[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emacs/gnuplot-mode
Will be removed 05 Feb 2007 Duplicated by USE=emacs sci-visualization/gnuplot V-Li signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] debug.eclass is dead now
Don't use debug.eclass. Pardon what may be a stupid question here, but what's the fix/workaround for using the debug.eclass ? Caleb -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] debug.eclass is dead now
Caleb Tennis napsal(a): Don't use debug.eclass. Pardon what may be a stupid question here, but what's the fix/workaround for using the debug.eclass ? Caleb eclass snip # It was broken, and debug useflag should _not_ touch CFLAGS to start with. # See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55708 for info about this # and http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/backtraces.xml to learn how to get # a debug build. /eclass snip -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] debug.eclass is dead now
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 07:19:30AM -0500, Caleb Tennis wrote: Don't use debug.eclass. Pardon what may be a stupid question here, but what's the fix/workaround for using the debug.eclass ? Simply stop using it. Drop it from the inherit line, and if your ebuild has a legitimate use of the debug flag, put that in IUSE. There is no need to restore the functionality that the eclass provided, since that didn't belong in ebuilds/eclasses in the first place. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] A reminder about elog/einfo usage
Just a heads up that in the coming weeks I'll start checking packages that still use einfo for important messages and convert them to elog if appropriate. If you have a problem with me doing that for your packages that notify me off-list. You can find the current list of packages to check at dev.gentoo.org/~genone/reports/einfo (if you want me to do a little favor then check the list for packages you maintain and fix them yourself). I know that it contains a number of false-positives, so all packages there will be checked manually. Marius -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list