[IP CLEARANCE] Apache Cassandra Harry

[Mick Semb Wever]

Apache Cassandra has received a code donation of Harry.

The IP clearance document is at
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/apache-cassandra-harry.html

Please review in the next 72 hours, then IP clearance will proceed by lazy
consensus, on condition the project's PMC vote that is running in parallel
also passes.

Thanks!
Mick

Re: [VOTE] Hop proposal

[Aditya Sharma]

+1 (non-binding)
Seems promising

Thanks and regards,
Aditya Sharma

On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 09:14, Dave Fisher  wrote:

> +1 (binding) let’s hop to it!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Sep 16, 2020, at 7:55 PM, Julian Hyde  wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > I have known several of the members of the Hop community (Matt, Bart,
> > Rodrigo, Doug, Gretchen, Dave) for well over ten years; they were
> > contributing to Pentaho, Kettle and other projects while I was working
> > on Mondrian. They are good people, and they know how to build a great
> > product by first building a great community.
> >
> > I volunteered to become a mentor of this project because I am excited
> > to see what they can achieve as part of Apache.
> >
> > Julian
> >
> >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 6:29 AM Matt Casters
> >>  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Apache,
> >>
> >> I'd like to call a vote on accepting Hop into the Apache Incubator.
> >> Please see the discussion thread [1].
> >>
> >> Please see the full proposal:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HopProposal
> >> Please cast your vote
> >>
> >>[ ] +1 Accept Hop into the Incubator
> >>[ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Hop
> >>[ ] -1 Do not accept Hop because …
> >>
> >> The vote will be open at least for 72 hours.
> >>
> >> Incubator PMC member votes are binding. Everyone else is welcomed to
> vote too
> >> (mark them as non-binding if you can)!
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance for your time.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Matt
> >>
> >> [1]
> http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Hop-proposal-td68232.html
> >>
> >>
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

[VOTE] Hop proposal

[Matt Casters]

Hi Apache,

I'd like to call a vote on accepting Hop into the Apache Incubator.
Please see the discussion thread [1].

Please see the full proposal:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HopProposal
Please cast your vote

[ ] +1 Accept Hop into the Incubator
[ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Hop
[ ] -1 Do not accept Hop because …

The vote will be open at least for 72 hours.

Incubator PMC member votes are binding. Everyone else is welcomed to vote
too
(mark them as non-binding if you can)!

Thanks in advance for your time.

Regards,
Matt

[1]
http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Hop-proposal-td68232.html

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Cassandra Harry

[John D. Ament]

Hi,

Typically the flow is to vote on your dev list then vote here.  Once that's
done, the vote should be in the bottom votes section of the IP Clearance.
Looking at the related threads on Cassandra lists, I'm not sure why Nate
McCall was selected.  Since you're a member I'd rather see your name
listed, it doesn't need to be the VP of the project and from the content on
the lists you've been doing it.

The only thing that looks a miss is that the chain of custody seems odd.
It appears the PMC created a repo, had someone fork the repo and dump the
code there.  Typically what we look for is a dump from a corporate entity
in the form of a zip (since IP clearance is typically to make some closed
source open source).  Since the two contributors listed are already PMC
members (and I only see content from one such developer) it's very hard to
follow whether or not all of the original authors are listed.  Typically
you would only change the headers once an SGA is filed, but I think all I
see is a CCLA.  Did the CCLA include comments indicating this code was to
be contributed?

John

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 5:51 AM Mick Semb Wever  wrote:

> Apache Cassandra has received a code donation of Harry.
>
> The IP clearance document is at
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/apache-cassandra-harry.html
>
> Please review in the next 72 hours, then IP clearance will proceed by lazy
> consensus, on condition the project's PMC vote that is running in parallel
> also passes.
>
> Thanks!
> Mick
>

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Cassandra Harry

[Michael Semb Wever]

Thanks John, a number of things mentioned are soaking in.

Some questions/answers inline…


> Typically the flow is to vote on your dev list then vote here.  Once that's
> done, the vote should be in the bottom votes section of the IP Clearance.


There has been discussion (and the jira ticket) on the contribution already, so 
the dev vote was (in practice) a formality (more of the ip clearance details 
than accepting the code).

The links to the this thread and the dev vote are in the doc. It just takes 
time to update the website :(


> Looking at the related threads on Cassandra lists, I'm not sure why Nate
> McCall was selected.  


Nate and I were working on it together. 
Still rather I change the name to me?


> The only thing that looks a miss is that the chain of custody seems odd.
> It appears the PMC created a repo, had someone fork the repo and dump the
> code there.  

That's on me. I suggested creating the git repo in advance (using selfserve.a.o)

Then we could not find `/repos/asf/incubator/donations`
Asking around didn't help much either.
 ref: https://the-asf.slack.com/archives/C4REPMB9S/p1599300470015700

So at that point the easiest place to dump it was in a fork.


> Since the two contributors listed are already PMC
> members (and I only see content from one such developer) it's very hard to
> follow whether or not all of the original authors are listed.  Typically
> you would only change the headers once an SGA is filed, but I think all I
> see is a CCLA.  Did the CCLA include comments indicating this code was to
> be contributed?


All authors are listed and correct. Their ICLA cover the work completely, no 
CCLA is required. I have double checked this with the authors. It is my 
understanding, with two PMC with ICLA, that the SGA is also not needed here. 

I am also aware that the IP Clearance probably isn't needed here. But because 
this work was done over a period of time in private, the IP Clearance process 
kicked off before we saw all this in the clear.

cheers,
Mick


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Training (Incubating) Tools 1.0.0 RC2

[Kevin Ratnasekera]

+1 ( binding )

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 1:50 AM Furkan KAMACI 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> +1!
>
> Kind Regards,
> Furkan KAMACI
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 7:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula 
> wrote:
>
> > My late +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 8:01 PM Christofer Dutz <
> christofer.d...@c-ware.de
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The vote to release Apache Training (incubating) Tools 1.0.0 has passed
> > > with 3 +1 (all from mentors) and one non-binding +1 vote.
> > >
> > > Binding votes (all were IPMC members):
> > > - Christofer Dutz (
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd2cbadaf3b8c050e927f7ec5078d9b783eeaa234026542131e01477e%40%3Cdev.training.apache.org%3E
> > > )
> > > - Justin McLean (
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r34fe140758417103ba6a53e5d3a15dba7ca9924368f52bdf8bceb67e%40%3Cdev.training.apache.org%3E
> > > )
> > > - Lars Francke (
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r857decb97e97b2d3a86fbf05a919e7990be79f57a61d8c861e6dfa60%40%3Cdev.training.apache.org%3E
> > > )
> > >
> > > Non-Binding vote:
> > > - Gautam Gupta
> > >
> > > The vote thread for some reason was fragmented, so I added links to the
> > > vote emails to each person voting.
> > >
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> > --Brahma Reddy Battula
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Training (Incubating) Tools 1.0.0 RC2

[Furkan KAMACI]

Hi,

+1!

Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 7:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula 
wrote:

> My late +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 8:01 PM Christofer Dutz  >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The vote to release Apache Training (incubating) Tools 1.0.0 has passed
> > with 3 +1 (all from mentors) and one non-binding +1 vote.
> >
> > Binding votes (all were IPMC members):
> > - Christofer Dutz (
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd2cbadaf3b8c050e927f7ec5078d9b783eeaa234026542131e01477e%40%3Cdev.training.apache.org%3E
> > )
> > - Justin McLean (
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r34fe140758417103ba6a53e5d3a15dba7ca9924368f52bdf8bceb67e%40%3Cdev.training.apache.org%3E
> > )
> > - Lars Francke (
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r857decb97e97b2d3a86fbf05a919e7990be79f57a61d8c861e6dfa60%40%3Cdev.training.apache.org%3E
> > )
> >
> > Non-Binding vote:
> > - Gautam Gupta
> >
> > The vote thread for some reason was fragmented, so I added links to the
> > vote emails to each person voting.
> >
> >
> > Chris
> >
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> --Brahma Reddy Battula
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Training (Incubating) Tools 1.0.0 RC2

[Brahma Reddy Battula]

My late +1 (non-binding)

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 8:01 PM Christofer Dutz 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The vote to release Apache Training (incubating) Tools 1.0.0 has passed
> with 3 +1 (all from mentors) and one non-binding +1 vote.
>
> Binding votes (all were IPMC members):
> - Christofer Dutz (
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd2cbadaf3b8c050e927f7ec5078d9b783eeaa234026542131e01477e%40%3Cdev.training.apache.org%3E
> )
> - Justin McLean (
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r34fe140758417103ba6a53e5d3a15dba7ca9924368f52bdf8bceb67e%40%3Cdev.training.apache.org%3E
> )
> - Lars Francke (
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r857decb97e97b2d3a86fbf05a919e7990be79f57a61d8c861e6dfa60%40%3Cdev.training.apache.org%3E
> )
>
> Non-Binding vote:
> - Gautam Gupta
>
> The vote thread for some reason was fragmented, so I added links to the
> vote emails to each person voting.
>
>
> Chris
>


-- 



--Brahma Reddy Battula

Please vote

[leerho]

Folks,

We would like to gently request that we get some IPMC members to vote on
our latest C++ release (see the permalink below.  It has been 17 days since
we posted the Vote Letter and we do not have a single vote.  We have
customers waiting for this release.

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbfaee427ffbe0148001e61d507103d8e807fd7520492cd0b486b941d%40%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E

We will be grateful!

Thank you!

Lee.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataSketches-cpp 2.1.0-incubating-rc1

[Dave Fisher]

Carrying over my VOTE +1(binding)

There was another IPMC vote which makes two, and we are looking for one more 
IPMC vote.

Regards,
Dave

Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 31, 2020, at 11:52 AM, Jon Malkin  wrote:
> 
> Hello IPMC and Apache DataSketches Community,
> 
> 1. This is a call for vote to release Apache DataSketches-cpp version:
> 2.1.0-incubating-rc1
> 
>NOTE 1: The C++ code provides a header-only library. Compilation
> is needed only to build unit tests. A Python extension is also
> included in this repository as a set of thin wrappers. That does
> produce a compiled artifact, but is not built by default.
> 
>NOTE 2: Compiling the C++ unit tests requires CMake 3.12 or newer.
> 
>NOTE 3: A few non-blocking issues were identified, as noted in section B
> 
>  A. Results from the PPMC vote:
> 
> - 2 (+1 binding) vote, 2 (+1 non-binding) votes
> 
> - The vote thread can be found at the Permalink:
>   
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbdcf341dcd41ce542976b9d09125c39c5d6a342d2e720e30e2882d3f%40%3Cdev.datasketches.apache.org%3E
> 
>  B. Testing/actions/votes performed by the voters in the PPMC Stage 1:
>- Alexander Saydakov (+1 non-binding)
>  Checked:
>  - gpg signature
>  - shasum
>  - cmake, make, make test
> 
>- Michael Himes (+1 non-binding)
>  Checked:
>  - make, make test
>  - python build/install
>  - python kll wrapper
>  - python vector_of_kll wrapper
> 
>- Dave Fisher (+1 binding)
>  - Checked incubating in name
>  - Checked signature and checksum
>  - Checked LICENSE
>  - Checked NOTICE
>  - Checked DISCLAIMER-WIP
>  - Ran RAT Check. [Jon's comment: non-blocking issues to be fixed
> in next release noted next]
> * one missing license (common/test/catch.hpp)
> * two missing headers (common/test/catch_runner.cpp,
> hll/include/hll.private.hpp)
> 
>- Furkan Kamaci (+1 binding)
>  I checked:
>  - Incubating in name
>  - DISCLAIMER-WIP exists
>  - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
>  - No unexpected binary files
>  - Checked PGP signatures
>  - Checked checksums
>  - Run make, make test
> 
> 2. Source repository:
>- https://github.com/apache/incubator-datasketches-cpp
> 
>Git Tag for this release:
>- 
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-datasketches-cpp/releases/tag/2.1.0-incubating-rc1
> on branch 2.1.x-incubating
> 
>Git HashId for this release starts with: c1a6f8e
> 
> 3. The Release Candidate / Dist (Zip Repository):
>- 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/datasketches/cpp/2.1.0-incubating-rc1/
> 
>The public signing key can be found in the KEYS file:
>- https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/datasketches/KEYS
> 
>The artifacts have been signed with --keyid-format SHORT : 38F334CC
> 
> 4. C++ Test Guide:
>- 
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-datasketches-cpp/blob/2.1.0-incubating-rc1/README.md
> 5. Python Build & Test Guide:
>- 
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-datasketches-cpp/blob/2.1.0-incubating-rc1/python/README.md
>- Most python unit tests are written in a tutorial style that can
> be followed as example usage:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-datasketches-cpp/tree/2.1.0-incubating-rc1/python/tests
>- Only python 3 is supported
> 
> 6. This is the second stage vote:
>   - This voting process will remain open for at least 72 hours AND
> until at least 3 (+1) IPMC votes or a majority of (+1) are acquired.
> 
> Please vote accordingly:
> 
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> Thanks,
> Jon malkinjmal...@apache.org 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Hop proposal

[Dave Fisher]

+1 (binding) let’s hop to it!

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 16, 2020, at 7:55 PM, Julian Hyde  wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> I have known several of the members of the Hop community (Matt, Bart,
> Rodrigo, Doug, Gretchen, Dave) for well over ten years; they were
> contributing to Pentaho, Kettle and other projects while I was working
> on Mondrian. They are good people, and they know how to build a great
> product by first building a great community.
> 
> I volunteered to become a mentor of this project because I am excited
> to see what they can achieve as part of Apache.
> 
> Julian
> 
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 6:29 AM Matt Casters
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Apache,
>> 
>> I'd like to call a vote on accepting Hop into the Apache Incubator.
>> Please see the discussion thread [1].
>> 
>> Please see the full proposal: 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HopProposal
>> Please cast your vote
>> 
>>[ ] +1 Accept Hop into the Incubator
>>[ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Hop
>>[ ] -1 Do not accept Hop because …
>> 
>> The vote will be open at least for 72 hours.
>> 
>> Incubator PMC member votes are binding. Everyone else is welcomed to vote too
>> (mark them as non-binding if you can)!
>> 
>> Thanks in advance for your time.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Matt
>> 
>> [1] 
>> http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Hop-proposal-td68232.html
>> 
>> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.5.0-incubating RC1

[Luciano Resende]

Transferring my +1 from the dev list.
We would appreciate some volunteers helping with the release vote.

On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 3:25 PM Luciano Resende  wrote:
>
> Please vote to approve the release of Apache Toree 0.5.0-incubating
> (RC1) which brings support for Spark 3.0.
>
> The podling dev vote thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb45468fbc9a21bdf9668b2aa17bf0a9b0d454b83bdbc788a7b28a970%40%3Cdev.toree.apache.org%3E
>
> And the result:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r10700652b70ffdab9774fe4c938630b699b0496c9cb17297c99072bd%40%3Cdev.toree.apache.org%3E
>
> Tag: v0.5.0-incubating-rc1 (3825a6c260251f2a9f3684d4d88a328709430406)
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/tree/v0.5.0-incubating-rc1
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found 
> at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.5.0-incubating-rc1/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetoree-1017
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
> 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.5.0-incubating
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/



-- 
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Hop proposal

[Julian Hyde]

+1

I have known several of the members of the Hop community (Matt, Bart,
Rodrigo, Doug, Gretchen, Dave) for well over ten years; they were
contributing to Pentaho, Kettle and other projects while I was working
on Mondrian. They are good people, and they know how to build a great
product by first building a great community.

I volunteered to become a mentor of this project because I am excited
to see what they can achieve as part of Apache.

Julian

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 6:29 AM Matt Casters
 wrote:
>
> Hi Apache,
>
> I'd like to call a vote on accepting Hop into the Apache Incubator.
> Please see the discussion thread [1].
>
> Please see the full proposal: 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HopProposal
> Please cast your vote
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Hop into the Incubator
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Hop
> [ ] -1 Do not accept Hop because …
>
> The vote will be open at least for 72 hours.
>
> Incubator PMC member votes are binding. Everyone else is welcomed to vote too
> (mark them as non-binding if you can)!
>
> Thanks in advance for your time.
>
> Regards,
> Matt
>
> [1] 
> http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Hop-proposal-td68232.html
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org