Re: [RESULT][POLL] drop point 12

2005-07-05 Thread robert burrell donkin
+1

- robert

On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 02:16 -0400, Henri Yandell wrote:
 We should do the same on Commons at some point. Throw out the ones that 
 seem dead.
 
 Hen
 
 On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:
 
  i count 4 +1's
 
  the consensus seems to be in favour of removal so that's what i'm going
  to do.
 
  i propose to leave retain the number by noting those that have been
  deleted (rather than removing them).
 
  - robert
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RESULT][POLL] drop point 12

2005-07-04 Thread Henri Yandell


We should do the same on Commons at some point. Throw out the ones that 
seem dead.


Hen

On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:


i count 4 +1's

the consensus seems to be in favour of removal so that's what i'm going
to do.

i propose to leave retain the number by noting those that have been
deleted (rather than removing them).

- robert


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RESULT][POLL] drop point 12

2005-07-03 Thread robert burrell donkin
i count 4 +1's

the consensus seems to be in favour of removal so that's what i'm going
to do. 

i propose to leave retain the number by noting those that have been
deleted (rather than removing them).

- robert


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]