Re: [POLL] drop 8

2005-07-05 Thread Eric Pugh

+1
On Jul 4, 2005, at 2:15 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:



+1

On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:


8. Packages are encouraged to either use JavaBeans as core  
objects, a

JavaBean-style API, or to provide an optional JavaBean wrapper.



doesn't seem very relevant. i think that it'd be simpler just to drop
it.

here's my +1

- robert

--8---
[ ] +1 Get rid!
[ ] -1 Keep it (please give a reason...)
--



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RESULT] [POLL] drop 8

2005-07-05 Thread robert burrell donkin
i count 5 +1's and no objections so i'm going to go ahead and delete
it. 

- robert

On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 19:44 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
  8. Packages are encouraged to either use JavaBeans as core objects, a
  JavaBean-style API, or to provide an optional JavaBean wrapper.
 
 doesn't seem very relevant. i think that it'd be simpler just to drop
 it.
 
 here's my +1
 
 - robert
 
 --8---
 [ ] +1 Get rid!
 [ ] -1 Keep it (please give a reason...)
 --
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [POLL] drop 8

2005-07-04 Thread Henri Yandell


+1

On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:


8. Packages are encouraged to either use JavaBeans as core objects, a
JavaBean-style API, or to provide an optional JavaBean wrapper.


doesn't seem very relevant. i think that it'd be simpler just to drop
it.

here's my +1

- robert

--8---
[ ] +1 Get rid!
[ ] -1 Keep it (please give a reason...)
--



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[POLL] drop 8

2005-07-03 Thread robert burrell donkin
 8. Packages are encouraged to either use JavaBeans as core objects, a
 JavaBean-style API, or to provide an optional JavaBean wrapper.

doesn't seem very relevant. i think that it'd be simpler just to drop
it.

here's my +1

- robert

--8---
[ ] +1 Get rid!
[ ] -1 Keep it (please give a reason...)
--



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [POLL] drop 8

2005-07-03 Thread Phil Steitz

+1 to drop this

Phil

robert burrell donkin wrote:

8. Packages are encouraged to either use JavaBeans as core objects, a
JavaBean-style API, or to provide an optional JavaBean wrapper.



doesn't seem very relevant. i think that it'd be simpler just to drop
it.

here's my +1

- robert

--8---
[ ] +1 Get rid!
[ ] -1 Keep it (please give a reason...)
--



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [POLL] drop 8

2005-07-03 Thread Martin Cooper
+1

--
Martin Cooper


On 7/3/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 +1 to drop this
 
 Phil
 
 robert burrell donkin wrote:
 8. Packages are encouraged to either use JavaBeans as core objects, a
 JavaBean-style API, or to provide an optional JavaBean wrapper.
 
 
  doesn't seem very relevant. i think that it'd be simpler just to drop
  it.
 
  here's my +1
 
  - robert
 
  --8---
  [ ] +1 Get rid!
  [ ] -1 Keep it (please give a reason...)
  --
 
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [POLL] drop 8

2005-07-03 Thread Rahul Akolkar
+1

-Rahul

On 7/3/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 +1
 
 --
 Martin Cooper
 
 
 On 7/3/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  +1 to drop this
 
  Phil
 
  robert burrell donkin wrote:
  8. Packages are encouraged to either use JavaBeans as core objects, a
  JavaBean-style API, or to provide an optional JavaBean wrapper.
  
  
   doesn't seem very relevant. i think that it'd be simpler just to drop
   it.
  
   here's my +1
  
   - robert
  
   --8---
   [ ] +1 Get rid!
   [ ] -1 Keep it (please give a reason...)
   --
  
  
  
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]