Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing expat 2.0.0
Christian Faulhammer wrote: > "Wulf C. Krueger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>> You will get them tomorrow...promised. :) Too many bugs, not >>> enough devs...as always. >> Well, I've offered my help with the amd64 team three times now. Was >> ignored two times and the third time an initial discussion lead to >> nowhere so I guess it's not exactly of getting more devs but wanting >> them - or not. > > Hmmm, I don't know how you did it, but I just nagged some people for > a day and was in it...and that was just a few weeks ago. > > V-Li > That's because they want you to do the java bugs *g* -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing expat 2.0.0
"Wulf C. Krueger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > You will get them tomorrow...promised. :) Too many bugs, not > > enough devs...as always. > Well, I've offered my help with the amd64 team three times now. Was > ignored two times and the third time an initial discussion lead to > nowhere so I guess it's not exactly of getting more devs but wanting > them - or not. Hmmm, I don't know how you did it, but I just nagged some people for a day and was in it...and that was just a few weeks ago. V-Li -- http://www.gentoo.org/ http://www.faulhammer.org/ http://www.gnupg.org/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing expat 2.0.0
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Carsten Lohrke wrote: > > the amd64 team is unresponsive on even trivial stabilisation > > request form the KDE team as well, lately. > > > welp's been away ;) welp does not touch KDE packages... V-Li -- http://www.gentoo.org/ http://www.faulhammer.org/ http://www.gnupg.org/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] add built_with_use_die() to eutils.eclass ?
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Marius Mauch kirjoitti:
>
>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:45:48 +0200
>> dju` <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> eerror "Your ${package} package has been built without"
>>> eerror "${func} support, please enable the '${use_flag}' USE flag
>>> and"
>>> eerror "re-emerge ${package}."
>>> elog "You can enable this USE flag either globally in
>>> /etc/make.conf,"
>>> elog "or just for specific packages in /etc/portage/package.use."
>>> die "${package} missing ${func} support"
>>>
>> A little detail about elog: You should not use different elog functions
>> (eerror, elog, ewarn, ...) within the same message as they may appear
>> out of order in the final log (e.g. the elog lines might appear before
>> the eerror lines). This is because messages of the same loglevel and in
>> the same phase are grouped together. It's an implementation detail that
>> might be changed in future versions, but for now you'll have to live
>> with it.
>>
>> Also I don't see much use in explaining how to enable a use flag inside
>> ebuilds, at most there should be a pointer to the real documentation
>> IMO.
>>
>> Marius
>>
>
> Any updates on this?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/portage/eclass $ grep built_with_use_die -r .
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/portage/eclass $
>
> I for one would use it if it existed.
>
> Regards,
> Petteri
>
>
built_with_use sys-apps/pciutils zlib && die "You need to build
sys-apps/pciutils without zlib"
WHY do we need YET another function for such a simple construct?
built_with_use is already available and very powerful.
For example, HAL does..
built_with_use --missing false sys-apps/pciutils zlib
If the USE flag is missing entirely, it'll treat it like it's disabled
because old versions didn't have the zlib USE flag and didn't gzip their
data. Some packages it might be the other way around so you can pass
true instead.
Adding built_with_use_die is utterly pointless.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-servers/boa
# Raúl Porcel (18 May 2007) # For treecleaners, bug 102174 # Pending removal 17 Jul 2007 www-servers/boa -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] distcc and precompiled headers
Caleb Tennis wrote: > Based on some recent findings, it looks like the two above mentioned features > don't > work together. pch don't get distributed to distcc nodes, so they're > basically > mutually exclusive. However, distcc is a FEATURE and pch are a USE flag. > > Should we just put a check in each ebuild that uses the pch use flag, make an > eclass, or build something into the package manager(s) ? Thoughts? Enhance distcc? lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] distcc and precompiled headers
Based on some recent findings, it looks like the two above mentioned features don't work together. pch don't get distributed to distcc nodes, so they're basically mutually exclusive. However, distcc is a FEATURE and pch are a USE flag. Should we just put a check in each ebuild that uses the pch use flag, make an eclass, or build something into the package manager(s) ? Thoughts? Caleb -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] SVN/CVS temporarily down for CIAbot debugging
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 10:48:37PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > CVS and SVN are temporarily offline while I figure out why bug #169930 > has come back and broken stuff. Ok, CVS+SVN are available again now. Majority of the failure was caused by NSCD failing at some point, and thus causing the quantity of LDAP passwd db lookups to have frequent failures. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux Developer & Council Member E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 pgpZilMpN60OS.pgp Description: PGP signature
