Re: [gentoo-dev] package up for grabs: mail-filter/spambayes
On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 07:28 +0200, Thomas - LordVan - Raschbacher wrote: > Hi. > > I decided to either give up maintainership of spambayes (not that > there > were any releases in the last 5+ years anyway). > > Anyone interested? if not I'll change it to maintainer-needed (or > maybe > just treeclean it .. not sure yet if anyone at all still cares - as > far > as I could see no packages depend on it in the tree) > > Regards > P.S.: if you're interested at least CC me directly please > Seems project dead. Not developed from 2008 year.
Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)
On 06/09/2016 12:38 PM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/06/16 16:53, Consus wrote: How all those people are expected to coordinate their work? I don't want to control this. That's up to them. It works well in Exherbo and NixOS. But I agree that tooling to support it would be useful. - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXWTkuAAoJENQqWdRUGk8BGo0P/1Zu0ql2hEjeyLa4PAZcpSZX Bkync3nf328qXZtghIR1BM/oBXc44LLV4bPctCAKCzvOTuf7O6u7GvEyqeRjqXHz EK2V85/XsujiwUFwucb064IUxvg3xhuJvJorOt8PlgVu1JrER6ZgQao5cGo7DU6/ UDSsGBC09MjSnm7QJOmygMVYRETR/3WrG5P8fAAlS6YBYsn+3MLQFES/BH1TEVCk YpF97XCtpFf+m/ryfXYgaf3PKX+yd5NrIv+jjLjAjudzgUOy6DzDrMXZqLcYVS2m HtqnnENKsPBXRpq3M34BrCSeD3JWyS5n3VLHuwDTl4oGCiRKSA34d7qotiAWjlDe r9+8kQv3kt0nlqBJ7gI6vIqm9QPEEkhPYQbbTf3pQlDVtPnrgdouFKrWlTNJTg0+ XbyDKZos2bz3Y7/HH3u2Ptz7YdE5Lv0TlE3p+nenBxjCCn58KzPCdo3aaASWpaUQ cgazEBqipLp93W4imxDs+bXWVFDXSDb1zSB0Vr/J9R3eOo9bNHRGGsgGzpGUMwju RB6vMAmTA/1WaNy2FBLpgPPToLyekun2mUYnLPIL+rJxrPHDWYltp0BNQDs8rWaT kxVCjZHv8q7UynuTnLZaklXtKvB5Yb8gx2oxV9gzTr/JFEyogxvHYdI+0XM71uHH x4KZKm2K77AzK8aNkb1N =0cnT -END PGP SIGNATURE- Ok how coordinate? Example: I install packageA in exherbo from repository1 and packageA denend on packageB on repository2. Now packageB removed from repository2 and exherbo crash on install package or on rebuild world (epic fail). Exherbo user need wait when return packageB or create new repository for this package.
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Global USE=gui
On 06/02/16 23:46, Michał Górny wrote: On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 16:37:58 -0400 waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 04:25:07PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote On 02/06/16 03:42 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:31:11AM -0400, Damien Levac wrote IMHO, you see this in reverse. the 'gui' useflag would be useful for users who don't want to care about X/wayland/mir and do not want to care about gtk/qt, they just want windows to be drawn for the applications they install -- without, if possible, pulling useless dependencies. How, exactly, will the app draw windows without linking against one of X/wayland/mir/qt4/qt5/gtk2/gtk3/fltk or whatever else comes down the pike? The "useless dependencies" is the result of one or more of these random flags being enabled globally when an end-user just wants to make sure they get the GUI built for their apps. The original discussion was about global defaults. If you want per-app settings, package.use is your friend. I'm going to keep this short: please try to understand that not everyone can spend hours of time adjusting every single package in Gentoo so that it may finally start working as expected. We understand that some people have goals like 'I want Qt everywhere, I hate GTK+ so much I'd rather not be able to do anything than have GTK+ on my system'. We respect them. But we're no longer going to optimize Gentoo for those people. Ok if i want just disable gtk i use USE="-gtk -gtk2 -gtk3".
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Reverted python3.4 defaults
On Tuesday 21 July 2015 18:59:00 Ben de Groot wrote: On 20 July 2015 at 17:27, Jason Zaman perfin...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 10:39:25AM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: I would like to hear from the other team members, yes. I have sympathy towards those who are asking for only one Python in stages (as in, I would be fine with that), but I very much think we should not leave Python 3 out of generally installed systems by default. We need to move through the transition, and increasing the barriers to Python 3 adoption will only make that process slower. I also feel like a voting process for this is probably not a solution. I also very much dislike shipping only python2. Having only one python is admirable and I'm all for it but if we only ship one by default it should be python3. That is a nice sentiment, but unpractical. We have a lot more packages that require python2, while we only have 74 that require python3. While it may be possible to ship with python3 only (I haven't looked at what the packages in stage3 support), users will almost certainly need to install python2 when they start installing more packages. But if we ship with python2 only, then most users won't need python3. Those who want it, can of course simply add it. Going with python2 as default simply makes more sense. Hmm on desktop machine with kde and etc. i have only one package with deps on python3 - onboard (because no packages with same functional). :) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: launch plan schedule (2015/Aug/08-09)
On Thursday 02 July 2015 21:39:52 Robin H. Johnson wrote: Hi all, The Git migration is moving forward, and I'd like to announce a tentative schedule for that end. https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Infrastructure/Git_migration#Status 2015/08/08 15:00 UTC - Freeze 2015/08/08 19:00 UTC - Git commits open for developers 2015/08/09 01:00 UTC - Rsync live again (with lagged changelog) 2015/08/11 - History repo available to graft 2015/08/12 - rsync mirrors carry up-to-date changelogs again I've allocated time for an 8 hour freeze, but hope to be completed much sooner than that. So dev-vcs/git now by default in stage3?
Re: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: launch plan schedule (2015/Aug/08-09)
On Friday 03 July 2015 11:08:16 Justin wrote: On 03/07/15 10:51, Igor Savlook wrote: On Thursday 02 July 2015 21:39:52 Robin H. Johnson wrote: Hi all, The Git migration is moving forward, and I'd like to announce a tentative schedule for that end. https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Infrastructure/Git_migration#Status 2015/08/08 15:00 UTC - Freeze 2015/08/08 19:00 UTC - Git commits open for developers 2015/08/09 01:00 UTC - Rsync live again (with lagged changelog) 2015/08/11 - History repo available to graft 2015/08/12 - rsync mirrors carry up-to-date changelogs again I've allocated time for an 8 hour freeze, but hope to be completed much sooner than that. So dev-vcs/git now by default in stage3? Why that? rsync is and will be the default sync method. We are switching for development not the sync clients. Justin Ahhh i see. Thx for info.
