[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-db/db-je

2021-11-12 Thread Sam James
# Volkmar W. Pogatzki  (2021-11-13)
# java package without consumers, bug #787338. Removal in 30 days.
dev-db/db-je


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP


[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-analyzer/neti

2021-11-12 Thread Sam James
# Volkmar W. Pogatzki  (2021-11-13)
# depends on deprecated jdk / jre, bug #787449
# stuck with EAPI 5, latest release in 2005
# Removal in 30 days.
net-analyzer/neti



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP


[gentoo-dev] Last rites: mail-client/cone

2021-11-12 Thread John Helmert III
# John Helmert III  (2021-11-13)
# Unmaintained in Gentoo, open security bug, many unfixed otther
# bugs. Removal on 2021-12-13, bug #764719.
mail-client/cone


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Proposed dates for Python 3.10 switch and Python 3.8 removal

2021-11-12 Thread Sam James

[Resending due to mail client nonsense...]

> On 11 Nov 2021, at 18:44, Patrick McLean  wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 09:55:48 -0800
> Patrick McLean mailto:chutz...@gentoo.org>> wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 17:05:45 +0100
>> Michał Górny  wrote:
>>> I'd like to add some dates regarding 3.8 removal and 3.10 switch to
>>> the implementation timeline [1].
>>> 
>>> Unless I'm mistaken, CPython is following a yearly release cycle these
>>> days.  I think it would make sense to also aim for a yearly cycle
>>> in Gentoo, i.e. roughly switch to the next minor version every year.
>>> 
>>> Hence my proposal would be to:
>>> 
>>> a. ASAP: send "please port your packages to py3.9" mail
>>> 
>>> b. 2022-06-01: remove py3.8 target
>> 
>> Could we please push this back, I would prefer some time in 2023 if
>> possible.
> To clarify, I am just asking for it to be pushed back to the start of
> 2023, not June 2023. 2023-01-01 would be fine.


I think this is fair but if you do need something for work, please say that
so we don't need to guess / think it might be for your personal capacity.

I also think it's probably worthwhile to offer upfront help if needed if you
can, especially if it is for that purpose.

That said, I agree!

I think we need to push it back a little bit to ease upgrades (see
the recent thread) but also to help downstreams like Flatcar OS
which are still migrating away from Python 3.8.

I don't mind chipping in to help.

[There is a separate issue with stabilising the Python 3.10
interpreter. I'd like this done as soon as it's ready (and it works
fine here), but there's a problem with circular dependencies
and python-any-r1 dragging it in on upgrades and causing issues with libxcrypt.]

Best,
sam


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP


Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: x11-misc/xscreensaver

2021-11-12 Thread Andrey Utkin
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 11:30:44PM +0100, Jonas Stein wrote:
> the following packages are up for grabs after dropping
> desktop-misc:
> 
> x11-misc/xscreensaver
> https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/x11-misc/xscreensaver
> 
> It has 3 open tickets.

Hi,

Strongly considering picking it up.
Please don't remove in the meanwhile.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature