Re: Vote ? was [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: So unless new issues come up once the vote starts (which would be bad - that's why we have a DISCUSS phase) I would very much like to close the vote after the standard 72 hours. +1 I'm persuaded that the week-long DISCUSS was a good call. A 72-hour VOTE should suffice after that. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Vote ? was [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:09 PM Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: Hi, On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: ...having seen some of the issues that came from prior proposals rushing a vote, I'd like to see [VOTE] thread to exist for at least a week I don't think letting the vote drag on purpose is useful - after almost a week of discussions it seems like all the (minor) issues that have not come to closure need to be discussed once the podling is established. A longer vote would be counterproductive w.r.t these issues. +1. That is the purpose of the discussion phase. We should all have enough context to vote one way or another. So unless new issues come up once the vote starts (which would be bad - that's why we have a DISCUSS phase) I would very much like to close the vote after the standard 72 hours. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Vote ? was [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: ...We already have demonstrated our ability to raises various points on various subjects, time to demonstrate The ASF in action !.. +1 - as I said elsethread it's in theory Roman's job to start the vote, as the Groovy champion. But I guess if any of the mentors feel impatient we can do that as well...going once... ;-) -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Vote ? was [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal
Hi guys, we can discuss for 3 more months, but at some point, isn't it time to start a vote ? We already have demonstrated our ability to raises various points on various subjects, time to demonstrate The ASF in action ! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Vote ? was [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal
On 17/03/2015 15:34, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: ...We already have demonstrated our ability to raises various points on various subjects, time to demonstrate The ASF in action !.. +1 - as I said elsethread it's in theory Roman's job to start the vote, as the Groovy champion. But I guess if any of the mentors feel impatient we can do that as well...going once... ;-) -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org I wouldn't mind starting a vote early, given the time constraints that we have :) -- Cédric Champeau Groovy language developer http://twitter.com/CedricChampeau http://melix.github.io/blog - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Vote ? was [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Cédric Champeau cedric.champ...@gmail.com wrote: ...I wouldn't mind starting a vote early, given the time constraints that we have :)... Ok, I'll start the vote Wednesday morning CET unless we hear from Roman until then. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Vote ? was [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, we can discuss for 3 more months, but at some point, isn't it time to start a vote ? Sure. But at least a week for something like Groovy should be expected. Besides, I still owe IPMC an answer about status of the Groovy trademark. I'm trying to research this on my end with Pivotal team. Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Vote ? was [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal
Hi! having seen some of the issues that came from prior proposals rushing a vote, I'd like to see [VOTE] thread to exist for at least a week. I am going to start a vote tomorrow once a full week of [DISCUSS] elapses. Thanks, Roman. On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Cédric Champeau cedric.champ...@gmail.com wrote: ...I wouldn't mind starting a vote early, given the time constraints that we have :)... Ok, I'll start the vote Wednesday morning CET unless we hear from Roman until then. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Vote ? was [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: ...I still owe IPMC an answer about status of the Groovy trademark. I'm trying to research this on my end with Pivotal team... Sure, it's good to find out but I don't think that's a blocker for entering incubation. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Vote ? was [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal
Hi, On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: ...having seen some of the issues that came from prior proposals rushing a vote, I'd like to see [VOTE] thread to exist for at least a week I don't think letting the vote drag on purpose is useful - after almost a week of discussions it seems like all the (minor) issues that have not come to closure need to be discussed once the podling is established. A longer vote would be counterproductive w.r.t these issues. So unless new issues come up once the vote starts (which would be bad - that's why we have a DISCUSS phase) I would very much like to close the vote after the standard 72 hours. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
