Re: Retiring Pirk (was [RESULT] [VOTE] Retire the Pirk podling)

2017-04-27 Thread Josh Elser 
To the best of my knowledge, the Pirk podling should be cleaned up. 
INFRA plowed through the last administrative acts as outlined on the 
retirement guide.


If I've missed anything, please let me know and I'll circle back around.

- Josh

Josh Elser wrote:

Just wanted to give a heads-up that I pushed forward with this process
today. I made the administrative changes that I could (e.g.
incubator-site, dist.a.o cleanup, RETIRE.txt in scm).

I believe we're presently waiting on INFRA to do the rest of the cleanup
[1].

- Josh

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13913

Josh Elser wrote:

The vote to retire Pirk passes with six binding +1's and one non-binding
+1.

Thanks folks. Will push the podling through the retirement steps.

Josh Elser wrote:

Folks,

The Pirk PPMC have recently voted unanimously to retire the podling.
This decision, while heavy-hearted, comes on the tails of months of no
development with no change on the horizon.

Context for those interesting in reading: DISCUSS [1], VOTE [2],
RESULT [3].

[ ] +1: Retire Pirk
[ ] -1: Do not retire Pirk because

Here's my +1 (binding)

- Josh

[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c0a2bcc6271d71efb60c688ad83c4c3e1aeffb8851e01f675135b0c5@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E


[2]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/447f04840531c439250ca6b05e3592ea3159d2e982b5bb75320ec427@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E


[3]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ef4699debd5fe0441e94c8f68e40e63d8a20d249a241bb50cf5341a6@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Retiring Pirk (was [RESULT] [VOTE] Retire the Pirk podling)

2017-04-18 Thread Josh Elser 
Just wanted to give a heads-up that I pushed forward with this process 
today. I made the administrative changes that I could (e.g. 
incubator-site, dist.a.o cleanup, RETIRE.txt in scm).


I believe we're presently waiting on INFRA to do the rest of the cleanup 
[1].


- Josh

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13913

Josh Elser wrote:

The vote to retire Pirk passes with six binding +1's and one non-binding
+1.

Thanks folks. Will push the podling through the retirement steps.

Josh Elser wrote:

Folks,

The Pirk PPMC have recently voted unanimously to retire the podling.
This decision, while heavy-hearted, comes on the tails of months of no
development with no change on the horizon.

Context for those interesting in reading: DISCUSS [1], VOTE [2],
RESULT [3].

[ ] +1: Retire Pirk
[ ] -1: Do not retire Pirk because

Here's my +1 (binding)

- Josh

[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c0a2bcc6271d71efb60c688ad83c4c3e1aeffb8851e01f675135b0c5@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E

[2]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/447f04840531c439250ca6b05e3592ea3159d2e982b5bb75320ec427@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E

[3]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ef4699debd5fe0441e94c8f68e40e63d8a20d249a241bb50cf5341a6@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[RESULT] [VOTE] Retire the Pirk podling

2017-04-17 Thread Josh Elser 

The vote to retire Pirk passes with six binding +1's and one non-binding +1.

Thanks folks. Will push the podling through the retirement steps.

Josh Elser wrote:

Folks,

The Pirk PPMC have recently voted unanimously to retire the podling.
This decision, while heavy-hearted, comes on the tails of months of no
development with no change on the horizon.

Context for those interesting in reading: DISCUSS [1], VOTE [2], RESULT [3].

[ ] +1: Retire Pirk
[ ] -1: Do not retire Pirk because

Here's my +1 (binding)

- Josh

[1] 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c0a2bcc6271d71efb60c688ad83c4c3e1aeffb8851e01f675135b0c5@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
[2] 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/447f04840531c439250ca6b05e3592ea3159d2e982b5bb75320ec427@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
[3] 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ef4699debd5fe0441e94c8f68e40e63d8a20d249a241bb50cf5341a6@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Pirk podling

2017-04-14 Thread Suneel Marthi 
+1 binding

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Markus Weimer  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
>
> On 2017-04-14 10:18 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On 14/04/17 04:25, Josh Elser wrote:
>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> The Pirk PPMC have recently voted unanimously to retire the podling.
>>> This decision, while heavy-hearted, comes on the tails of months of no
>>> development with no change on the horizon.
>>>
>>> Context for those interesting in reading: DISCUSS [1], VOTE [2], RESULT
>>> [3].
>>>
>>> [ ] +1: Retire Pirk
>>> [ ] -1: Do not retire Pirk because
>>>
>>> Here's my +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> - Josh
>>>
>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c0a2bcc6271d71efb60c688
>>> ad83c4c3e1aeffb8851e01f675135b0c5@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
>>> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/447f04840531c439250ca6b
>>> 05e3592ea3159d2e982b5bb75320ec427@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
>>> [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ef4699debd5fe0441e94c8f
>>> 68e40e63d8a20d249a241bb50cf5341a6@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Pirk podling

2017-04-14 Thread Markus Weimer 

+1 (binding)

On 2017-04-14 10:18 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:

+1 (binding)

On 14/04/17 04:25, Josh Elser wrote:

Folks,

The Pirk PPMC have recently voted unanimously to retire the podling.
This decision, while heavy-hearted, comes on the tails of months of no
development with no change on the horizon.

Context for those interesting in reading: DISCUSS [1], VOTE [2], RESULT [3].

[ ] +1: Retire Pirk
[ ] -1: Do not retire Pirk because

Here's my +1 (binding)

- Josh

[1] 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c0a2bcc6271d71efb60c688ad83c4c3e1aeffb8851e01f675135b0c5@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
[2] 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/447f04840531c439250ca6b05e3592ea3159d2e982b5bb75320ec427@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
[3] 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ef4699debd5fe0441e94c8f68e40e63d8a20d249a241bb50cf5341a6@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Pirk podling

2017-04-14 Thread Tim Ellison 
+1 (binding)

On 14/04/17 04:25, Josh Elser wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> The Pirk PPMC have recently voted unanimously to retire the podling.
> This decision, while heavy-hearted, comes on the tails of months of no
> development with no change on the horizon.
> 
> Context for those interesting in reading: DISCUSS [1], VOTE [2], RESULT [3].
> 
> [ ] +1: Retire Pirk
> [ ] -1: Do not retire Pirk because
> 
> Here's my +1 (binding)
> 
> - Josh
> 
> [1] 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c0a2bcc6271d71efb60c688ad83c4c3e1aeffb8851e01f675135b0c5@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
> [2] 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/447f04840531c439250ca6b05e3592ea3159d2e982b5bb75320ec427@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
> [3] 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ef4699debd5fe0441e94c8f68e40e63d8a20d249a241bb50cf5341a6@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Pirk podling

2017-04-14 Thread Josh Elser 
Oops, I forgot to a duration: this vote will be open for the standard
72hrs (at least until ~2016/04/17 0600).

I should have known better to email late at night :)

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Josh Elser  wrote:
> Folks,
>
> The Pirk PPMC have recently voted unanimously to retire the podling.
> This decision, while heavy-hearted, comes on the tails of months of no
> development with no change on the horizon.
>
> Context for those interesting in reading: DISCUSS [1], VOTE [2], RESULT [3].
>
> [ ] +1: Retire Pirk
> [ ] -1: Do not retire Pirk because
>
> Here's my +1 (binding)
>
> - Josh
>
> [1] 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c0a2bcc6271d71efb60c688ad83c4c3e1aeffb8851e01f675135b0c5@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
> [2] 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/447f04840531c439250ca6b05e3592ea3159d2e982b5bb75320ec427@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
> [3] 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ef4699debd5fe0441e94c8f68e40e63d8a20d249a241bb50cf5341a6@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Pirk podling

2017-04-14 Thread Pierre Smits 
+1 (non-binding)

Best regards,

Pierre

On Friday, April 14, 2017, Raphael Bircher  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Am .04.2017, 05:25 Uhr, schrieb Josh Elser :
>
> Folks,
>>
>> The Pirk PPMC have recently voted unanimously to retire the podling.
>> This decision, while heavy-hearted, comes on the tails of months of no
>> development with no change on the horizon.
>>
>> Context for those interesting in reading: DISCUSS [1], VOTE [2], RESULT
>> [3].
>>
>> [ ] +1: Retire Pirk
>> [ ] -1: Do not retire Pirk because
>>
>> Here's my +1 (binding)
>>
>> - Josh
>>
>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c0a2bcc6271d71efb60c688
>> ad83c4c3e1aeffb8851e01f675135b0c5@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
>> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/447f04840531c439250ca6b
>> 05e3592ea3159d2e982b5bb75320ec427@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
>> [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ef4699debd5fe0441e94c8f
>> 68e40e63d8a20d249a241bb50cf5341a6@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> --
> My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

-- 
Pierre Smits

ORRTIZ.COM 
OFBiz based solutions & services

OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Pirk podling

2017-04-14 Thread Raphael Bircher 

+1 (binding)

Am .04.2017, 05:25 Uhr, schrieb Josh Elser :


Folks,

The Pirk PPMC have recently voted unanimously to retire the podling.
This decision, while heavy-hearted, comes on the tails of months of no
development with no change on the horizon.

Context for those interesting in reading: DISCUSS [1], VOTE [2], RESULT  
[3].


[ ] +1: Retire Pirk
[ ] -1: Do not retire Pirk because

Here's my +1 (binding)

- Josh

[1]  
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c0a2bcc6271d71efb60c688ad83c4c3e1aeffb8851e01f675135b0c5@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
[2]  
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/447f04840531c439250ca6b05e3592ea3159d2e982b5bb75320ec427@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
[3]  
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ef4699debd5fe0441e94c8f68e40e63d8a20d249a241bb50cf5341a6@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




--
My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Pirk podling

2017-04-14 Thread John D. Ament 
+1

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:25 PM Josh Elser  wrote:

> Folks,
>
> The Pirk PPMC have recently voted unanimously to retire the podling.
> This decision, while heavy-hearted, comes on the tails of months of no
> development with no change on the horizon.
>
> Context for those interesting in reading: DISCUSS [1], VOTE [2], RESULT
> [3].
>
> [ ] +1: Retire Pirk
> [ ] -1: Do not retire Pirk because
>
> Here's my +1 (binding)
>
> - Josh
>
> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c0a2bcc6271d71efb60c688ad83c4c3e1aeffb8851e01f675135b0c5@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
> [2]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/447f04840531c439250ca6b05e3592ea3159d2e982b5bb75320ec427@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
> [3]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ef4699debd5fe0441e94c8f68e40e63d8a20d249a241bb50cf5341a6@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Pirk podling

2017-04-14 Thread Joe Witt 
+1 (binding)

On Apr 13, 2017 11:25 PM, "Josh Elser"  wrote:

> Folks,
>
> The Pirk PPMC have recently voted unanimously to retire the podling.
> This decision, while heavy-hearted, comes on the tails of months of no
> development with no change on the horizon.
>
> Context for those interesting in reading: DISCUSS [1], VOTE [2], RESULT
> [3].
>
> [ ] +1: Retire Pirk
> [ ] -1: Do not retire Pirk because
>
> Here's my +1 (binding)
>
> - Josh
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c0a2bcc6271d71efb60c688ad83c4c
> 3e1aeffb8851e01f675135b0c5@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/447f04840531c439250ca6b05e3592
> ea3159d2e982b5bb75320ec427@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
> [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ef4699debd5fe0441e94c8f68e40e6
> 3d8a20d249a241bb50cf5341a6@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

[VOTE] Retire the Pirk podling

2017-04-13 Thread Josh Elser 
Folks,

The Pirk PPMC have recently voted unanimously to retire the podling.
This decision, while heavy-hearted, comes on the tails of months of no
development with no change on the horizon.

Context for those interesting in reading: DISCUSS [1], VOTE [2], RESULT [3].

[ ] +1: Retire Pirk
[ ] -1: Do not retire Pirk because

Here's my +1 (binding)

- Josh

[1] 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c0a2bcc6271d71efb60c688ad83c4c3e1aeffb8851e01f675135b0c5@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
[2] 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/447f04840531c439250ca6b05e3592ea3159d2e982b5bb75320ec427@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E
[3] 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ef4699debd5fe0441e94c8f68e40e63d8a20d249a241bb50cf5341a6@%3Cdev.pirk.apache.org%3E

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org