On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 14:57 +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote:
On 2/17/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 16:52 -0800, Martin Cooper wrote:
Given its database-centric nature, and the fact that it's a framework,
this
would appear to be more appropriate for the Apache DB Project:
Hmm.. okay. it isn't a large framework. but, okay.
jakarta commons does bricks not frameworks
(however, it is possible that you are actually describing something
which is an adaptive bridge brick and not technically a framework)
http://db.apache.org/
+1 but don't let that discourage you :)
jakarta isn't really accepting sub-projects any more: we're very slowly
moving away from that model towards something flatter.
- robert
I was specifically referring to the Commons. Well, okay! :)
it was the language that fooled me :)
sub-projects are jakarta mini-me's with separate communities, mailing
lists and so on. apache has found that sub-projects don't scale.
components are the bricks the community happens to be working on.
but martin's right that we try to push data access related proposals
towards the db project.
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
