[gentoo-dev] Re: Adding PYTHON_TARGETS=python2_7 to base profile
On Mon, 21 May 2012 21:50:33 -0500 Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote: On 16:27 Sun 13 May , Mike Gilbert wrote: To make ebuilds utilizing python-distutils-ng.eclass usable I didn't read any farther because I couldn't stop laughing. What will the next version of this eclass be called, -ng-ng? -really-ng? =) -ds9 -- fonts, gcc-porting toolchain, wxwidgets @ gentoo.org signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding PYTHON_TARGETS=python2_7 to base profile
On 22/05/12 07:58, Hans de Graaff wrote: On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 21:50 -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 16:27 Sun 13 May , Mike Gilbert wrote: To make ebuilds utilizing python-distutils-ng.eclass usable I didn't read any farther because I couldn't stop laughing. What will the next version of this eclass be called, -ng-ng? -really-ng? =) Given that Diego named the original ruby-ng eclass I would assume it would be ruby-voyager, or python-distutils-voyager. ruby-enterprise and python-distutils-enterprise ;) We can also go the Borland way and have ruby-turbo python-disutils-turbo. -- Krzysztof Pawlik nelchael at gentoo.org key id: 0xF6A80E46 desktop-misc, java, vim, kernel, python, apache... signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6.* unmasked, 4.7.0 added to tree
Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org said: I've added 4.7.0 to the tree tonight (unkeyworded and masked as usual). I've also keyworded the 4.6 series on all arches except amd64 (due to the grub bug). This is a temporary measure until we figure out the best course of action (at least we have some people looking at the problem now). Awesome, thanks. I personally apologize for the extremely long delay in getting these releases out in a timely manner. As such, I'm stepping down as GCC maintainer. Someone with as limited free time and programming experience as myself has no business maintaining a such core piece of a source-based distro. Sorry to dump even more on your shoulders Mike, but really I haven't been helping out much this past year anyways. I'll still be doing gcc-porting and hunting down patches like I used to. I've been looking for things to start working on again, and I could step back up and start to do some of the work I used to do for GCC releases. I'll talk with Mike to figure out how we can best split up the work. Thanks for all your work on the releases, -- Mark Loeser email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com web - http://www.halcy0n.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature
[gentoo-dev] Lastrite x11-wm/parti (replaced by x11-wm/xpra)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 # Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org (22 May 2012) # Masked for removal in 30 days. # Replaced by x11-wm/xpra. x11-wm/parti - -- Gentoo Dev http://xmw.de/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk+7S+cACgkQknrdDGLu8JAs5wD+MjEzgayDdXwJs9r7MZ04Uc/M xLL5p9AZ72UbNqWy+hcA/RsclJgM2GbwMUmXpcebDPyzeufeZ0jPo9NNlu8cXy3p =gf7r -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
Missing ChangeLog entry; echangelog works in profiles/ On 05/22/2012 11:16 AM, Michael Weber (xmw) wrote: xmw 12/05/22 08:16:33 Modified: package.mask Log: mask x11-wm/parti Revision ChangesPath 1.13781 profiles/package.mask file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.13781view=markup plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.13781content-type=text/plain diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?r1=1.13780r2=1.13781 Index: package.mask === RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v retrieving revision 1.13780 retrieving revision 1.13781 diff -u -r1.13780 -r1.13781 --- package.mask22 May 2012 05:09:29 - 1.13780 +++ package.mask22 May 2012 08:16:32 - 1.13781 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.13780 2012/05/22 05:09:29 dirtyepic Exp $ +# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.13781 2012/05/22 08:16:32 xmw Exp $ # # When you add an entry to the top of this file, add your name, the date, and # an explanation of why something is getting masked. Please be extremely @@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ #--- END OF EXAMPLES --- +# Michael Weberx...@gentoo.org (22 May 2012) +# Masked for removal in 30 days. +# Replaced by x11-wm/xpra. +x11-wm/parti + # Samuli Suominenssuomi...@gentoo.org (20 May 2012) # Still using vulnerable net-libs/xulrunner wrt bug 412341 # Build problems wrt bug 390325
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 fixed. On 05/22/2012 10:48 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: Missing ChangeLog entry; echangelog works in profiles/ On 05/22/2012 11:16 AM, Michael Weber (xmw) wrote: xmw 12/05/22 08:16:33 Modified: package.mask Log: mask x11-wm/parti Revision ChangesPath 1.13781 profiles/package.mask file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.13781view=markup plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.13781content-type=text/plain diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?r1=1.13780r2=1.13781 Index: package.mask === RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v retrieving revision 1.13780 retrieving revision 1.13781 diff -u -r1.13780 -r1.13781 --- package.mask22 May 2012 05:09:29 -1.13780 +++ package.mask22 May 2012 08:16:32 - 1.13781 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ - -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.13780 2012/05/22 05:09:29 dirtyepic Exp $ +# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.13781 2012/05/22 08:16:32 xmw Exp $ # # When you add an entry to the top of this file, add your name, the date, and # an explanation of why something is getting masked. Please be extremely @@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ #--- END OF EXAMPLES --- +# Michael Weberx...@gentoo.org (22 May 2012) +# Masked for removal in 30 days. +# Replaced by x11-wm/xpra. +x11-wm/parti + # Samuli Suominenssuomi...@gentoo.org (20 May 2012) # Still using vulnerable net-libs/xulrunner wrt bug 412341 # Build problems wrt bug 390325 - -- - -- Gentoo Dev http://xmw.de/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk+7VXcACgkQknrdDGLu8JAl3gD+LVcdhSBAw3t55C+3RXySdH38 bTqP30X+ffJgWXCxhDMA/3fwxRaqCXI/hzsrK6r80p1lJRsHIe9AVzdhl4gbNrcQ =0YuH -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/20/2012 03:55 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Am Sonntag 20 Mai 2012, 15:30:45 schrieb Nirbheek Chauhan: On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: I will repeat once again: autogenerate them. +1 for this, seriously. +1 and consider profiles/**/package.mask, too. - -- - -- Gentoo Dev http://xmw.de/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk+7VfAACgkQknrdDGLu8JAClQD/SVh+bstPurUReBipvCeGPYfE ZIGHcSs8Wt7HH0dy/YcA/iB2TRcd3BlcVy4O6v5wmf52s4UtCNnpYOL+RpD3O/in =uZ6k -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/20/2012 03:55 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Am Sonntag 20 Mai 2012, 15:30:45 schrieb Nirbheek Chauhan: On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: I will repeat once again: autogenerate them. +1 for this, seriously. +1 and consider profiles/**/package.mask, too. and how about getting rid of echangelog and just have it autogenerated as well? Or even better, how about giving up with cvs once for all? - -- - -- Gentoo Dev http://xmw.de/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk+7VfAACgkQknrdDGLu8JAClQD/SVh+bstPurUReBipvCeGPYfE ZIGHcSs8Wt7HH0dy/YcA/iB2TRcd3BlcVy4O6v5wmf52s4UtCNnpYOL+RpD3O/in =uZ6k -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Fabio Erculiani
Git migration (2012) (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog)
El mar, 22-05-2012 a las 11:22 +0200, Fabio Erculiani escribió: On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/20/2012 03:55 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Am Sonntag 20 Mai 2012, 15:30:45 schrieb Nirbheek Chauhan: On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: I will repeat once again: autogenerate them. +1 for this, seriously. +1 and consider profiles/**/package.mask, too. and how about getting rid of echangelog and just have it autogenerated as well? Or even better, how about giving up with cvs once for all? Regarding migration to git, I think some people where working on it, but there were some pending problems preventing the migration: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531 there, you can see the blockers, the problem is that most of them are stalled :|, if you (or anybody) could take care of them... signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Git migration (2012) (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog)
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: Regarding migration to git, I think some people where working on it, but there were some pending problems preventing the migration: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531 there, you can see the blockers, the problem is that most of them are stalled :|, if you (or anybody) could take care of them... ISTM things like bug 333697 (partial checkout support) and 333699 (git-cvsserver, so that holdouts can still commit through CVS?) shouldn't block the migration... they're just nice-to-haves. Cheers, Dirkjan
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Add new remote-id types in metadata.dtd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Can we bump our gentoo-x86/skel.metadata.xml and app-vim/gentoo-syntax:/usr/share/vim/vimfiles/plugin/newmetadata.vim files to display some upstream+remote-id lines to make these tags more prominent? upstream maintainer status=active email/email name/name /maintainer changelog/changelog doc lang=en/doc bugs-to/bugs-to remote-id type=/remote-id /upstream On 04/19/2012 05:31 PM, Corentin Chary wrote: Add rubygems, github, gitorious, pecl, pear, bitbucket. All of them are handled by my remoteids.py script. ref: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406287 ref: https://github.com/iksaif/portage-janitor/blob/master/remoteids.py --- a/metadata/dtd/metadata.dtd 2010-03-02 18:52:11.0 +0100 +++ b/metadata/dtd/metadata.dtd 2012-04-19 14:22:14.077954310 +0200 @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ !ELEMENT bugs-to (#PCDATA) !-- specify a type of package identification tracker -- !ELEMENT remote-id (#PCDATA) - !ATTLIST remote-id type (freshmeat|sourceforge|sourceforge-jp|cpan|vim|google-code|ctan|pypi|rubyforge|cran) #REQUIRED + !ATTLIST remote-id type (freshmeat|sourceforge|sourceforge-jp|cpan|vim|google-code|ctan|pypi|rubyforge|cran|rubygems|github|gitorious|pecl|pear|bitbucket) #REQUIRED !-- category/package information for cross-linking in descriptions and useflag descriptions -- - -- - -- Gentoo Dev http://xmw.de/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk+7n6IACgkQknrdDGLu8JB0bwEAlh9AilEx700DVEwQYD2KJxtc nLrzXyCrZZLZLE6cpX8BAJIj05i+LN8ZLJOH3bAtcSp41YG4EarviiKTdEpy2Yon =CQje -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes?
I've opened a bug for this: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417101 -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds!
El lun, 21-05-2012 a las 12:25 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: On 05/21/2012 12:04 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: El lun, 21-05-2012 a las 13:46 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió: On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils, see http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.133r2=1.134 Relying on autotools.eclass for your eutils needs was always a terrible idea, but a few ebuilds did it anyway. Those ebuilds are now *broken* since they can no longer use epatch. See bug #416847 for an example. Check your ebuilds to make sure you inherit eutils in anything that uses epatch! -Alexandre Rostovtsev. Looks like ebuilds not inheriting eutils directly even using epatch are a lot as I have seen running: grep inherit $(grep -r epatch */*/*.ebuild| cut -d: -f1) | grep -v eutils Maybe they should be checked and a repoman warning should be added when an ebuild is using epatch without inheriting eutils directly, otherwise this problem could reappear if some other eclass no longer inherit it in the future :-/ Yeah, we have a similar check for inherit of prefix.eclass: http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=b583812101f1156c553385effcd9dbee0b751087 Should we (I) open a bug report requesting that or this is enough as report? Thanks :) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds!
On 05/22/2012 11:22 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: El lun, 21-05-2012 a las 12:25 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: On 05/21/2012 12:04 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Maybe they should be checked and a repoman warning should be added when an ebuild is using epatch without inheriting eutils directly, otherwise this problem could reappear if some other eclass no longer inherit it in the future :-/ Yeah, we have a similar check for inherit of prefix.eclass: http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=b583812101f1156c553385effcd9dbee0b751087 Should we (I) open a bug report requesting that or this is enough as report? Thanks :) Done already: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417159 -- Thanks, Zac
[gentoo-dev] Re: autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds!
On 2012-05-22 03:46, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils, see
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.133r2=1.134
Relying on autotools.eclass for your eutils needs was always a terrible
idea, but a few ebuilds did it anyway. Those ebuilds are now *broken*
since they can no longer use epatch. See bug #416847 for an example.
Check your ebuilds to make sure you inherit eutils in anything that uses
epatch!
-Alexandre Rostovtsev.
Since eutils inherits multilib and user, the breakage extends beyond epatch.
For example, I just saw bug #417153, where a user reported failed calls
to enew{user,group}.
[gentoo-dev] Re: Remove eclass/ChangeLog (was: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: autotools.eclass)
On Sun, 20 May 2012 15:33:11 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: ChangeLog entries missing for every autotools.eclass modification today. On 05/20/2012 03:31 PM, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote: vapier 12/05/20 12:31:33 One person doesn't do entries. OMG let's remove it! -- fonts, gcc-porting toolchain, wxwidgets @ gentoo.org signature.asc Description: PGP signature
