Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bugzilla enhancements wrt AT work
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 05:37:15PM +0100, Torsten Rehn wrote: +jakub scel: basically... instead of KEYWORDREQ/STABLEREQ +jakub create keywording and stabilization components +jakub and use flags accordingly there +jakub bugzilla already has the features, why not use them +jakub also, nuke things like TESTED and STABLE As the Bugzilla admin, this sounds reasonable, and it plays into some of my plans wrt to Bugzilla3. In that, depending on some bits with Bugzie3, I'd like to consider a radical re-arrangement of Products and Components, to help users find the right place to file stuff, and also reduce some of the needless complexity that we have. As a short-list quickly on products: - Demote the 'Bugzilla' product down to a component under the 'Infrastructure' product. - Demote 'Mirrors' to a component under 'Infrastructure'. - Promote the components under 'Gentoo Hosted Projects' to Products of their own, to enable them to have their own components (I can see several of them benefiting from this). - Merge the Admin product to the Infrastructure product. Beyond the product stuff, I have a tracker bug here for the Bugzilla3 migration: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213782 If you have a feature request, open a bug, and link it to the tracker. The bugstest.g.o side will go up soon either with Bugzilla3.0.3 or a CVS snapshot of 3.2 (which was supposed to have a release candidate already, but isn't available yet). -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux Developer Infra Guy E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 pgpNOmmqeLv0n.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bugzilla enhancements wrt AT work
On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote: As the Bugzilla admin, this sounds reasonable, and it plays into some of my plans wrt to Bugzilla3. In that, depending on some bits with Bugzie3, I'd like to consider a radical re-arrangement of Products and Components, to help users find the right place to file stuff, and also reduce some of the needless complexity that we have. As a short-list quickly on products: - Demote the 'Bugzilla' product down to a component under the 'Infrastructure' product. - Demote 'Mirrors' to a component under 'Infrastructure'. - Promote the components under 'Gentoo Hosted Projects' to Products of their own, to enable them to have their own components (I can see several of them benefiting from this). - Merge the Admin product to the Infrastructure product. Can you add deleting the Security component in the Gentoo Linux product to that list? Thanks, Robert signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bugzilla enhancements wrt AT work
Two weeks ago, dirtyepic suggested making some modifications to how ATs and
developers interact using Bugzilla [1].
+jakub scel: basically... instead of KEYWORDREQ/STABLEREQ
+jakub create keywording and stabilization components
+jakub and use flags accordingly there
+jakub bugzilla already has the features, why not use them
+jakub also, nuke things like TESTED and STABLE
This is trivial to implement and would greatly improve the ability to search
for {STABLE,KEYWORD}REQs that have been tested by ATs. All ATs I've spoken to
(most of the active ones at amd64) would really appreciate this change.
Discuss.
Also notice bug 213514 [2] for actual progress on this.
[1]
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_a5495659df35010ae44c266dd785ae4e.xml
[2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/213514
--
Torsten Rehn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo AMD64 Arch Tester
http://scel.info
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bugzilla enhancements wrt AT work
Saturday, 15 of March 2008 17:37:15 Torsten Rehn wrote: Two weeks ago, dirtyepic suggested making some modifications to how ATs and developers interact using Bugzilla [1]. +jakub scel: basically... instead of KEYWORDREQ/STABLEREQ +jakub create keywording and stabilization components +jakub and use flags accordingly there +jakub bugzilla already has the features, why not use them +jakub also, nuke things like TESTED and STABLE +1 -- Cheers Dawid Węgliński signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bugzilla enhancements wrt AT work
Torsten Rehn a écrit : Two weeks ago, dirtyepic suggested making some modifications to how ATs and developers interact using Bugzilla [1]. +jakub scel: basically... instead of KEYWORDREQ/STABLEREQ +jakub create keywording and stabilization components +jakub and use flags accordingly there +jakub bugzilla already has the features, why not use them +jakub also, nuke things like TESTED and STABLE Just curious, who would be the default assignee for those 2 new components? /me will vote for whatever helps to improve Gentoo :) Cheers Rémi -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bugzilla enhancements wrt AT work
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Rémi Cardona wrote: Just curious, who would be the default assignee for those 2 new components? I don't think anything should be changed here. Unpriviledged users automatically assign to bug-wranglers, everyone else goes for the target packages' maintainer. Do you see any problem with this? -- Torsten Rehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo AMD64 Arch Tester http://scel.info signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bugzilla enhancements wrt AT work
Torsten Rehn a écrit : On Saturday 15 March 2008, Rémi Cardona wrote: Just curious, who would be the default assignee for those 2 new components? I don't think anything should be changed here. Unpriviledged users automatically assign to bug-wranglers, everyone else goes for the target packages' maintainer. Do you see any problem with this? Nope, none at all, just wondering if anything were to change there. Rémi -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
