Release process ( Was Re: [vote] Request approval to declare Woden 1.0.0 M3 Candidate by EOD Jan. 24)

2006-01-29 Thread Jean T. Anderson
In 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200601.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Roy T. Fielding wrote:

On Jan 24, 2006, at 3:50 PM, Lawrence Mandel wrote:


Sanjiva,

Sorry about violating Apache netiquette. This was not intentional.  I had
previously been asked to send this vote to the incubator and ws pmc  
lists

and was advised to send it to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list as well.

To be honest, I'm feeling pretty lost wrt the correct process to  
release a

milestone driver from an incubator project and would appreciate  guidance
from the community. The information I have is to:

1. Hold a vote amongst the project's committers on the project's  mailing
list.
2. Request approval from the incubator and, in Woden's case, WS  pmcs by
sending an e-mail requesting a vote to [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


All release votes must be made on public lists.  Even if people say
yes in private, they still need to vote in public.  So, you should
hold a vote on woden-dev and then send a summary of that vote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], saying pointedly that you need X more +1 votes
from incubator PMC members within 72 hours.


Assuming no negative votes, the milestone can be released.
 
Minimum three binding (official PMC) +1 votes and a majority of all

votes being positive.  Releases do not need consensus.


I logged INCUBATOR-14 to remind myself to improve the info at 
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases . 
I think even a little more clarification in this section would be helpful.


I'll start a [doc] thread for this after the Incubator site conversion 
[1] settles down. (Existence of the Jira issue will keep me from 
forgetting.)


-jean

[1] 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200601.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [vote] Request approval to declare Woden 1.0.0 M3 Candidate by EOD Jan. 24

2006-01-25 Thread Paul Fremantle
+1 from me

Paul

On 1/25/06, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Jan 24, 2006, at 3:50 PM, Lawrence Mandel wrote:

  Sanjiva,
 
  Sorry about violating Apache netiquette. This was not intentional.
  I had
  previously been asked to send this vote to the incubator and ws pmc
  lists
  and was advised to send it to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list as well.
 
  To be honest, I'm feeling pretty lost wrt the correct process to
  release a
  milestone driver from an incubator project and would appreciate
  guidance
  from the community. The information I have is to:
 
  1. Hold a vote amongst the project's committers on the project's
  mailing
  list.
  2. Request approval from the incubator and, in Woden's case, WS
  pmcs by
  sending an e-mail requesting a vote to [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL 
  PROTECTED], and
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 All release votes must be made on public lists.  Even if people say
 yes in private, they still need to vote in public.  So, you should
 hold a vote on woden-dev and then send a summary of that vote to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], saying pointedly that you need X more +1 votes
 from incubator PMC members within 72 hours.

  Assuming no negative votes, the milestone can be released.

 Minimum three binding (official PMC) +1 votes and a majority of all
 votes being positive.  Releases do not need consensus.

 Roy

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Oxygenating the Web Service Platform, www.wso2.com


[vote] Request approval to declare Woden 1.0.0 M3 Candidate by EOD Jan. 24

2006-01-24 Thread Lawrence Mandel
*note: I'm resending this message as I don't believe it showed up on 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Lawrence Mandel



Following the release process for projects in incubation, I'd like to 
request approval for Woden to declare milestone 3. A vote was held on the 
woden-dev list where M3 received 5 +1 votes and no negative votes. The 
votes collected are as follows:

John Kaputin +1
Lawrence Mandel +1 
Dims +1 
Jeremy Hughes +1
Arthur Ryman +1 


As required of releases from projects in incubation, the distributable 
archives contain incubating in their names. The M3 archives can be found 
at http://cvs.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/milestones/1.0.0M3-incubating/.

My original post summarizing Woden 1.0.0 M3 is below. 

Please vote by 5pm EST, Tuesday, Jan. 24, 2006.

Thanks,

Lawrence Mandel 



- Forwarded by Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/IBM on 01/22/2006 03:22 PM 
- 
Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
01/18/2006 04:55 PM 

Please respond to
woden-dev


To
woden-dev@ws.apache.org 
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject
Woden 1.0.0 M3 Candidate - please vote by EOD Thursday, Jan. 19









Woden committers, I'd like to request your vote on the status of M3. I've 
placed a Woden 1.0.0 
M3 Candidate build at 

http://cvs.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/milestones/1.0.0M3-incubating/

The Woden M3 candidate includes the major work items from the M3 plan. 
Specifically, the following items are complete in the M3 Candidate:

Parsing of WSDL 2.0 import and include (DOM) 
WSDL 2.0 Service parsing (DOM) 
Implement validation logic for Binding 
Unit tests for validation logic for Binding 
Integrate W3C WSDL 2.0 Binding tests into Woden test suite 

The following items are incomplete in the M2 plan:

Unit tests for import and include parsing (DOM) 
WSDL 2.0 HTTP Binding extension (DOM) 
Unit tests for HTTP Binding extension (DOM) 
Unit tests for Service parsing (DOM) 
Investigate WSDL 2.0 parsing with StAX 
Update technical documentation about Woden design and implementation on 
Wiki 
Create initial user documentation 

In an effort to make Woden more immediately usable, we deferred HTTP 
Binding extension work to M4 in favour of adding support for WSDL import 
and include elements. StAX will continue to be an investigation item until 
the DOM implementation is close to complete or we get more development 
help. John and I are working on user documentation and should have it 
ready for the Woden site around the proposed M3 release on Friday. 
Automated tests for the parser continue to require attention but, as John 
has conducted manual testing and the W3C test suite has been integrated 
into the Woden automated test suite, we are in good shape for M3.

Both John and I think Woden is in good shape to declare M3 as solid 
progress has been made on the parser and the validator. At this point we'd 
like to ask the Woden committers to vote on the status of M3. John and I 
both vote +1 (so +2). Please vote ASAP. We will collect votes until EOD 
(5pm EST) Thursday, Jan. 19. If there are no negative votes I will then 
request WS and Incubator PMC approval to release M3 by EOD Friday, Jan. 
20. Once the PMCs approve, M3 will be declared and a link will be placed 
on the Woden site. (Feel free to reply to this note with any concerns over 
this process.) 

Thanks, 

Lawrence Mandel



Re: [vote] Request approval to declare Woden 1.0.0 M3 Candidate by EOD Jan. 24

2006-01-24 Thread Lawrence Mandel
Sanjiva,

Sorry about violating Apache netiquette. This was not intentional. I had 
previously been asked to send this vote to the incubator and ws pmc lists 
and was advised to send it to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list as well.

To be honest, I'm feeling pretty lost wrt the correct process to release a 
milestone driver from an incubator project and would appreciate guidance 
from the community. The information I have is to:

1. Hold a vote amongst the project's committers on the project's mailing 
list.
2. Request approval from the incubator and, in Woden's case, WS pmcs by 
sending an e-mail requesting a vote to [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
and 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Assuming no negative votes, the milestone can be released.

I think it would be useful to formally declare this process on the 
incubator site so all incubator projects have a defined process to follow.

BTW, as you said that my mail did make it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], have you seen any replies? I have yet to see one.

Thanks,

Lawrence Mandel




Sanjiva Weerawarana [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
01/24/2006 06:40 PM
Please respond to
woden-dev


To
general@incubator.apache.org
cc
woden-dev@ws.apache.org woden-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject
Re: [vote] Request approval to declare Woden 1.0.0 M3 Candidate by EOD 
Jan. 24






On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 13:54 -0500, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
 *note: I'm resending this message as I don't believe it showed up on 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Lawrence please don't send to general@ and a private list (the PMC
lists). That's against Apache email netiquette ..

Unless I am mistaken your mail did make it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sanjiva.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]