Re: SVN Change?

[Greg Stein]

On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Marvin Humphrey 
wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 8:13 AM, John D. Ament 
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 11:02 AM Marvin Humphrey 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 7:21 AM, John D. Ament 
> >> wrote:
> >> > All,
> >> >
> >> > Did anyone change something recently in SVN? I pulled this morning and
> >> got
> >> > back a larger than expected amount of content.  It seems like the
> whole
> >> > site tree's been duplicated.
> >>
> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1746519
> >>
> >>
> > :-(
> >
> > Any thoughts on how to fix this? Is it just a matter of deleting a
> > directory tree?
>
> Yeah, it's just `svn rm FULL_URL`.  I took care of it.
>
> Please folks: always preview before you commit. With Subversion,
> that's `svn diff`.


I removed additional incorrect files in r1746855.

Comparing the current tree to 1746518 (ie. just before the bad revision),
the only changes are "good changes".

Cheers,
-g

[DRAFT] Board Report for Incubator PMC - June 2016

[John D. Ament]

All,

Please find the current draft of the board report, below.  I still have to
write a narrative unless someone else wants to do it.  I'll send a more
refined copy tomorrow evening.

There's still a couple of podlings that need sign off, but I think we're
really close.  I've already removed CMDA based on discussions happening on
their list.

- John

Incubator PMC report for June 2016

The Apache Incubator is the entry path into the ASF for projects and
codebases wishing to become part of the Foundation's efforts.

< narrative >

* Community

  New IPMC members:

  - Joe Witt

  People who left the IPMC:



* New Podlings

 - Pony Mail
 - Fluo


* Graduations

  The board has motions for the following:



* Releases

  The following releases entered distribution during the month of
  May:

  - 2016-05-05 Apache Mynewt 0.8.0
  - 2016-05-24 Apache Tephra 0.8.0
  - 2016-05-24 Apache CommonsRDF 0.2.0
  - 2016-05-24 Apache Mnemonic 0.1.2

* IP Clearance



* Legal / Trademarks

  - A comment on a recent Podling Name Search indicated that there was a
desire
  to have PNS's come later on during incubation.  Many IPMC members seem to
believe
  that they should happen earlier.  An email requesting clarification has
been
  sent.

* Infrastructure

  - Multiple former podlings are reporting delays in being converted to
TLPs.

* Miscellaneous

  - The CMDA podling is now 2 months behind.  In response to the lack of
activity,
  a mentor has begun retirement discussions with the podling.

* Credits

  - Report Manager:

 Summary of podling reports 

* Still getting started at the Incubator

  - Fluo
  - Gossip
  - Pony Mail

* Not yet ready to graduate

  No release:

  - Airflow
  - Gearpump
  - iota
  - log4cxx2
  - Quarks
  - Quickstep
  - Streams
  - Toree
  - Trafodion

  Community growth:

  - Atlas
  - CommonsRDF
  - HTrace
  - Mnemonic
  - MRQL
  - Myriad
  - Omid
  - OpenAz
  - Ranger
  - SAMOA
  - Singa
  - Taverna
  - Tephra
  - Wave

* Ready to graduate

  The Board has motions for the following:

  - Twill (Pending)

* Did not report, expected next month

  - Climate Model Diagnostic Analyzer (2 months)

--
   Table of Contents
Airflow
Atlas
CommonsRDF
Fluo
Gearpump
Gossip
HTrace
iota
log4cxx2
Mnemonic
MRQL
Myriad
Omid
OpenAz
Pony Mail
Quarks
Quickstep
Ranger
SAMOA
Singa
Streams
Taverna
Tephra
Toree
Trafodion
Wave

--


Airflow

Airflow is a workflow automation and scheduling system that can be used to
author and manage data pipelines.

Airflow has been incubating since 2016-03-31.

Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:

  1. Releases
  2. Grow up user and contributor communities
  3. Improve and extend documentation and samples on the website

Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
aware of?

  None

How has the community developed since the last report?

  * Since our last podling report 1 month ago, we grew
our contributors from 137 to 148
  * Since our last podling report 1 month ago, we
accepted/merged 51 PRs
  * We voted on the following matters according to Apache guidelines:
 * We voted to make all current and future committers part of the PPMC
 * We voted in a new committer and PPMC member : Steven Yvinec-Kruyk and
   he accepted
 * We voted in a commit policy of "RTC with a +1 vote from a committer
   other than the author (assuming no vetos)"

How has the project developed since the last report?

  * All resources have been created and all migrations are complete - code
donation included
  * The website is in progress

Date of last release:

  N/A - we are still working out releases as we are new to Apache.

When were the last committers or PMC members elected?

  On May 20, 1 committer/PPMC member(Steven Yvinec-Kruyk) was elected and he
  accepted.

Signed-off-by:

  [ ](airflow) Chris Nauroth
  [x](airflow) Hitesh Shah
  [x](airflow) Jakob Homan
Shepherd/Mentor notes:




Atlas

Apache Atlas is a scalable and extensible set of core foundational
governance
services that enables enterprises to effectively and efficiently meet their
compliance requirements within Hadoop and allows integration with the
complete
enterprise data ecosystem

Atlas has been incubating since 2015-05-05.

Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:

  1. Podling name search is pending.
  2. Expand the community and add more committers.
  3. The upcoming release for Atlas (0.7-incubating) will be nearly 6 months
 since the last one. We would like to improve on this by making more
 frequent releases, and also encourage the community to discuss in
 release roadmaps etc.

Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
aware of?

  No 

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.0 (incubating)

[Pierre Smits]

Congratulations Steve

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

ORRTIZ.COM 
OFBiz based solutions & services

OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Steve Varnau 
wrote:

> This vote passes, with condition of not including the client binary
> package.
>
> -1 (binding) Justin Mclean  (With client convenience binary)
> +1 (binding) Justin Mclean (Without the client convenience binary)
> +1 (binding) Michael Stack (carried over from dev list vote)
> +1 (binding) Jean-Baptiste Onofre
> +1 (binding) Sergio Fernandez
>
> Thanks to those who took time to review and vote!
>
> The podling community will decide whether to spin another release
> candidate to fix the
> client binary to NOT bundle OpenSSL or to release 2.0.0 (without client
> binary) and follow
> it immediately with a patch (2.0.1) release.
>
> --Steve
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Steve Varnau [mailto:steve.var...@esgyn.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 10:10 AM
> > To: 'general@incubator.apache.org' 
> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion 2.0.0 (incubating)
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Trafodion 2.0.0-incubating
> (Release
> > Candidate 3).
> >
> > The trafodion community has approved RC3 for release.
> > Vote result:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-trafodion-
> > dev/201605.mbox/%3Cebe8936d36c9cedc2fbf65a94e6c5cbf%40mail.gmail.co
> > m%3E
> > Or in Pony Mail: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/Zl1sh41t2mahwox
> >
> > Voting thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-
> > trafodion-
> > dev/201605.mbox/%3C85e78601a290f595707ee81d033c6b4c%40mail.gmail.co
> > m%3E
> >
> > Release artifacts:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafodion/trafodion-2.0.0
> -RC3
> > Artifacts are signed with my key (7F14AF20), which is in
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/trafodion/KEYS
> > This is the first release we are including convenience binaries built
> from the
> > source code artifact.
> >
> > The tag for this candidate is "2.0.0rc3". Git repository:
> > git://git.apache.org/incubator-trafodion.git
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > trafodion.git;a=tag;h=1a8942c91e58212968d94478db18005568f4
> >
> > The JIRA release notes:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318620;
> v
> > ersion=12333044
> >
> > Instructions for
> > Setting up build environment:
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TRAFODION/Create+Build+Environ
> > ment
> > Building:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TRAFODION/Build+Source
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Please vote by Friday, June 3, Noon Pacific Time (7pm UTC).
> >
> > Thank you,
> > --Steve
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 0.9.0-incubating-rc3

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

+1 binding

I checked:
- all artefacts contain incubating
- signatures correct
- LICENSE and NOTICE all good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- all Apache licensed files have ASF headers
- no unexpected binaries
- can compile from source
- can run blinky example

Thanks,
Justin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

SVN Change?

[John D. Ament]

All,

Did anyone change something recently in SVN? I pulled this morning and got
back a larger than expected amount of content.  It seems like the whole
site tree's been duplicated.

John

Re: SVN Change?

[John D. Ament]

On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 11:02 AM Marvin Humphrey 
wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 7:21 AM, John D. Ament 
> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Did anyone change something recently in SVN? I pulled this morning and
> got
> > back a larger than expected amount of content.  It seems like the whole
> > site tree's been duplicated.
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1746519
>
>
:-(

Any thoughts on how to fix this? Is it just a matter of deleting a
directory tree?


> Marvin Humphrey
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: SVN Change?

[Marvin Humphrey]

On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 7:21 AM, John D. Ament  wrote:
> All,
>
> Did anyone change something recently in SVN? I pulled this morning and got
> back a larger than expected amount of content.  It seems like the whole
> site tree's been duplicated.

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1746519

Marvin Humphrey

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: SVN Change?

[Marvin Humphrey]

On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 8:13 AM, John D. Ament  wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 11:02 AM Marvin Humphrey 
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 7:21 AM, John D. Ament 
>> wrote:
>> > All,
>> >
>> > Did anyone change something recently in SVN? I pulled this morning and
>> got
>> > back a larger than expected amount of content.  It seems like the whole
>> > site tree's been duplicated.
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1746519
>>
>>
> :-(
>
> Any thoughts on how to fix this? Is it just a matter of deleting a
> directory tree?

Yeah, it's just `svn rm FULL_URL`.  I took care of it.

Please folks: always preview before you commit. With Subversion,
that's `svn diff`.

Marvin Humphrey

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Podling name search - early or late?

[John D. Ament]

I'm CC'ing Shane to try to get a response.

John

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:44 PM John D. Ament  wrote:

> TBH, I'm a bit surprised with the answer provided by Shane in the JIRA.
> My understanding has been that branding is an important part of incubation,
> so hearing that it should come near the conclusion is a bit perplexing.
>
> Hopefully he can provide some clarification of it.
>
> John
>
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:19 PM P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
>
>> +1 for doing it early. Waiting to the bitter end can delay graduation,
>> and a podling rename can be disruptive.
>>
>> IMO part of incubation is about establishing and learning how to protect
>> your brand. Establishing a brand is not an exercise you want to have to do
>> twice.
>>
>> -Taylor
>>
>> > On May 27, 2016, at 6:37 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
>> chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>> >
>> > I’ve always done the podling name search right away. I’m not
>> > sure where that comment came from from Shane - my experience
>> > has been the opposite.
>> >
>> > ++
>> > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> > Chief Architect
>> > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>> > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> > Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>> > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
>> > WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> > ++
>> > Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS)
>> > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>> > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> > WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/
>> > ++
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> On 5/27/16, 3:35 PM, "Stian Soiland-Reyes"  wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I think the point is that name search is not a blocker for doing
>> incubator
>> >> releases - it can be time consuming and there are many other
>> "bureaucratic"
>> >> steps to get through in the beginning like IP clearance and license
>> >> checking.
>> >>
>> >> For brand new projects, name search can therefore be delayed - their
>> name
>> >> is less important as their community will be fully within the
>> incubator to
>> >> start with.
>> >>
>> >> However I think for established distributed projects moving to the
>> >> incubator it is more important to sort name earlier - it can be
>> disruptive
>> >> enough for the community with the change of infrastructure and the
>> >> formalities, so you may might not want to confuse them again with a new
>> >> name many months later - effectively changing all infrastructure again.
>> >>
>> >> Some podlings found their name could be tricky trademark wise and had
>> to
>> >> change, but getting together and deciding a new name can even be a good
>> >> thing, as it breaks any legacy corporate ownership and builds a new
>> >> collective identity.
>> >>> On 27 May 2016 7:20 p.m., "Balaji Ganesan" 
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Podling namesearch is essential step that needs to be completed
>> before the
>> >>> podling graduates. There is no specific guidance, as far as i know,
>> on what
>> >>> stage of podling you should do it.
>> >>>
>> >>> That said, it would be better to do this early enough and get
>> approval on
>> >>> the name. If there is any reason to change name, due to a conflict,
>> it is
>> >>> better to do it before releases are made and community starts building
>> >>> around. Name change is always a pain.
>> >>>
>>  On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Jakob Homan 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>  We were getting ready to start the PNS for Airflow when I came across
>>  this comment from Shane in regards to Kudu:
>> 
>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-93
>>  "This looks like a pretty good set of search data, but we usually
>>  don't work on resolving PODLINGNAMESEARCHES until a podling is
>> clearly
>>  established, has a release, community is building, etc."
>> 
>>  This is surprising to me and different than the last time I was
>>  involved in an incubating project.  Is this correct?
>> 
>>  It seems more useful to determine if a name can be used early in the
>>  incubation, before releases, talks, thousands of lines code, package
>>  names, emotional attachments, etc.  In the event that a podling
>> fails,
>>  nothing is lost by okaying the name early, assuming we don't attempt
>>  to trademark (which we haven't been for non-TLPs, I believe).
>> 
>>  Any thoughts?  Any reason not to start doing the PNS for Airflow now?
>> 
>>  Thanks,
>>  Jakob
>> 
>>  -
>>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> 

Re: Request Access to the Wiki To Create Proposal

[John D. Ament]

Please give us your username.
On Jun 4, 2016 08:10, "Ellison Anne Williams" 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to request access to the wiki in order to create a proposal.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ellison Anne
>