Re: License question when including other ASF projects
Hey Chris, Thank you, solved that. Wasn’t sure about the licenses, but as they come from Calcite we just whitelisted Eclipse. Cheers, —Alex > On 3. May 2023, at 14:24, Christofer Dutz wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > sorry for the late response ... I also checked and the Eclipse Distribution > Licence 1.0 seems to be Category A and EPL 2.0 cat B, so it should be ok as > long as you only have dependencies to it. > > However I don’t know the plugin that you are using, so I can’t really help > about how to resolve false-positives ... might have a look at it thoug. > > Chris > > > Von: Alexander Alten-Lorenz > Datum: Dienstag, 2. Mai 2023 um 16:05 > An: general@incubator.apache.org > Betreff: Re: License question when including other ASF projects > Can anyone give us a tip regarding this one? > > Thanks, > —alex > >> On 30. Apr 2023, at 18:13, Alexander Alten-Lorenz >> wrote: >> >> Hey Dominik, >> >> Sry for bugging, any chance you know how to tune the license check that the >> Eclipse License passes? >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-wayang/actions/runs/4845087374/jobs/8633774880#step:6:1151 >> >> It’s merged, but we’d love to have a green build :) >> >> Cheers, >> —Alex >> >> >>> On 29. Apr 2023, at 11:40, Alexander Alten-Lorenz >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hey Dominik, >>> >>> Thank you for confirming. I try to merge now, let’s hope :) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> —Alex >>> >>>> On 29. Apr 2023, at 11:36, Dominik Riemer wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Alex, >>>> >>>> EPL 2.0 should be fine in case it is included in binary-only form (see >>>> Category B under [1]). >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> Dominik >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html >>>> >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Alexander Alten-Lorenz >>>> Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2023 11:29 AM >>>> To: general@incubator.apache.org >>>> Subject: License question when including other ASF projects >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> We use Apache Calcite, dependabot suggests a bump, but the automation >>>> failed since Calcite uses a non-compatible license (if I’m right) >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-wayang/actions/runs/4751917613/jobs/8441627979?pr=302#step:6:1117 >>>> >>>> How can we solve this, except not to update ;) Or is this just a false >>>> alarm? >>>> >>>> Thanks for the help, >>>> —Alex >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
AW: License question when including other ASF projects
Hi Alex, sorry for the late response ... I also checked and the Eclipse Distribution Licence 1.0 seems to be Category A and EPL 2.0 cat B, so it should be ok as long as you only have dependencies to it. However I don’t know the plugin that you are using, so I can’t really help about how to resolve false-positives ... might have a look at it thoug. Chris Von: Alexander Alten-Lorenz Datum: Dienstag, 2. Mai 2023 um 16:05 An: general@incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re: License question when including other ASF projects Can anyone give us a tip regarding this one? Thanks, —alex > On 30. Apr 2023, at 18:13, Alexander Alten-Lorenz > wrote: > > Hey Dominik, > > Sry for bugging, any chance you know how to tune the license check that the > Eclipse License passes? > https://github.com/apache/incubator-wayang/actions/runs/4845087374/jobs/8633774880#step:6:1151 > > It’s merged, but we’d love to have a green build :) > > Cheers, > —Alex > > >> On 29. Apr 2023, at 11:40, Alexander Alten-Lorenz >> wrote: >> >> Hey Dominik, >> >> Thank you for confirming. I try to merge now, let’s hope :) >> >> Cheers, >> —Alex >> >>> On 29. Apr 2023, at 11:36, Dominik Riemer wrote: >>> >>> Hi Alex, >>> >>> EPL 2.0 should be fine in case it is included in binary-only form (see >>> Category B under [1]). >>> >>> Cheers >>> Dominik >>> >>> >>> [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html >>> >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Alexander Alten-Lorenz >>> Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2023 11:29 AM >>> To: general@incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: License question when including other ASF projects >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We use Apache Calcite, dependabot suggests a bump, but the automation >>> failed since Calcite uses a non-compatible license (if I’m right) >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-wayang/actions/runs/4751917613/jobs/8441627979?pr=302#step:6:1117 >>> >>> How can we solve this, except not to update ;) Or is this just a false >>> alarm? >>> >>> Thanks for the help, >>> —Alex >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >
Re: License question when including other ASF projects
Can anyone give us a tip regarding this one? Thanks, —alex > On 30. Apr 2023, at 18:13, Alexander Alten-Lorenz > wrote: > > Hey Dominik, > > Sry for bugging, any chance you know how to tune the license check that the > Eclipse License passes? > https://github.com/apache/incubator-wayang/actions/runs/4845087374/jobs/8633774880#step:6:1151 > > It’s merged, but we’d love to have a green build :) > > Cheers, > —Alex > > >> On 29. Apr 2023, at 11:40, Alexander Alten-Lorenz >> wrote: >> >> Hey Dominik, >> >> Thank you for confirming. I try to merge now, let’s hope :) >> >> Cheers, >> —Alex >> >>> On 29. Apr 2023, at 11:36, Dominik Riemer wrote: >>> >>> Hi Alex, >>> >>> EPL 2.0 should be fine in case it is included in binary-only form (see >>> Category B under [1]). >>> >>> Cheers >>> Dominik >>> >>> >>> [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html >>> >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Alexander Alten-Lorenz >>> Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2023 11:29 AM >>> To: general@incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: License question when including other ASF projects >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We use Apache Calcite, dependabot suggests a bump, but the automation >>> failed since Calcite uses a non-compatible license (if I’m right) >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-wayang/actions/runs/4751917613/jobs/8441627979?pr=302#step:6:1117 >>> >>> How can we solve this, except not to update ;) Or is this just a false >>> alarm? >>> >>> Thanks for the help, >>> —Alex >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >
Re: License question when including other ASF projects
Hey Dominik, Sry for bugging, any chance you know how to tune the license check that the Eclipse License passes? https://github.com/apache/incubator-wayang/actions/runs/4845087374/jobs/8633774880#step:6:1151 It’s merged, but we’d love to have a green build :) Cheers, —Alex > On 29. Apr 2023, at 11:40, Alexander Alten-Lorenz > wrote: > > Hey Dominik, > > Thank you for confirming. I try to merge now, let’s hope :) > > Cheers, > —Alex > >> On 29. Apr 2023, at 11:36, Dominik Riemer wrote: >> >> Hi Alex, >> >> EPL 2.0 should be fine in case it is included in binary-only form (see >> Category B under [1]). >> >> Cheers >> Dominik >> >> >> [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Alexander Alten-Lorenz >> Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2023 11:29 AM >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: License question when including other ASF projects >> >> Hi, >> >> We use Apache Calcite, dependabot suggests a bump, but the automation failed >> since Calcite uses a non-compatible license (if I’m right) >> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-wayang/actions/runs/4751917613/jobs/8441627979?pr=302#step:6:1117 >> >> How can we solve this, except not to update ;) Or is this just a false alarm? >> >> Thanks for the help, >> —Alex >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >
Re: License question when including other ASF projects
Hey Dominik, Thank you for confirming. I try to merge now, let’s hope :) Cheers, —Alex > On 29. Apr 2023, at 11:36, Dominik Riemer wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > EPL 2.0 should be fine in case it is included in binary-only form (see > Category B under [1]). > > Cheers > Dominik > > > [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html > > > -Original Message- > From: Alexander Alten-Lorenz > Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2023 11:29 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: License question when including other ASF projects > > Hi, > > We use Apache Calcite, dependabot suggests a bump, but the automation failed > since Calcite uses a non-compatible license (if I’m right) > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-wayang/actions/runs/4751917613/jobs/8441627979?pr=302#step:6:1117 > > How can we solve this, except not to update ;) Or is this just a false alarm? > > Thanks for the help, > —Alex > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
RE: License question when including other ASF projects
Hi Alex, EPL 2.0 should be fine in case it is included in binary-only form (see Category B under [1]). Cheers Dominik [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html -Original Message- From: Alexander Alten-Lorenz Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2023 11:29 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: License question when including other ASF projects Hi, We use Apache Calcite, dependabot suggests a bump, but the automation failed since Calcite uses a non-compatible license (if I’m right) https://github.com/apache/incubator-wayang/actions/runs/4751917613/jobs/8441627979?pr=302#step:6:1117 How can we solve this, except not to update ;) Or is this just a false alarm? Thanks for the help, —Alex
License question when including other ASF projects
Hi, We use Apache Calcite, dependabot suggests a bump, but the automation failed since Calcite uses a non-compatible license (if I’m right) https://github.com/apache/incubator-wayang/actions/runs/4751917613/jobs/8441627979?pr=302#step:6:1117 How can we solve this, except not to update ;) Or is this just a false alarm? Thanks for the help, —Alex
