Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:09:08 -0400 "John R. Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike, I agree. But, the file that _must_ exist isn't "~/.bashrc" but > "~/.bash_profile". That's wrong. Quote: "When bash is invoked as an interactive login shell, or as a non-inter- active shell with the --login option, it first reads and executes com- mands from the file /etc/profile, if that file exists. After reading that file, it looks for ~/.bash_profile, ~/.bash_login, and ~/.profile, in that order, and reads and executes commands from the first one that exists and is readable. The --noprofile option may be used when the shell is started to inhibit this behavior." Notice "the first one that exists and is readable". > If "~/.bash_profile" doesn't exist, then "~/.bashrc" won't be sourced > whether it exists or not. Wrong again. Two paragraphs down in the man page: "When an interactive shell that is not a login shell is started, bash reads and executes commands from ~/.bashrc, if that file exists." In this case ~/.bashrc is sourced directly. Cheers, Renat -- Probleme kann man niemals mit derselben Denkweise loesen, durch die sie entstanden sind. (Einstein) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] gecko-sdk and mozilla
Hi all! I don't know where to ask this question, so I'll ask here. Is it necessary to build net-libs/gecko-sdk if you have www-client/mozilla already installed? Right now I am in this situation so I was wondering why I have to build the same source twice. Since the USE-flags are the same for both packages it seems useless and a waste of time to have them both. Can someone elaborate on this? Cheers, Renat -- Probleme kann man niemals mit derselben Denkweise loesen, durch die sie entstanden sind. (Einstein) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 01:37:00 -0600 Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Curtis Napier wrote: > > > If you have access to a Macintosh, Windows, *BSD or any other OS or > > Browser please test the site and include your OS and the browser > > version in your feedback. I haven't received feedback from > > Konqueror or Safari so feedback from those browsers would be much > > appreciated. > > Visually, the light grey color for the main text makes it a bit harder > to read the instructions. Any reason why you couldn't use black or a > darker color for the text? To me that text is the most important part > of our site and if we can't read that well, we have a problem :-). Variable names and commands are bright blue in the old docs. The new color is darker and that does not improve readability since the contrast is not optimal. I think a brighter tint would make it easier to distinguish the text color from the (highlighted) parts. Cheers, Renat -- Probleme kann man niemals mit derselben Denkweise loesen, durch die sie entstanden sind. (Einstein) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
