for more than 72 hours on the developer mailing list. After the voting timeframe, we have 3 non-binding votes (from jspwiki developers). I'd therefore like to ask now the general incubator to check our release candidate. The release notes (fixed issues) are available at the Jira Issue Tracker [#2]. Please find attached below the concrete details on the release and on the vote. thanks in advance, juan pablo [#1] http://s.apache.org/UDD [#2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732version=12321249 === Note that we are voting upon the source (subversion tag and signed artifacts). Binaries are provided for convenience only. The tag to be voted upon: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_1_incubating_rc2 Source and binary files, with RAT report: http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/releases/2.9.1-incubating-4-rc2/ Checksums: JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-4-bin.zip MD5:58b7e2fd9290612762825683e81ca22d SHA1: 5eb4cfa7c7b00e2a002573c72f1e83c15f708e2b SHA512: 0e1487d09044e0ce900194b42ff3e465ee96ebde1a75c0603715ec42bbf425b950c901bff87bbadf43173d3c91ced170ab0eebe4525706344642e68db069ba18 JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-4-src.zip MD5:707b52ce9ca32fe012bcc3b1a79d8f96 SHA1: 41619359a04d49a2f5b58b8ba1a5d0c186fbbb1c SHA512: 2c4f6e0b9e163d2b3ae60a091993598ed6e315a7f7b4c08a9232cbd0c1eccba4259818e0e9ab8a86350a0109924be21cc0627e8a549bbd52b14ca7b40dcccee0 JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache JSPWiki 2.9.1-incubating [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating (2nd RC)
Hi Ant, thanks for the vote :-) Regarding the NOTICE file, specifically which comments? Right now has 4 entries, being the reasons behind each one: - fckconfig.js entry: published under MPL 2.0, so it requires to be in NOTICE - Portions of this code donated by BaseN Corporation. entry: legal's advice [#1] was to keep this entry in NOTICE - SilkIconSet entry: published under Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License, which in section 4.b states If you distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform the Work or any Derivative Works or Collective Works, You must keep intact all copyright notices [...] - Slimbox: published under MIT license so shouldn't be there, as pointed in [#2]. However, as it's been modified, I thought of it as a derivative work and, it fell under section 4.d of the AL You may add Your own attribution notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed as modifying the License. Please note that I'm not saying they *should* be there, only why they are there. If there's anything wrong on that file we'll correct it ASAP (btw, a handy way to check if other projects are including specifics entries in NOTICE files for 3rd party libraries is to search for an specific dependency at [#4] and then checking the svn's NOTICE file of the projects using it) Regarding the missing DISCLAIMER, our distribution target didn't catch it. It's already fixed on trunk, although our plan is release 2.9.1 in order to start graduation discuss soon thereafter. @general: aside from Ant's vote, we've got another couple of votes at jspwiki-dev, so the tally right now is 5PPMC +1 votes, 1 +1 IPMC vote br, juan pablo [#1]: http://s.apache.org/7Hs [#2]: http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps [#3]: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html#redistribution [#4]: https://analysis.apache.org/dependencies/index On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:15 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: Hi JSPWiki, I'm from the Incubator PMC and looking at your release. I give it a +1. There are a couple of nits. One is that it looks like the Incubation DISCLAIMER text is missing from the binary zip. It is there in the source artifact and tag though and we've let releases go with these missing before so i don't think this is a blocker, fix it next time, or better, graduate from the Incubator now so its not needed next time. The NOTICE file still has some comments that probably aren't needed there and they could be moved somewhere else like the README. Again many Incubator releases have similar issues so i don't think that should be a blocker and i can help you get that updated for the next release. ...ant On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, We've held a vote on jspwiki-dev for a 2nd RC of Apache JSPWiki 2.9.1-incubating [#1]. The vote on release candidate has been open for more than 72 hours on the developer mailing list. After the voting timeframe, we have 3 non-binding votes (from jspwiki developers). I'd therefore like to ask now the general incubator to check our release candidate. The release notes (fixed issues) are available at the Jira Issue Tracker [#2]. Please find attached below the concrete details on the release and on the vote. thanks in advance, juan pablo [#1] http://s.apache.org/UDD [#2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732version=12321249 === Note that we are voting upon the source (subversion tag and signed artifacts). Binaries are provided for convenience only. The tag to be voted upon: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_1_incubating_rc2 Source and binary files, with RAT report: http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/releases/2.9.1-incubating-4-rc2/ Checksums: JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-4-bin.zip MD5:58b7e2fd9290612762825683e81ca22d SHA1: 5eb4cfa7c7b00e2a002573c72f1e83c15f708e2b SHA512: 0e1487d09044e0ce900194b42ff3e465ee96ebde1a75c0603715ec42bbf425b950c901bff87bbadf43173d3c91ced170ab0eebe4525706344642e68db069ba18 JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-4-src.zip MD5:707b52ce9ca32fe012bcc3b1a79d8f96 SHA1: 41619359a04d49a2f5b58b8ba1a5d0c186fbbb1c SHA512: 2c4f6e0b9e163d2b3ae60a091993598ed6e315a7f7b4c08a9232cbd0c1eccba4259818e0e9ab8a86350a0109924be21cc0627e8a549bbd52b14ca7b40dcccee0 JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache JSPWiki 2.9.1-incubating [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
[VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating (2nd RC)
Hi all, We've held a vote on jspwiki-dev for a 2nd RC of Apache JSPWiki 2.9.1-incubating [#1]. The vote on release candidate has been open for more than 72 hours on the developer mailing list. After the voting timeframe, we have 3 non-binding votes (from jspwiki developers). I'd therefore like to ask now the general incubator to check our release candidate. The release notes (fixed issues) are available at the Jira Issue Tracker [#2]. Please find attached below the concrete details on the release and on the vote. thanks in advance, juan pablo [#1] http://s.apache.org/UDD [#2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732version=12321249 === Note that we are voting upon the source (subversion tag and signed artifacts). Binaries are provided for convenience only. The tag to be voted upon: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_1_incubating_rc2 Source and binary files, with RAT report: http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/releases/2.9.1-incubating-4-rc2/ Checksums: JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-4-bin.zip MD5:58b7e2fd9290612762825683e81ca22d SHA1: 5eb4cfa7c7b00e2a002573c72f1e83c15f708e2b SHA512: 0e1487d09044e0ce900194b42ff3e465ee96ebde1a75c0603715ec42bbf425b950c901bff87bbadf43173d3c91ced170ab0eebe4525706344642e68db069ba18 JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-4-src.zip MD5:707b52ce9ca32fe012bcc3b1a79d8f96 SHA1: 41619359a04d49a2f5b58b8ba1a5d0c186fbbb1c SHA512: 2c4f6e0b9e163d2b3ae60a091993598ed6e315a7f7b4c08a9232cbd0c1eccba4259818e0e9ab8a86350a0109924be21cc0627e8a549bbd52b14ca7b40dcccee0 JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache JSPWiki 2.9.1-incubating [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote: - I'm especially worried about the NOTICE file, how short is short enough? Could you provide a good example from any other project so we can take a look at it? To take a grasp of how we should do it. We'd like to have it as good as the LICENSE file (also, the incorrect year in NOTICE was also pointed by Siegfried, but not as a blocker, so it's fixed in trunk). The ASF now has documentation which describes a formulaic approach to creating LICENSE and NOTICE. If you follow the recipe, you should be OK. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating
Hi Marvin, Sebb, thanks for the insights :-) br, juan pablo On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.comwrote: On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote: - I'm especially worried about the NOTICE file, how short is short enough? Could you provide a good example from any other project so we can take a look at it? To take a grasp of how we should do it. We'd like to have it as good as the LICENSE file (also, the incorrect year in NOTICE was also pointed by Siegfried, but not as a blocker, so it's fixed in trunk). The ASF now has documentation which describes a formulaic approach to creating LICENSE and NOTICE. If you follow the recipe, you should be OK. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating
On 15 April 2013 22:56, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, We've held a vote on jspwiki-dev to release 2.9.1-incubating [1]. The vote on release candidate has been open for more than 72 hours on the developer mailing list. After the voting timeframe, we have the following voting results: - 1 binding vote (from Siegfried Goeschl -mentor-) - 4 non-binding votes (from jspwiki developers) I'd therefore like to ask now the general incubator to check our release candidate. The release notes (fixed issues) are available at the Jira Issue Tracker [2]. [1] http://s.apache.org/iy [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732version=12321249 Please find attached below the concrete details on the release and on the vote. thanks in advance, juan pablo === Note that we are voting upon the source (subversion tag and signed artifacts). Binaries are provided for convenience only. However binaries should still have the correct NL files, and the DISCLAIMER (for Incubator podlings) The tag to be voted upon: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_1_incubating_rc1 There's no DISCLAIMER file The NOTICE file has lots of extra content which is not relevant; the NOTICE file must be a short as possible, but no smaller. Like a good poem, it's finished when no more can be taken out. Note in particular that the NOTICE file must only contain required notices for bits that are actually included in the enclosing archive. The year in the NOTICE file looks wrong. IMO those must be fixed before a release can be signed off. The LICENSE file is very clear; it's great to have the full jar names with versions. Probably not a good idea to include the Eclipse .classpath and .project files in SVN as these files are host-specific. [Not a blocker] If you want to provide sample versions as a starting point, this can be done by providing copies with a different name and perhaps path. For example, Tomcat puts their versions here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/res/ide-support/eclipse/ Likewise, the .externalToolBuilders and .settings trees don't belong in SVN as they are IDE and host-specific. Source and binary files, with RAT report: http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/releases/2.9.1-incubating-0-rc1/ There are no signatures (.asc files). There's not much point in including SHA512 hashes as well as SHA1. Hashes are really only useful for checking whether the download succeeded; as such MD5 and SHA1 are sufficient Checksums: JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-bin.zip MD5:76bf79828fd709fc3dbf2c230dd546ff SHA1: bec05e47b21cdacaa171323d2fe7e28fa2a99574 SHA512: 13b8f33137287a32a04737b7d2dbe3d32651d527983d88f3c89ebe3db1e6428ece93a1d541d9a2224dbd2a12f8a0bf866952d0b65bd0fb90ccd25f668653a954 JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-src.zip MD5:daa25020abeed3762aa901fa6fd35f34 SHA1: 44075855d753335688e1ea89c8dbf6054d4d506d SHA512: ecf8e90a9088ca27d0e302fe81b80b996bcf89d24ec816f475055250b7cc6b0e0e8b1ed5a6499a90285b7f8c8485c3cacd1b7985df9fef44b22e01f0035e95b8 Thanks - it's useful to have at least one hash in the vote email as that helps tie the vote to the archives. JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS Except that there are no signature files... [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Marmotta 3.0.0-incubating [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... IMO, there are several blockers that need to be fixed before release.
Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating
Hi Sebb, first of all, thanks for your time reviewing the RC and your comments seems we'll have to cancel the vote. Hopefully, we'll have a new RC in a few days with all these issues fixed. Some notes, though: - I'm especially worried about the NOTICE file, how short is short enough? Could you provide a good example from any other project so we can take a look at it? To take a grasp of how we should do it. We'd like to have it as good as the LICENSE file (also, the incorrect year in NOTICE was also pointed by Siegfried, but not as a blocker, so it's fixed in trunk). - The signature files is big mistake on my side. Don't know how or what did I did when doing the scp of the binaries. It's.. awkward. - IDE specific files: right now our build tool is Ant so, in order to ease the initial hop in, we provide Eclipse specific files with the project configuration. We're working on moving to Maven, which will allow us to delete those files from svn. thanks best regards, juan pablo On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:54 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 April 2013 22:56, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, We've held a vote on jspwiki-dev to release 2.9.1-incubating [1]. The vote on release candidate has been open for more than 72 hours on the developer mailing list. After the voting timeframe, we have the following voting results: - 1 binding vote (from Siegfried Goeschl -mentor-) - 4 non-binding votes (from jspwiki developers) I'd therefore like to ask now the general incubator to check our release candidate. The release notes (fixed issues) are available at the Jira Issue Tracker [2]. [1] http://s.apache.org/iy [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732version=12321249 Please find attached below the concrete details on the release and on the vote. thanks in advance, juan pablo === Note that we are voting upon the source (subversion tag and signed artifacts). Binaries are provided for convenience only. However binaries should still have the correct NL files, and the DISCLAIMER (for Incubator podlings) The tag to be voted upon: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_1_incubating_rc1 There's no DISCLAIMER file The NOTICE file has lots of extra content which is not relevant; the NOTICE file must be a short as possible, but no smaller. Like a good poem, it's finished when no more can be taken out. Note in particular that the NOTICE file must only contain required notices for bits that are actually included in the enclosing archive. The year in the NOTICE file looks wrong. IMO those must be fixed before a release can be signed off. The LICENSE file is very clear; it's great to have the full jar names with versions. Probably not a good idea to include the Eclipse .classpath and .project files in SVN as these files are host-specific. [Not a blocker] If you want to provide sample versions as a starting point, this can be done by providing copies with a different name and perhaps path. For example, Tomcat puts their versions here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/res/ide-support/eclipse/ Likewise, the .externalToolBuilders and .settings trees don't belong in SVN as they are IDE and host-specific. Source and binary files, with RAT report: http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/releases/2.9.1-incubating-0-rc1/ There are no signatures (.asc files). There's not much point in including SHA512 hashes as well as SHA1. Hashes are really only useful for checking whether the download succeeded; as such MD5 and SHA1 are sufficient Checksums: JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-bin.zip MD5:76bf79828fd709fc3dbf2c230dd546ff SHA1: bec05e47b21cdacaa171323d2fe7e28fa2a99574 SHA512: 13b8f33137287a32a04737b7d2dbe3d32651d527983d88f3c89ebe3db1e6428ece93a1d541d9a2224dbd2a12f8a0bf866952d0b65bd0fb90ccd25f668653a954 JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-src.zip MD5:daa25020abeed3762aa901fa6fd35f34 SHA1: 44075855d753335688e1ea89c8dbf6054d4d506d SHA512: ecf8e90a9088ca27d0e302fe81b80b996bcf89d24ec816f475055250b7cc6b0e0e8b1ed5a6499a90285b7f8c8485c3cacd1b7985df9fef44b22e01f0035e95b8 Thanks - it's useful to have at least one hash in the vote email as that helps tie the vote to the archives. JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS Except that there are no signature files... [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Marmotta 3.0.0-incubating [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... IMO, there are several blockers that need to be fixed before release.
Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating
On 16 April 2013 22:24, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Sebb, first of all, thanks for your time reviewing the RC and your comments seems we'll have to cancel the vote. Hopefully, we'll have a new RC in a few days with all these issues fixed. Some notes, though: - I'm especially worried about the NOTICE file, how short is short enough? http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice Could you provide a good example from any other project so we can take a look at it? To take a grasp of how we should do it. We'd like to have it as good as the LICENSE file (also, the incorrect year in NOTICE was also pointed by Siegfried, but not as a blocker, so it's fixed in trunk). - The signature files is big mistake on my side. Don't know how or what did I did when doing the scp of the binaries. It's.. awkward. It also shows that there are problems with how others have checked the RC. - IDE specific files: right now our build tool is Ant so, in order to ease the initial hop in, we provide Eclipse specific files with the project configuration. We're working on moving to Maven, which will allow us to delete those files from svn. The build tool is irrelevant here. Both Ant and Maven can be used without Eclipse, and vice-versa. If you want to help users to set up Eclipse, by all means provide sample configuration files, but don't use the default names or you will cause problems for Eclipse users that don't have the same setup as you. e.g. different default JVM or different plugins. thanks best regards, juan pablo On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:54 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 April 2013 22:56, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, We've held a vote on jspwiki-dev to release 2.9.1-incubating [1]. The vote on release candidate has been open for more than 72 hours on the developer mailing list. After the voting timeframe, we have the following voting results: - 1 binding vote (from Siegfried Goeschl -mentor-) - 4 non-binding votes (from jspwiki developers) I'd therefore like to ask now the general incubator to check our release candidate. The release notes (fixed issues) are available at the Jira Issue Tracker [2]. [1] http://s.apache.org/iy [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732version=12321249 Please find attached below the concrete details on the release and on the vote. thanks in advance, juan pablo === Note that we are voting upon the source (subversion tag and signed artifacts). Binaries are provided for convenience only. However binaries should still have the correct NL files, and the DISCLAIMER (for Incubator podlings) The tag to be voted upon: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_1_incubating_rc1 There's no DISCLAIMER file The NOTICE file has lots of extra content which is not relevant; the NOTICE file must be a short as possible, but no smaller. Like a good poem, it's finished when no more can be taken out. Note in particular that the NOTICE file must only contain required notices for bits that are actually included in the enclosing archive. The year in the NOTICE file looks wrong. IMO those must be fixed before a release can be signed off. The LICENSE file is very clear; it's great to have the full jar names with versions. Probably not a good idea to include the Eclipse .classpath and .project files in SVN as these files are host-specific. [Not a blocker] If you want to provide sample versions as a starting point, this can be done by providing copies with a different name and perhaps path. For example, Tomcat puts their versions here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/res/ide-support/eclipse/ Likewise, the .externalToolBuilders and .settings trees don't belong in SVN as they are IDE and host-specific. Source and binary files, with RAT report: http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/releases/2.9.1-incubating-0-rc1/ There are no signatures (.asc files). There's not much point in including SHA512 hashes as well as SHA1. Hashes are really only useful for checking whether the download succeeded; as such MD5 and SHA1 are sufficient Checksums: JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-bin.zip MD5:76bf79828fd709fc3dbf2c230dd546ff SHA1: bec05e47b21cdacaa171323d2fe7e28fa2a99574 SHA512: 13b8f33137287a32a04737b7d2dbe3d32651d527983d88f3c89ebe3db1e6428ece93a1d541d9a2224dbd2a12f8a0bf866952d0b65bd0fb90ccd25f668653a954 JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-src.zip MD5:daa25020abeed3762aa901fa6fd35f34 SHA1: 44075855d753335688e1ea89c8dbf6054d4d506d SHA512:
[VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating
Hi all, We've held a vote on jspwiki-dev to release 2.9.1-incubating [1]. The vote on release candidate has been open for more than 72 hours on the developer mailing list. After the voting timeframe, we have the following voting results: - 1 binding vote (from Siegfried Goeschl -mentor-) - 4 non-binding votes (from jspwiki developers) I'd therefore like to ask now the general incubator to check our release candidate. The release notes (fixed issues) are available at the Jira Issue Tracker [2]. [1] http://s.apache.org/iy [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732version=12321249 Please find attached below the concrete details on the release and on the vote. thanks in advance, juan pablo === Note that we are voting upon the source (subversion tag and signed artifacts). Binaries are provided for convenience only. The tag to be voted upon: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_1_incubating_rc1 Source and binary files, with RAT report: http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/releases/2.9.1-incubating-0-rc1/ Checksums: JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-bin.zip MD5:76bf79828fd709fc3dbf2c230dd546ff SHA1: bec05e47b21cdacaa171323d2fe7e28fa2a99574 SHA512: 13b8f33137287a32a04737b7d2dbe3d32651d527983d88f3c89ebe3db1e6428ece93a1d541d9a2224dbd2a12f8a0bf866952d0b65bd0fb90ccd25f668653a954 JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-src.zip MD5:daa25020abeed3762aa901fa6fd35f34 SHA1: 44075855d753335688e1ea89c8dbf6054d4d506d SHA512: ecf8e90a9088ca27d0e302fe81b80b996bcf89d24ec816f475055250b7cc6b0e0e8b1ed5a6499a90285b7f8c8485c3cacd1b7985df9fef44b22e01f0035e95b8 JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Marmotta 3.0.0-incubating [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating
/s/Marmota 3.0.0/JSPWiki incubating/g/ O:-) (oops) On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, We've held a vote on jspwiki-dev to release 2.9.1-incubating [1]. The vote on release candidate has been open for more than 72 hours on the developer mailing list. After the voting timeframe, we have the following voting results: - 1 binding vote (from Siegfried Goeschl -mentor-) - 4 non-binding votes (from jspwiki developers) I'd therefore like to ask now the general incubator to check our release candidate. The release notes (fixed issues) are available at the Jira Issue Tracker [2]. [1] http://s.apache.org/iy [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732version=12321249 Please find attached below the concrete details on the release and on the vote. thanks in advance, juan pablo === Note that we are voting upon the source (subversion tag and signed artifacts). Binaries are provided for convenience only. The tag to be voted upon: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_1_incubating_rc1 Source and binary files, with RAT report: http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/releases/2.9.1-incubating-0-rc1/ Checksums: JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-bin.zip MD5:76bf79828fd709fc3dbf2c230dd546ff SHA1: bec05e47b21cdacaa171323d2fe7e28fa2a99574 SHA512: 13b8f33137287a32a04737b7d2dbe3d32651d527983d88f3c89ebe3db1e6428ece93a1d541d9a2224dbd2a12f8a0bf866952d0b65bd0fb90ccd25f668653a954 JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-src.zip MD5:daa25020abeed3762aa901fa6fd35f34 SHA1: 44075855d753335688e1ea89c8dbf6054d4d506d SHA512: ecf8e90a9088ca27d0e302fe81b80b996bcf89d24ec816f475055250b7cc6b0e0e8b1ed5a6499a90285b7f8c8485c3cacd1b7985df9fef44b22e01f0035e95b8 JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Marmotta 3.0.0-incubating [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
