[gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/conkeror

2018-10-23 Thread Ulrich Mueller
# Ulrich Müller  (23 Oct 2018)
# Depends on 

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] GitHub problems aftermath

2018-10-23 Thread Ralph Seichter
> Just 'git commit --amen' to update the timestamp [...]

Thanks Michał, that did the trick.

-Ralph



Re: [gentoo-dev] GitHub problems aftermath

2018-10-23 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 13:21 +0200, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> According to https://status.github.com/ the technical problems have been
> fixed for a good 12 hours now, but I still have a pull request with the
> status "QA checks in progress". That message has now been displayed for
> almost 24 hours.
> 
> Is there any way for me to restart the QA tests, other than a fresh
> commit?
> 

Just 'git commit --amen' to update the timestamp, and 'git push --force
...'

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[gentoo-dev] GitHub problems aftermath

2018-10-23 Thread Ralph Seichter
According to https://status.github.com/ the technical problems have been
fixed for a good 12 hours now, but I still have a pull request with the
status "QA checks in progress". That message has now been displayed for
almost 24 hours.

Is there any way for me to restart the QA tests, other than a fresh
commit?

-Ralph



Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Removing barely used global flags

2018-10-23 Thread Hanno Böck
On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 12:41:03 +0200
Michał Górny  wrote:

> We seem to have a lot of global flags that are used only by a few
> packages.  How about moving them to local flags?  List of flags with
> less than 5 packages using them, ordered by use count, follows.  Where
> applicable, local flag descriptions are listed.

No disagreement in principle, however it might be worth checking which
of them are practically used at all or could be removed entirely.

"directfb" caught my attention, which I doubt is very active today.
Though the package in question - libggi - only uses the directfb flag
in an old ebuild, the latest one hard-disables directfb.
So well, if you stabilize libggi-2.2.2-r1 and remove the old ebuild you
can entirely get rid of this useflag instead of making it local.

Plausibly there may be other such cases, i.e. flags that were used in
the past, but for things that got deprecated / out of fashion / are
practically no longer used.

-- 
Hanno Böck
https://hboeck.de/

mail/jabber: ha...@hboeck.de
GPG: FE73757FA60E4E21B937579FA5880072BBB51E42


pgpD2YYux9maw.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[gentoo-dev] New global flag: elogind

2018-10-23 Thread Michał Górny
Hi,

How about:

 elogind - Enable session tracking via sys-auth/elogind

Currently used by 12 packages, one more coming soonish:

 local:elogind:app-admin/packagekit-base: Enable elogind support to get user 
session
 local:elogind:gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon: Rely on sys-auth/elogind as 
runtime logind provider
 local:elogind:gnome-base/gnome-shell: Use sys-auth/elogind for session 
tracking and suspend support.
 local:elogind:gnome-base/gvfs: Use sys-auth/elogind for session tracking.
 local:elogind:net-misc/networkmanager: Use sys-auth/elogind for session 
tracking
 local:elogind:sys-apps/accountsservice: Use sys-auth/elogind instead of 
sys-auth/consolekit for session tracking
 local:elogind:sys-apps/dbus: Use sys-auth/elogind for session tracking.
 local:elogind:sys-auth/pambase: Use pam_elogind module to register user 
sessions with elogind.
 local:elogind:sys-auth/polkit: Use sys-auth/elogind instead of 
sys-auth/consolekit for session tracking
 local:elogind:sys-fs/udisks: Use sys-auth/elogind for session tracking
 local:elogind:sys-process/procps: Use sys-auth/elogind for session tracking.
 local:elogind:x11-misc/sddm: Use sys-auth/elogind for session tracking.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part